OpinionTrending Commentary

Noam Chomsky wants to starve you into submission


Frank Barat, CC BY 3.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

Longtime, avowed socialist/communist Noam Chomsky has unabashedly advocated for locking down his political opponents and starving them into submission.

That would of course, include a huge number of people in the black community who have steadfastly refused to take the jab.

Why does ‘the Chom’ feel that strongly about the virus and the vax?  What could they possibly have to do with Communism? 

He feels so strongly in fact, that he’s willing to expose his homicidal desires toward his enemies. Betcha he won’t be called a racist, and he won’t be censored from social media either.

It’s tough to get your brain around, but could this be why communists like Chomsky never said much about Stalin’s genocide?

It’s time to stop attributing good intentions to those who have shown that they have none.

What would Hitler and Stalin have done with the kind of technology we have today? (Biological weapons, technocratic censorship and surveillance, the ability to change votes with the click of a button)  Would they have restrained themselves from using it?

There is nothing new under the sun. The totalitarian tactics in Chomsky’s playbook have been used for decades.

We just never thought there would be enough of our own citizens who would sellout their own country to help make it happen here on our own soil.

Who’s more dangerous?  One who makes his own health decisions or one who wants to starve the masses into submission?

Support Conservative Daily News with a small donation via Paypal or credit card that will go towards supporting the news and commentary you've come to appreciate.

Karen Kataline

Karen Kataline is a commentator, columnist & talk show host. She holds a Master’s Degree from Columbia University and is a frequent guest host on AM Talk Radio. She has an active blog and her Op Eds can be seen online at Fox News, Investor’s Business Daily, Western Journal, Town Hall, The Daily Caller, FrontPage Mag, and The American Thinker.

Related Articles

One Comment

  1. We need to protect ourselves from tyrannical, communist lunatics like Chomskey without polluting our prison population with their vile influence. A good option would be a labor and re-education camp but where? I propose the construction of a Gulag. We could call it the Gulag Alleutian Archepelago. Of course it’s name reveals its location and it is perfect for the task. The worst prisoners like Chomski could be held in the furthest camp 1200 miles from the mainland and closer to Russia than Alaska. Subsequent camps could be built on the 12 major and 55 minor islands closer to the US mainland. All internment would be preceeded by internment at GITMO for two years to ensure discipline, work ethic and extreme climate-punishment. Just imagine the educational benefit of a rapid transition from a windless, humid 100°F+ GITMO to a 30mph wind torn 20°F Attu Island. Ahhh, communist nirvana. But no time for thinking cause it’s time to work, work, work. Prisoners will build their own shelters cook their own food and dream of escape. 1200 miles on a raft made of wood pallets and plastic bottles in rough seas? Don’t think so, Chomskey!

Back to top button