Military and DefenseOpinionTrending Commentary

Pelosi, Soleimani & The War Powers Act

Once again, and purely for political purposes, Nancy Pelosi and the “America bad” Progressives in the Democrat Party are moving the goalposts to fit their agenda. This time it is the crafting of resolution language that would – once again – politicize military operations and hobble the President’s ability to defend our military personnel on the ground.

In the aftermath of the Soleimani get, Pelosi and her gaggle of self-important, power-hungry over-steppers have indicated they are introducing and voting on a War Powers Resolution that would limit the President’s use of force against Iran. This grandiose action is, in reality, a reiteration of the War Powers Resolution of 1973 and brings nothing new to the table. It is an attention-grabbing action to insert Pelosi and her ilk into relevancy on the issue of Iran.

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 requires the President (the constitutionally mandated Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces) to notify Congress within 48 hours of inserting US forces into a military theater without limitation and, limits the President’s authority to maintain a US military presence in any situation to 60 days without congressional approval. For the record, President Trump satisfied this requirement by delivering a classified communique to congressional leaders within the required 48 hour time period.

So, what is the genesis of the War Powers Resolution? It is the byproduct of President Truman’s and then Presidents Kennedy and Johnson’s constitutionally questionable “police actions” in the Korean and Vietnam Wars. It was in Korea and then in Vietnam that the politicians in the United States moved away from “declaring war” and toward engaging US military forces conditionally and without a clear mandate. This has facilitated the very “never-ending wars” that the Left insists they abhor.

Ironically (or not), the three Presidents who created this unconstitutional situation were all Democrats: Truman, Kennedy, and Johnson. And in both instances – both in Korea and Vietnam – it took an electoral change of leadership to a Republican president to disengage our soldiers from conflict.

It was during President Nixon’s maneuvering to position the United States for a “position of strength” withdrawal of US troops from Vietnam that the Democrats came up with the War Powers Resolution of 1973; an effort to maintain control of the military after an electoral defeat. The move was wholly unconstitutional.

While the US Constitution mandates that the Legislative Branch holds the sole power to “declare war”, the President of the United States is Commander in Chief of the US Armed Forces, exclusively. Article II, Section 2 of the US Constitution plainly states:

“The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States…”

It has no limitations placed on that status. While Article I, Section 8 states that Congress has the authority to “declare war” and “make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces”, it gives Congress no authority to interfere in battle operations or the strategic defense of the country or her military apparatus in theater.

So it goes that the War Powers Resolution has been challenged and even ignored by many presidents including Nixon in Vietnam, Reagan in El Salvador, Clinton in Kosovo, and Obama in Libya. In fact, the US Supreme Court refused to hear a case challenging the violation of the War Powers Resolution regarding Yugoslavia under Clinton in 2000.

All of this understood and proven factual by history, Pelosi and the Democrat’s move to “reiterate” the War Powers Resolution of 1973 in the context of President Trump’s actions regarding Iran can only be viewed as a desperate cry for relevance on the issue, and a cry that reeks of election-year politics. The exclamation point on this analysis comes in Chuck Schumer acknowledging that President Trump satisfied the War Powers Resolution in his whining that the communique should be “declassified”.

An aside, the communique, because it involves military operations should not be declassified. The United States should never telegraph its military intentions to the enemy, just as we did consistently during the Obama Administration. Doing so puts our military personnel in theater in harm’s way.

In the end, the pushing of this irrelevant resolution by Pelosi, Schumer, and the Democrats is both whorish for their need to be included in an issue that doesn’t involve them and serving to maintain an unconstitutional power grab that sees the Legislative Branch encroach on the Executive Branch; a continuation of the clear violation of Separation of Powers brought into being by the codifying of the War Powers Resolution.

The American people – and even a few politicians – have made it clear that politicians have no place on the battlefield. Korea, Vietnam, and every protracted military engagement since has proven beyond doubt that politicians armchair quarterbacking the battlefield costs American lives. Of course, our enemies would more than welcome Pelosi, Schumer, and the America-hating Progressives onto the battlefield.

That said, pay no attention that little man – or in this case, woman – behind the curtain, she is definitely not the great and powerful Oz…

Support Conservative Daily News with a small donation via Paypal or credit card that will go towards supporting the news and commentary you've come to appreciate.

Frank Salvato

You can read all of Mr. Salvato's news analysis at Frank Salvato is the executive partner at The CompassPoint Group, LLC. He is the host of The Underground and RightMinded podcasts as heard on iHeart Radio, Pandora, Spotify, Amazon Podcasts, and anywhere podcasts are heard. He is a national political writer for National File. His writing has been recognized by the US House International Relations Committee and the Japan Center for Conflict Prevention. His analysis has been published by The American Enterprise Institute, The Washington Times, and Accuracy in Media, and is nationally syndicated. Mr. Salvato appeared on The O'Reilly Factor on FOX News Channel and is the author of six books examining internal and external threats facing our country. He can be heard twice weekly on “The Captain’s America: Third Watch” radio program syndicated nationally on the Salem Broadcasting Network and Genesis Communications affiliate stations.

Related Articles


  1. This “speaker” is not only bad for the Democrat Party, she’s bad for America. She’s a toxic tyrant.

  2. Pelosi is working to create changes to the Office of President that would make it a lackey position. No longer would they have the power to direct some military operations in our Nation’s best intrest where the time is limited in decision making and information of a secret or sensitive nature is involved nor could they work with foreign leaders from a position of power.
    With information coming out that not all of the money we’re giving some of the Countries we help is going to the cause we it’s given for it fall’s to our President to have the final release of funds! If he sees a problem he should have the power to stop them, that gives him the power to make sure they will be used for the purpose they were intended!
    Ukraine is the example and some of their own people have been trying to tell us this! They want the money back! People in their country have funneled it off in money laundering schemes that look like bank loans turning some around to pay the board members of Burisma! Who knows where else it went? The new President proposed to his electorate to stop this and was elected! Trump asked him to do what he said he would do which only ensures the money we sent would be used for Ukraine’s defense and not funneled off for pay off! Trump protected our tax dollars and Ukraine’s proper use of the money for their defense! He did the right thing! If Pelosi get’s her way, changing the position of President to Lackey future President’s won’t have the power to react to situations only wave goodbye to good money and cause problems in other countries.
    Do American’s elect Leaders or Lackeys? I think we elect Leaders and when people lead you get those who disagree with them, even some who undercut for any number of reasons. It’s not Pelosi’s place to lead our Country and she should not be undermining the person our Country elected as it’s Leader!

  3. MIT announces the discovery of the densest element known to science. This new discovery has been named Pelosium

    Pelosium has one neutron, 12 assistant neutrons, 75 deputy neutrons, and 224 assistant deputy neutrons, giving it an atomic mass of 311.

    These particles are held together by dark forces called MORONS which are surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called peons.

    The symbol of Pelosium is PU.

    Pelosium’s mass actually increases over time, as morons randomly interact with various elements in the atmosphere and become assistant deputy neutrons within the Pelosium molecule, leading to the formation of isodopes.

    This characteristic of moron-promotion leads some scientist to believe that Pelosium is formed whenever morons reach a certain quantity in concentration. This hypothetical quantity is referred to as Critical Morass. When catalyzed with money, Pelosium activates CNNadnausium, an element that radiates orders of magnitude more energy, albeit as incoherent noise, since it has half as many peons but twice as many morons as Pelosium.

    Schumerium Symbol (CS) with an atomic mass of 310 is similar to Pelosium and like Pelosium has lost most of its density and will soon decay into another useless isodope known to the scientific community as Reidium. Reidium (DHR) atomic number of 300 has reached its half life and is decaying into nothingness creating a black hole.

    Pelosium, Schumerium, and Reidium are dense compounds that make up the bulk of the deadliest substances known to man LIEBERALISM COMMUNISM and SOCIALISM. Incidental contact with any of these toxic lethal substances causes brain damage and if not promptly and correctly treated is fatal!

    Unfortunately the duration of the residual effects of Pelosium, Schumerium, and Reidium are unknown at this time. Scientists have determined that a prolonged and intense decontamination period (several decades) is needed to eradicate and reverse all traces of these deadly compounds!!!

Back to top button