Trending Commentary

The Politically Correct Guide to Racism for Idiots

Conservatives may be unaware that the Democrat Party has passed new legislation redefining the rules of logic and political discourse regarding racism. For those who have grown used to such concepts as “hypocrisy,” and “logical inconsistency,” they need to eliminate these from their thinking and vocabulary.

Everyone must get hip to the new rules of civility and tolerance, or else face serious penalties. The following are some examples that should get you racist wingnuts up to speed on the “New Discourse.”

Clear cases of Racism against Black Democrats:

  • Criticizing President Obama’s ineptitude
  • Criticizing President Obama for black unemployment and poverty going up, wages and political influence going down during his presidency
  • Criticizing the girth of domineering health food activist Michelle Obama
  • Criticizing UN Ambassador Susan Rice’s less-than-honest statements about the Benghazi scandal
  • Criticizing Reverend Al Sharpton for anti-semitism
  • Criticizing Reverend Jesse Jackson for dropping the N-bomb and saying he wanted to cut Obama’s n*** off
  • Criticizing Jesse Jackson Jr. for allegedly trying to buy a Senate seat
  • Criticizing Maxine Waters for telling the tea party to “go to hell”
  • Criticizing Hank Johnson for saying the island of Guam could “capsize”
  • Criticizing black caucus chair Emanuel Cleaver for calling debt compromise a “satan sandwich”
  • Criticizing Keith Ellison for obvious ties to Islamist organizations
  • Criticizing Diane Watson for opposing interracial marriage
  • Criticizing randomly elected Al Green for saying “take back the country”
  • Criticizing Sheila Jackson-Lee for championing women’s rights, like in Rwanda, China, Algeria, and Afghanistan
  • Criticizing Bobby Rush for describing his meeting with communist dictator Fidel Castro “almost like listening to an old friend”
  • Criticizing Barbara Lee for characterizing voter ID laws (which they have in Europe) as a racist plot

Clear false claims of Democrat Racism:

  • Criticizing the Democrat Party for never renouncing its racist past of supporting slavery and segregation
  • Criticizing Senator Robert Byrd’s history as a KKK recruiter and Kleagle who filibustered the Civil Rights Act
  • Criticizing Woodrow Wilson for screening racist, KKK-glorification film Birth of a Nation
  • Criticizing the KKK past of FDR-appointed Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black
  • Criticizing FDR for his forced detainment of Japanese-Americans
  • Criticizing President Harry Truman for paying $10 to become a member of the KKK
  • Criticizing Lyndon Johnson for saying, “I’ll have those n*ggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.”
  • Criticizing Jimmy Carter for writing the book, “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid,” which was praised on numerous white supremacist websites
  • Criticizing Bill Clinton for once saying of Obama, “A few years ago, this guy would have been carrying our bags.”
  • Criticizing Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for describing Obama as “light skinned,” and “with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.”
  • Criticizing Hillary Clinton for faking a “negro dialect” (as Harry Reid put it) in front of a black church audience
  • Criticizing Joe Biden for once saying to an Indian-American voter, “You cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin’ Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent.”
  • Criticizing Joe Biden for saying Republican Mitt Romney wanted to “put y’all back in chains”
  • Criticizing Joe Biden for saying of Obama, “I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.”

Statements that are Not Racism or Reverse Racism made by Democrats against Republicans:

  • Criticizing former RNC Chair Michael Steele, like Steny Hoyer did, for his “career of slavishly supporting the Republican Party.”
  • Criticizing Condaleezza Rice like left-wing radio host Neal Rogers: “Is you their black-haired answer-mammy who be smart? Does they like how you shine their shoes, Condoleezza? Or the way you wash and park the whitey’s cars?”
  • Criticizing former Representative Allen West, like Andre Carson did, for aligning himself with the tea party, which “would love to see us as second-class citizens” and would love to see blacks “hanging on a tree.”
  • Criticizing Republican convert Artur Davis, like Gary Franks did: “I do not believe it is healthy for Americans to go around looking for blacks to put in a congressional district.”
  • Criticizing General Colin Powell, as Harry Belafonte did: “In the days of slavery, there were those slaves who lived on the plantation and [there] were those slaves that lived in the house. You got the privilege of living in the house if you served the master…”
  • Criticizing Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, like Spike Lee called him, “A handkerchief-head, chicken-and-biscuit-eating Uncle Tom.” Leftists commonly call Thomas a “House N*gga,” but that’s not racist.
  • Criticizing rising Republican star Mia Love as a “token” and an “Aunt Tom”
  • Criticizing conservative media personalities like CDN’s Kira Davis, or Alonzo Rachel, “News Ninja”Wayne Dupree, blogger Sister Toldjah, Crystal Wright and many others using racial epithets
  • Criticizing Republicans for allowing numerous diverse speakers at their convention by playing a popular Twitter game called, “#Negrospotting.” (This would be tough to play while watching MSNBC, which refused to air minority speakers at the convention.)
  • Criticizing any black Republicans in the party as pure “tokenism”
  • Criticizing minorities in the way journalist Mike Wallace did: Blacks and Hispanics are “too busy eating watermelons and tacos” to learn how to read and write.

Racist code words about Black Democrats:

Simply put, if you are a conservative who is for Constitutionally limited government, free market capitalism, equality under the law, and freedom for all Americans, then you are a racist. If you are for unlimited government and increasing dependency on the Democrat Party, then you are not a racist. Any questions?

Support Conservative Daily News with a small donation via Paypal or credit card that will go towards supporting the news and commentary you've come to appreciate.

Related Articles


  1. I seriously feel that there is a single word in the English language that is not considered racist by these racist that denounce so called racism in others. This is one of the main reasons that the First Amendment is under attack by the real racist. Freedom of speech is only for those that cannot speak the truth.

  2. I find this page quite entertaining, especially the false claim of Democrat racism. First, many of these are exaggerations. Neither me or the majority of people would find criticisms of Jesse Jackson, Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Maxine Waters racist if they sstuck strictly to their policies. It is only when some critics use stereotypical suggestions or slightly racist comments that they are criticized, and with good reason. You are blinded be your own ideology and only see the comments that support your argument. I thought the Democrat racism very funny, Becker you obviously haven’t taken a history class in a while. If you knew about the Democratic party before the 1930’s, you would realize they hold the same ideology the Republican Party holds now. The Southern belt would continuously vote Democratic until around 1940’s-1950’s. Woodrow Wilson was a racist southerner, as are some people now in Louisiana, Alabama, and his home state of Virginia. In comparison, Woodrow Wilson was not supportive of Teddy Roosevelt’s anti trust policies, just as George W Bush would not ensue busting monopoly cases, such as the situation with Microsoft. If you knew anything about Harry Truman you would understand he was one of the biggest advocates of civil rights. The incident you’re referring to is when his campaign adviser thought it would be wise to gain the trust of the KKK in Jackson county because they were so powerful there. Truman was reluctant at first but paid the membership. After meeting with Klan officer Truman did not agree with his racist policies and demanded his $10 back and immediate exit from the klan. Truman in fact desegregated the army and continued to support blacks and Jewish immigrants. The comment about FDR and his forced detainment of Japanese-Americans was a security threat, just as Bush did to many Muslim citizens during the war on terror, mirroring WWII. I do not support this action but I come to realize that in this haunting time, that was an appropriate measure, and I’m sure you would agree if you agree with Bush. The comment about Jimmy Carter’s book is a true but uninformed claim. Carter’s book was about how Israel was uncooperative towards Palestine, which resulted in more war and violence. White supremacists misread this book and thought of it more as an anti-antisemitism book which it was not. Finally, the when you claim LBJ said the N word, I’m sure he did. You must not understand history where saying the N word in the 1960’s was not as bad as it is now. Any smart politician/historian would understand the civil rights movement would not be possible without LBJ. I think it’s funny you miss out on some very big racists. Richard Nixon was a lot worse and that was even after the 1960’s when black people gained a lot more respect and rights. You can look right here and see many of the things he has said on his tapes. I could go on and on about the inaccurate information on this page and find the title “The Politically Correct Guide to Racism for Idiots” very Ironic. While these may be correct, they are taken out of context and without explaining. I’m not sure whether you’re an idiot or you’re just taking advantage of poor uninformed readers that really need to hear the truth. I worry for people like you that would rather hear what they want to hear, rather than facts and data.

      1. LOL good argument buddy, that’s really respectable in the political community. I’m glad to know these are the opponents I’m up against 🙂

        1. No problem skippy…Hey you might want to give Guinness Records a shout and check to see if you you won for the longest nonsensical paragraph typed out in history…lol

    1. With all due respect, Zach, I find you lecturing me on history to be quite hilarious. And the bit about being blinded by ideology — priceless. A Gawker article — that’s sure to be mind-blowing and intellectually honest, I’m sure. Feel free to comment anytime.

      1. If you find it so hilarious then go ahead and argue my points, the fact of the matter is that at least I bring out the full detail in your arguments which you fail to point out. If you know history so well then please argue on an educated level, look past ideology and include all of the detail. No, my source was not the most credible, but neither was yours, I found many other sources to use that was just the easiest. Don’t deny the facts just because of the source, that’s quite lazy for a writer. I could look into any middle school, High school, college level history book to find evidence for my arguments. The thing is, arguing is what this country was founded on, we wouldn’t have the constitution, bill of rights, or the great compromise without it. The problem is that when I bring a different perspective into the mix you are afraid to fight back and immediately attack the writer, which is a fallacy by the way. If you find me lecturing you on history so hilarious, then please, indulge me, I’d love to hear a good argument.

      2. Also,,_racism_and_the_republicans

        I am in no way saying that all Republicans are racist or that no Democrats are racist, in fact both are, we’re all just human. I just want to point out that it happens to both sides, not one side more than another but both sides equally. I just want to show you another perspective, however you seem to be afraid of any other kind of perspective and your response attacks my source and my use of diction rather than the argument itself. I’d love to hear your thoughts.

    2. Zach, I find it ‘mind-blowing’that one who claims in such a rightous, all knowing individual such as yourself, would be so openly brash & quick as to ‘assume’ that if another simply has an opinion that differs from standards & ideals held as tightly as yours would have the gall to call another ‘blined by idealogy’ or “uninformed”. It’s obvious that you have indulged only in information/incidents that support your own views as seen through scaled eyes…Ironic isn’t it, that under the guise of fact, there is deception steeped in sound bytes, fragments of events & your own intolerance? However, your presense here indicates you are reaching out for help….so by all means, visit us again…We’re a pretty good bunch that will share our knowledge & ideas & respect you. But please wean yourself from the shallow & inacraucy of ‘gawker’& the like. “May your path become smoother & brighter”

      1. I understand where you’re coming from but a lot of what I’m saying is just fact, such as Harry Truman’s alleged “membership” in the KKK. I respect others’ opinions because I understand everyone has different beliefs based on religion, upbringing, gender, etc. What I don’t like is when people bend the truth or just flat out lie to promote their ideas. How about instead of complaining about my arguments, you argue my points through resources, I will respect that even if I don’t believe that. But don’t sit there and criticize my “intolerance” when I truly just want to ensure historical accuracy.

Back to top button