The Trump administration is backing a coalition of Second Amendment activists challenging New York City’s gun transportation regulations before the Supreme Court.
The Department of Justice has asked the Court to appear in support of the activists during oral arguments in New York City Rifle and Pistol Association v. New York City. The government has already filed an amicus (or “friend of the Court”) brief urging the justices to strike down the city’s rules.
“The United States has a substantial interest in this case,” Solicitor General Noel Francisco told the Court in legal filings. “As a general matter, the United States has a substantial interest in the preservation of the right of the people to keep and bear arms. In addition, Congress has enacted numerous laws regulating firearms, and the United States has a substantial interest in defending the constitutionality of those laws.”
“The United States is thus well-positioned to address the reconciliation of the constitutional right to keep and bear arms with the governmental interest in regulating firearms,” DOJ added. The Supreme Court often grants the government’s request for argument time, and the Second Amendment activists challenging New York’s rules have consented to the Department’s involvement in oral argument.
The regulations at issue prohibit licensed gun owners from carrying firearms beyond city limits. License-holders may only transport their weapons — unloaded and in a locked container — to authorized gun ranges. The plaintiffs are a gun-rights group and several city residents who wish to take their guns to vacations homes and shooting competitions outside the five boroughs.
The plaintiffs argue that the city’s regulations violate the fundamental right to keep and bear arms, the right to travel freely, and a constitutional rule forbidding the states from discriminating against out-of-state competitors. That last rule is sometimes called the “dormant commerce clause.”
The administration takes a slightly different position. Though they agree the ordinance violates the Second Amendment and the dormant commerce clause, they do not believe it violates the right to travel.
“This ban, on its face, discriminates against interstate commerce in favor of local business; it allows petitioners to take their firearms to local firing ranges, but not to firing ranges outside the city,” government lawyers told the Court.
The city amended its rules after the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, setting off an extended debate as to whether the case should be dismissed. The justices have not yet scheduled the case for argument.
The New York City case is one of several major Second Amendment cases looming over the high court after a string of deadly massacres in Gilroy, California, El Paso, Texas, Dayton Ohio, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Court returns from an extended summer recess in October, when it will resume hearing cases.
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected]