America Is No Longer the “Land of the Free”
Is America really the “land of the free?” We may have been initially founded and constructed as such, but each year the land of the free becomes increasingly the land of the regulated, oppressed, disparaged, and dependent.
Gallup regularly conducts global polls to assess citizen’s perception of their levels of freedom around the world. In 2006, 91% of US residents were satisfied with their “level of freedom,” which was among the highest in the world. Last year’s iteration of the survey indicated only 79% of Americans are satisfied with their level of freedom. Such a precipitous drop in a few short years dropped the US to 36th place among the 120 nations sampled. Cambodia, Uzbekistan, Paraguay, and Rwanda are among the 35 nations more satisfied with their levels of freedom.
This seems to be confirmed by Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic Freedom, which has seen the U.S. slip to number 12 this year. Countries with greater economic freedom, based on ten criteria, from personal property rights to personal financial freedom, include Chile, Estonia, and Mauritius, none of which could be considered bastions of liberty, as the U.S. historically has been.
America was founded differently than any other nation in human history, which is what we refer to as American exceptionalism. Our founding documents guaranteed rights of free exercise of religion, free speech, free association, freedom from government oppression and illegal searches and seizures, among others. These rights and freedoms, our founding documents asserted, were “inalienable rights” derived from God, not granted by government. That “all men are created equal,” and that among those precious rights were “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (property).”
Every year those liberties are assaulted afresh by an ever-expanding governmental reach into our personal lives. Even those fundamental rights that are codified, by constitutional amendment as our Bill of Rights, are under assault. Freedoms of religious expression, speech, assembly, arms, illegal search and seizure, and due process are eroded with every congressional, legislative, and council bill, act, and statute, and are increasingly rarely upheld through judicial review.
In short, it seems that the machinations of government, politicians, and the courts, are arrayed broadly against the interests of individual liberty, personal accountability, and private freedoms. Our nation can only loosely be identified as a republic, where the enumerated powers of government are narrow and defined, with all non-enumerated powers residing in the states and the citizens, as the Tenth Amendment declares. The nation has morphed, and can be categorically and definitionally identified as a statist system, concentrating “extensive economic, political, and related controls in the state at the cost of individual liberty.”
This devolution of the republic and our individual liberties has only accelerated over the past several years, since the despicable attacks of 9/11. It was deemed necessary to relinquish some individual liberty for the defense of the realm, as the Patriot Act and other anti-terrorism measures sliced away at individual liberties for security purposes. In spite of the sunset provisions incorporated into that measure, they were extended in 2011, and have been expanded by NSA surveillance, more expansive monitoring of financial transactions, and even more circumvention of the 4th Amendment with the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2012. Sections 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA essentially classify the entire country as a battlefield, allowing extraordinary rendition, indefinite detention, and enhanced interrogation against U.S. citizens here on American soil.
The omnipotence of government today certainly contrasts sharply with what our founding fathers envisioned for this “land of the free.” As Thomas Jefferson said,
“A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have.” Or, in the context of abrogation of 4th Amendment rights, any government that is powerful enough to do everything we allow it, certainly is powerful enough to get away with everything it does.
Which also brings to mind Ben Franklin’s astute observation, “Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.” Clearly, the more ground we cede collectively as a citizenry to security, the less freedom and liberty there is. And that applies not just to issues of national security, but also to domestic fiscal policies as well.
Patrick Henry famously mirrored that sentiment, when he said, “Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!” I’m sure the good governor would be aghast at the sacrifice of liberty for thralldom to government that has ensued these past several years.
Every election from here on out is a referendum on the future of our republic. Will we choose to elect those who embrace our founding principles based on liberty and freedom, or will we continue to cede our liberty for “security” provided by a statist government which is increasingly less attune to the concerns and interests of the individual citizen?
For those of us who are lovers of liberty, there has never been a more critical time to reassert our founding principles and the constitutional limitations of governmental power than today. If we want to have anything even remotely resembling the American republic surviving for future generations, it’s time to quit being a doormat to the politically correct progressive and statist agenda, and to proactively engage in the political process. Most of the statist “accomplishments” can be unwoven, but we need the electoral majorities to do it. Passivity and acquiescence are no longer options for those who would concur with Patrick Henry, “…give me liberty, or give me death!”
Associated Press award winning columnist Richard Larsen is President of Larsen Financial, a brokerage and financial planning firm in Pocatello, Idaho and is a graduate of Idaho State University with degrees in Political Science and History and coursework completed toward a Master’s in Public Administration. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
The US, is rumbling down the mobocrat highway of “Land of the Gimme your stuff”. There’s plenty of blame for why this is happening.
For example, the supposedly religiously based Social Conservatives pays limited attention to ‘thou shall not covet thy neighbor’s stuff’ creating an immoral culture that uses big grubermint to take other people’s stuff and hand it out to the masses. This commandment is all about successful societies need to focus upon working towards creating your own weath by providing essential products and services to everyone. The creation of new wealth thru hard work and property rights is essential to make a moral society grow. When the big gruberment takes and redistributes wealth, there’s less wealth to go around, and the morality of society declines.
There’s also barely a mention of ‘teach someone to fish, and they can feed themselves, their family, and many more’. Nope, this has been replaced by Crony permutations such as “give us some Crony bucks, and we’ll make everyone put corn based alcohol in their gasoline, and take money from others to pay to you grow corn too. Prepare to worship the resulting a wonderful green Crony world the grubermint picks winners and losers.”.
Then there’s the creation of the eleventh and twelve Commandments that go something like “thou shall create a big grubermint do what we don’t Trust God to do. Or something — actually, a whole lot of somethings…”. This is followed by the Cherry Picking Commandment “thou shall pick and choose which Commandments to focus upon, and which to ignore”. Followed by a few more ‘or somethings…’
This isn’t to say there’s a lot of other reasons for the societal mess we’re in.
However, it seems the Social Conservatives basically have put all their effort behind holding up a single fence post while the rest of the fence defining a moral society has been stampeded into dust. Preserving a single fence post without also standing up to protect the rest of the fence is proving to be a pretty worthless effort.
Rick, both you and Seipherd make some poignant (&valid) points as to “What the” and “How the” current debauch attitude gained such a prevalent foot hold in such an exceptional Country as Ours…..Rick, I believe that the root may well be found in your column on the “nuclear family”. This is where the teaching should (& did) begin. The foundation of moral values are not a natural part of DNA. A child must be ‘taught’ moral layers of behavior, respect, love,and personal responsibility. If not, we are a Nation of clay feet……
Many of the young leaders today were those children of yesterday. The candidates for all elected office, particularly for President can demonstrate personal responsibility and avoid ‘passing the buck’ by telling us of all the egregious acts of their opponents, but, instead tell us ‘what they can do and how’. Not a solution…..just a start to under pinning & strengthening our base.