Author Archives: Rebecca Diserio

Understanding The History Of The SCOTUS DOMA Ruling

032713_al_doma_640No doubt. in the days and weeks to come, the talking heads will be edifying us on the complex nature of the DOMA ruling. In California, the voters mandated that “Marriage is between and Man and a Woman” period. Called “Proposition 8″, this vote was taken “to the people” and the “people” spoke. Historically an extremely liberal State ( I am a resident), it came as a surprise—-however, the voters of California had spoken.

Enter the “opposition” who took it to the 9th Court of Appeals, who overturned the ruling/proposition. However,  prior to that ruling,  it was heard at a lower  federal level in California.   An openly gay Judge, Judge Vaughan Walker, was assigned.  Judge Walker’s decision was key to continue that climb to the Supreme Court.  As Gerard V. Bradley, wrote back in August 2010

These high stakes have attracted a lot of attention to the California case of Perry v. Schwarzenegger. But not enough attention – in fact, almost none – has been paid to one very troubling aspect of the case.

This is the question of the judge’s bias due to his possible interest in which side wins the case.

Judge Vaughan Walker has surprised just about everyone with his unorthodox handling of the Prop. 8 trial.

Supporters describe him as iconoclastic and creative. Those less enamored have charged him with turning the proceedings into a sensationalized show-trial.

Both sets of observers could probably agree with the explanation offered by conservative commentator Ed Whelan who has observed that Walker has been determined from the outset “to use the case to advance the cause of same-sex marriage.”

I do not doubt that Judge Walker made up his mind about Prop 8 before the trial began.

But that is not the bias that has received too little attention.

Battalions of commentators have wondered about his bizarre handling of the case, and many have attributed it to Walker’s belief that it is unjust for the law to limit marriage to opposite-sex couples.

Nor is the neglected bias related to the fact that (as several newspapers have reported) the judge is openly gay.

Of course, Walker’s opinions about marriage and sexual preference could be related to his own homosexuality.

But even if they are, it does not follow that he would be incapable of being impartial and of rendering a judgment in accord with the law in the Prop. 8 case – any more than a happily married heterosexual would necessarily be.

In fact, all judges have beliefs and personal habits which intersect from time to time with the matters in dispute before them. We do not require judges to be blank slates without a personal life. Judges are not automatons.

All we ask and what we rightly expect is that judges put aside those things insofar as they might interfere with deciding a case fairly and in accord with the law.

But no one is immune to all conflicts of interest or of belief.

So our law rightly requires that public officials – judges included – stay out of matters in which they have a financial stake. It is not that everyone would be corrupted by the prospect of financial gain. Not at all.

But some people would be corrupted. And everyone can have greater confidence in the outcome of public deliberations when they know that at least one temptation towards corruption has been removed.

The neglected bias in the Prop. 8 trial has instead to do with the fact that – as reported in The Los Angeles Times last month – Judge Walker “attends bar functions with a companion, a physician.”

If (as The Times suggests) Judge Walker is in a stable same-sex relationship, then he might wish or even expect to wed should same-sex marriage become legally available in California.

This raises an important and serious question about his fitness to preside over the case. Yet it is a question that received almost no attention.

When a judge is obliged to withdraw from a case due to a conflicting interest we call it “recusal.

Following the ruling, it was kicked up to the 9th Court of Appeals, one of the most Liberal Court of Appeals known.  The outcome:

The federal appeals court has declared California’s same-sex marriage ban to be unconstitutional, paving the way for a likely U.S. Supreme Court showdown on the voter-approved law. A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled 2-1 Tuesday that Walker, a lower-court judge, interpreted the U.S. Constitution correctly in 2010 when he declared Proposition 8 to be a violation of the civil rights of gays and lesbians.

The Attorneys in the case, Boies and Walker always had the Supreme Court in mind.  Which brings us to today.  I think Ed Morrissey at HOTAIR sums it up best

This decision bothers me a lot more than the DOMA case.  The voters in California amended the state constitution by referendum legally, to define a legitimate government policy regarding the recognition of marriage.  The court is making the case that this is a matter for California to settle, not the federal courts, and there is a very good case to make there.  However, the effect of this is to overturn an election whose legality was never in doubt just because some people didn’t like the outcome.  That to me is a more dangerous outcome than a precedent-setting decision on standing.

“Upside” of today?  The court has evaded the question of whether same-sex marriage is constitutionally-protected in all states.  I’m sure that is the “next” move.

For great coverage of the overall unfolding of today’s ruling see

You can read the ruling here

Abortion Rights Thugs Storm Texas Legislature; Block Vote On Limiting Abortions To 20 Weeks

Same old Pro-Death “activists”. Hey, let’s go filibuster the “outrage” of limiting abortions to 20 weeks and requiring those “clinics” to implement the same standards as any surgical center! YEA! That sounds like something that is right up there with Slavery! Hurry get your code pink outfits and meet at the Texas State Capitol!! Do these idiots know just how ridiculous they sound? Killing the unborn at any time is murder, but a woman who is 20 weeks pregnant—that’s 5 months pregnant, and they are protesting the “right” to slaughter that innocent child? Watch the video below. After “demonstrating” for over 10 hours, at 3am, the Republicans conceded the vote could not be finished on time.

Obama Calls For End To Catholic Schools—“Too Divisive”

obama-catholicsThe “Scottish Observer” reports while Obama is in Northern Ireland he addressed a group:

President Barack Obama (above), repeated the oft disproved claim that Catholic education increases division in front of an audience of 2000 young people, including many Catholics, at Belfast’s Waterfront hall when he arrived in the country this morning.

“If towns remain divided—if Catholics have their schools and buildings and Protestants have theirs, if we can’t see ourselves in one another and fear or resentment are allowed to harden—that too encourages division and discourages cooperation,” the US president said.

The US politician made the unfounded claim despite a top Vatican official spelling out the undeniable good done by Catholic education in a speech in Glasgow on Saturday and in his homily at Mass on Friday.

Archbishop Gerhard Müller (below), prefect of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, told an audience in Scotland that Catholic education provided a rare place where ‘intellectual training, moral discipline and religious commitment would come together’ while giving the presitigous Cardinal Winning Lecture on Saturday to officially launch the St Andrews Foundation for Catholic teacher education at Glasgow University. During Mass at St Andrew’s Cathedral, Glasgow, on Friday night he said that ‘the Catholic school is vitally important … a critical component of the Church,’ adding that Catholic education provides young people with a wonderful opportunity to ‘grow up with Jesus.’

Hmmm, I guess Muslim schools etc don’t cause division?  He stated that “peace” comes from empathy and some other liberal propaganda regurgitated talking points.  ITS all goes back to that secular humanism, which MAN is his own “god”.  Peace can only come from “MAN” meshing all religions ultimately into a “One World Religion, all genders, so we are gender “neutral”, everything with any semblemce of Natural Law or God given Right and making it into what MAN decides it should be—not what God created IT to be.   To see the video click this link


True Crime: IRS Targeted My Family For Over 4 Months Due To Tea Party Ties

22_Secret-Behind-IRS-300x231I suffer in silence.  Its not a virtue, its not heroic.  Maybe it comes from years of Trauma Nursing at USC Medical Center, where stabbings and gunshots are known as a “regular Friday night”.  Maybe, (and yes I’m going to bare my soul here) maybe,  its from one Friday night in May 1995.  It was my husband, Deputy Stephen Blair, who sustained gunshots, which claimed his life.  His life, given in service to Los Angeles County, given, as he believed, ultimately for a Country where freedom and justice reigned.  I remember my thoughts that night.   Although he was not in the Military, he patrolled South Central LA, its own war zone.  I thought, he died knowing his sacrifice meant something.  That our sons would know it meant something.  That our great Nation’s way of life at times extacts that price.

After Obama was elected, and that other day of doom,  the day the National Health Care bill passed, I felt called to act.  Up until that point, I devoted my life to raising my 3 sons, I remarried (a Police Detective), and was in no way “political”.   I realized what the “Healthcare” nightmare would mean, and I joined a local Tea Party.  I became extremely active, setting up the websites, funding much of the expenses, and was listed as the “Public Relations/ Internet Coordinator.

I started writing articles that were picked up by some well known Conservative websites– a scathing expose on Loretta Sanchez, and a follow-up on my experiences as a Co-Manager for Star Parker’s 2010 bid for Congress– which made it onto HotAir. My articles started to circulate, as I found my voice, always fact based, but with just a tad hint of sarcasm & tomfoolery….something different.  I’d like to thank Anita MonCrief for giving me start on her website Emerging Corruption.  (I am relating all this history as it may shed light on what is to follow.)

In 2010, I started my Blog Talk Radio show, which grew into a “Radio Network” called “Fidelis Radio Network”.  Blessed with a few other Conservative voices, Fidelis averaged over 200,000 listens a month.  Fidelis also had Catholic programming.  As of December 2012, we aired 3 “Conservative Politics” talk shows and 3 “Conservative” Catholic talk shows.  As we grew we attracted some “big named” interviews.  We had plans to expand in 2013.

What a recipe for “disaster”—-Tea Party type folks and Catholics, exactly the mix the Obama Administration “loves” the most.  Those darn Catholics and their non-compliance with providing abortions and birth control.  And those backwater Tea Party hicks, always ranting about their “free speech” while carrying AK47’s around.

Sometime at the end of January, or beginning of February, a funny thing happened.

My husband’s direct deposit pay which is approximately 1600 every 2 weeks was garnished—–and I mean garnished.  Confused and alarmed, his Human Resources Department said it was the IRS.  The IRS? Huh? What?

We never received any correspondence prior– as in “Hello, unless you pay we will start to garnish your wages”.     We usually get a tax return.  His pay was garnished so that we netted 365.00 every 2 weeks.

Luckily, my husband is a “Retired Detective” who receives a pension.   He took a job after retirement  for a firm which needed experienced top professionals in security— for one purpose—to ensure my sons, his step-sons, could finish College.

It had to be a mistake.  This garnishment….what else could it be?  I tried without success to reach a “live” person at the IRS.  And stupid me.  I kept thinking—watch—-his next paycheck will be “right”.  But the HR Department never received any paperwork to stop it.  I STILL thought, I KNEW, its a clerical error somewhere, and I kept calling.  One time on hold for over 3 hours.

Our lives changed drastically.  Just like Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs, my focus was food and shelter.  And getting our sons to their classes.  That was the one thing I could not, would not, allow to change.  My middle son was scheduled to graduate in May 2013, my youngest son was in his Junior year.

So, as I do in a crisis, I tried to just focus on food and shelter.  No internet, no TV, no cell phones.  Little by little all the things many of us take for granted had to go.  And then I got through.  YES, about a week before the whole IRS story “broke” a live person was on the phone with me.

After I gave our Social Security numbers, the “minion” placed me on hold to get a Supervisor.  The Supervisor was completely apologetic! (HUH? the IRS acting somewhat human?)

“OH, mam, yes we have your file here, and while you are on the phone, as we speak, I am faxing directly to your husband’s Human Resource Department to lift this….right away…hold on….its going through.  Yes, there.  Now give them a call to make sure.”

Shocked, and elated, I asked few questions.  At this point I was suffering from exhaustion, depression, shell shock.

I asked “Well, can you tell me why this “snafu” occured?” Silence for about 30 seconds.  Then “Hmmm, its odd, looks like your return was “flagged” for something….not sure why, but its fixed now and you should not expect anymore issues.”

When the IRS story broke, it still didn’t fit until I remembered in January my accountant filed Fidelis Radio as a start-up business, a Conservative Radio Network— so we could write off the expenses.

Then, something even stranger happened.  My domain name ( expired on April 11, 2013.  ON that same day a “Japanese Firm” bought the domain.  It makes no sense.  We are looking into who these people are and just why and how they would want that domain.  Its of no value except to me.  One would have to be tracking that domain name, c’mon, its no “”.

The IRS is stating that they “double taxed” us.  When my husband medically retired (he sustained many injuries after being hit by a truck pursuing a armed felon), we received a settlement.  Less than 50,000, this was back in 2009, and we paid the required tax. But that’s their story and they are sticking to it.

I want to apologize for just “dropping” off the face of the earth.  See, it was the only way I could cope.  Only way I could get through it.  In hindsight, I am left with the knowledge of our Country’s demise.  Like Nazi Germany in 1938, you look the other way.  You keep your mouth shut, or it will be shut for you.  We are fed pathetic excuses and unreal propaganda so we can sleep at night.  We may not have the “gold stars” on our coats, but they are there just the same.  Grassroots Conservatives are “little fish” they say.  Why would we bother with a Mom who does a Radio Show and writes a few internet articles?  Even to this writer it sounds  ludicrous.

Ludicrous, right?  That’s what the Liberals say.

We understand there is a price extacted from time to time for our freedoms.  We understand that price.  We are willing, we are able, we are ready, when fate calls our name.  It’s not our strength which carries us through this struggle—we know the strength to endure comes from God.

And that is what they fear.  Truth.  When you speak the truth, there are no “little fish”—make no mistake, the truth always comes out, and that truth will set America free.   Our battle begins, again.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

God Bless You All & God Bless America

PS–My son did graduate in May— with a BA in Criminal Justice and a Minor in Political Science.  He will become a Police Officer, just like his Dad and Step-Dad.



Susan Rice Bows Out As Sec’y Of State Nominee; Benghazi Related?

Susan Rice has withdrawn her name for consideration as the next Secretary of State. The liberal pundits are out en mass, with Andrea Mitchell, playing the ‘ol race card, stating “A woman of color has been forced out”. (emphasis mine)

As reported by NBC news:

United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice has pulled her name out of consideration for nomination as the next secretary of state.

“If nominated, I am now convinced that the confirmation process would be lengthy, disruptive and costly – to you and to our most pressing national and international priorities,” Rice wrote in a letter to President Obama obtained by NBC News. ”That trade-off is simply not worth it to our country…Therefore, I respectfully request that you no longer consider my candidacy at this time.”

Rice has come under sustained criticism from Republicans both for her handling of questions about the attack on a U.S. diplomatic outpost in Benghazi.

President Obama responded in a statement of his own, saying that he is “grateful” that Rice will continue to serve as ambassador to the United Nations and as a “key member” of his national security team.

This is no shock. As arrogant as Obama is, and his tendency to act like a Dictator, I admit it is a tad shocking that he didn’t attempt to ram her confirmation through–but then there is Benghazi. Did the cabal surrounding Obama make it clear that the Rice confirmation hearings would stir the pot called Benghazi? Seems stories on Benghazi are fading, and that is just how the Regime wants it. Reflecting on the Rice Sunday show debacle, its Hillary Clinton who seems to have been the savvy Politician. Clinton has traveled out of the Country and been silent mostly on the Benghazi issue—she sure KNEW not to be available for those Sunday shows.

Well, gang, it looks like John Kerry, that stellar liberal with the “Swift Boat” controversy will be the likely Secretary of State.

Sandra Fluke As “Time’s Person Of The Year Finalist”~Is She A Whore?

Disgusting.  Deranged.  Denigrated. Disturbing.  I could go on with any letter of the alphabet, to describe “Sandra Fluke as Person of the Year”.   Not only is Fluke a paid shill,  she is represented by SKD Kinckerbocker, as O’Reilly uncovered last March

O’Reilly made his case by first detailing who has been booking Fluke with various media outlets — a mysterious man named “Mike.” Strangely enough, O’Reilly can’t track Mike down, and now, Fluke is being represented by someone from the progressive PR firm SKDKnickerbocker, where Anita Dunn — the former Obama communications director — is a managing director.

So, here is this “activist”who is launched to be a paid “actor” in the fake “War on Women”.  As you all remember, Fluke, a law student at Georgetown University, gave a mediocre “performance” testifying before the Democratic Steering Committee, headed by Nancy Pelosi and Elijah Cummings.  She played the part of a “storyteller” about how women at Georgetown (a Catholic University by the way) could not obtain adequate birth control.  Sounds like a “plot” rife with unreasonable scripting—if it wasn’t “real life” no one would believe it!  Yet, that is how it went down.  Fluke, sometimes on the verge of tears, sometimes with mock “outrage” in her voice, gave an implausible speech, not worthy of even a “B” movie.  Sandy talked about how a friend had ovarian cysts, who couldn’t afford over 100 dollars a month out of pocket expense for Birth Control pills.   Sandy stating she was denied coverage, oh yea and she was gay, so Sandy thought herself the smart vixen, saying “I don’t think pregnancy was her reason for needing the BC pills”.  (Question- you can get it at the Walmart for 30 bucks a month, Sandy.  Was that not an option?) She continued to preach to her handlers, Pelosi and Cummings, in a ridiculous hearing, paid for by you and me.  All this to “launch” this fake “War on Women”, which sadly, did have quite an effect on single female voters.

We all recall their “game plan” then unfold.  This would be a major “talking point” for the Obama re-election Campaign.  Even though Sandy decided on Georgetown (I doubt anyone from the Vatican put a gun to Ms. Fluke’s head to attend Catholic Georgetown)  she must have known the Church isn’t a fan of Birth Control, yet that’s where Sandy decided to place her cap for her education.  Only to “kill two birds with one stone” attacking the Church and attacking insurances.  Brilliant.

She went on to infamy, highlighted by our President making a phone call to Sandy.  Yes, these memories are little nuggets of  gold which helped re-elect Barak Obama.  Obama, placed a much publicized phone call to Sandy, making sure “she was OK” after Rush Limbaugh referred to her as a whore in an on air diatribe.  Perfectly reasonable, for the President to make sure a 30 year old paid shill was “OK” after such a National incident as the Limbaugh diatribe.  Call Brian Terry’s family?  You know, Brian Terry, the Border Patrol agent who was gunned down by our weapons in the Fast & Furious debacle.  NO sir.  Why would he call them?  Sandy being called a whore, now there is a tragedy, worthy of a phone call.

Is Sandy a whore?  You betcha.  A whore for the Left, a paid shill.  A self promoted activist, who was in the right place at the right time. Just like a “working girl” on any urban corner, waiting for the right “John” to drive by.

Has Chris Christie Jumped The Shark?

If you are like me, you find Chris Christie a tab bit “over-exposed”.   And Christie, this isn’t remotely funny.  To really top it off, he ends with a quote from his new best friend Bruce Springsteen.   You all recall his “bromance” early in the month, when Obama “allowed” Chrissy to speak with Bruce from Air Force One.   Wasn’t that a touching moment? Christie has jumped the shark, and to quote another Springsteen song, Chrissy, “he was blinded by the light”.   Good Luck with the Left, Christie, you’re gonna need it.

Turkish Ambassador Who Dined With Stevens On 9-11 Knew Of Benghazi Attack & Failed To Warn

According to Clare Lopez,  a Retired operations officer with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), serving domestically and abroad for 20 years (full bio here) troubling reports have surfaced regarding the Turkish Consul General Ali Sait Akin, who dined with Ambassador Stevens on the evening of September 11th, 2012.  Lopez follows a timeline for the Turkish Consul and compares it to timelines for the fatal events of that night.  The Turkish Consul, Ali Sait Akin, dined with Stevens from 7:30-8:30pm according to October 9th State Department’s briefing report, and Steven’s walked the Consul out to the gate.  That has the Turkish Consul driving away from the “mission Benghazi” around 8:35pm.  At that point, the Turkish Consul would have surely seen the Jihadi’s setting up for attack, according to the AP:

The neighbors all described the militants setting up checkpoints around the compound at about 8 p.m.” The checkpoints were described as being manned by bearded jihadis in pickup trucks mounted with heavy machine guns and bearing the logo of the Al-Qaeda terror franchise, Ansar al-Shariah.

That means that the Turkish Consul General would have had to pass out through the blockade as he departed the American compound and left the area. There is no record that he phoned a warning to his American colleague, the one he’d just had dinner with, Ambassador Stevens. Given the description of the blockade around the American compound and of the jihadis and their trucks that were manning it, it seems unlikely that the he somehow just failed to notice. “[N]o one could get out or in,” according to one neighbor interviewed by the AP.

“No one could get out or in?” Really?  Seems nobody but the Turkish Consul, Ali Sait Akin.

What about the guards around the “mission Benghazi?” (I am calling it “mission Benghazi, because this was not a “Consulate” —and notice you won’t hear Obama or Clinton or anyone in the Regime call it one.  Why?  Because this was a “mission” and the whole thing is —what was the MISSION?)  The “mission” was guarded by this Feb. 17th Brigade:

“February 17 Martyrs Brigade,” the jihadi militia subcontracted by the British firm Blue Mountain, which was the prime contractor for the U.S. Benghazi compound security contract. (emphasis mine)

These “guards” must have been aware, in the very least 5-10 minutes prior (if not all along) for they were guarding the perimeter.  Yet, not until they burst through the gates, did any of our American personnel know.  Which gives credence to Sean Smith, last report.  And get this, this news comes from:

United Arab Emirate (UAE)’s Alaan TV, in which an intrepid young reporter shows viewers how she found pages of documents strewn about the U.S.’s Benghazi Tactical Operations Center (TOC) in the wake of the 11 September 2012 attack.

This “report” is from November 1st! Of course our FBI has been through the whole place--I guess they just “missed” these papers...both are dated September 11th, and they are from Sean Smith, from Lopez’s article (shocking video of News report):

One report was addressed to Mohamed Obedi, head of the Libyan Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ office in Benghazi and the other to the “Benghazi Police Chief.” According to the Alaan report, the letters complained about an incident which had occurred outside the Benghazi compound where Sean Smith and the Ambassador would be killed later that night.

Describing the incident as “troubling,” the report states that at 6:30 that morning, one of the Libyan guards(likely a member of the “February 17 Martyrs Brigade” that had been hired to protect the facility) reported that he’d seen someone he identified as a member of the local police force in the upper level of a building across from the American compound photographing the interior of the compound.

Here’s the deal.  WE the United States of America, were moving weapons from that CIA Annex to arm the Syrian Rebels.  Those Rebels are linked to Al-Qaida and other jihadis.  We know this.  The route to which we transferred these weapons is through Turkey.  Hence, we have this Turkish Consul at dinner with Stevens—this was “mission Benghazi”.   As Clare Lopez notes:

There is no doubt but that the U.S. Department of State (DoS) would have received an official cable traffic from Sean Smith (probably signed off on by Ambassador Stevens) about the Libyan police surveillance activity as well as the Libyan failure to provide the security previously requested. Such traffic would have been marked with a high level of urgency

And the cover-up and lack of responding to our people there is due to this gun running, just as Brian Terry our hero from “Fast and Furious” will never receive justice, neither will our 4 American “heroes” who must have wondered “where are they, where is our back-up?” right before they died.  Don’t count on Petraeus.  I highly suspect he will toe the line of the Regime. I hope not, we could use a real LIVE American hero about now, General.


UPDATED Shocker: Petraeus ‘Friend’ Jill Kelley Linked To New Email Scandal With General John Allen

Breaking news from late Monday Novemeber 12th, 2012.  FOX news reports General John Allen, top American Commander in Afghanistan, is under investigation for “inappropriate” emails to Jill Kelley, who is the woman that notified authorities that she was receiving “threatening” emails from a source which led to Petraeus mistress Paula Broadwell.  This certainly is a strange “twist” to this already shocking story.  According to FOX news:

The defense official confirmed the investigation was due to allegations of inappropriate emails between Allen and Jill Kelley, a close friend of the Petraeus family who reportedly led the FBI to investigate communications between Petraeus and his biographer Paula Broadwell.

The FBI then discovered Petraeus and Broadwell had engaged in an extramarital affair, which led Petraeus to resign as director of the CIA on Nov. 9.
The defense official says the investigation into Allen involves 20,000 to 30,000 emails that were dated between 2010 and 2012, and that the department is in the very early stages of their investigation.
He would not say whether they involved sexual matters or whether they are thought to include unauthorized disclosures of classified information or any criminal activity. He said he did not know whether Petraeus is mentioned in the emails. (emphasis mine)

Meanwhile, Fox News also confirmed Monday night that the FBI is searching Broadwell’s North Carolina home, though they did not say what they were doing there or what prompted the search.  Searching her home tells me they are looking for something “incriminating”?  There seems to be quite a bit more to this whole “email” scandal then meets the eye.

In another as the “emailing of Jill Kelley turns” moment, the initial FBI agent who was assigned to investigate the “threatening emails” Ms. Kelley was complaining of, sent Kelley “shirtless” photos of himself.  Why are all theses seemingly accomplished men losing “it” over Kelley?  The agent was later taken off the case because

“supervisors soon became concerned that the initial agent might have grown obsessed with the matter, and prohibited him from any role in the investigation.”

Something very odd here. I want to recommend a 12 step “email anonymous” program, hi my name is John, or Jill, and I am powerless over emailing….  This woman Jill Kelley sure seems to be one “popular” woman, people in high places like to email heralot.  I think we will learn there is more to Jill Kelley than just being a “victim”, receiving 20-30 thousand emails reek of obsessive behavior that is pretty mutual.   This story is like a bad “B” movie, and the popcorn is stale, soda is flat.  Terrible plot, so not believable.    And no refunds, no exceptions.  Just like the Obama Administration, even the scandals are shoddy.

Let’s keep our eyes on Benghazi, and not get caught up in this “Jersey Shore” type scintillating headlines being thrown at us.

UPDATE!! OK, here ya go….reports are surfacing that the Kelley’s are broke, house in foreclosure—and Ms. Kelley has hired the same “crisis management” team as Monica Lewinsky hired during the Bill Clinton sex scandal.  Hmmm, I smell possible book deal, wow, just in time to pay off the house!   Remember those so called “threatening emails” were not so “threatening”, in fact its reported the FBI was sort of “not impressed” with their content, and originally told Ms. Kelley—

The messages were instead what the source terms “kind of cat-fight stuff.”

“More like, ‘Who do you think you are? … You parade around the base … You need to take it down a notch,’” according to the source, who was until recently at the highest levels of the intelligence community and prefers not to be identified by name.

Yet Ms. Kelley pushed the FBI—interesting, very interesting.

Updated! Petraeus Mistress Claim Of Benghazi Prison Is Denied By CIA; Feinstein (D-CA) Wants Answers

( UPDATE VIDEO BELOW~ FOX News Jennifer Griffin confirms Broadwell’s claim that the CIA Annex held prisoners.  Griffin reports their sources from on the ground in Benghazi indeed confirmed the taking and holding of prisoners, Libya militia and possibly others from the Middle East. CIA still denying this claim)

On October 26, 2012, Paula Broadwell appeared at the University of Denver for a presentation in which she claims

Now I don’t know if a lot of you heard this, but the CIA annex had actually had taken a couple of Libya militia members prisoner. And they think that the attack on the consulate was an effort to try to get these prisoners back. So that’s still being vetted.

Reports came out Sunday from Arutz Sheva, an Israeli news outlet, first published a partial transcript of Broadwell’s speech.  By late Sunday night news agencies were reporting and tweeting

CIA adamant that Broadwell claims about agency holding prisoners at Benghazi are not true.

— Greg Miller (@gregpmiller) November 12, 2012

This is just the latest in the Petraeus shocker that came Friday November 9th, 2012, when he resigned citing and extra martial affair.  Speculation surrounds this Broadwell disclosure of the CIA Annex/ Prisoner allegation, which seems to be false, could have led the CIA to push for resignation.  Questions are swirling of the “way” in which Broadwell came upon said information.  What is clear, there is far more to this story, something is just not adding up.  According to CNN, Petraeus was in Libya in the last 2 weeks, conducting his own investigation. Now, Petraeus is not slated to testify, although Congressman have alluded to the possibility if said investigation on November 15th “requires” it.  Diane Feinstein talks about the upcoming hearings, and her disappointment the FBI did not update the House Intelligence Committee regarding Petraeus.

Petraues Mistress Reveals Benghazi “Secret”- “CIA Annex Had Taken Libya Militia Members Prisoner”

At a University of Denver “Alumni Symposium” held back in October 2012, Paula Broadwell, revealed information about the CIA Annex that has not come to light in the past.   Paula Broadwell, 40, is a North Dakota native whose résumé lists her as valedictorian of her high school, homecoming queen, state student council president and fitness champion at West Point.  Ms. Broadwell met General Petraeus in 2006, when General Petraeus spoke at Harvard University, where Ms. Broadwell was pursuing a master’s degree in public administration. For a detailed account of Ms. Broadwell click here.

Ms. Broadwell revealed information about the Benghazi attack at the University of Denver talk.  During the question and answer period, at about 35:44 min, you will hear Ms. Broadwell state:

 “Now I don’t know if a lot of you heard this, but the CIA annex had actually had taken a couple of Libya militia members prisoner. And they think that the attack on the consulate was an effort to try to get these prisoners back. So that’s still being vetted.”

This information has not been available to the Main Stream Press.  It sure raises questions as to what else Ms. Broadwell knows, and if it  was this type of “disclosures” on her part that caused the FBI to pull the plug on Petraues, who resigned Friday November 9th, 2012.

–“Poppy” of Hidden British News contributed to the article.

« Older Entries