Monthly Archives: July 2013

The Left’s Continuing War on Women

New York mayoral candidate Anthony Weiner and his wife Huma Abedin attend a news conference in New YorkHuma Abedin learned from a young age that as a woman, she’s a second class citizen. Her value is not equal to that of a man, therefore she must tolerate whatever painful, humiliating or otherwise unpleasant treatment the man in her life decides to unleash upon her. Not only must she tolerate it, she must accept it as her due. She must not question it, fight it, or be seen to be upset by it.

Many people are wondering why she is standing by her philandering, pervert of a husband, Anthony Weiner. Some assume she’s taking notes from another “feminist”, Hillary Clinton, who’s also accepted second class status in favor of her powerful husband and that is probably true to a certain degree. But there is a far more sinister reason. Not only is Abedin a practicing Muslim, she was raised by a mother who is an ardent defender of Sharia Law, supporter of female genital mutilation, and a founding member of the Muslim Sisterhood, a Muslim Brotherhood women’s group.

In addition, Abedin’s mother Dr. Saleha Mahmood Abedin, is the longtime chairwoman of the International Islamic Committee for Women and Children (IICWC) which calls for, among other things, decriminalizing female genital mutilation, child marriage, polygamy for men, and child abuse. They also seek to disallow women from registering their newborns for a birth certificate by themselves because, according to Sharia Law, a child’s lineage belongs strictly to the father.

Huma Abedin has not actively participated in such blatant anti-woman advocacy, but neither has she distanced herself from it. For that matter, neither has her “feminist” mentor Hillary Clinton. During Clinton’s trip to Saudi Arabia last year, the Secretary of State visited and spoke at the Islamic college of Dar El-Hekma along with Huma, where Dr. Saleha Mahmood Abedin was a vice-dean and one of its founders.

While it’s unlikely that Huma is as big a fan of Sharia Law as her mother, there is no doubt these destructive and dangerous beliefs have heavily influenced her worldview, both personally and politically. While the left pretends women having to buy their own birth control is a “war on women”, the real war is being waged by those who don’t vehemently denounce the despicable behavior of men like Weiner and the mindset of women who are coerced by a perverted religion to embrace it.

Why Doesn’t George Zimmerman Mind His Own Business?

Obama in hoodieOnce a vigilante, always a vigilante.

One would think that after enduring a nationally–televised trial and being the subject of a current Department of Justice witch hunt, George Zimmerman would finally mind his own business. But no, Zimmerman continues to poke his nose into situations better handled by public safety professionals. (As I’ve previously written about in ‘The only thing George Zimmerman didn’t do is play lacrosse’ and ‘Nine out of ten journalists say, “Guilty!”’)

Last Wednesday, Zimmerman came across a Ford Explorer that had just been involved in a car crash. The SUV had turned over and a family of four was trapped inside as the damaged car began smoking.

If Zimmerman would simply take the advice of experts like Russell Moore, the recently appointed head of the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, he would have either stayed in his car and dialed 9–1–1 or simply driven down the road; content in the knowledge that expert medical specialists were on the way and would no doubt be on scene before the car exploded.

But no, this EMT wannabe had to jump out of his car and rush over to the wreck where he helped the family escape. The only thing Zimmerman didn’t do was arrange a news conference to announce his deed. The media learned of his unauthorized rescue activities when the Seminole County Sheriff’s office announced it on Monday. So at least Zimmerman is not guilty of practicing PR without a license.

Moore thinks Zimmerman is a buttinski who is causing white America to forget it should be feeling guilty. In an interview with the Washington Post Moore explains, “Most white evangelicals, white Americans, are seeing this microscopically in terms of this verdict, and most African Americans are seeing it macroscopically. It’s Trayvon Martin, it’s Emmitt Till, it’s Medgar Evers, it’s my son, it’s my neighbor’s son, it’s my situation that I had. . . . Most white Americans say, “We don’t know what happened that night,” and [whites] are missing the point.”

Moore doesn’t explain why white Americans are taking their lead on racial solidarity from a Hispanic like Zimmerman. But as a Southern Baptist, I can assure you I’ll think twice before I take my theology lead from Dr. Moore.

Lining up with the “Rev.” Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson (who has been known to feel a bit uneasy in the past when approached by black youth wearing gang attire), Moore goes on to say, “Regardless of what Trayvon Martin was doing or not doing that night, you have someone who was taking upon himself some sort of vigilante justice, even by getting out of the car. Regardless of what the legal verdict was, this was wrong.”

Based on that statement, I’m going to assume Moore also gave the movie Machine Gun Preacher two thumbs down. Regardless of the good doctor’s movie preferences, the ignorance and arrogance in that statement are breathtaking.

George Zimmerman was the neighborhood watch captain and he was on patrol that night. He was watching, which is what the neighborhood watch does. Zimmerman lived in the neighborhood, Martin did not. The angelic and childlike Martin was staying with his father’s girlfriend because he was serving his third suspension from school and mom was tired of being disobeyed.

Zimmerman was already outside his car looking for Martin when the 9–1–1 dispatcher said, “Okay, we don’t need you to do that.” The dispatcher is not a sworn law enforcement officer and the statement does not have the force of law. Different dispatchers will tell you different things. When Moore has guests over for dinner and they show up with food or a bottle of vintage Welch’s (he is a Baptist, after all) and the wife says, “Oh, you didn’t have to do that,” does Moore force them to return the item to their car?

Besides, there actually was crime in the area Zimmerman volunteered to patrol. Police records show eight burglaries, nine thefts and one shooting in the prior year. Cynthia Wibker, secretary of the homeowner’s association, observed, “He once caught a thief and an arrest was made. (Zimmerman) helped solve a lot of crimes.”

The behavior that Moore advocates closely resembles what witnesses to the fatal confrontation actually did. One man heard the commotion, looked out the window and called 9–1–1. Since he wasn’t a “vigilante” or “wannabe” that was the sum total of his civic duty for the evening.

Yet if he had walked outside and yelled at Martin to stop pounding Zimmerman because he was calling the police, there’s a chance Martin would have stopped and thereby survived the encounter.

Instead, by being the Passive Samaritans, witnesses did nothing to protect anyone’s life. Even the police will tell you when seconds count — they are minutes away.

Moore finishes destroying his credibility by observing, “And when you add this to the larger context of racial profiling and a legal system that does seem to have systemic injustices as it relates to African Americans with arrests and sentencing, I think that makes for a huge crisis. . . ”

This inaccurate cant is something you expect from a Berkeley sociology professor. It’s always a bit daunting to cast Bible verses at a theologian, but does the phrase “for whatever one sows, that will he also reap” ring a bell for Dr. Moore?

Most of us won’t ever be involved in a fight for our lives, but the following could well happen. Let’s say you find yourself alone and in trouble on a dark, cold and rainy night. Who would you rather have chance by and observe your predicament: Russell Moore or George Zimmerman?

What Would Muhammad Do?

cliff1066™ (CC)

cliff1066™ (CC)

It looks like John Kerry, our esteemed Secretary of State, is working hard to earn his money – shuttling back and forth trying to return the Israelis and “Palestinians” to peace negotiations. It would be impressive if this meant something, but I guess he needs something relatively useful to do with his time.

For negotiations to be successful, one must assume that the partner with which they are negotiating with is actually trustworthy – otherwise, the whole thing is an exercise in futility and a farce. Of course, that is what these negotiations are.

Just this week we’ve seen Israeli Arab Knesset minister Ahmed Tibi threaten another intifada (I assume with requisite bus, pizza and cafe bombings) if talks didn’t produce results – even before negotiations have resumed. How’s that for blackmail? Treason?

What is even better is what was reported yesterday. A Palestinian Authority minister compared the upcoming negotiations with Israel and assumed subsequent treaty to the peace treaty Muhammad made with the Quraish tribe – one that was disregarded by Muhammad after he became strong enough to defeat them.

[Religious Endowments Minister Mahmoud] Habbash then compared the decision of the PA leadership to negotiate with Israel to the agreement of the Prophet Muhammad on a 10-year truce with his rivals in the Quraish tribe of Mecca, known as the Treaty of Hudaibiya, reached in the year 628 CE.

“The hearts of the Prophet’s companions burnt with anger and fury … this is not disobedience [of God’s command], it is politics. It is crisis management, conflict management … in less than two years, based on this treaty, the Prophet returned and conquered Mecca. This is the example. It is the model.”

Really?! This is the model? Is this an example of negotiating in “good faith” – that treaties are meant to be broken?

There is absolutely no reason for Israel to negotiate with these “people” – especially after this revelation, it would be stupid of them to do so.

Despite Sequestration, Pentagon Finds $31,000 For Portrait

31k portrait
Sequestration? What sequestration?

Sequestration, which was enacted in 2012 after Congress failed to agree on a budget compromise, will cut some $1 trillion from the defense budget over the coming decade. Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), said, “Sequestration was set up to be so stupid that no group of rational people would ever let it happen. Yet it’s happening.” Congress, defense contractors, Defense Department employees, and military experts, testifying before the Senate Budget Committee, warned on Tuesday, July 22, 2013, that an additional $52 billion in defense cuts scheduled for October 2013, will completely devastate the U.S. military. Sequestration has already caused all military branches to ground warplanes, cut training, reduce operations, furlough employees, and severely reduce troop levels. Current Secretary of Defense, Chuck Hagel, said that the $52 billion reduction will cause the Air Force to ground one-third of its fighter and bomber squadrons.

Tom Donnelly, a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), and a military expert, says:

“There’s no way the world is going to stay the same if the U.S. plays a lesser role in the world. It will be less secure, less prosperous, and less free.”

Yet, despite the budget cuts caused by sequestration, the Pentagon somehow found enough money to pay for a portrait of former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta. I guess that illustrates just where the priorities lie. Defending this country: NO! Portrait: YES!

The $31,000 for Panetta’s portrait is, admittedly, a “drop in the bucket” in the Pentagon’s overall FY2014 budget (which is, BTW, 17% of Obama’s proposed FY2014 budget, behind Social Security, Unemployment, and Labor [33%], and Medicare and Health [25%]). The portrait cost is only 4.8E-6% of the entire military budget. But the attitude, the symbology, springing for a portrait now, is rather unseemly.

Let’s see. A life size picture portrait costs less than $150. And a fancy frame, from an exclusive frame shop, goes for less than $150. So, for about $300, we could achieve similar results. In fact, the portrait that accompanies this article, gotten for no cost, could do. But, noooooooooooo, the Pentagon has to spend $31,000 on an oil portrait.

We’re broke, continue to borrow, can’t even support our military. Yet Obama, Kerry, et al., continue to give away millions of dollars we don’t have in foreign aid. Now, the Pentagon finds money for a portrait. Talk about a slap in the face! Talk about bad timing!

But that’s just my opinion
Please visit RWNO, my personal, very conservative web site!

America Our Way with Dustin Hoyt – July 24th

When: Wednesday, July 24th, 10pm Eastern/7pm Pacific

Where: America Our Way with Dustin Hoyt on Blog Talk Radio

What: Dustin Hoyt takes on the biggest issues of the day, advocating for smaller government, liberty, common sense, and honest politicians. His insight and witty commentary provide entertaining and provoking angles on everything from fiscal policy to the most sensational statements. With a twist of Libertarianism and Conservativism that blends well to all who support the tea party and true American values. This show taps into all the things patriotic Americans love and need to hear in the battle against the left and the expansive government we fight against.

Tonight: Dustin will be talking about RINOs and the Amash Amendment – no love for John Boehner tonight! Also, there might be a little talk with fellow CDN broadcasters, Jennifer Meadows and Josh Bernstein from “Grit and Grace”.

Listen to internet radio with CDNews Radio on BlogTalkRadio

This Is Your Future: Ordering a Pizza In 2015, NSA Style

This is your future, America!

YouTube Description:

As your personal data from hospitals, insurance companies, banks, retailers, phone carriers, traffic records and every other manner of electronic interaction is merged into massive databases, it will soon be possible for not just the government, but companies you patronize on a daily basis to know your most intimate secrets.

All of this information will be used to build detailed profiles of your personal habits and qualifications for certain services. Just as your credit report is used to determine your financial worth and capability, a computer will soon determine what you are or not allowed to do.

Why Would Anyone Want To Open A Business?

Why would anyone in this country, want to open a business of their own? It seems that if you do, you automatically have a partner and not a silent partner, a partner that puts up no money, takes none of the risks or responsibilities, but comes in and tells you how you should run your business. I am sure that everyone has guessed that the name of this partner is Government. You see, you work hard, save your money, take the risk of starting a new business, then the Government steps in and tells you how to run it, and they could not care less when you have to fold because of all the regulation they slap down on you.

I know this first hand, having lost my mortgage business, not because of the housing meltdown, I was squeaking by after that. However, when the Government came in with all its new regulation, that was the final nail in the coffin. Big mortgage companies could afford to have separate compliance departments that employ 10 to 12 people, I had a small business, just me and three others, how could I afford that? I know eight other brokers that went out of business as well because of new Government regulation.

You would think that right in the middle of our great recession, Government would make it easier for a business to flourish, but leave it to Obama to make it harder for a business, not easier. However, what can you expect from a President who has no clue about what makes an economy run and grow.  We have a President who has put more people out of work than he put back to work.

95% of what Government does in the private sector should be eliminated, the only time Government should mandate what a business does is when it comes to public safety. Things like how many fire exits a business should have or what kind of lighting on the stairwells, or the type of sprinklers, these are the things a Government should mandate, everything else, butt out.

I am a big free market guy, I believe the market should dictate its own needs. I don’t believe there should be a minimum wage law, let the market dictate, why should I pay someone ten dollars an hour when they are only worth five? A minimum wage not only hurts new businesses, but contributes to unemployment as well. If I have a new business and I could really use two people, but I can only afford to pay ten dollars an hour, it makes it harder on me and there is one person left unemployed.

Affirmative action, all those discrimination laws and quota systems have to go; all they do is create a mountain of lawsuits and keeps the most qualified people from getting the job. If a person takes the risk and opens up a business, he should be able to hire fire and promote who ever he wants and for whatever reason he wants.

Why can’t we take a lesson from Singapore, which has one of the best economies in the world. The overall regulatory environment remains one of the world’s most transparent and efficient. With no minimum capital required, launching a business takes only three days. The top income tax rate is 20 percent, and the top corporate tax rate is 17 percent. There is no minimum wage, yet Singapore has the world’s highest percentage of millionaires, with one out of every six households having at least one million US dollars in disposable wealth.

The Singaporean economy is known as one of the freest, most innovative, most competitive, and most business-friendly. The Index of Economic Freedom ranks Singapore as the second freest economy in the world, behind Hong Kong. According to the Corruption Perceptions Index, Singapore is consistently ranked as one of the least corrupt countries in the world. Acute poverty is rare in Singapore; the government has rejected the idea of a generous welfare system, stating that each generation must earn and save enough for its entire life cycle.

Wow, isn’t that what America should be like, what the hell are we doing wrong? No wonder why Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin packed-up and moved there.

My latest book: “What Kind Of Society Are We Leaving Our Kids.”  Available Here


This is one man’s opinion.

Pew proves that illegals really do lean left

Natasha Mayers (CC)

Natasha Mayers (CC)

Conservatives have pointed out for what seems forever that illegal immigrants are just more Democratic party supporters. Now, Pew Research Center has come out and stated that they have run a poll that proves that point. Given the fact that there is still an argument going on the Hill about immigration reform, this information is something every conservative should be pointing out to any fence-pole sitting Republican lawmaker, or worse, any lawmaker talking about passing any form of amnesty (yes, we’re looking at you, John McCain).

Politico reports:

“…Latino immigrants who are likely unauthorized, 31 percent identify as Democrats while just 4 percent identify as Republicans. Of those who don’t identify with a party but lean one way or the other, 23 percent lean toward the Democratic Party while just 15 percent lean towards Republicans.

The study also found that the longer Hispanic immigrants of any legal status were in the U.S., the more likely they were to identify with one of the major parties, particularly Democrats. Of those in the U.S. for fewer than 10 years, 26 percent identified with Democrats and 9 percent with Republicans.”

Politics, as in war, is not the place to give aid to the enemy. While it’s generally counter-productive to suggest that there is never middle ground between the parties, in this case, there truly isn’t. Amnesty of any form will only serve to quicken the demise of conservative representation in Washington, period.

The Confederate Corner with George Neat July 23rd – Drugs, Cross-dressing Boys, and Hillary-gate


When: Tuesday, July 23rd, 10pm Eastern/7pm Pacific

Where: Confederate Corner with George Neat on Blog Talk Radio

What: Yes there are Confederates north of the Mason-Dixon line, and George Neat is one of them. And we’re happy to bring his views to you in the “Confederate Corner” radio show.

For more information on George and his political views, please drop by the Confederate Corner at (

Tonight: George will be talking about drugs, cross-dressing boys, George Zimmerman, and Hillary-gate. Of course there will also be a Soldier Salute, and a “nearly-infamous” Crack Pipe Moment.

Listen to internet radio with CDNews Radio on BlogTalkRadio

Obama On Trayvon Could Have been Me

America is on fire and Obama is pouring gasoline on the flames and using a giant wind machine known as a prèss conference to fan the flames.

At the beginning of the Zimmerman trial Obama stepped in it where he shouldn’t have and said if he “had a son he would look like Trayvon.” Now he’s upped it a step further saying Trayvon could have been him. At Friday’s press conference Obama went into detail how black men have always been scrutinized by security in stores and how women would clutch their purses and hold their breath in an elevator if they got on with a black man until they got off. and how white people always lock their car doors when they see a black person. He also mentioned how he was often profiled on the streets before he was a senator. I ask you does this sound like a president of the United States to who wants to unite people or a race baiter in the streets bent on division?

This is pure anarchy that is happening now. President Obama and Eric Holder are responsible for this anarchy as is Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. They are agitating for a race war instead of improving relations. These men are all schooled in the Saul Alinsky school of dividing America into a hostile racial gender and class warfare for their own power and agenda. For those of you not familiar with Saul Alinsky, he was self proclaimed communist here in the fifties and sixties who wrote a book called Rules for Radicals and dedicated it to Satan. Obama was schooled in his ideas. One rule was to” find a target, isolate it and destroy it.”

Yes, Obama is fermenting another civil war between whites and blacks, between haves and have-nots, and between producers and do-nothings. He’s deliberately stirring up people over the outcome of this trial that wasn’t even about race, and should be utterly despised for it. Trayvon Martin has not lived a life of privilege, but Obama has, and he was admitted to the best Ivy League universities. Trayvon was not ”an innocent child” like the media likes saying but was a school drop-out, a thief, and a thug. The only similarities between the two is that they both used drugs and that their pasts have both been covered up.The only other similarities is that both were sadly lacking in a decent upbringing and both lacked a moral compass. There has already been property damage, bodily injury, and deaths as a result of this trial. Obama shares the responsibility for it all.

Holder and co. say they want to bring civil rights charges against Zimmerman now and holder says he doesn’t want to give ZImmerman his gun back. Since Zimmerman was acquitted he has a right to have his gun back therefore by denying him his gun they are denying him his civil rights and he should sue them.

Another thing Obama mentioned was that if “the teen had been white the outcome would have been different.” Well I hate to tell you this Mr. Obama, but that already has happened and the outcome wasn’t any different. Of course you won’t see this in the mainstream press.

Just outside Rochester New York recently a black man with a gun whose name was Roderick Scott shot a white teen named Christopher Cervini who was ransacking cars and who lunged at him when he saw him and his friends breaking into the cars.

Here’s a summary of what happened.

Scott says he acted in self defense when he confronted Cervini and two others saying they were stealing from neighbors cars. He told them he had a gun and ordered them to freeze and wait for police.

Scott says he shot Cervini twice when the victim charged toward him yelling he was going to get Scott.

Based on what I’ve been able to find, the jury reached the correct verdict in Scott’s case and found him innocent based on self defense just as they did in the Zimmerman trial.

I also understand why we haven’t heard a word from President Obama, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, the NAACP or anything about expanded investigations from the Department of Justice.

That is called “hypocrisy”.

Liberals are always telling us that we need to have an honest conversation about race. Okay, so let’s be honest: Blacks are regarded with suspicion by whites (and other blacks) because they commit crimes in disproportionate numbers. And a major reason for that is that they are constantly told by black leaders like Sharpton ,Jackson and Obama that they are failing at life because white America has cheated them out of what is rightfully theirs and that they are entitled to get it back through programs that lavish other people’s money on them.

There are plenty of hard working, black people who have gotten where they were due to working hard and playing by the rules like everyone else who has succeeded and not listened to the race baiters like Sharpton and Jackson. Dr. Ben Carson comes to mind. A genius children’s brain surgeon who grew up in poverty and became a world renowned surgeon. There are many blacks who are CEO’s of major companies like Herman Caine . So I don’t want to hear liberals say to blacks you need a program to succeed.


President calls for ‘soul-searching’ and ‘national conversation’ – but warns politicians to butt out…
Recalls suffering racial profiling…
History of racism ‘doesn’t go away’…
Could Trayvon have ‘stood his ground on that sidewalk?’
FANNING THE FLAMES: If teen had been white, ‘outcome and aftermath might have been different’…
Click here: Chris Matthews uses show to apologize ‘for all white people’ – Washington Times

Martin Luther King III calls for boycott of Florida orange juice – Washington
Jesse Jackson blasts Florida as ‘apartheid state’ – Washington Times
Trayvon Martin backers call for boycotts of all things Florida – Washington Ti


Greg Abbott and the Art of the Twitter Townhall


abbottTwitter is probably one of the best ways to make connections with people across the globe, but it’s hard to have a serious political conversation at 140 characters. Despite this limitation, politicians are using a Twitter Town Hall as a way to get their message across and interact with voters. It’s not a bad strategy, but depends on how it’s used and what questions get answered.

For most politicians it’s easier to answer questions from supporters. For one, it helps them expound on their agenda. It also allows them to see positive messages they can play off of. Best examples are probably President Obama’s #my2k town hall in 2012 and Virginia Senator Tim Kaine’s #AskTim town hall on July 16th and 17th. Simple questions, simple answers. Kentucky Senator Rand Paul’s #Randchat town hall with Reason had more positive questions than negative. But some of Paul’s answers were against the standard Republican answer and helped establish his libertarianism even more. Plus Paul actually talked policy, which not everyone is willing to do.

One of the more entertaining town halls was one given by Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott. Abbott is running for governor and used the #AskAbbott event to differentiate himself from Governor Rick Perry, especially on how contracts get handed out. He did a good job, but the best part was probably his willingness to take questions from Democrats, when they crashed the party. It’s not something politicians normally do, probably because they know the opposition isn’t going to be happy, regardless of the answers.

But Abbott was willing to play along, especially when Battleground Texas, an organization run by former Obama campaign members, stepped in. They first asked Abbott if he could speak Spanish, which didn’t get an answer. They decided to ask another one which, this time, Abbott answered.

Quick translation: Battleground Texas asked if Abbott could talk to the Latin community. Abbott said, in Spanish, his wife is Latina and he will be able to communicate to all voters. It’s a great response and pretty much shut Battleground Texas up for the night. But it shows how politicians on Twitter can respond without it disintegrating into a shouting match. It also shows a willingness to engage with people who don’t agree. Some questions aren’t worth answering because they’re either too snarky, too stupid or require an answer that’s far too nuanced for 140 characters. The nuanced answers are best for a one-on-one conversation or a column or a radio interview. But that’s Twitter.

There’s a big difference between what Abbott did and what politicians normally do. He talked to opponents without beating them over the head. Not everyone was happy, but that’s politics. It certainly beats the same ol’ questions and the same ol’ answers. If anyone still cares about that.

Stupid Is As Stupid Does

Six people were killed, and seventeen wounded (including a six year old girl) last weekend in Chicago. There have been over 200 murders in Chicago so far in 2013. In fact, during to twenty days of the George Zimmerman trial, four children were murdered in Chicago.

In terms of numbers, Chicago is far and away the leader in murder. But, as the liberal web site PoliticusUSA says, on a per capita basis, Chicago’s murder rate is lower than forty other cities with populations above 40,000 residents. I’m sure that’s comforting to know for all of Chicago’s murder victims.

“That’s news?” you ask. Crime, including murder, goes unabated in Chicago, Obama’s hometown. And all Obama lackie mayor Rahm Emanuel does is offer platitudes about a moral code and how gang bangers should keep away from children.

Well, it seems as if Emanuel has been outdone. Illinois State Representative Monique Davis (above), on July 16, 2013, said:

“I’m going to tell you what some suspicions have been, and people have whispered to me: they’re not sure that black people are shooting all of these children. There’s some suspicion – and I don’t want to spread this, but I’m just going to tell you what I’ve been hearing – they suspect maybe the police are killing some of these kids.”

As if that statement wasn’t stupid enough, Davis doubled-down with this:

“I don’t know. I don’t know that they are, and I don’t know that they aren’t, since no one is being arrested, we don’t know who’s doing it.”

To say that the Chicago police were outraged by her statements would be an understatement. Mike Shields, the president of Chicago’s Fraternal Order of Police, said of Davis’ statements:

“I think it’s outrageous. … anybody that says that Chicago police officers are out there killing babies is insane.”

Davis is a Democrat who represents Chicago’s South Side district.

To quote Forrest Gump’s mother, “Stupid is as stupid does,” which means that stupidity is demonstrated by one’s actions. Well, Monique Davis, your actions (speech) demonstrates that you are, indeed, stupid!

But that’s just my opinion
Please visit RWNO, my personal, very conservative web site!

« Older Entries Recent Entries »