Why Democrats mask Susan Rice incompetence with White Racism charge

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Why Democrats mask Susan Rice incompetence with White Racism charge”.


  • I’m wondering if the CDC should be concern about the spread of stupidity in the liberal/progressive community in Washington DC as being a contagious disease. Maybe isolation would help in controling this dangerous dysfunstional disease. As a suggestion, the Bikini Atoll might be available.

  • I would like to point out that another woman who was actually named Secretary of State towed an official story that later was discovered to be completely false that dealt with a significant terrorist attack. That woman of course was Condoleezza Rice who lied about Iraq’s involvement of the attacks and wrote articles claiming that the country had weapons of mass destruction. These of course were later proven to be blatantly false. Not to minimize the importance of the attacks on the Consulate in Libya, but they pale in comparison to the attacks of September 11, 2001 and the U.S. led invasion of Iraq was…well, here’s one of many litmus tests of sanity.
    Susan Rice, as an Ambassador to the U.N. (and not the National Security Advisor) would not have access to the same materials that Condaleeza Rice would have had when forming her own bogus statements. She did her job, which was to promote what was the CIA assessment that was given. While Condaleeza Rice’s lies have helped cost to date over 4,400 hundred American lives and anywhere from 100,000 to 1,000,000 Iraqi civilian lives (depending on which study is consulted), Susan Rice’s have led to nothing but more time and a greater understanding of the events surrounding the attack.
    I have looked for articles suggesting that John McCain put Condeleeza Rice through the same wringer and have come up empty. I don’t think it is from lack of trying. I do not want to join the Congressmen who have suggested that race is a motivating factor for the attack. It isn’t. Saying it is clouds the issue.
    “This is the 12st century. In the final analysis, America needs to know that when its sends its sons and daughters to fight a war or to place their lives in danger for this nation, their president will not cover up, will not deceive and will not ignore their sacrifice.”
    I know you did not mean to say 12th century. What I will say is that I hope hope hope you used this same level of rhetoric and outrage when the stakes were much much higher.

    • Supposing anything in that was true, two wrongs make it right? Or are you saying neither were fit?

      • Thanx RM

      • I’m saying that it looks like Susan Rice stalled for time, for what purpose…I don’t know. Condeleeza Rice, however, helped to push the U.S. into something really terrible that has had not insignificant consequences, and I don’t remember this sort of vigorous anger thrown at Condeleeza Rice when her name was suggested as Secretary of State.

  • Of course Susan Rice told a lie ! But WHOSE lie was it? The expression “the less you know the better” plays here. She is, regretably, in a position of authority & recognizable, yet is not privey to, nor attendeds daily Intel briefings (nor does ‘lil Macavilian) AND she follows instructions like a well trained pet, serving her master. Her imortance exists ONLY because it is a pivotal point in the timeline. NOT because of her gender, her position or race. This race card is so covered with caca de toro it needs to be flushed now!! Heads up, my Patriot Friends, “could be better, but it’s gonna get worse”