Can A Hotel Be Sued Over Disability Accommodations By Someone Who’s Never Been There? SCOTUS To Decide
The Supreme Court will take a case considering whether an Americans with Disabilities Act “tester” can sue a hotel for failing to offer disability accommodations without ever visiting, it announced Monday.
The case, Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer, was filed by Deborah Laufer, who has targeted over 600 hotel owners and operators with federal lawsuits after finding their websites “insufficiently clear” about accessibility accommodations for people with disabilities, according to court documents. A federal district court in Maine dismissed her lawsuit based on lack of standing, but the First Circuit allowed the case to proceed.
Though Laufer had “no intent to use the information for anything but a lawsuit,” the First Circuit found her “feelings of frustration, humiliation, and second-class citizenry” sufficient to grant standing to sue, given that they are “‘downstream consequences’ and ‘adverse effects’ of the informational injury she experienced.”
The Supreme Court agreed to take up Acheson Hotels’ appeal on Monday. Acheson Hotels argues in its petition for a writ of certiorari that the case is of “immense practical importance” because of its implications for small businesses, often small hotels or bed-and-breakfasts, which can be pushed into bankruptcy by Laufer’s lawsuits.
“A cottage industry has arisen in which uninjured plaintiffs lob ADA lawsuits of questionable merit, while using the threat of attorney’s fees to extract settlement payments,” the petition states. “These lawsuits have burdened small businesses, clogged the judicial system, and undermined the Executive Branch’s exclusive authority to enforce federal law.”
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org
How does someone experience “informational injury”? And what, exactly is “informational injury”? Just when you think these mental midgets have hit rock bottom, you find out that they aren’t even close yet.
It infuriates me that the Supreme Court is using it’s valuable time on this low-level matter that has limited impact but refuses to rule on election fraud, a truly damaging matter that affects the whole country in it’s breathtaking breadth and depth. Disgusting!