OpinionTrending Commentary

The Best Democracy

Now that we the deplorables have been told in no uncertain terms that it is their country and we just live in it, allow me to suggest the only and sweetest counterplay. Us 75 million disenfranchised Trump supporters need to begin advocating for App Voting.

App Voting is the idea that all discretionary spending by and policies of the government be decided by weighted voting of the electorate. Every year, an electronic ballot would be presented to all voters who are registered by their fingerprint on a smart phone or touch screen app located at post offices. Every issue could be presented in easy to understand laymen terms. And every voter would have a 1/200 millionth input on the outcome. This way, instead of 49% of the voters getting totally screwed by the 51%, or 45% whole stole 6% of the votes, 49% of the budget would be spent their way and only 51% would be spent the other way.

Everyone who wanted to subsidize solar and wind could allocate some fraction of their 100% vote to that cause while others might choose to subsidize advanced nuclear, or they might choose to spend 100% of their discretionary spending on whatever.

As for policy, it would probably be necessary to restrict these issues to a statewide or even county wide issue. For instance, if the topic were outlawing abortions, restricting them to the first trimester, or allowing infanticide, a majority within a county would make that the policy for that county. That way, if a person found themselves in a county that wanted to teach white guilt for a 170 year old crime in public schools, people would have options to move to counties that didn’t. The problem with national policy is that it does not leave options for people to hold opposing viewpoints.

The singular failing of democracy is that it used to be a system of tyranny by the majority over the minority and now, with the stolen election, by the minority over the majority. But in all reality, it has always been a tyranny by the minority over the majority as the bankers have been running it all along. The whole voting charade is just the herd going where they are told.

It is now possible to implement a true democracy where the ultra wealthy do not rule simply by buying the candidates of their choice. Of course, they will still have undue influence by virtue of their information censorship. But with app voting, they will only be able to steal the votes of the brain dead public education part of the population. All the older adults in the population will still be able to think for themselves and with app voting, get their viewpoints expressed in proportion to their share of the population.

The beauty of this proposition is that we might be able to win back the country just at the moment that have taken it all. Just at the moment when their is nothing stopping them from totalitarian control, we have a good chance of selling the idea of true representative voting that allows both halves of a sharply divided country to get their half.

If everyone ignores this proposition and the Trump half are never allowed any part of this countries governance, I fear for the future. Think about 50 million retired people feeling like their country has been over thrown by people who sold out to China. There they are with all the time in the world, all the savings of a lifetime, all the intelligence of a lifetime, nothing but aches and pains to lose, and a deep seated feeling that they owe the future the blessings they have enjoyed having lived in a free country. Either they recover their democracy by selling a true democracy enabled by technology, or maybe they become the enemies of the state.

The Best Democracy

Now that we the deplorables have been told in no uncertain terms that it is their country and we just live in it, allow me to suggest the only and sweetest counterplay. Us 75 million disenfranchised Trump supporters need to begin advocating for App Voting.

App Voting is the idea that all discretionary spending by and policies of the government be decided by weighted voting of the electorate. Every year, an electronic ballot would be presented to all voters who are registered by their fingerprint on a smart phone or touch screen app located at post offices. Every issue could be presented in easy to understand laymen terms. And every voter would have a 1/200 millionth input on the outcome. This way, instead of 49% of the voters getting totally screwed by the 51%, or 45% whole stole 6% of the votes, 49% of the budget would be spent their way and only 51% would be spent the other way.

Everyone who wanted to subsidize solar and wind could allocate some fraction of their 100% vote to that cause while others might choose to subsidize advanced nuclear, or they might choose to spend 100% of their discretionary spending on whatever.

As for policy, it would probably be necessary to restrict these issues to a statewide or even county wide issue. For instance, if the topic were outlawing abortions, restricting them to the first trimester, or allowing infanticide, a majority within a county would make that the policy for that county. That way, if a person found themselves in a county that wanted to teach white guilt for a 170 year old crime in public schools, people would have options to move to counties that didn’t. The problem with national policy is that it does not leave options for people to hold opposing viewpoints.

The singular failing of democracy is that it used to be a system of tyranny by the majority over the minority and now, with the stolen election, by the minority over the majority. But in all reality, it has always been a tyranny by the minority over the majority as the bankers have been running it all along. The whole voting charade is just the herd going where they are told.

It is now possible to implement a true democracy where the ultra wealthy do not rule simply by buying the candidates of their choice. Of course, they will still have undue influence by virtue of their information censorship. But with app voting, they will only be able to steal the votes of the brain dead public education part of the population. All the older adults in the population will still be able to think for themselves and with app voting, get their viewpoints expressed in proportion to their share of the population.

The beauty of this proposition is that we might be able to win back the country just at the moment that have taken it all. Just at the moment when their is nothing stopping them from totalitarian control, we have a good chance of selling the idea of true representative voting that allows both halves of a sharply divided country to get their half.

If everyone ignores this proposition and the Trump half are never allowed any part of this countries governance, I fear for the future. Think about 50 million retired people feeling like their country has been over thrown by people who sold out to China. There they are with all the time in the world, all the savings of a lifetime, all the intelligence of a lifetime, nothing but aches and pains to lose, and a deep seated feeling that they owe the future the blessings they have enjoyed having lived in a free country. Either they recover their democracy by selling a true democracy enabled by technology, or maybe they become the enemies of the state.

The Best Democracy

Now that we the deplorables have been told in no uncertain terms that it is their country and we just live in it, allow me to suggest the only and sweetest counterplay. Us 75 million disenfranchised Trump supporters need to begin advocating for App Voting.

App Voting is the idea that all discretionary spending by and policies of the government be decided by weighted voting of the electorate. Every year, an electronic ballot would be presented to all voters who are registered by their fingerprint on a smart phone or touch screen app located at post offices. Every issue could be presented in easy to understand laymen terms. And every voter would have a 1/200 millionth input on the outcome. This way, instead of 49% of the voters getting totally screwed by the 51%, or 45% whole stole 6% of the votes, 49% of the budget would be spent their way and only 51% would be spent the other way.

Everyone who wanted to subsidize solar and wind could allocate some fraction of their 100% vote to that cause while others might choose to subsidize advanced nuclear, or they might choose to spend 100% of their discretionary spending on whatever.

As for policy, it would probably be necessary to restrict these issues to a statewide or even county wide issue. For instance, if the topic were outlawing abortions, restricting them to the first trimester, or allowing infanticide, a majority within a county would make that the policy for that county. That way, if a person found themselves in a county that wanted to teach white guilt for a 170 year old crime in public schools, people would have options to move to counties that didn’t. The problem with national policy is that it does not leave options for people to hold opposing viewpoints.

The singular failing of democracy is that it used to be a system of tyranny by the majority over the minority and now, with the stolen election, by the minority over the majority. But in all reality, it has always been a tyranny by the minority over the majority as the bankers have been running it all along. The whole voting charade is just the herd going where they are told.

It is now possible to implement a true democracy where the ultra wealthy do not rule simply by buying the candidates of their choice. Of course, they will still have undue influence by virtue of their information censorship. But with app voting, they will only be able to steal the votes of the brain dead public education part of the population. All the older adults in the population will still be able to think for themselves and with app voting, get their viewpoints expressed in proportion to their share of the population.

The beauty of this proposition is that we might be able to win back the country just at the moment that have taken it all. Just at the moment when their is nothing stopping them from totalitarian control, we have a good chance of selling the idea of true representative voting that allows both halves of a sharply divided country to get their half.

If everyone ignores this proposition and the Trump half are never allowed any part of this countries governance, I fear for the future. Think about 50 million retired people feeling like their country has been over thrown by people who sold out to China. There they are with all the time in the world, all the savings of a lifetime, all the intelligence of a lifetime, nothing but aches and pains to lose, and a deep seated feeling that they owe the future the blessings they have enjoyed having lived in a free country. Either they recover their democracy by selling a true democracy enabled by technology, or maybe they become the enemies of the state.

The Best Democracy

Now that we the deplorables have been told in no uncertain terms that it is their country and we just live in it, allow me to suggest the only and sweetest counterplay. Us 75 million disenfranchised Trump supporters need to begin advocating for App Voting.

App Voting is the idea that all discretionary spending by and policies of the government be decided by weighted voting of the electorate. Every year, an electronic ballot would be presented to all voters who are registered by their fingerprint on a smart phone or touch screen app located at post offices. Every issue could be presented in easy to understand laymen terms. And every voter would have a 1/200 millionth input on the outcome. This way, instead of 49% of the voters getting totally screwed by the 51%, or 45% whole stole 6% of the votes, 49% of the budget would be spent their way and only 51% would be spent the other way.

Everyone who wanted to subsidize solar and wind could allocate some fraction of their 100% vote to that cause while others might choose to subsidize advanced nuclear, or they might choose to spend 100% of their discretionary spending on whatever.

As for policy, it would probably be necessary to restrict these issues to a statewide or even county wide issue. For instance, if the topic were outlawing abortions, restricting them to the first trimester, or allowing infanticide, a majority within a county would make that the policy for that county. That way, if a person found themselves in a county that wanted to teach white guilt for a 170 year old crime in public schools, people would have options to move to counties that didn’t. The problem with national policy is that it does not leave options for people to hold opposing viewpoints.

The singular failing of democracy is that it used to be a system of tyranny by the majority over the minority and now, with the stolen election, by the minority over the majority. But in all reality, it has always been a tyranny by the minority over the majority as the bankers have been running it all along. The whole voting charade is just the herd going where they are told.

It is now possible to implement a true democracy where the ultra wealthy do not rule simply by buying the candidates of their choice. Of course, they will still have undue influence by virtue of their information censorship. But with app voting, they will only be able to steal the votes of the brain dead public education part of the population. All the older adults in the population will still be able to think for themselves and with app voting, get their viewpoints expressed in proportion to their share of the population.

The beauty of this proposition is that we might be able to win back the country just at the moment that have taken it all. Just at the moment when their is nothing stopping them from totalitarian control, we have a good chance of selling the idea of true representative voting that allows both halves of a sharply divided country to get their half.

If everyone ignores this proposition and the Trump half are never allowed any part of this countries governance, I fear for the future. Think about 50 million retired people feeling like their country has been over thrown by people who sold out to China. There they are with all the time in the world, all the savings of a lifetime, all the intelligence of a lifetime, nothing but aches and pains to lose, and a deep seated feeling that they owe the future the blessings they have enjoyed having lived in a free country. Either they recover their democracy by selling a true democracy enabled by technology, or maybe they become the enemies of the state.

he Best Democracy

Now that we the deplorables have been told in no uncertain terms that it is their country and we just live in it, allow me to suggest the only and sweetest counterplay. Us 75 million disenfranchised Trump supporters need to begin advocating for App Voting.

App Voting is the idea that all discretionary spending by and policies of the government be decided by weighted voting of the electorate. Every year, an electronic ballot would be presented to all voters who are registered by their fingerprint on a smart phone or touch screen app located at post offices. Every issue could be presented in easy to understand laymen terms. And every voter would have a 1/200 millionth input on the outcome. This way, instead of 49% of the voters getting totally screwed by the 51%, or 45% whole stole 6% of the votes, 49% of the budget would be spent their way and only 51% would be spent the other way.

Everyone who wanted to subsidize solar and wind could allocate some fraction of their 100% vote to that cause while others might choose to subsidize advanced nuclear, or they might choose to spend 100% of their discretionary spending on whatever.

As for policy, it would probably be necessary to restrict these issues to a statewide or even county wide issue. For instance, if the topic were outlawing abortions, restricting them to the first trimester, or allowing infanticide, a majority within a county would make that the policy for that county. That way, if a person found themselves in a county that wanted to teach white guilt for a 170 year old crime in public schools, people would have options to move to counties that didn’t. The problem with national policy is that it does not leave options for people to hold opposing viewpoints.

The singular failing of democracy is that it used to be a system of tyranny by the majority over the minority and now, with the stolen election, by the minority over the majority. But in all reality, it has always been a tyranny by the minority over the majority as the bankers have been running it all along. The whole voting charade is just the herd going where they are told.

It is now possible to implement a true democracy where the ultra wealthy do not rule simply by buying the candidates of their choice. Of course, they will still have undue influence by virtue of their information censorship. But with app voting, they will only be able to steal the votes of the brain dead public education part of the population. All the older adults in the population will still be able to think for themselves and with app voting, get their viewpoints expressed in proportion to their share of the population.

The beauty of this proposition is that we might be able to win back the country just at the moment that have taken it all. Just at the moment when their is nothing stopping them from totalitarian control, we have a good chance of selling the idea of true representative voting that allows both halves of a sharply divided country to get their half.

If everyone ignores this proposition and the Trump half are never allowed any part of this countries governance, I fear for the future. Think about 50 million retired people feeling like their country has been over thrown by people who sold out to China. There they are with all the time in the world, all the savings of a lifetime, all the intelligence of a lifetime, nothing but aches and pains to lose, and a deep seated feeling that they owe the future the blessings they have enjoyed having lived in a free country. Either they recover their democracy by selling a true democracy enabled by technology, or maybe they become the enemies of the state

he Best Democracy

Now that we the deplorables have been told in no uncertain terms that it is their country and we just live in it, allow me to suggest the only and sweetest counterplay. Us 75 million disenfranchised Trump supporters need to begin advocating for App Voting.

App Voting is the idea that all discretionary spending by and policies of the government be decided by weighted voting of the electorate. Every year, an electronic ballot would be presented to all voters who are registered by their fingerprint on a smart phone or touch screen app located at post offices. Every issue could be presented in easy to understand laymen terms. And every voter would have a 1/200 millionth input on the outcome. This way, instead of 49% of the voters getting totally screwed by the 51%, or 45% whole stole 6% of the votes, 49% of the budget would be spent their way and only 51% would be spent the other way.

Everyone who wanted to subsidize solar and wind could allocate some fraction of their 100% vote to that cause while others might choose to subsidize advanced nuclear, or they might choose to spend 100% of their discretionary spending on whatever.

As for policy, it would probably be necessary to restrict these issues to a statewide or even county wide issue. For instance, if the topic were outlawing abortions, restricting them to the first trimester, or allowing infanticide, a majority within a county would make that the policy for that county. That way, if a person found themselves in a county that wanted to teach white guilt for a 170 year old crime in public schools, people would have options to move to counties that didn’t. The problem with national policy is that it does not leave options for people to hold opposing viewpoints.

The singular failing of democracy is that it used to be a system of tyranny by the majority over the minority and now, with the stolen election, by the minority over the majority. But in all reality, it has always been a tyranny by the minority over the majority as the bankers have been running it all along. The whole voting charade is just the herd going where they are told.

It is now possible to implement a true democracy where the ultra wealthy do not rule simply by buying the candidates of their choice. Of course, they will still have undue influence by virtue of their information censorship. But with app voting, they will only be able to steal the votes of the brain dead public education part of the population. All the older adults in the population will still be able to think for themselves and with app voting, get their viewpoints expressed in proportion to their share of the population.

The beauty of this proposition is that we might be able to win back the country just at the moment that have taken it all. Just at the moment when their is nothing stopping them from totalitarian control, we have a good chance of selling the idea of true representative voting that allows both halves of a sharply divided country to get their half.

If everyone ignores this proposition and the Trump half are never allowed any part of this countries governance, I fear for the future. Think about 50 million retired people feeling like their country has been over thrown by people who sold out to China. There they are with all the time in the world, all the savings of a lifetime, all the intelligence of a lifetime, nothing but aches and pains to lose, and a deep seated feeling that they owe the future the blessings they have enjoyed having lived in a free country. Either they recover their democracy by selling a true democracy enabled by technology, or maybe they become the enemies of the state

The Best Democracy

Now that we the deplorables have been told in no uncertain terms that it is their country and we just live in it, allow me to suggest the only and sweetest counterplay. Us 75 million disenfranchised Trump supporters need to begin advocating for App Voting.

App Voting is the idea that all discretionary spending by and policies of the government be decided by weighted voting of the electorate. Every year, an electronic ballot would be presented to all voters who are registered by their fingerprint on a smart phone or touch screen app located at post offices. Every issue could be presented in easy to understand laymen terms. And every voter would have a 1/200 millionth input on the outcome. This way, instead of 49% of the voters getting totally screwed by the 51%, or 45% whole stole 6% of the votes, 49% of the budget would be spent their way and only 51% would be spent the other way.

Everyone who wanted to subsidize solar and wind could allocate some fraction of their 100% vote to that cause while others might choose to subsidize advanced nuclear, or they might choose to spend 100% of their discretionary spending on whatever.

As for policy, it would probably be necessary to restrict these issues to a statewide or even county wide issue. For instance, if the topic were outlawing abortions, restricting them to the first trimester, or allowing infanticide, a majority within a county would make that the policy for that county. That way, if a person found themselves in a county that wanted to teach white guilt for a 170 year old crime in public schools, people would have options to move to counties that didn’t. The problem with national policy is that it does not leave options for people to hold opposing viewpoints.

The singular failing of democracy is that it used to be a system of tyranny by the majority over the minority and now, with the stolen election, by the minority over the majority. But in all reality, it has always been a tyranny by the minority over the majority as the bankers have been running it all along. The whole voting charade is just the herd going where they are told.

It is now possible to implement a true democracy where the ultra wealthy do not rule simply by buying the candidates of their choice. Of course, they will still have undue influence by virtue of their information censorship. But with app voting, they will only be able to steal the votes of the brain dead public education part of the population. All the older adults in the population will still be able to think for themselves and with app voting, get their viewpoints expressed in proportion to their share of the population.

The beauty of this proposition is that we might be able to win back the country just at the moment that have taken it all. Just at the moment when their is nothing stopping them from totalitarian control, we have a good chance of selling the idea of true representative voting that allows both halves of a sharply divided country to get their half.

If everyone ignores this proposition and the Trump half are never allowed any part of this countries governance, I fear for the future. Think about 50 million retired people feeling like their country has been over thrown by people who sold out to China. There they are with all the time in the world, all the savings of a lifetime, all the intelligence of a lifetime, nothing but aches and pains to lose, and a deep seated feeling that they owe the future the blessings they have enjoyed having lived in a free country. Either they recover their democracy by selling a true democracy enabled by technology, or maybe they become the enemies of the state.

Support Conservative Daily News with a small donation via Paypal or credit card that will go towards supporting the news and commentary you've come to appreciate.

Related Articles

2 Comments

  1. Joe – America has never been a democracy. We are a representative republic, for whatever that’s worth these days.

  2. In my opinion, every rule, law, idea, suggestion, etc., etc. in our government MUST be voted on by “WE THE PEOPLE” of this NATION using fingerprint ID and double-checked with extreme scrutiny!!!!

Back to top button