U.S. Should ‘Create Alternatives To Chinese Supply That Uses Forced Labor,’ Experts Say
- Resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute Derek Scissors, human rights expert Olivia Enos and economist Riley Walters from the Heritage Foundation told the Daily Caller News Foundation that U.S. business supply chains should look for alternatives to production from Chinese companies that use “forced labor.”
- Scissors told the DCNF that “this is the right time” for companies “to invest in alternative supply” for protective medical equipment.
- A New York Times investigation found that some Chinese companies are using “forced labor” to produce face masks and other personal protective equipment (PPE) through a government-sponsored program that experts say coerces people, including Uighur Muslims and other minorities, into working involuntarily.
The U.S. should find different personal protective equipment (PPE) production sources rather than depending upon Chinese companies that reportedly use “forced labor,” experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation.
“For many industries, the idea of moving away from China is especially painful now because earnings have been crushed by a weak global economy,” Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) Derek Scissors told the DCNF.
“But PPE makers have high demand for their products. This is the right time to invest in alternative supply, for example in a country like Mexico which can easily ship to the U.S.,” Scissors said.
State media reports and public records indicate at least 17 Chinese companies in Xinjiang that make “medical grade protective equipment” use a Chinese-government sponsored program that experts say coerces people, including Uighur Muslims and other minorities, into working involuntarily, The New York Times reported Sunday.
A medical supply of face masks imported to Georgia were from a factory in the Hubei province in China, where more than 100 Uighur Muslims were sent to work, the NYT reported.
“One way the CCP punishes and deters opposition is through forced labor. It’s not limited to religious suppression or to making PPE, PPE supply is just helping bring long-term CCP practices to light,” Scissors told the DCNF.
Senior Policy Analyst and Human Rights Expert Olivia Enos and Senior Policy Analyst and Economist Riley Walters from the Heritage Foundation explained that PPE independence from Xinjiang would be more difficult than transferring masks and apparel production to other parts of China or other countries. Most Uighur Muslims are from Xinjiang, the NYT reported.
“It wouldn’t be hard to shift production from the Xinjiang area to either voluntary workers somewhere else within China or to other countries in the long-run,” Enos and Walters told the DCNF.
“Generally, products (masks, apparel) that use forced labor have alternative sourcing scattered across southeast Asia. PPE is a different story, however, given the spike in demand we’re continuing to see,” Enos and Walters wrote.
“Even as the U.S. and other countries ramp up domestic production, the U.S. is still having to import more than $3 billion worth of disposable masks a month from China, when in January we were barely importing $200 million worth,” Enos and Walters continued.
“It could very well be the case that by the time the U.S. builds or finds enough alternative sources for PPE from China, we may have a vaccine for COVID,” Enos and Walters said.
Experts have accused the Chinese government of coercing Uighur Muslims into involuntary factory work, according to the AP.
The AP investigation further found that the Chinese government is “committing demographic genocide” on its Uighur Muslim population through forced abortions, birth control, and detention imprisonment.
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org
