One of the most polarizing issues surrounding contraception and abortion is whether or not taxpayer dollars should be used to pay for these services and procedures. For those who don’t know about the link, taxpayer dollars are used to fund public problems such as Medicare and Medicaid. Medicare is the healthcare program that is used to help people who are over the age of 65. Around age 65, many people retire and stop working. Given that most people get health insurance through their employers, people who stop working need to have another option for health insurance. This is Medicare. The other program, Medicaid, is used to provide healthcare services to those who are poor or underserved. These are people who might not be able to work or those who are unable to land a job that offers health insurance. These patients are unlikely to be able to order online from sites like Apomeds.
Taxpayer dollars are used to fund both of these programs and the services they provide. In some cases, these services include contraception and abortion procedures. This revelation has caused some people to balk at the idea of their tax dollars being used to fund birth control methods including contraception and abortion.
Some people have pointed to something called the Hyde Amendment. This amendment has been put in place to protect taxpayer dollars from being used to fund abortion. In reality, this amendment is decades old and some people claim that it has been ignored. This amendment was thrust back into the spotlight once again with the controversy surrounding Planned Parenthood. In reality, it is impossible to police every tax dollar that enters the healthcare system. Numerous studies have been published which have pointed out that some tax dollars are used to fund abortions. This has led many people to question the morality of this practice. Should taxpayer dollars be used to fund abortions?
Some people say that abortion coverage for women is needed, particularly for those who receive their coverage through a program that is funded by the federal government. They point out that this is a reproductive right and a public health issue. They say that blocking this funding is a form of discrimination because it would hurt women who come from lower socioeconomic backgrounds.
On the other hand, those who argue against using taxpayer dollars to fund abortion say that this is an issue of free speech and religious freedom. Taxpayer money should not be used to fund these services unless the taxpayers are okay with this. People deserve to have their personal beliefs protected.
These are only a few of the most important questions to keep in mind. As the election cycle continues to heat up, the rhetoric surrounding this issue is only going to become more heated and intense. It will be interesting to see how people use their votes to speak on this issue at the ballot box.
