Beto O’Rourke, a onetime leader among the 2020 Democrat presidential candidates, describes his plan for the government “buy-back” of America’s guns, as being comprised of citizens voluntarily obeying the demands he would make and peacefully turning in their weapons with no objections and no pushback. But how likely is this forced “buy-back” of personal arms to remain peaceful?
And what’s the sense of taking weapons from peaceful, law-abiding people, who would passively hand them over to government representatives? If these people are so law-abiding and peaceful, then what is the sense in taking their weapons? If they are lacking a criminal record, what threat do they represent? This seems to be a simple case of the government, under leftist, progressive, Democrat rule, being given an inch of power and taking a mile‘s worth, in disobedience to the constitution.
And why run the risk of making criminals of otherwise honest, law-abiding people if they should object to this government overreach? If they have no criminal record and have lived peaceful lives, are they really, logically suspected of being potential mass killers? But the leftist, idiot Democrats will risk getting law enforcement officers killed, and possibly causing mass uprisings and wild-west shootouts, in order to violate and nullify the second amendment. This radical move by Democrats, itself borders on an act of domestic terrorism.
And then after all of this disruption and unconstitutional behavior on the part of Democrats, criminals will still have their guns and there will be fewer armed patriots available to oppose them should trouble develop in their homes or on a larger scale in a city.
Democrats must be kept out of all elected offices, because these people are deranged and dangerous.