In The News

SCOTUS Employees Caught withholding legal documents from Supreme Court Justices



Clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of the Judiciary Committee of Congress

Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013

Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of the Judiciary Committee of Congress

Law offices of  Orly taitz

29839 Santa Margarita Ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita ca 92688

ph. 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603


Via Federal Express

Attn. Congressman Bob Goodlatte

Chairman of the Committee on Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives


2309 Rayburn HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5431
Fax: (202) 225-9681





Dear Mr. Goodlatte,

On 12.11. 2013   Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, ES filed an application for stay on behalf of plaintiffs in Noonan et al v Bowen et al 12 A 606.

On 12.26.2012 Attorney for Plaintiffs resubmitted her application to the Chief Justice John Roberts, who referred the case to the conference of all 9 Justices to be conducted on February 15, 2013. Taitz followed Rule 22 of the Supreme Court that stated “Renewed application is made by a letter to the clerk, designating the Justice to whom the application is to be directed, and accompanied by copies of the original application…” these copies were supposed to be forwarded to 9 individual justices, library of Congress and National Archives.

Clerk for Stays Redmond Barnes sent back to Taitz 5 copies, whereby 5 justices never got the application, so clearly they could not discuss the case during the conference, as they never saw a word of the pleadings or evidence. Taitz submits herein the Exhibit 1, photograph of the original box in which 5 copies were sent back,  as well as the photograph of the stamp. Taitz preserved the box and the documents as evidence.

Moreover, on 02.12.2013 Taitz traveled to Washington DC and submitted to the clerks’ office a supplemental brief with information crucial to the U.S. National Security to be reviewed by the justices prior to the February 15 conference. Taitz talked to clerks Sevgi Tekeli and James Baldin.  She was told to give the pleadings to the guard at the entrance, as the Supreme Court has mandatory screening for anthrax, but the pleadings will be docketed the same day and forwarded to Justices.

The clerks’ office never docketed the Suplemental Brief (Exhibit 2 Supplemental Brief with the date stamp of the Supreme Court) and sent it back, so none of the Justices read the Supplemental Brief as well.

Taitz provides the Judiciary Committee with the application (Exhibit 3) and the Supplementary Brief (Exhibit 2).

Case at hand was scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013 in a conference of all the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.

This case came from the Supreme Court of California and was brought by Presidential Candidates: Edward Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran and Keith Judd  against the Secretary of the State of California, seeking to stay the certification of the votes for the candidate for the U.S. President Barack Obama due to the fact that the aforementioned candidate committed fraud when he provided his declaration of the candidate and when the Democratic party submitted the certificate of the nomination  due to the fact that Barack Obama is not eligible for the position, as he is not a Natural born U.S. citizen, as required by the U.S. Constitution Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5. The declaration of the candidate and the certification of the nomination were based on fraud, on Obama’s use of forged IDs, , stolen Connecticut social Security number xxx-xx-4425, use of a name that was not legally his use of Indonesian citizenship and based on aiding and abetting by corrupt governmental officials. Most notable example of criminal aiding and abetting was signing by the chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii Brian Schatz a falsified OCON (Official Certificate Of Nomination of a candidate) where the usual wording “eligible according to the provisions of the U.S. Constitution” were removed in order to accommodate ineligible Obama.

Plaintiffs provided the Supreme Court of California and the Supreme Court of the United States with over 100 pages of official records, sworn affidavits of senior law enforcement officials and  experts showing that Barack Obama is:

  1. A citizen of Indonesia, as listed in his school registration #203 from Franciscan Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia. As  a citizen of Indonesia Obama was never eligible and never legitimate for the U.S. Presidency.
  2.  Obama is using last name not legally his. Plaintiffs provided this court with the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham,  deceased mother   of Barack Obama, showing that he is listed under the last name Soebarkah in her passport. He was removed from her passport in August of 1969 pursuant to the request and sworn statement of Ms. Dunham and signed by the U.S. consul in Jakarta Indonesia. As the requirement for removal as listed in the passport,  is obtaining a foreign allegiance, it is believed that Barack Obama Soebarkah was removed from his mother’s passport  when he obtained his Indonesian passport. Barack Obama cannot serve as a U.S. President as the legal entity Barack Obama does not exist. The only legal entity based on the only verifiable record is Barack Obama Soebarkah.
  3. Obama does not have a valid U.S. birth certificate. Plaintiff provided affidavits  from Sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona Joseph Arpaio, Investigator Zullo, experts Felicito Papa, Douglas Vogt, Paul Irey, showing that the image posted by Obama on is a computer generated forgery. When there is a question of authenticity of a document, the only way to authenticate, is to conduct expert evaluation of the original document.  Registrar of the State of Hawaii and Director of Health and Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii in charge of the Health Department were obstructing justice and absolutely refused to comply with any subpoenas and produce the original 1961 birth certificate and as such there was never any authentication of the alleged birth certificate. After 4 years of obstruction of Justice, it is clear that the Hawaiian officials have nothing to show and genuine 1961 birth certificate for Barack Obama simply does not exist.

Obama does not have a valid Selective Service certificate. Based on the affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo, alleged copy of Obama’s Selective Service Certificate, is  COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY. In this   supplemental brief Plaintiffs are providing additional evidence, a sworn affidavit from the Chief investigator of the Special Investigations Unit of the US Coast Guard (ret) and  former special agent of the DHS Jeffrey Stephan Coffman who attested under the penalty of perjury that Obama’s alleged Selective Service registration is a forgery.

Plaintiffs submitted with their TRO and complaint the Affidavits of Sheriff Arpaio and Investigator Zullo and as a supplement an affidavit of the Chief Investigator of the Special investigations of the US Coast Guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman. Based on those affidavits Obama’s alleged application for the selective service is a forgery. According to  5 USC § 3328.every man born after 1959 has to register with the Selective Service and cannot work in the executive branch if he did not register with the selective service.

(a)An individual—

(1)who was born after December 31, 1959, and is or was required to register under section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 App. U.S.C. 453); and

(2)who is not so registered or knowingly and willfully did not so register before the requirement terminated or became inapplicable to the individual,

shall be ineligible for appointment to a position in an executive agency.

As Obama claims to be born in 1961 (without a valid birth certificate we don’t even know when he was born) he had a duty to register with the Selective Service. A forgery does not represent a registration, as such Obama is not eligible to be working in the executive branch of the U.S. government. He is not eligible to be a President in the White House or a janitor in the White House and it is a duty of this court to exercise its’ jurisdiction to rule Obama not constitutionally eligible.


  1. 4.     Obama’s 2009 tax returns posted by Obama himself on line showed him using a CT Social Security number xxx-xx-4425, which failed both E-verify and SSNVS. Affidavit of investigator Albert Hendershot provided herein as an exhibit showed it being issued to Harrison (Harry ) J. Bounel, born in 1890 in Russia, immigrant to the United States, presumed to be deceased, whose death was either not reported to the SSA or deleted from the computer system by a treasonous and criminally complicit employee of the SSA. Due to Obama’s use of a stolen SSN he is not eligible to work anywhere in the United States, not in the Federal Branch, not in any other branch, not in the private sector, not even to pick tomatoes or clean toilets. Based on his use of a stolen SSN the only thing Obama is eligible to is at least 18 month prison term and deportation. For that reason alone the Supreme Court of California erred in denying the application. This court has to either grant the application or remand it back to the Supreme Court of California for reconsideration.


Justices Antonin Scalia in his book “Making your case” p77 described a process of triage in the Supreme Court, he wrote: “Another factor distinctive to petitions for certiorari is that judges don’t like to spend a lot of time deciding what to decide. Indeed in most courts they won’t even read the brief in support of your petition, but will rely on summaries (or on the selection of particular briefs) by law clerks. And law clerks don’t like to spend much time on this job either.”

Unfortunately, the clerks do more than summaries. Taitz, counsel for the plaintiffs submits as Exhibit 3 a recent correspondence with the Supreme Court in regards to case Taitz v Astrue USCA District of Columbia Circuit no 11-5304, where Taitz caught the employees of the Supreme Court actively obstructing justice and tampering with the documents submitted to the Supreme Court.     Taitz provided the court with Federal Express receipts showing packages received by the Supreme Court and signed for by the employees of the Supreme Court, but never docketed and hidden from the Justices of the Supreme Court by the employees. These employees of the court were not appointed by the President, were not confirmed by the Senate, they never took an Oath of Allegiance and nobody knows where their allegiance lies.

This is only one of a number of suspicious activities in the Supreme Court of the United States. Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen A-084524 by the same attorney Taitz  was deleted from the docket of the Supreme Court on inauguration day January 21, 2008, ostensibly to give an impression that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy. Only after the enormous pressure from the public,  media, State Representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys the case was reentered in the public docket. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle repeatedly made incorrect statements claiming that all files were deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which was not the case. Later, in March of 2009 during a meeting with attorneys and book signing in Los Angeles Taitz was able to discuss the case with Justice Scalia, who was absolutely clueless that the case even existed, even though according to the docket he was a part of the conference of justices who denied that case dealing with the legitimacy of the U.S. President and he voted to deny that case. One can believe that a judge would forget a case about some trivial dispute, but not a case dealing with the U.S. Presidency he supposedly discussed in conference only a month and a half earlier. It is clear that the case Lightfoot v Bowen was decided by the clerks, the names of the justices were printed on the order when the justices had no clue the case even existed. In a case at hand dealing with the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency this is HIGH TREASON, for which guilty parties should be getting a life in prison or death penalty and the nation is entitled to know who these people are.

In a different case Rhodes v MacDonald 10A56 (entered by the Supreme Court as

Taitz v MacDonald) a docket entry showing Justice Clarence Thomas denying an

application for STAY was made retroactively on a weekend when Justice Thomas was thousands of miles away giving a seminar in Utah. When Taitz demanded to see an actual signature by Justice Thomas on the order to deny stay or on the cover page of the application, she was referred to Eric Fossum, the same

employee, who signed the denial letter in the Taitz v Astrue case, who admitted to her on the phone thatthere is no signature of Justice Thomas either on the order or on the cover page of the petition. As such, there is no proof justice Thomas ever saw the petition or ever read a word written in the petition. When citizens went to the Supreme Court and requested copies of the pleadings in aforementioned cases, they were told that there are no such documents available.

Noonan v Bowen is a case which provides an undeniable evidence of usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a criminal, a citizen of Indonesia who claims that his name is Barack Obama, who is using all forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number and a last name not legally his. Allowing this usurpation to go on is an act of HIGH TREASON. The nation has a right to know who is committing high treason: 9 justices of the Supreme Court of clerks, who hide the pleadings and sworn affidavits from justices. For that reason plaintiffs respectfully demand signatures of the justices on the order or on the front page of the application. If there are no actual signatures of the justices the plaintiffs and the nation as a whole will know that the justices never saw a word of pleadings an the case was “ruled upon” by court employees with unknown allegiance.   Plaintiffs also demand to know the names of the court employees who summarized the case, provided it to the justices and compiled the list of approved or denied applications. Plaintiffs, U.S. Congress, law enforcement and World Community at large deserve to know who committed HIGH TREASON, who should be tried for high treason, who should be getting a penalty which is customary in such cases, which is a life in prison or death penalty.


Plaintiffs and their attorney are demanding an immediate investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices and Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security 042-68-4425.

Not addressing this case represents high treason against the United States of America and people of the United States of America

Respectfully submitted

/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ


Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013

Press Release via Orly Taitz, Esq.

H/T Red Flag News

Support Conservative Daily News with a small donation via Paypal or credit card that will go towards supporting the news and commentary you've come to appreciate.

Related Articles


  1. Please correct the spelling on the title. It gives the wrong impression this is about Boy Scouts. Thanks- very interesting article

  2. Good GRIEF! Just how far and wide does this cover up go?!

    Never give up! The truth of the matter will all come out someday, along with all the names of those who had a role to play in the betrayal of their country.

    1. AL, this is nothing more than Hugo Chavez or the Castro boys on steroids, we are now a third world country.

    1. I knew that Orly Taitz would get screwed with her case against Obama. This is the same pattern with all the other cases against Obama.

  3. While I can see many probably true statements in this ‘article’, I also see some glaring errors that cause me to question the validity of it.
    First of all the date at the beginning of the article is listed as a filing date of 12.11.2013 and that date hasn’t arrived yet.
    Later in the article mentions an ‘inauguration date’ of January 19, 2008. That date was NOT an inauguration day.

    1. Ted, I agree. (Continuing from the comment reply to Carol andrikides… I agree. There are questionable things in the filing. Interesting note to add… when I posted the article, I had to go through and fix capitalization on the heading portion.)

      Ted, you are right… there are many statements that are probably true. Is this valid, or not? Not to steal Fox New’s “catch phrase”, but… we report, you decide.

      The sad thing is, there are so many things that are not right about this Administration. To fight a battle, especially of this magnitude, you have to be prepared.

      Interestingly, a Press Release should be picture perfect. Obviously, this one was not. It does bring a lot of questions to the surface. If it is a valid claim, and just a lot of typos, it does not help in fighting the battle.

  4. 02.16.2013.

    Dear Mr. Goodlatte,

    On 12.11. 2013 Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, ES filed an application for stay on behalf of plaintiffs in Noonan et al v Bowen et al 12 A 606.

    What’s with the date on this?

    1. Carol andrikides… I agree. There are questionable things in the filing. Interesting note to add… when I posted the article, I had to go through and fix capitalization on the heading portion.

      (Since you are not the only one that has addressed this, I am going to continue this conversation, with more thoughts, in the other comment, so this one doesn’t get too lengthy.)

  5. With such clear evidence of erroneous or fraudulent filings of affidavits, why has there been NO official FEDERAL actions to investigate their authenticity? Failure to do so by SO MANY officials seems to indicate a conspiracy of actions or inactions!

    This also leads to the question of WHY? Are they withholding actions as this might tend to cause a MAJOR disruption in our government? Or, ARE they also covering up their own adjacent acts of corruption by continuing the pretense of having a legitimate President in office?

    This is NO reason to continue malfeasance or corruption in offices, as there is NO excuse for performing a criminal act to cover ANOTHER criminal act! Something is SERIOUSLY rotten in Washington, D.C.!

  6. When the dominoes fall I hope Sheriff Joe Arpaio is granted the honor of putting the cuffs on the impostor! He and his posse worked long and hard to bring the truth out and he deserves the glory and honor of putting the impostor in cuffs and taking him to tent city! (One can dream) Please keep up the fight and don’t give in the United States of American Citizens deserve the truth and justice for all that has been done to our wonderful country by him and his Anti-American administration!

  7. We the people must get to the bottom of this. Corruption from polling booths to the Supreme Court. Call and keep calling your Congress person until we get action.

    1. Sad thing is too many of them in Congress are in the same boat. They have been ignoring this whole scam for years even when proof was put in their face! So who can we trust and count on?

  8. Does not surprise any of us who know that a real muslim will lie, cheat, steal and ect…???? to get the ultimate goal of destroying the country that has helped so many people all over the world to be free and stay free just to let one unscrupulous person to gain for himself at the expense of all others. We know what HE is and what HE stands for, so now what are “WE THE PEOPLE” going to do about it.
    As quoted: The only way to let evil exist is for good men to do nothing.

  9. Sad thing is, there is nothing you can do about it. Except for this last scenario, all the rest has been old news and no matter if it was treasonous, the dems have THEIR man in position. Even the Justice Department avowed that they would not arrest Holder for anything.
    NO I am afraid Obanana has full control and he is gaining in that department, or way ask milatary brass if they would fire upon American citizens or why order over 2 billion bullets not only for the HS but for the VA and the NOAA and the SS???
    Does anyone at all get the picture?
    It is too late to do anything legal, at least within the bounds of our laws as they exist today.
    Your friends the Dems, for the most part have been hoodwinked too but they are faithful to the party and not to America so even if they suspected, they would turn a blind eye to all the evidence.
    If it ever does get out and we are able to prosecute, all involved should be arrested and charged, bar none.

    1. Don, your feelings are share by many from about every walk of life. True, ther is very little, if anything, we can do TODAY…however there is TOMMROW. 2014 will put 23 Senate seats up, at least 8 are Democrats. IF we roll up our sleeves & sweat, we CAN take the Senate back & keep the House. Again, if, we do it right we can hold back the tide of destruction & begin reconstruction. Line up with Tea Party like groups or even like minded people in any organization & start NOW, beating the bushes. There are Mark Rubios & Ted Cruzs in every state. Cruz, especially, was considered the underdog with no chance against the established Lt Gov….We found “our” candidate, put on walking shoes & covered blocks one door at a time, handed out flyers,, made phone calls, whatever it took..It was hard work, but payoff was had…With these elections in sight, more attention will be paid to constituients letters, call & faxes. YOU tell THEM what their job is!!!…There are time when you think no one will step up & do these things, but you might be suprized that how many just need a nudge & are waiting to be asked…If you write a letter to 25 people & ask them to do the same to 25 more etc. it adds up….when you want a job done right, sometimes you just have to do it yourself.

      We can’t wait until the storm passes to act, We must pull out the umbrellas & risk getting wet now. Today is our tommrow

      1. Great comeback and answer Jan!!

        Now I need to do the dirty work and roll up my sleeves and put my hand to the plow.

        Thanks again Jan


        1. You’re very welcome, Don. I’ll take that as your promise to get involved. Yesterday I was ONE AMERICAN, now I am TWO..let’s make us three…It’s tough going up hill so If I can help you with that plow, let me know. After all “What we sow, we shall reap”

          Do you, by chance know a city council member or State Legislator?

  10. The Justice Deparment may not arrest Holder, but the House of Representatives can impeach him for high crimes and misdemeanors and if we have any decent Senators they will convict him and if we have SC justices with any integrity they will remove him from office. We need a steady stream of protesters sitting in Washington to protest the entire government, the most corrupt government in the Western World.

  11. This is terrible, Obama seems to have total control. Hopefully, SCOTUS will get to the bottom of this and clean house.

  12. These clerks need to be given the pink slip post haste and this breach of legal ethics needs to become a permanent part of their records. Someone in the White House needs to be exposed and fired, possibly the POTUS.

  13. Why can’t we take back our country, And Impeach this guy? get of some of the Congressmen and some worthlless senator’s

Back to top button