Sarah Palin in 2016 Presidential Race is no laughing matter
The presidential campaign of 2016 was launched as soon as the last light dimmed on the stage after Mitt Romney gave his concession speech, in losing his presidential bid to Barack Obama. With the new battle now warming up amongst the GOP hierarchy there are many Republican leaders who want to point the party leftward, away from Ronald Reagan and his heir apparent Sarah Palin.
That is correct. There is no stuttering here. Sarah Palin may appear to liberals, leftwing pundits as well as GOP Washington leaders as yesterday’s news. Yet Mitt Romney’s loss was not due to conservative steel in his campaign. What is clear is that nearly two million conservatives did not embrace Romney’s attempt to skedaddle to the middle road by running away from conservative positions and values. They simply stayed home.
Consider the results of Palin’s steadfast 2012 primary season effort as she crisscrossed the nation campaigning on behalf of conservative congressional, senatorial officials. The results of Palin’s efforts are notable, beginning with backing Texas U.S. Senator-elect Ted Cruz. Combine that with eight congressional candidates being elected to congress out of 14, due to Palin’s endorsement.
Now examine Romney’s results. In a general election where Republicans were expected to be more competitive in U.S. Senate races. Republicans actually lost two U.S. Senate seats. There are many who have engaged in a lot of finger pointing in order to place blame for the loss. But the buck does stop at the top with Mitt Romney.
To refresh everyone’s memory, it was Romney and his Boston campaign brain-trust, who said to Palin back in July, “Thanks but no thanks.” They denied her a prime time speaking role before the GOP National Convention and the nation. Mitt was bound and determined to place both Palin and the Tea Party organization supporters on the sidelines and go it alone to seek more moderate political pastures.
Romney may have listened to comedians like Bill Maher and political pundits like Chris Matthew who found no end in skewering the non-candidate Palin during the campaign year. There is a lesson in Romney’s loss that reminds conservatives that Ronald Reagan was the 1976 version of Sarah Palin. He too had his many detractors as well as liberal and Republican pundits who scoffed at Reagan’s notion of a new conservative under current building in America.
Ronald Reagan was held at arm’s length by Washington GOP insiders and derided in liberal circles as a joke. Many in the mainstream media poked fun of his film character that played opposite a Chimpanzee in the 1951 “Bedtime for Bonzo” movie. While the democrats and the Washington insider pundits laughed, Reagan beat President Jimmy Carter with nearly 51 percent of the vote to Carter’s 41 percent in the 1980 presidential election.
Now no one is laughing, including President Barack Obama, who saddles up to Reagan-like comparisons when he’s feeling a little light in the accomplishment department.
It is far more important for Americans who are earnestly concerned about the direction of the nation and its drift away from conservative values. They want to support a true bona fide conservative leader like Reagan.
Sarah Palin like Ronald Reagan understands that presidential elections are won in the grassroots campaign trenches found in Ohio counties and Pennsylvania coal fields. Conservative leadership is nourished in the farmlands of Iowa, Indiana and Illinois and in the kitchens of homes in Nevada and Colorado. Presidential elections are solidified with the commitment of Reagan Democrats in Macomb County, Michigan and Tea Party patriot all over this nation!
It is the power and strength of conservative ideals that when fully embraced will see a repeat of the 2010 elections, where the Tea Party grass roots movement resulted in Republicans gaining 63 congressional seats. Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi loss the Speaker’s gavel to Sarah Palin’s tireless effort to create a new conservative history which is still being made in America.
The keys to the White House Oval Office do not lie in the hands of the political power elite in Washington. They instead belong squarely in the firm grasp of Americans in the Heartland. There, with conservative families in states all over this nation the fate of America will be determined.
In 1980 America no longer wanted to be trapped in what President Carter called a “crisis of confidence” in his now famous July 1979 “Malaise Speech,” Instead, Reagan determined that America wanted to be freed up from government. He firmly gripped the reins away from moderation and liberalism. He grabbed the American microphone and said, “I paid for this microphone.”
America’s conservatives know full well that Sarah Palin also knows how to use a microphone. Much like, Reagan, Palin is committed to let millions across the nation speak through it in 2016!
( Click – Let me know what you think )
Yep. Palin would be great…just not in the G.O.P.
The G.O.P. does not *want* to change – please refer to Bill Whittle’s video, “What it would be like to have a candidate who really believes in conservatism”.
They talk about Jeb Bush?…and Chris Christie?!?
***G.O.P. = R.I.P.***
Tea Party 2016.
G.O.P. = R.I.P.
They are in a death spiral from which they can never recover, but a new “TEA Conservative Republican Party” might be the vehicle to take Sarah to the White House.
The present RINO Establishment would hand (has handed) the country over to open Marxist revolutionaries before letting Sarah run under their banner.
Yes, yes, yes…a thousand times yes. If any conservative female is elected, please dear Lord let it be her.
She is certainly a dynamic & commanding personality & more importantly…she is a leader. I’m not totally sold on her bilities as president, but she certainly in with the cream on top of the milk jug & a great improvement over current offerings. I’m not so sure that she ‘wants’ to b president & had developed quite a lucrative life for herself in 4 yrs. While I might hesitate to vot for her, I’d never bet against her (horseracing fans will get that refrence) NOW the grassroots efforts of the Tea Party have to date been undenieable. BUT now that group is fragmented & splintering in different directions. IF it will re-group, (forget the 3rd party angle) it could grow & dictate the elections in the Legislative branches in 2 yrs & presidential in 2016. Their efforts created more excitement, interest & eduction than any movement in my lifetime (& that covers A LOT of years)
We cannot expect to find a true total conservative to lead. There is no ideal. No extreme view can lead a diversified nation & must be capable of bending without breaking the branches of their own princibles. We ask & expect so much from a person that we sometime lose focus of what is absolute & what is ideal. Failure of the grassroot people uniting will result in more of the same. Remember it’s God & Country first, then family…then maybe you.