Like Him or Not, Ron Paul is Relevant

At age 75, Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) is the oldest of a crowd of potential Republican presidential challengers, if only by a few years. If elected in 2012, he would be the oldest president in U.S. history; the record-holder, Reagan, assumed office at age 69. The uninformed reader might jump to the incorrect conclusion that Paul, who is old enough to be President Obama’s father, is hopelessly out of touch with the young voters who turned out in 2008 and ignorantly propelled a dangerous radical into the highest office of the land, but as anyone who pays attention to political chatter knows, Paul is wildly popular with the under-thirty crowd.

Paul won a GOP presidential straw poll on April 16 in South Carolina, easily beating Mitt Romney and Donald Trump, who tied for second place. Paul has been winning such polls left and right since the libertarian-rooted Tea Party became a political force in 2009, but his popularity among Republicans continues to be underemphasized by mainstream media outlets, which frequently (and probably intentionally) identify him as a libertarian rather than a Republican.

According to the talking heads, Romney, Huckabee, Palin, and Gingrich are the Republicans worth paying attention to as the 2012 election cycle approaches. Hesitant to take Trump’s candidacy seriously, they laughingly praise his ability to generate publicity, and might or might not remember to mention Paul, Bachmann, Pawlenty, and a handful of others. The fixation on Romney and Huckabee is somewhat understandable, as they hold impressive leads in most of the polls, but might prove to be unjustified as the race heats up.

Paul leads the others in fundraising, having raised about $3 million in the last quarter, with Bachmann following close behind. Romney trails at third, proving that it takes more than an eerie resemblance to Bill Pullman (who played the president in the 1996 sci-fi film Independence Day) to impress donors.

Paul’s financial support, by the way, comes from grass-roots activists—not corporations or wealthy CEOs looking for favors.

With several recent trips to Iowa and New Hampshire under his belt, a new book coming out—entitled Liberty Defined—and plans to participate in the first nationally televised GOP presidential debate on May 5, Paul is making it clear that he is a serious candidate and has no intention of being an irrelevant also-ran. His 2008 campaign, though unsuccessful, laid the foundation for the Tea Party movement that sprang up only months after candidates McCain and Romney dismissed his predictions of a coming financial collapse (which proved to be entirely correct).

Of course, Paul has yet to officially declare his candidacy—but he will. Too old to consider a run in 2016 or beyond, Paul’s only reasons for staying out of the 2012 Republican primary would be: 1) To enable his son, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), to run, or 2) To prepare for an independent campaign, as recently suggested by Jesse Ventura. Either scenario would probably end in disappointment for Paul’s supporters.

That dedicated group of conservative libertarians, though passionate, is anything but naïve. They understand that Paul’s chances of winning the Republican nomination are slim, and don’t care, choosing instead to believe that the principles of liberty—which emerge unscathed from the most heated debates—can save the United States from a bleak future of centralization and socialism, and usher in a new era of peace and prosperity.

Regardless of the outcome of Paul’s 2012 presidential campaign, the revolution will continue to grow. That is reason enough for America’s Congressman to embark upon what detractors might view as a hopeless quest.

*update – Ron Paul announced his formation of a Presidential Exploratory Committee on April 26th, 2011


to see more candidate profiles, visit our 2012 Election Page

Support Conservative Daily News with a small donation via Paypal or credit card that will go towards supporting the news and commentary you've come to appreciate.

Rich Mitchell

Rich Mitchell is the editor-in-chief of Conservative Daily News and the president of Bald Eagle Media, LLC. His posts may contain opinions that are his own and are not necessarily shared by Bald Eagle Media, CDN, staff or .. much of anyone else. Find him on twitter, facebook and

Related Articles


  1. Ron Paul has no respect for the sacred cows of Republicans and Democrats. He thinks for himself and follows his conscience no matter the consequence.

  2. Sweet. Now would the blue hairs please get behind him? Its not like he doesnt make much sense. We need a Goldwater that WINS!!!

  3. Ron Paul is a true American hero and I am so encouraged that there are men like him in government. He may be the only one in DC right now but perhaps he’ll inspire other men and women to run for office.

  4. Ron Paul is the ONLY honest presidential candidate who has a chance at winning. We need him badly, regardless of how old he is

  5. Ron Paul will not qualify for the first Fox debate next month if he doesn’t form an official exploratory committee by then. I respect his independence and disgust for the big government tyrants in both parties infecting Congress today. I think he would make a decent POTUS in 2012, but I doubt the entrenched elitists in the GOP will ever give him a fair shake.
    Here is a thought: Ron Paul, Romney, Trump, Herman Cain, Gingrich, Gary Johnson, Pawlenty, Bachman and Palin all on the same stage in a national debate but with one twist: no prepared questions, no notes, no bullshit, just straight up honest questions from the teaparty, from the libertarians and from hardest line conservatives we can muster up! Make it a real test for them, make it at least 4 hours long or do 3- 2 hour debates on consecutive nights. Moderated by Rush Limbaugh to boot ! Lets get it on!

  6. I have listened to and admired Dr. Ron Paul since 2007… I wish others would wake up and smell the coffee…

  7. Why do reporters say his chances are slim when he hasn’t even gotten started? Yes Ron Paul is relevant and for people already trying to make predictions of when he will drop out of the race, that is the media hard at work trying to make it sound like his run for president destined for failure. So many people come out of the woodwork to say some of his ideas are good and in the same breath say he has no chance. Are we really going to believe what the bias media tells us and fall for their spinning of lies they try to pass off as being a statement of fact?

Back to top button