It would be really funny if it were not true!
My favorite is the one that stumbles over himself at the 38 second mark.
It would be really funny if it were not true!
My favorite is the one that stumbles over himself at the 38 second mark.
If you murder children with guns, the world will regard you as a monster; if you shoot cops you will become a cult hero to the Left.
When 20 year-old psycho Adam Lanza went on a gun-killing spree, murdering 20 children and seven adults, he became the most hated man in America and the propaganda mug for anti-gun leftists desperate for mass-murder-buy-guns in order to promote the anti-second Amendment cause.
When former cop-turned-cop-killer Chris Dorner unleashed his guns against police, Dorner became the latest cop-killer cult hero to anti-gun race-baters and left-wing media anchors.
There are only two differences between Lanza and Dorner: Lanza massacred children, Dorner massacred police officers. Lanza did not murder cops in revenge for the criminal, drug addicted, alcoholic, wife-beating thug Rodney King, Dorner did. Thus, Lanza is hated and Dorner is adored.
King’s beating and arrest by cops, who had to defend themselves against King’s violent attacks, automatically made police racist in the eyes of leftists and media whores promoting all things anti-American and racist–including Chris Dorner.
Adam Lanza’s violence, on the other hand, gave the Left everything it’s been searching for in order to disarm citizens: Children murdered by guns. Now guns truly are assault weapons, dangerous, and the real cause of all deaths in America.
If guns are banned—or at least regulated to the point that citizens are only allowed to purchase one bullet at a time–ala Barney Fife—crime and murder will disappear. Unless necessary–to kill cops.
Necessary murder in the eyes of left-wingers is shooting any American who appallingly wears a uniform.
The Left’s newest darling provided 11,000 reasons for the Left to adore him in a so-called manifesto:
In the end, I hope that you will realize that the small arms I utilize should not be accessed with the ease that I obtained them. Who in there right mind needs a (expletive) silencer!!! who needs a freaking SBR AR15? No one. No more Virginia Tech, Columbine HS, Wisconsin temple, Aurora theatre, Portland malls, Tucson rally, Newtown Sandy Hook. Whether by executive order or thru a bi-partisan congress an assault weapons ban needs to be re-instituted. Period!!! Mia Farrow said it best. ‘Gun control is no longer debatable, it’s not a conversation, its a moral mandate.’ Sen. Feinstein, you are doing the right thing in leading the re-institution of a national AWB. Never again should any public official state that their prayers and thoughts are with the family.
Lanza destroyed all evidence and records for his psychotic rampage. But that shouldn’t matter. Murder is murder. Or is it?
Dorner’s racist, unintelligent, self-styled manifesto further states: “I know I will be vilified by the LAPD and the media.”
Wrong. Dorner has not been denigrated or maligned by the media. He’s been heralded with praise for his violence.
MSNBC’s Chris Matthews shivered with tingles over Dorner’s manifesto admiration of Matthews: “keep up the great work and follow Cronkite’s lead. I hold many of you [journalists, including Matthews] in the same regard.”
How touching. Where’s the Nobel Peace Prize!
Matthews ignored Dorner’s demand that he and his cronies: “Don’t honor these fallen officers/dirtbags.”
Imagine if Lanza left behind a manifesto demanding the media “not honor those fallen dirt bag children?” Matthews would have flown into a psychiatric rage and shot himself in the leg.
[Dorner is] Someone who had great media-savvy, who knew, who had the brains to keep track of Hollywood, to keep up with Charlie Sheen, to establish relationships with people through the media, to, in some strange way, enjoy his situation and at the same time wreak havoc on anyone he came in contact to.
Whenever I seek to be well-informed, I look to the “savvy” rantings of drug-addicted, alcoholic, wife-beater Charlie Sheen.
Furthermore, Matthews’ so-called passive “brainy” intellect, who couldn’t spell or construct proper sentences, certainly demonstrated a hatred of high powered rifles by morally murdering cops with tinier guns than fellow lunatic Lanza.
Journalist, I want you to investigate every location I resided in growing up. Find any incidents where I was ever accused of being a bully. You won’t, because it doesn’t exist. It’s not in my DNA. Never was. I was the only black kid in each of my elementary school classes from first grade to seventh grade in junior high and any instances where I was disciplined for fighting was in response to fellow students provoking common childhood schoolyard fights, or calling me a nigger or other derogatory racial names. I grew up in neighborhoods where blacks make up less than 1%.
Poor darling! He was the only black kid in school! Someone called him names! And schoolyard fights? Has any American ever heard of such a thing occurring in school? That has NEVER HAPPENED TO ANY KID IN AMERICA!
Can anyone imagine the New Black Panther Party referring to whites as “whitey,” “white devils,” or “Cracker, you are about to be ruled by a black man” or “You want freedom, you gonna have to kill some crackers…You gonna have to kill some of they [sic] babies,” and “I hate white people, all of them, every last iota of the cracker, I hate em’!”
Ironically Adam Lanza committed what the Black Panthers yearn for: Lanza massacred white children. Yet Lanza and his guns are vilified by the Left. That’s because murder is justifiable when murder involves killing cops: “Those Caucasian officers who join South Bureau divisions with the sole intent to victimize minorities who are uneducated, and unaware of criminal law, civil law, and civil rights,” further declaring:
[T]his is a necessary evil that I do not enjoy but must partake and complete for substantial change to occur within the LAPD and reclaim my name. The department has not changed since the Rampart and Rodney King days. It has gotten worse. The consent decree should never have been lifted. The only thing that has evolved from the consent decree is those officers involved in the Rampart scandal and Rodney King incidents have since promoted to supervisor, commanders, and command staff, and executive positions.
Again: If you shoot children, the world will deem you monstrous and demand gun bans. However, if you shoot cops, you will become a leftist cult hero, not to mention highly regarded Ive League college professor.
On the upside, Dorner, who “wants my brain left to science,” likes Michelle Obama’s hair: “I love your new bangs, Mrs. Obama.”
Thank heavens! We can all breathe a sigh of relief! That proves Dorner, whose brain is now useless chard remains, was not a monstrous murderer like Adam Lanza! Dorner was a psychotic murderer with style and taste!
“Architect” Karl Rove is a progressive disaster to the Republican Party: He’s pushing to destroy the Tea Party and American conservatism in order to install his version of politics that mirrors Woodrow Wilson.
There’s not much difference between Wilson and Rove: Wilson wanted control over the Democrat Party and the American people abiding by his will. Rove is doing the exact same thing: Controlling the GOP vote by putting RINO candidates up against Tea Party candidates in order to destroy conservatives.
Rove decides GOP primary winners, not voters. Rove chose the 2008 and 2012 presidential candidates: John McCain and Mitt Romney. Both decisions failed and the GOP was defeated like Waterloo on steroids.
Yet, Rove is hell-bent on choosing the 2014 and 2016 GOP candidates and preventing Tea Party candidates from getting on ballots. And the GOP machine does not care: Its goal is power, not constitutionalism.
The result: The GOP is failing because it keeps bringing this power-hungry, overweight knife to the political gun fight.
Despite Rove’s American Crossroads Super PAC proving a dismal failures, the GOP refuses to learn lessons and listen to its conservative base. Instead, the GOP wants Rove to move ahead with his Wilsonian-style plan: Decide the candidates people need as president, Senate and House leaders.
To pull off this anti-Constitution, strong-arming-the-people plan, Rove set up the Conservative Victory Group, another progressive-style Pac to choose candidates, and further to the point, advise candidates on what they can and cannot articulate.
Rove’s plan was laid out in the New York Times:
The biggest donors in the Republican Party are financing a new group to recruit seasoned candidates and protect Senate incumbents from challenges by far-right conservatives and Tea Party enthusiasts who Republican leaders worry could complicate the party’s efforts to win control of the Senate. Steven J. Law, a leader of the Conservative Victory Project, say they are taking steps to steer Mr. King away from a Senate run. The group, the Conservative Victory Project, is intended to counter other organizations that have helped defeat establishment Republican candidates over the last two election cycles. It is the most robust attempt yet by Republicans to impose a new sense of discipline on the party, particularly in primary races.
Notice Rove’s goal: “protect Senate incumbents” from Tea Party candidates and “counter other organizations that have helped defeat establishment Republican candidates.” In other words, down with Mia Love Tea Partiers shaking things up, no Todd Akin slip-ups allowed on ballots, and defeat upstarts like incumbent Rep. Allen West, whom Rove could not “discipline” and “impose” his GOP power.
Rove’s ideology is similar to British constitutionalism where leaders, not the people, pick prime ministers and MPs, and decide laws as they go. That was Woodrow Wilson’s ideology. Is it any different than Rove picking candidates? Worse, is that any different than Wilson’s desire to abolish the Separation of Powers?
No, Rove has never called for abolishing Separation of Powers so presidents have parliamentary-style control. However, if party leaders control votes, prevent people from deciding primary candidates, party leaders control Congressional leader’s votes, and Separation of Powers dissolves, and the House and Senate belong to party leaders, not voters.
To cover his fat rump, Rove made radio talk show rounds, backtracking his bashing the Tea Party. Big deal! Rove believes he is the architect of politics and he’s attempting to design America’s leadership.
Rove assumes he knows what’s best for the people, as Wilson himself believed. Rove is Woodrow Wilson in every sense of the Progressive Movement: Mold the party, voters, and America’s future to party leadership command, not the Constitution. How is that “consent of the governed?”
There is nothing conservative about Rove’s Conservative Victory Party or Rove.
Wilson said choose elite candidates best suited for making the people’s decisions. Candidates must do the thinking for the people, because citizens are too inept at making individual decisions.
Wilson said: “Governments are what the politicians make them…:”
[T]here should be a science of administration which shall seek to straighten the paths of government, to make its business less unbusinesslike, to strengthen and purify its organization, and to crown its duties with dutifulness.
Rove too wants to “make” the government.
Matt Hoskins, Executive Director of Senate Conservatives Fund said of Rove:
This is a continuation of the establishment’s effort to avoid blame for their horrible performance in the 2012 elections. They [the GOP] blew a ton of races up and down the ticket because they recruited moderate Republicans who didn’t stand for anything. Now they want to use this new PAC to trick donors into giving them more money so they can lose more races.
Hoskins is correct. Rove helped destroy GOP conservative Florida Rep. Allen West by refusing to help West win reelection and stop the redistricting of West’s seat.
Rove trashed Tea Party favorite Sarah Palin as “thin-skinned,” claiming that if no one speculates “about her, she’d be upset and try and find a way to get us to speculate about her.”
It sounds like chunky skin, who was adamant Palin would run for the 2012 presidency, is not only off beam with erroneous predictions, he’s jealous of popularity that may possibly destroy his power.
Rove demonstrated disloyalty to Rep. Michele Bachmann when Bachmann demanded answers to why Muslim Brotherhood-connected Huma Abedin-Weiner was Hillary Clinton’s top aid with high security clearance in the State Department. GOP leaders Marco Rubio, John McCain, and Speaker John Boehner condemned Bachmann. Rove took the RINO side against Bachmann.
When it comes to breaking Constitution law to grant illegals amnesty, Rove tramples the Constitution for the Hispanic vote. He is empowering Tea Partier-turned-RINO Senator Marco Rubio, whom Rove says has “The framework of the proposed reforms highlights the persuasive powers of Sen. Marco Rubio.”
Notice the phrase “persuasive.” Rove wants “persuasive” leaders making voter’s decisions. That is what Wilson wanted:
“Wherever regard for public opinion is a first principle of government, practical reform must be slow and all reform must be full of compromises… Whoever would effect a change in a modern constitutional government must first educate his fellow-citizens to want some change. That done, he must persuade them to want the particular change he wants. He must first make public opinion willing to listen and then see to it that it listen to the right things. He must stir it up to search for an opinion, and then manage to put the right opinion in its way.
This is exactly what Rove is doing with conservative voters who must reject what will surely destroy conservatism if “We The People” don’t stand up and fight Karl Rove.
Rove’s Conservative Victory Project is progressivism. His record demonstrates he’s not a Republican, he’s a left-wing progressive in GOP clothing molding the GOP into his image, just as Wilson did with Democrats and America.
When: Monday, February 4 at 10pm Eastern/7pm Pacific
Tonight: We’re joined by Todd Kincannon and Michelle Ray to discuss #TGDN
When: Monday, January 28th, 10pm Eastern/7pm Pacific
What: AFP’s Audrey Jackson joins us to talk Virgina politics and later, we visit with The Dark Side’s Kira Davis to discuss news of the day.
We all know the famous line from A Few Good Men… “You just can’t handle the truth!”
This is what the “News Media” is counting on!
“The CIA owns everyone of any significance in the major media.” – William Colby, former CIA director
“We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”
– William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting, 1981)
Reported yesterday: “[Obama’s] new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens… . Those who will not are being removed.”
Obama is drenched in Americans’ skepticism about potential for martial law. Gun control fanatics have given more rise to what many perceive as an imminent possibility. Americans’ concerns first arose in 2008 when Obama spoke about instituting “a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as our military. Given similar statements he’d made that ultimately were not what Americans believed his words meant (known as “information dominance”) such as “fundamentally transforming America,” Americans are right to remain concerned.
Subsequently in 2010’s Health Care Bill Obama provided for a “Ready Reserve Corps,” dismissed by some as simply being comprised of health care professionals in event of catastrophe. Since then questionable images have surfaced of Obama’s “civilian army” comprising young black chanting thugs quite unlike any military Americans have ever known. That was enhanced by Obama’s official statements defining “Veterans” and “Christians” as “domestic terrorists;” and by now the well known FEMA Camps that make no practical sense. Admittedly, two-years later Americans still know very little about just what is in the Health Care legislation – and why – so these legitimate questions do persist.
A year or more ago it was reported in legitimate Conservative news that Obama was infiltrating our nation’s military with street thugs, changing its composition with characters who’d have less discipline and no particular loyalty to the American People. I find this believable not only because of its source but mostly because Obama has, on many occasions, indulged in and allowed thuggary and, through his silence on a grand scale, has further encouraged it in his governing of America. Those behavioral examples speak loudly, as they should, regardless of the words being used.
Americans have taken comfort in believing our military will stand with us, they having sworn duty to our Constitution, not to any one president or his ideology. The formation of Oath Keepers gave us some reassurance. Oath Keepers had their first annual conference in 2009, understandably so given Obama’s wholly unAmerican handling of the Health Care Bill despite majority demands of The American People in opposing it. From the Oath Keepers site:
Oath Keepers is a non-partisan association of current and formerly serving military, reserves, National Guard, veterans, Peace Officers, and Fire Fighters who will fulfill the Oath we swore … to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, so help us God. Our Oath is to the Constitution.
On Monday Dr. Jim Garrow, a well-respected man dedicated to rescuing infant girls from China’s one-child policy and Nobel Peace Prize nominee, reportedly posted on Facebook:
I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. “The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not.” Those who will not are being removed.
When asked who his source was Garrow reportedly answered: “The man who told me this is one of America’s foremost military heroes.” Read Garrow’s Amazon bio here. The Examiner reported on this yesterday, adding:
This comes on the heels of Sunday’s report in the Washington Free Beacon (WFB) that the head of Central Command, Marine Corps Gen. James Mattis is being dismissed by Obama and will leave his post in March.
Lest we forget the three high-ranking Generals plus an Admiral who were inexplicably and untimely unseated from their positions immediately following Obama and Hillary Clinton’s “stand-down” orders in Lybia; and their nonsensical lies about a little-known “film” that clearly did not lend to that great American tragedy. Reports of inordinately replacing these officials were buried, curiously superseded by the just as suspicious “scandal” surrounding Lybia and our otherwise renown for his ethics general, General Patraeus.
Oh what a wicked web we weave when we seek first to deceive. God bless our Oath Keepers. God bless America.
Have you wondered why there’s an inexplicably dead silence among media and politicians when it comes to America’s fatherless children? The discussion is always about “women’s rights” or “a woman’s right to choose” or the struggles of “single mothers.” A politician’s rhetoric is as if children are the lone conception thus responsibility of immaculately impregnated women. The seemingly few men who want the joys and responsibilities of fatherhood are just as slighted as overburdened mothers and parentally under-nourished children are.
[Click on chart to view.] I’ve asked myself if this is happenstance of living in a man’s world: Men’s government, men’s politics, men’s mentality. Most politicians, women and men, seem perfectly content with the one-sided silence. Perhaps that’s an unspoken politics that falls better in line with inflaming overbearingly outspoken women who want what they want when they want it more direly than they want fathers’ helping, making themselves more easily manipulated in the process? Men who, in this century and advanced world, are aided and abetted in escaping all social accountability for fatherhood if not celebrated for it. “Baby’s Mama/Daddy,” are you kidding me? Are America’s women so easily led?
At behest of men I fear women have totally forgotten that the onus of rearing good kids does not and should not fall totally on them. It IS okay to talk about that. We should be talking about it and we need to be talking about that.
Anyone reading this who’s followed politics over the last four-years is probably aware of the 45 Communist Goals published by an FBI specialist in 1958, once deemed critical enough to be recorded in our country’s Congressional Record (1963). And, yes, that is directly related. If you’re not familiar with them remember those years (roughly 50-years ago) as you check off each one since accomplished. And, yes, that is alarming. In particular are the following two, though there are more that just as aptly apply covering the destruction of American morals and traditions, the taking over of school teacher unions and socializing churches:
40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influences of parents.
For startling statistics surrounding fatherless children visit Fathers Unite and not the least of which is gun violence, by the way. Or visit any number of other sites that pop-up when searching on the topic, though you’d never guess there were that many given what little we hear of this subject from today’s politicians – including women. Doesn’t that peak your curiosity in the least?
Having finally asked my nagging questions I leave this short article’s good reading (only excerpted here). It’s time this subject became a part of every political discussion laid on “women” and their “reproductive rights.” Or on gun violence and “gun control.” What women and their children – especially America’s children – have a ‘right’ to is the support and dedication of these shameless men – certainly not limited to absent fathers – who have no problem using “women’s rights” and our children for their own self-gratifying personal, financial and political power plays.
By John Renken
(… excerpted) In case you haven’t noticed there is an epidemic … I mean this both literally and figuratively. I don’t think for a second that it is an exaggeration to point to the single most important reason [Americans] are losing ground. The reason we are losing ground is because we have lost the men!
… This particular epidemic … is a problem in our nation. When we look at our educational system we must admit that the vast majority of teachers are females. Peg Tyre in her article “The Trouble with Boys” shows us that boys are having more difficulties in school as the teaching methodologies utilized primarily suit girls. She concludes that,
One of the most reliable predictors of whether a boy will succeed or fail in high school rests on a single question: does he have a man in his life to look up to? Too often, the answer is no. High rates of divorce and single motherhood have created a generation of fatherless boys. In every kind of neighborhood, rich or poor, an increasing number of boys – now a startling 40 percent – are being raised without their biological dads.
Read full article here.
Chances are you haven’t heard (and won’t hear) about this Federal report from the Liberal media.
Two days ago the non-partisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) released its Annual Audit of the United States Government for fiscal years 2011 – 2012. The government’s own conclusion is this:
“… Absent policy changes – the Federal Government continues to face an unsustainable fiscal path.” (Minute 00:35)
That means – if the Federal Government does not stop the wild spending – the U.S. dollar will collapse.
But the beach folks say, “I like it here, I’m not moving,” and eventually the wave comes in and kills them.
That’s exactly what’s happening now.
We The People are allowing this.
Only We can change this.
The best Talking Points I’ve heard in a long time:
One cannot be more dishonorable than the person who uses children as weapons to create political propaganda for one’s sordid self-gain. But when talking about Barack Obama and Democrats, or progressives in general, using children as weapons to gain public popularity in order to destroy constitutional rights, is not unfounded. In fact, it’s the progressive statist way.
Rather than mourn the 20 Newtown children and their teachers, Obama and Washington leaders understand children are the best prop against laws leftists want abolished. Children are after all adorable, and their cute little faces seen reading pleading letters to the president, begging him to outlaw guns so schools never again experience the horrors of Newtown’s Sandy Hook School, is a great way to push party-line agendas and pull the heartstrings of Americans, whom progressives hope to turn against their Second Amendment rights protecting Americans from tyrannical government.
Obama’s anti-gun speech used children for political props in order to pass 23 Executive Orders against guns. What more proof do we need that Obama will stop at nothing, including placing children in the cross-hairs of political misinformation to enact his plans for America, than his actions this week?
It’s been 33 days since the nation’s heart was broken by the horrific, senseless violence that took place at Sandy Hook Elementary School—20—20 beautiful first-graders gunned down in a place that’s supposed to be their second sanctuary. Six members of the staff killed trying to save those children. It’s literally been hard for the nation to comprehend, hard for the nation to fathom.
Yes, it’s true: It’s hard for any law-abiding, loving person to fathom what a psycho did to those children and their teachers. But Adam Lanza does not speak for gun owners or Americans, he was psychotic, he was a monster, he speaks for evil, not law-abiding gun owners.
The truth doesn’t matter to progressives who want the people and their children to see guns as the threat and cause of all violence in America.
Progressives hate the fact that in the hands of law-abiding citizens, guns can stop tyrants and violent criminals coddled by leftists, who believe violent people should be rehabilitated among us while they murder us. And government should control the people. The only way for that to happen is ban guns.
But, instead of telling the truth, Obama used children to disarm guns:
These are our kids [speaking here today in letters to me]. This is what they’re thinking about. And so what we should be thinking about is our responsibility to care for them, and shield them from harm, and give them the tools they need to grow up and do everything that they’re capable of doing — not just to pursue their own dreams, but to help build this country. This is our first task as a society, keeping our children safe. This is how we will be judged. And their voices should compel us to change.
How many children understand politics and legislation? How many children know why the Second Amendment was written? Have the obviously left-wing parents of those children, used as props by Obama the other day, explained the facts to their children, or did those parents do what Obama did: Use their children to invoke anti-gun legislation? The answer is obvious, because no parent who holds the Constitution with regard, and understands the rights it upholds, would ever let their child be used as a weapon against the Second Amendment. But that is what those parents allowed Obama to do to their children.
Obama cleverly concealed his true plan against guns and the Second Amendment:
Let me be absolutely clear. Like most Americans, I believe the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms. I respect our strong tradition of gun ownership and the rights of hunters and sportsmen. There are millions of responsible, law-abiding gun owners in America who cherish their right to bear arms for hunting, or sport, or protection, or collection. I also believe most gun owners agree that we can respect the Second Amendment while keeping an irresponsible, law-breaking few from inflicting harm on a massive scale. I believe most of them agree that if America worked harder to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people, there would be fewer atrocities like the one that occurred in Newtown. That’s what these reforms are designed to do. They’re common-sense measures. They have the support of the majority of the American people.
How many believe Obama supports the right to bear arms? If so, why the constant mention of hunting and sports, but not facts: The Second Amendment protects the citizens against government tyranny.
Obama’s claims were: The Second Amendment is only about sports, hunting and not about protecting yourselves from government tyrants. Obama did not dare tell those children the Second Amendment protects them from government stealing Constitutional rights.
This gun-grab legislation ceremony was also Obama’s attempt to brainwash children into hating guns and gun-owners: Make children believe guns are evil and if outlawed, violence against children and grownups will never again happen in America.
Those children should visit Obama’s Chicago where violent thugs murder daily with guns leftists wont take from thugs.
After Obama finished his anti-gun rant, elementary school age children read letters to the president and us people, pleading for gun bans.
There was an eight year-old from Maryland named Grant who read: “[T]here should be some changes in the law with guns. It’s a free country, but I recommend there needs be a limit with guns.” Grant further declared:
Please don’t let people own machine guns or other powerful guns like that. I think there should be a good reason to get a gun. There should be a limit about how many guns a person can own.
What eight year-old uses such grown-up language as “I recommend,” and “there needs to be a limit,” and “Good reason to get a gun?” Only the parent could have written that letter, because children do not speak with that rhetoric.
There were more letters: A child named Julia said:
I know laws must be passed by Congress, but I beg you [Mr. President] to try very hard to make guns not allowed.
Again, these children have no idea why our Founders passed the Second Amendment, because they obviously have parents who are anti-gun and do not want their children to understand that tyrannical governments destroy people, including children, if people do not have the power to protect themselves from tyrants.
But it is guns that are being called tyrants, not leaders trying to steal people’s rights. It is guns that are made to be seen as the cause of violence, rather than mentally disabled and psychotic people who use guns, or other weapons, to murder people.
The truth was never mentioned nor explained to the children Obama used for his anti-American progressive legislation. Those innocent children were thrown into the political cross-hairs and used as weapons against America’s rights to bear arms.
In late December 2012, the Journal News published names and addresses of legal gun owners in 2 New York counties. The paper obtained the list via a Freedom of Information request (FOIA), compiled the data and published an article entitled, ‘The Gun Owner Next Door’ complete with interactive maps in the online version of the piece. (Link intentionally left out so as not to provide the Journal News with more hits)
Gun owners immediately voiced their concerns saying that publishing such a list unfairly infringes on their privacy and gives criminals a literal road map of homes to attack and which to avoid.
The gun owners may have been correct.
Police are investigating a burglary in White Plains, NY in which the victim’s legally owned weapons may have been the target. The home was on the Journal News gun map.
One lawmaker is outraged by the event and is blaming the paper for the burglary.
State Senator Greg Ball released a harshly worded statement as news of the crime surfaced over the weekend.
“The Journal News has placed the lives of these folks at risk by creating a virtual shopping list for criminals and nut jobs. If the connection is proven, this is further proof that these maps are not only an invasion of privacy, but they present a clear and present danger to law-abiding, private citizens. Former convicts have already testified to the usefulness of the asinine Journal News ‘gun maps’ yet the reckless editors are evidently willing to roll the dice, gambling with the lives of innocent local homeowners.”
The 72 year old victim of the burglary was not home at the time of the robbery and the accused were unable to open the gun safe. One person is in custody.
In retaliation of the Journal News’ list, the NRA published a list of their own. Read here.
Follow me on Twitter! www.twitter.com/erinhaust
Many Americans who watch the Miss America Pageant no doubt wonder if intelligence is still a qualification for young women entering beauty pageants. It appears as long as beauty queens are left-winged and give the desired politically correct answers leftist judges demand, beauty overcomes inglorious stupidity.
I’m speaking of the the latest Miss America Pageant and the beautiful Miss California, who wowed judges with her anti-gun political correctness, but made the “Idiots Hall of Fame” headline’s with her answer to euthanasia: “That’s a vaccine, right?”
My first thought was: “If Euthanasia is a vaccine, strangulation is the best Asthma medication!”
At first I thought Miss California’s brain was perhaps crushed by years of over-weight pageants crowns, until I realized Miss California’s seemingly ignorant answer is 100% correct.
No, I’m not giving stupidity the thumbs up; I’m looking within Miss California’s answer. The young woman has no idea she stated an historical fact: Vaccines do kill diseases, but euthanasia is not about eliminating AIDS or the Flu, it’s about extermination, and you can’t find a better vaccine to kill off mankind than euthanasia.
Obviously Miss California was not joking when she responded. She truly has no idea what euthanasia or eugenics projects are, and for that, the young woman needs to read books containing words and study what she is reading. But despite proving herself ill-educated, Miss California’s brainless comment is historically true.
For instance: Leftist feminist’s ideology demands abortion as the best way to keep a woman’s life free of the hindrance of that nasty pre-existing condition called motherhood. Since pregnancy is viewed by FemiNazis as a disease worse than Cancer and AIDS, as well as the destruction of women’s sex lives, the answer to eliminating the pre-existing condition of motherhood is abortion—euthanasia.
In view of the fact abortion takes the life of unborn children, it technically is euthanasia.
Abortion is the vaccine of all vaccines against unwanted pregnancies for pre-existing conditioned women.
Of course no one in the pageant will ever utter such words. To do so might demoralize women expected to have such high morals, they make Catholic nuns look like street walkers.
History, however, proves Miss California’s uneducated answer true: Euthanasia has vaccinated millions of unwanted human beings from existence.
In author Edwin Black’s book War Against The Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race he discusses how early 19th century, British statistician Francis Galton believed forced sterilization on women considered inferior would prevent a so-called degenerate race, while superior women produced children.
American Charles Davenport, who helped launch radical feminism’s push for abortion with eugenics, believed abortion and sterilization was the answer to creating a perfect society by:
plot[ing] a bold campaign of ‘purging the blood of the American people of the handicapping and deteriorating influences of these anti-social classes,’ meaning the socially unfit, such as epileptics, the feebleminded, the deformed, the deaf, mute and blind.
Davenport’s horrific methods sterilized 50,000 Americans.
Sadly, Miss California would be on the list of “feebleminded, but would be allowed to live, because her looks could produce superior-looking, tall blonde children. And isn’t that of utmost importance!
President Theodore Roosevelt agreed with Davenport’s sterilization and euthanizing of unborn children:
Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce.
The Carnegie Institute and Rockefeller Foundation funded the euthanasia projects in America. By 1904, those seen as unfit to breed children were sterilized or forced into abortions. They were: Native Americans, epileptics, alcoholics, Jews, Mexicans, Blacks, small-time crooks, the mentally ill, the unemployed and homeless. In fact David Rockefeller stated this of China’s Mao
The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.
Look at China today: The One Child Only Policy. Girl children must be aborted or killed after birth to create a male-dominated society.
Rockefeller was so intent on sterilization and abortion for a perfect race; he funded Hitler’s eugenics scientists in order to create the master race.
Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes upheld Virginia’s decision to sterilize a woman named Carrie Buck, because:
Three generations of imbeciles are enough” in this country.
Justice Holmes may have been on to something: Three generations of Kennedys did actually breed “alcoholics,” “imbecile” sleep drivers, and “degenerate” womanizers!
created a board of examiners of feeble-minded, epileptics and other defectives. Under it, the state could determine, ‘when procreation is inadvisable like for criminals, prisoners, poor kids and the ill-defined, other defectives.’
Wilson didn’t realize it, but he classified the whole of Washington leadership in both parties!
Margaret Sanger, who said “The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it,” set up the Negro Project to sterilize black mothers and “exterminate” unborn black children.
Hitler was so taken with America’s euthanasia plan; he used abortion and sterilization to euthanize the unborn children of Jewish women and mentally disabled women. This was Hitler’s way of vaccinating unfit women’s bodies in order to produce a pure Aryan race.
400,000 Germans were sterilized against their will, while 800,000 abortions were performed yearly. Germany literally began losing its population due to euthanasia. The result was the Lebensborn Born Project: impregnate as many German women by SS soldiers to create the master race. Many of those children were killed because they didn’t look Nordic.
Miss California has no idea just how point on her ill-educated answer is. It’s too bad the young woman doesn’t have a clue as to what euthanasia is and what it has done to the world, as well as her own country, or she could have answered by saying: “Euthanasia? You can’t find a better vaccine against humanity and breeding what progressives consider unfit-to-live people than sterilization and abortion.”
Now all America needs to do is give Roman Polanski America’s “Baby-Sitting” award of the century!
For reasons that can only be deemed a-love-of-all-things-immoral-and-licentious, Americans have come to idolize rapists, molesters, murderers, and thugs of every sort.
If you raise your children to be decent, law-abiding people, discipline them with love, teach them that God is real and God loves them, tell them they must achieve what they dream through hard work, don’t expect Americans to hold you in high regard. Morals and values are for old-fashioned idiots.
Case in point: The Father’s Day/Mother’s Day Council Inc. declares:
The Father’s Day/Mother’s Day Council, Inc. is a not-for-profit, non-commercial, all volunteer association. Our mission is to promote the celebration, observation, and preservation of the holidays Mother’s Day and Father’s Day by focusing on the value of good sound parenting.
I’ve no doubt Bill Clinton loves his daughter, but doesn’t sound parenting and being a good father include fidelity? Apparently not.
America no longer values traditional values that create functional, well-rounded citizens. Adultery and fathering children by as many women as possible—while living under the same roof with all those women a man sleeps with—is now considered the utmost in upstanding morals.
The left is gushing over their favorite serial molester—after rapist Roman Polanski of course—Bill Clinton, who is receiving the “Father of the Year” award. Huffington Post noted that “National Father’s Day Committee chairman Dan Orwig commended the politician and philanthropist.”
USA Today said Orwig gave Clinton the award for his:
profound generosity, leadership and tireless dedication to both his public office and many philanthropic organizations, President Clinton exemplifies the attributes that we celebrate through the Father of the Year award.
Cheating on your wife, being accused of rape, losing your law license after lying under oath, and being impeached is what The Father’s Day Mother’s Day Council considers exemplary characteristics for fathers? No wonder reality TV is promoting single fatherhood and motherhood (16 and Pregnant), as well as fathering as many children as (All My Babies Mama’s) possible, by as many women a man can have sex with, as normal.
Forget traditional fathers and happily married devoted husbands like father of five and grandfather of 15, presidential candidate Governor Mitt Romney: That man is over-populating the country! And heaven forbid we award the happily married Catholic Senator Rick Santorum! That father of seven children is a creationist, who supports the War on Terror, is against abortion and gay marriage, demands religious freedom for Christians, and home schools his seven children!
Men like Romney and Santorum are ruining America’s new-found ideology of “do whatever makes you happy.” We need to look to the scumbags and morons of Hollywood if we want our children to have role models they can look up to.
For instance: Drug-addicted, alcoholic, wife beater Charlie Sheen, who was fired from his TV show “Two and a Half Men,” only to become a national hero by displaying his outlandish and debauched life-style in TV interviews. That led to Americans following Sheen by the tens of thousands on Twitter. It also gave Sheen TV commercials where Sheen makes fun of himself, and now, a new and highly rated TV show “Anger Management,” devoting constant innuendos to Sheen’s real life. Charlie Sheen is an icon to today’s young America.
Next: Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, who committed adultery together when Pitt was married to actress Jennifer Aniston. Pitt dumped Aniston for mistress Jolie, whom he refuses to marry, but continues to get pregnant, until gay marriage is legal in all 50 states. Pitt and Jolie’s lives are idolized by Americans.
Next we have reality TV’s superstar foul-mouth: The un-wed “Jersey Shore” mother Snooki, who is famous for doing nothing but drinking, partying, brawling, cussing on TV, and excessive tanning and shopping sprees spent on New Jersey taxpayer’s dime. None of this matters to America’s younger generation, who aspire to be more like Snooki (as well as her drunken, party-boy male co-stars), than well-educated leaders like Governor Sarah Palin and Congresswoman Michele Bachmann and Rep. Lt. Col. Allen West and Senator Marco Rubio.
America’s youth look up to the likes of rappers, whose songs glorify rape and cop killing, as well as mass murderer Charles Manson, who, over the years, has become an icon to music celebrities and their fans.
So, is it any wonder the man accused of rape, who had sex in the oval office, lied about the affair under oath, was impeached and lost his law license as a result, ignored Osama bin Laden, disqualifying bin Laden as a threat when Clinton had the chance to take the terrorist into custody years before 9/11, is awarded “Father of the Year?”
If rap singers, who shoot people, are glorified, but not condemned by the government gunning for guns, and drug addicts and alcoholics are praised as kool, and adulterers are looked upon as people to aspire to, why on earth aren’t we handing Roman Polanski an award for “Baby-Sitter of the Century?”
Leave it to the socialist/collectivist/statist, low-life expectancy, gun-banned UK to blame the United State’s low life expectancy on American gun-ownership and not the fact America has aborted over 54 million children, who, if allowed to live, would be populating this nation’s future.
Never blame abortion for population decline; you might wage war on selfish women’s sexual life-styles, which includes sex, getting pregnant, and aborting that infringement on women’s non-existent constitutional privacy rights.
Infringe the Second Amendment; its guns are decreasing the population!
According to England’s Daily Mail:
The lax gun rules are a major contributor to the low life expectancy rate that Americans have compared to their global counterparts. A new report reveals that of the 17 wealthiest countries, American males have the lowest life expectancy of 75.6 years and their female counterparts are the second lowest in the rankings coming in at 80.7 years.
Those mortality numbers are not caused by guns, thousands die each year in America from Influenza.
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) says 71,382 Americans died from the flu in 2007. That year, 23,199 Americans died from alcohol related deaths, and by 2011, the CDC says the leading causes of death in America continue to be “heart disease, cancer, and stroke.”
[I]n 2006, Last up to date numbers [for gun deaths], 30,896 total, of which, 642 accidental, 16,883 were Suicide, 12,791 were Homicide, 220 were Undetermined and 360 by Legal intervention. Remember that in the same year, 43,664 [people] were killed in Motor vehicle accidents, 37,286 died from poisoning, 20,823 died from unintention falls. In 2005 CDC reported 652,091 people died from heart disease, 559,312 from cancer and 143,579 from stroke.
The University of Utah points out that “In the U.S. for 2010, there were 31,513 deaths from firearms.” The causes of these guns deaths were the combination of “Suicide 19,308; Homicide 11,015; Accident 600.”
Guns did not make the CDC’s 15 leading causes of death in America for 2011.
Never mind facts, leftists are determined to blame America’s population decline on guns, not leading causes such as disease, or heaven forbid, something far more significant annihilating human life daily: Abortion.
The truth is leftists don’t give a flying fart in space when it comes to unborn children. The left only cares about children born and old enough to enter classrooms where they can be indoctrinated into believing government control of every aspect of citizen’s lives improves health. Guns, however, are evil, but not pedophilia against children’s little bodies, which is just another sexual orientated life-style choice.
Gun deaths compared to mothers who willingly allow doctors to vacuum their unborn children from the womb and toss babies in trash cans is low.
Using GI figures through 2008, estimating 1,212,400 abortions for 2009 through 2011, and factoring in the possible 3% undercount GI estimates for its own figures, the total number of abortions performed in the U.S. since 1973 equals 54,559,615.
Abortion in black communities is far higher than gun deaths in American black communities.
[B]lack women are more than 5 times as likely as white women to have an abortion. On average, 1,876 black babies are aborted every day in the United States.
This incidence of abortion has resulted in a tremendous loss of life. It has been estimated that since 1973 Black women have had about 16 million abortions.
The number is calculated at 36 million black American women, whom BG says:
[R]epresents an enormous loss,” [because had] America’s Black community [not aborted 16 million children, there] would now number 52 million persons. It would be 36 percent larger than it is. Abortion has swept through the Black community like a scythe, cutting down every fourth member.
black women are more than four times more likely than non-Hispanic white women to have an abortion, and Hispanic women are 2.7 times as likely.
“In the US, every day during 2007, about 266 Americans were shot. Every day, a third of them (82 daily) died.” That overall number is extremely low compared to abortion.
Notice the left refuses to declare abortion what it truly is: Race murder.
For the left, murder is only murder when guns are involved. Gun deaths are treated as the most threatening thing to life in America. Abortion simply keeps the planet’s population (which the left is only concerned about when guns are involved) low.
The United States does not have 1,876 gun murders daily in America’s black communities; murder-by-abortion doctors is helping decrease America’s population, most specifically black Americans.
Your “Babies Mama’s” don’t need guns to decrease population; Margaret Sanger’s vile plan to decrease America’s black population is succeeding.
The Daily Mail skimmed facts while blaming guns for U.S. population decline: “The United States has about six violent deaths per 100,000 residents and none of the 16 other countries included in the review came anywhere close to that ratio.” But:
The researchers said there is little evidence that violent acts occur more frequently in the United States than elsewhere. It’s the lethality of those attacks that stands out…‘One behavior that probably explains the excess lethality of violence and unintentional injuries in the United States is the widespread possession of firearms and the common practice of storing them (often unlocked) at home. The statistics are dramatic,’ the report said.
Daily Mail admits:
The U.S. also suffers higher rates of drug-related deaths, infant mortality and AIDS…The nation’s health disadvantages have economic consequences as they lead to higher costs for consumers and taxpayers as well as a workforce that remains less healthy than that of other high-income countries.
Notice the quick mention of disease that shifted to blaming America’s economy for disease deaths. That’s the subtle statist insinuation that if America had free, socialized [tax-funded] medicine, we would not have people dying from diseases. Just like Europeans, who die from diseases, because socialism forbids full healthcare until your Cancer reaches stage 4, or you have a fatal gun-shot to the head.
The Mail won’t admit guns are not the problem, guns are not decreasing population, and aside from disease and seasonal viruses; abortion is the epidemic decreasing the United State’s population rate by the thousands each day.
No, abortion was never mentioned in the Mail, nor will abortion be mentioned by Stalin-sympathizing, Gulag thug leftists who believe children are not worth crying over unless they are born, and then shot to death, by psychotic murderers.
The truth is, when guns are used to do what abortion doctors do by the thousands each day—kill, then leftists consider killing children murder.
Harry Reid is up in arms over John Boehner’s “Plan B,” insisting the plan will hurl America over the fiscal cliff and force the nation to default its loans.
Memo to Harry Reid: America is $16 trillion in debt. I think it’s safe to assume you leaders defaulted America when we passed the $1 trillion mark.
Furthermore, if you’re going to feign indignant outrage, don’t do it over John Boehner’s liberal Democrat actions. Boehner’s no different than you Harry: You’re both sticking it to the people!
As to Speaker Boehner, he’s is nothing more than a liberal Democrat in GOP clothing. He has no intentions of demanding deep tax-and-spend cuts or he never would have agreed to the 2011 debt ceiling hike. If Boehner truly wanted to cut spending, he would have called the Democrat’s bluff: Demand they cut billions from government-funded programs like Planned Parenthood. Nancy Pelosi’s facelift would hit the floor, but, calling for deep cuts in areas taxpayers do not want to fund is the kind of demands conservatives want, not tax-hikes on the wealthy, as Boehner’s “Plan B” demands.
Despite “Plan B” being nothing more than anti-wealth socialist collectivism, Reid says:
Speaker Boehner’s ‘plan B’ is the farthest thing from a balanced approach. It will not protect middle class families because it cannot pass both Houses of Congress. The Senate bill is the only ‘plan B’ that can be signed into law and prevent taxes from rising by $2,200 on the average middle-class family. Now is the time to show leadership, not kick the can down the road. Speaker Boehner should focus his energy on forging a large-scale deficit reduction agreement. It would be a shame if Republicans abandoned productive negotiations due to pressure from the Tea Party, as they have time and again.
Give me a break! John Boehner lays down and rolls over for Obama and spending hikes like a Paris Hilton sex video!
I’m surprised Harry Reid isn’t praising “Plan B;” it’s progressive Democrat legislation: More tax-and-spend hikes on millionaire earners that will trickle down to the middle class, creating more job and business losses and more government dependency.
Reid is angry. He says “John Boehner seems to care more about keeping his speakership than keeping the nation on firm financial footing.” If I didn’t know better I would say Harry was talking about himself and every other leader serving unconstitutional life terms.
Its obvious Harry Reid doesn’t spend much time around Speaker Boehner or Reid would realize they are two of a kind: They care more about their careers than serving the country and fixing America’s economy.
Still, Reid is in a huff over Boehner’s tax-hiking fiscal cliff standoff. As if any legislative standoff will stop the bill-shoving Obama from hiking taxes on American earners in 2013.
Reid blames Boehner, insisting he is pushing America over the fiscal cliff with a plan that terminates Bush-era tax-cuts to those earning $250,000 and under. Reid says this debacle could be avoided if only Boehner would concede to Senate legislation. Political translation: Concede to Harry Reid. America’s dilemma: All Boehner ever does is concede.
America has a debt crisis both parities contributed to. None of these spendaholic leaders ever admits that America goes over the fiscal cliff every time the Federal Reserve cuts interests rates too low, over prints worthless paper, and the federal government over spends, lends and borrows what it cannot repay.
That didn’t stop Reid from calling Boehner a “dictator” who won’t go against the GOP, because Boehner caterers to his fellow Republican leaders:
The American people I don’t think understand the House of Representatives is operating without the House of Representatives. It’s being operated by a dictatorship of the speaker, not allowing the vast majority of the House of Representatives to get what they want…If the 250 [cut-off for income tax votes] were brought up, it would pass overwhelmingly.
Furthermore, Reid insists “what goes on [in the GOP] shouldn’t be decided by the majority, it should be decided by the whole House of Representatives.”
Reid never made that statement when Nancy Pelosi was Speaker of the House. Nor will Reid admit his statements reflect the way President Obama pushes bills into law without a “majority” Congressional consent.
As to dictators, most leaders in Washington are dictators, the reason many Americans dislike the modern-day government. Both parties have become power-grabbing life-termed aristocrats who care more about party loyalty than working to preserve, uphold, and defend the Constitution. That’s why the Tea Party started.
Reid himself admitted to the Senate that conservatives are sick and tired of Boehner:
He has so many people over there [in the GOP] that won’t follow what he wants, That’s obvious from the debacle that took place that week [with Tea Party leaders saying no to “Plan B”]. And it was a debacle. It was so bad, he was in such difficult shape there, he wouldn’t even allow a vote to take place with his Republicans because he knew he would lose.
Conservative House members are furious with Boehner because he silenced their votes, removed their committee seats, trashed the Tea Party, and acts like Harry Reid: He legislates as Democrat and compromises to Obama.
Boehner has not presented one, single plan that significantly cuts spending, decreases the deficit, and reduces taxes for every American.
According to The Economist:
“Plan B” is a bill that hikes taxes only for income over $1 m[illion] per year, with no other spending measures or tax compromises…Mr. Boehner’s Plan B is an attempt to defray blame for the fiscal cliff onto Democrats, but if the country actually goes over the cliff, Plan B is unlikely to shield Republicans. Pressure from business groups and from taxpayers to reach a compromise deal before the economy suffers serious damage will become immense.
Hiking taxes on millionaires will crush middle class businesses that earn $1-$5 million before taxes. “Plan B” is another compromise for government programs to continue spending billions through taxes and increasing debt as America defaults.
Both Reid and Obama should be jumping for joy; John Boehner has been a gift to the DNC: He’s just like Harry Reid, a liberal Democrat.