Tag Archives: elite

Robosigning to Robosettlement to Roboslaves

housing crisisLet’s keep this short and easy.  The banks own you.

They own your houses and most of your cars and your land and your government.  Oops, did I say that out loud.  Well if they didn’t, wouldn’t the government have actually punished the banks for the illegal, specifically fraudulent practice of “Robosigning”?  In stead they helped the banks in every way possible.

OK, if you heard anything form the lame-stream media, it was that the banks just got hit with a stiff $26 billion fine.  Fine.

Actually it was a “settlement.”   But that’s not all!  Of that $26 billion, over $20 billion worth are secured loans covered by Fannie & Freddie, pension funds, insurers, and 401(k)s  all backed by “we the taxpayers.”   In short, we take it in the shorts.

So, what the banks are left holding is $5 Billion, which is about $2000 per loan, or about 1% of the average $200,000 loan.  Oh, and the banks themselves are to report each loan and fine.  Good luck with that.

But wait, there’s more!  Having settled this, those huge bundles of low expectation loans are now worth much more.  Happy banks.  How much more remains to be seen, but certainly greater than 1% more.  So once again the banks get bailed out by … um … us.

But wait, there’s more!

It’s funny how “we the people” sounds like we’re in charge, but in the modern world of doublespeak it only means “we the burden bearers.”  So if you are one of those radical folks who are worried about becoming enslaved by some elite and powerful group, worry no more.  More and more of whatever you do for employment, you do for “da man.”  It is just a matter of who “dat man” is.  You might fight all those “Progressives” who have infiltrated and inflated our government, but who owns the government?

Well if the government were actually in charge, they would have done as any logical party who discovered and investigated blatant institutionalized fraud.  But no, the Federal task force didn’t use what they found to uncover a huge conspiracy between all banks.  After all such a coordinated widespread standard of fraud might kinda, maybe, suggests a conspiracy to those prone to such delusional thoughts that there is a deeper corruption, but our Federal task force decided to settle without a hearing.  This not only lets the bank structure off the hook, but shoots holes in State level suits as in New York, Massachusetts, and Delaware.

But wait!  There’s even more.  There is a new Federal Foreclosure Task Force to watch over us.  Doesn’t that make you feel better?  More tax money is being spent to pay more federal employees to ensure we don’t look any further behind the new curtain they have just pulled over our eyes.  Well that’s only if you call headlines that the settlement is a big victory for you, “a curtain.”

Don’t wait!  There’s always more.  Just uncover your eyes and spread the word.

Judicial Watch Sues U.S. Air Force for Documents on Cost of Michelle Obama’s Family Trip to Africa

Military Aircraft Alone Reportedly Cost at least $430,000

WASHINGTON, Aug. 25, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Judicial Watch, the organization that investigates and fights government corruption, announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit on August 19, 2011, against the United States Air Force to obtain records related to theJune 21-27, 2011, trip taken by First Lady Michelle Obama, her family, and her staff to South Africa and Botswana.  Judicial Watch is seeking the documents to determine details about the trip and, in particular, a breakdown of the costs to taxpayers (Judicial Watch v. USAF (No. 11-1496)).

The Judicial Watch FOIA request filed on June 28, 2011, seeks:

  • Any and all records concerning mission taskings of First Lady Michelle Obama’s June 21-27, 2011trip to South Africa and Botswana.
  • Any and all records of concerning transportation costs for Mrs. Obama’s June 21-27 trip to South Africa and Botswana.
  • Any and all passenger manifests (DD-2131) for Mrs. Obama’s June 21-27, 2011 trip to South Africaand Botswana.

According the U.S. Postal Service records, Judicial Watch’s FOIA request was received by the Air Force on July 6, 2011. A response to the request was due within 20 working days, or by August 3, 2011.  As ofAugust 19, 2011, the date of the complaint, the Air Force has failed to produce the records requested or respond with a date they will be forthcoming.

The professed purpose of Mrs. Obama’s trip was to encourage young people living in South Africa andBotswana to get involved in national affairs.  The First Lady’s remarks focused on education, health, and wellness issues.  However, accompanied by her daughters Malia and Sasha, her mother, Marian Robinson, and her niece and nephew, Leslie and Avery Robinson, the trip also included such tourist events as visits to historical landmarks and museums as well as a visit with Nelson Mandela, described by Mrs. Obama as “surreal.”  The trip ended with a private family safari at a South African game reserve before the group returned to Washington on June 27.

Judicial Watch is investigating the total cost of the trip to the taxpayers in the face of a ballooning federal debt and a sinking economy.  As stated in an analysis by White House Dossier (the blog of White House reporter Keith Koffer, who writes for CongressDailyNational JournalRoll Call and Politico), the cost to taxpayers for the C-32 was $430,000 alone.  This cost is based on an estimated charge of $12,723 an hour, which is what the Department of Defense charges other federal agencies for use of the aircraft.  If a military cargo plane was included ‒ which typically accompanies a First Lady ‒ the cost of transportation could have escalated by another $200,000.

Other costs, such as Secret Service protection, the care and feeding of staff, and pre-trip advance work done by administration officials in Africa, cannot be determined without examining records.

“How much did the American people spend to send the First Lady on a family outing in Africa?  That’s what we want to know,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.  “On the surface, the trip seems to have been totally unnecessary and was as much an excuse for the Obama family to go on a safari as it was a mission intended to advance the nation’s business in Africa.”

What is Bilderberg Group?

In the height of all the controversy, and with blame at a heightened state in Washington, many of the candidates running in the 2012 election are gearing up for opposition. Texas Governor, Rick Perry, has not announced yet if he will run. As all the new candidates are under scrutiny by the media there has been some speculation that Perry is part of a secret group of elitists by the name of Bilderberg. The group may be part of a select few whose goals are to develop an international agenda.

The group was established in 1954, the Bilderberg Group holds annual meetings, which are by invitation only for the most wealthy and powerful people. Roughly one-third of those who attend are Americans and the rest are European. The group took the name Bilderberg after their first meeting which was held in Oosterbeek, Netherlands at the Hotel de Bilderberg.  There are those who believe the group is made up of an elite group of people whose strategic goal is a new world order. They meet to discuss, and influence, the changing global, political, economic and social landscape. Bilderberg -Planning on a New World Order. What appears to be the official website of Bilderberg is rather vague, but to the point. If it is in fact the groups web-site cannot be confirmed, however information on the site states:

What is unique about Bilderberg as a forum is

  • the broad cross-section of leading citizens that are assembled for nearly three days of informal and off-the-record discussion about topics of current concern especially in the fields of foreign affairs and the international economy;
  • the strong feeling among participants that in view of the differing attitudes and experiences of the Western nations, there remains a clear need to further develop an understanding in which these concerns can be accommodated;
  • the privacy of the meetings, which has no purpose other than to allow participants to speak their minds openly and freely.Bilderberg Meetings | The official website.

Governor Perry gets endorsement for Presidential election from Bilderberg according to Paul Joseph Watson of InfoWars.com. In an article he states, “While spewing Tea Party-style rhetoric about  secession, shooting coyotes and courting the favor of Christian evangelicals,  behind closed doors Perry has been quietly selling out Texas to globalist  interests, auctioning off  highways to foreign companies to turn them into profit-driven toll  roads.”

“Speculation that Perry is the Bilderberg group’s  ace card was prompted by the current political climate, which can largely be  gleaned from the fact that Perry is a longtime, unwavering supporter of the  NAFTA Superhighway and related infrastructure projects,” wrote  AFP’s Jim Tucker earlier this month. “These pave the way for the  Bilderberg-supported North American Union (NAU) proposal that would merge the  U.S., Canada and Mexico.” via » Bilderberg-Approved Perry Set to Become Presidential Frontrunner Alex Jones’ Infowars: There’s a war on for your mind!  Although he is clearly violating the Logan Act, Governor Perry still attends the 2007 Bilderberg conference. viaBusted! Kathleen Sebelius admitts that she and Rick Perry are Bilderberg Group attendees! – Orange County: Campaign For Liberty. The Logan Act is a US federal law which prohibits unauthorized citizens from negotiating with foreign governments. It was passed in 1799 and amended in 1994, violation of the law is a felony, punishable with up to three years in prison.

Executive Director Wes Benedict of the Libertarian Party expressed his voice regarding Mr. Perry. He said about Governor Perry, “You supported Lance Armstrong’s 3 billion dollar Texas taxpayer funded medical research center. That’s like Obama-Care. you secured a 300 million dollar business handout slush fund for you and just the two leaders of the legislature to dole out to whomever you felt like being friendly to.” He also went on to accuse Perry of a state business tax, setting up state toll booths on the TX highways, and signing an executive order which forces Texas schoolgirls to get the HPV vaccine – whether they, or their parents, want it or not. via Rick Perry slammed by Libertarian Director: video | Libertarian Party

Governor Perry has stated he will announce his plan to run for President this Saturday. Is it a good idea or not? You decide, and while you’re at it, you may want to look into all the candidates for yourself. Remember, the campaign trail has an historical record for producing a lot of rhetoric and very little action once they are in office.

Special thanks to those of you who provided information for this article.

Hollywood’s Mask Comes Off

After years of denial or dismissal from the left, the mask of Hollywood has finally come off. However, it is not something that I imagine the “elite” of Tinsel Town really expected.

In interviews with what they thought to be a liberal reporter (because, come on- any “good” reporter worth sitting down with is liberal, right??) several Hollywood producers used words such as “idiots” and “medieval minds” when referring to conservatives.

In reality, all it takes is a baseball cap with a liberal college logo-  Harvard- and the fact that the reporter’s last name is “Shapiro”, and you have the perfect scene for the latest expose’ of the liberal agenda.

Mr. Shapiro conducted the interviews for his book, Primetime Propaganda: The True Hollywood Story of How the Left Took Over Your TV, which was just released this past Tuesday.

In reading what these executives had to say in the interviews with Mr. Shapiro, what I find more than just a little bit amusing is how in this day and age where you can find out anything about anyone with just a few keystrokes on a computer, it does not appear that very many, if any of the 39 Hollywood executives interviewed bothered to “google”  the name Ben Shapiro. As Mr. Shapiro states,

“Most of them didn’t Google me. If they had, they would have realized where I am politically,” he said. “I played on their stereotypes. When I showed up for the interviews, I wore my Harvard Law baseball cap — my name is Ben Shapiro and I attended Harvard, so there’s a 98.7 percent chance I’m a liberal. Except I happen not to be.”

So it doesn’t look like the elite know so much after all!

One thing that I find quite interesting is how these people who claim to be so “tolerant” of others show their true colors! The truth is they are “tolerant” of people that have the same views as they do, but as soon as someone comes along who does not agree with their agenda they are not so tolerant after all.

Just more proof of the hypocrisy of the left.

In another quote from the article about Mr. Shapiro’s book:

Another video Shapiro will release shortly has producer-director Nicholas Meyer being asked point-blank whether conservatives are discriminated against in Hollywood. “Well, I hope so,” he answers. Meyer also admits his political agenda for “The Day After,” a TV movie he directed for ABC that was seen by 100 million people when it aired in 1983.

Wow! I’m guessing Mr. Meyer was not counting on that statement being made public!

I also find it very interesting that liberals have no problem at all pushing their agenda, yet if we conservatives- especially God-fearing, Bible believing, gun-toting conservatives just so much as breathe our beliefs or want to make a movie about our beliefs we are called bigoted, racists, extremists, and any other derogatory name they can think of.

The bottom line comes down to this: if you are a conservative with dreams of becoming a Hollywood star, you would do best to keep your mouth shut about your political beliefs or just find another dream to pursue.

Or, another idea: I say the conservatives in Hollywood ban together and revolt against this leftist agenda! In the modern age of the Internet, Netflix, and other options who needs the left? Who needs the network TV stations? And for that matter, who needs Primetime TV? There’s very little that comes out of Tinsel Town worth watching at all anymore anyway! On the rare occasion that something decent DOES come out it is canceled after half a season, or a complete season at most!

The leftist agenda has indeed taken over what is produced for TV. They have completely “dumbed down” what once was quality entertainment.  Just like everything within the leftist agenda it’s been a slow process. But the slippery slope that began forty years ago has been quite successful. We are now left with “reality shows” and we call that entertainment.

I say let the leftist liberals continue their agenda on Primetime TV. Let Hollywood continue the downward spiral into the abyss they seem to crave. We conservatives can put our money- advertising funds, production funds, funds for conservative actors- whatever it takes- to create a conservative entertainment outlet. What that is I don’t know- I am a writer, not a movie or TV producer. But I know with the collective minds of the conservative movement the answer is out there!

It’s All About Them – and Only Them

This week has been full of self-interested politicians .. being self-interested.  Christine O’Donnell pointed out the elitistm with her “ruling class” comments on Friday .. then .. the elitists just went and proved her point.

Lisa Murkowski has announced that she will be a write-in candidate against the Joe Miller who defeated her in the primary.  Her motives are those of self-interest.  She believes she is entitled to that Senate seat – damn the will of the people.  She lost in a primary.  The people have spoken, but she’s not listening.

Then again, when we look at how Mike Castle has handled losing to Christine O’Donnell in Delaware, it becomes obvious that those that associate themselves so closely with established politics are all self-interested elitists.  Castle is refusing to endorse the candidate that defeated him in the primary and took calls from the White House shortly after losing.  Will he pull a Charlie Crist and come back as an independent to split the Conservative vote?  Would fit his lack of character perfectly.

As the piece-de-resistance, we get our President deciding that the Declaration of Independence has it wrong.  By deciding to omit “Creator” from the a reciting of the document, is he saying that the rights are endowed to us .. by him, the Obarrassment?  The striking omission is in this video around the 22:30 mark.