Home >> Politics >> State of the Union 2013 Edition: What it Was and Wasn’t

State of the Union 2013 Edition: What it Was and Wasn’t

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “State of the Union 2013 Edition: What it Was and Wasn’t”.

READ:  Leftist Revolt Against DNC Boss Tom Perez Begins With Calls for #DemExit

Looking for more great news and commentary from a conservative perpective? Visit our homepage!

About Richard Larsen

AP award winning columnist Richard Larsen is President of Larsen Financial, a brokerage and financial planning firm in Pocatello, Idaho, and is a graduate of Idaho State University with a BA in Political Science and History and former member of the Idaho State Journal Editorial Board. He can be reached at [email protected]


  1. I’m going to keep saying this;

    We have no legal President. This man has come to power under the most dubious circumstances of any election I am aware of. There were outright illegal votes, intimidation at the polls, coercion and unqualified voters.

    Furthermore, Obama has ignored his Sacred Oath to uphold the Constitution and he has taken plenty of opportunity to act outside of the Constitution in attempts to further his agenda.

    So. We can continue to Just decry his lying, his illegal use of office and his continuing destruction of our Nation or we can decry his treachery AND act immediately to remove him. There is no shortage of reason to impeach him! We need to do this now!

    We need to jerk the tail of the Progressive Left Emos – hard! – and bring them back to reality – they have no mandate to destroy us; We the People are in Charge. We the People need to act and make it so!

  2. Richard, as expected, you’ve clearly sumerized what is in most minds. To me it ‘all’ just how grossly expensive ‘perpetual campaigning’ is. ‘Funding’ guide lines don’t apply when using ‘revenue’ from taxpayers like us. This is apparently the legal method of stealing or misappropriation….Then it could mean that this ?? in office is so terribly insecure in his ability & decision making that he is compelled to continoulosy ‘sell’ himself & pimp for his “socially inclined” handlers….eithr way, We are without leadership!!! A disaster in itself….I tend to take a different perspective on the SOTU speech, I found it more a first person’s cling to power & self elavation that ideological. ..While the so-called ‘insiders reports’ should not be taken as gospel, many of the personallity traits & habits seem reflectd in his presentations. (I think) even ‘he’ is begining to realize that he is clueless & getting close to losing his ‘handlers’ support & recalls how quickly groups like ‘MediaMatters’ Soros switched from Hillary to him…..I admit that if I was standing outside soaking wet & he said it was raining, I’d have serious doubts…with that, Richard, keep on doing what you do so well