By
R. Mitchell on Nov 10, 2011 in
Politics
Conservative Daily News allows a great deal of latitude in the topics contributors choose and their approaches to the content. This is due to our approach that citizens have a voice, not only the mass media. Readers will likely not agree with every contributor or every post, but find reasons to think about the topic and respond with comments. We value differing opinions as well as those that agree. Opinions of contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of CDN, Anomalous Media or staff. Click here if you'd like to write for CDN.
Put This Story in your Circles and Share with your Friends
Tags: Cain, CNBC, debate, huntsman, Jim Cramer, Michele Bachmann, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, Ron Paul, U.S. economy
Was Ron Paul not at the debate? I don’t see his name anywhere in this post..
I have always thought Newt was electable. Who has been telling us he’s not all these years? Why it’s been our wonderful, objective, pure as the wind-driven snow press of course, with absolutely no ax to grind whatsoever, right?
If we really want to talk electability here, picture each one of these candidates in a 1 on 1 debate with Obama – Lincoln/Douglas style or otherwise – and which one would absolutely clean his clock? Pretty clear to me.
All in all it was a pretty decent debate. (IMO) Yes, that was despite Jim Cramer giving off the appearance of being a mentally deranged attention seeker whom should not ever have been anywhere near this debate. While Perry did have what only can be described as a huge brain fart, heck, Obama has had them 24/7 for over 3 years now, and nobody in the media brings that up much. Newt was very good, Huntsman surprised me with some solid answers, and Herman Cain did quite well in describing what this country needs to turn it around in 2013.
I too am starting to really appreciate the experience and straight-forwardness that Newt brings to these debates and which he could bring to the White House in 2013.