What’s Behind the Attacks on Crisis Pregnancy Centers

In the aftermath of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, abortion activists and the powerful abortion lobby have turned their attention to the anti-abortion pregnancy centers that have saved so many lives in the nearly 50 years since Roe v. Wade was originally decided.

A radical pro-abortion group that calls itself Jane’s Revenge has perpetrated dozens of attacks on centers that provide resources for pregnant women in need. Clinics in Massachusetts, California, Washington, Oregon, Minnesota, Iowa, Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas, Louisiana, Alabama, Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, Washington, D.C., Maryland, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine and Alaska have been vandalized in the past few months, including broken windows, smashed doors and graffiti. Clinics in Colorado, Wisconsin, Oregon, and New York have been firebombed. The attackers frequently leave messages spray-painted or written in fake blood saying things like, “If abortion isn’t safe neither are you,” “Abort the (United States Supreme) Court” and “God loves abortion,” along with anarchist symbols.

Jane’s Revenge has published statements taking responsibility for the attacks. After the firebombing attacks in Wisconsin, the group published a statement demanding that “all anti-choice establishments” and “fake clinics” disband within 30 days and promising to ramp up their violence. When 30 days elapsed, they published another statement declaring “open season” on all anti-abortion organizations: “We have demonstrated in the past month how easy and fun it is to attack … We promised to take increasingly drastic measures against oppressive infrastructures. Rest assured that we will, and those measures may not come in the form of something so easily cleaned up as fire and graffiti.”

Although Facebook has labeled Jane’s Revenge a terrorist organization, per parent company Meta’s official policy, the FBI — which entertained invitations to consider parents at school board meetings a national threat — has yet to make any such official designation.

It isn’t just fringe anarchist groups; leftist politicians are also on the warpath, with Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) taking the lead. In an interview two weeks ago, Warren accused anti-abortion pregnancy centers of “torture” and said, “In Massachusetts right now, those crisis pregnancy centers that are there to fool people who are looking for pregnancy termination help outnumber true abortion clinics by three to one. We need to shut them down here in Massachusetts, and we need to shut them down all around the country.”

Warren is co-sponsoring legislation that would fine anti-abortion pregnancy centers $100,000 for anti-abortion “disinformation” — without defining the term. And she is among several prominent Democrats pressuring Google to restrict the appearance of anti-abortion pregnancy centers in their online search engine, and to attach disclaimers when those centers do appear in searches.

These are only the latest efforts by Democrats to crush those who offer pregnant women choices other than abortion. In 2015, the state of California passed the Reproductive FACT Act, a state law that required anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers to advertise for abortion services provided at other locations, and imposed stiff fines for failing to do so. Vice President Kamala Harris was the attorney general of California at the time, and issued a statement saying that she was “proud to have co-sponsored the Reproductive FACT Act, which ensures that all women have … the facts they need to make informed decisions about their health and their lives.”

The National Institute of Family and Life Advocates sued the state of California, arguing that the Reproductive FACT Act violated their constitutionally protected freedom of speech. Current Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra (who became California’s AG when Harris was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2016) defended the law as the litigation made its way through the courts.

In 2018, the United States Supreme Court struck down the Act as unconstitutional.

The editors of National Review remarked at the time, “(T)he state intentionally targeted anti-abortion health centers … No other health centers were subject to the law’s requirements — which, we rather suspect, was the point … (T)he state had a clear bias against anti-abortion groups and in favor of the abortion industry (the bill was drafted with the assistance of Planned Parenthood executives).”

What was Planned Parenthood’s motivation then? The same as it is now: money.

An NPR article published the day of the NIFLA v. Becerra decision pointed out that there were 2,700 crisis pregnancy centers in the U.S. — “more than three times the number” of abortion clinics (the same ratio Warren mentioned in her recent quote).

More importantly, crisis pregnancy centers have an extraordinary success rate. The majority of women who visit anti-abortion pregnancy centers decide to have their babies. (Here in South Bend, Indiana, the anti-abortion Women’s Care Center reports that more than 90% of the women they see carry their pregnancies to term.) This threatens the business model of abortion clinics across the country like Planned Parenthood, which performs about 40% of all abortions in the United States. Planned Parenthood likes to claim that abortions are only 4% of their services, but abortion — not pregnancy testing, contraception or STI screening — is the source of most of the Planned Parenthood clinics’ income. Almost 97% of the pregnant women who visit a Planned Parenthood clinic will abort.

Notwithstanding the hysterical accusations of Warren and others, anti-abortion pregnancy centers are not forcing women to have their babies. But many pregnant women consider abortion because they fear that it is their only option. When presented with assistance, they feel empowered to make a different choice.

One would think that the “pro-choice” movement would embrace — or at least tolerate — the ability of women to make the choice to have their children. That they have declared war on the people and organizations supporting women who make that choice tells you plenty.

Agree/Disagree with the author(s)? Let them know in the comments below and be heard by 10’s of thousands of CDN readers each day!

Support Conservative Daily News with a small donation via Paypal or credit card that will go towards supporting the news and commentary you've come to appreciate.

Laura Hollis

Laura Hirschfeld Hollis is a native of Champaign, Illinois. She received her undergraduate degree in English and her law degree from the University of Notre Dame. Hollis' career as an attorney has spanned 28 years, the past 23 of which have been in higher education. She has taught law at the graduate and undergraduate levels, and has nearly 15 years' experience in the development and delivery of entrepreneurship courses, seminars and workshops for multiple audiences. Her scholarly interests include entrepreneurship and public policy, economic development, technology commercialization and general business law. In addition to her legal publications, Hollis has been a freelance political writer since 1993, writing for The Detroit News, HOUR Detroit magazine, and the Christian Post, on matters of politics and culture. She is a frequent public speaker. Hollis has received numerous awards for her teaching, research, community service and contributions to entrepreneurship education. She is married to Jess Hollis, a musician, voiceover artist and audio engineer, and they live in Indiana with their two children, Alistair and Celeste.

Related Articles

Back to top button