Customs, Border and Immigration NewsIn The NewsUS News

Nearly 80,000 Illegal Aliens Had an Arrest Record Before Winning DACA Approval, Government Data Show

Tens of thousands of people who successfully enrolled in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program carried prior arrest records, according newly released data by the Trump administration.

United States Citizenship and Immigration Services — the agency under the Department of Homeland Security that is tasked with managing the country’s legal immigration system — released a report on Saturday detailing the arrest history of those who requested, and received, approval for the Deferred Actin for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

In total, there were nearly 889,000 applicants for the DACA program. Roughly 110,000 of those who applied had an arrest record — making up 12% of total applicants. Offenses for some of these arrests included murder, rape, battery, assault, and driving while intoxicated, according to United States Citizenship and Immigration (USCIS).

More notably, of the 765,166 individuals who were granted DACA status, 79,398 had a prior arrest. This translates to one-in-ten DACA recipients carrying an arrest record. Nearly 25,000 requestors who were approved were arrested more than once.

“As DACA continues to be the subject of both public discourse and ongoing litigation, USCIS remains committed to ensuring transparency and that the American people are informed about those receiving DACA,” said outgoing USCIS Acting Director Ken Cuccinelli in a statement provided by the agency on Saturday.

“This agency is obligated to continue accepting DACA requests from illegal aliens as a direct result of the previous administration’s decision to circumvent the laws as passed by Congress. We hope this data provides a better sense of the reality of those granted the privilege of a temporary deferral of removal action and work authorization under DACA,” Cuccinelli continued.

However, the agency noted in its press release that the data could include arrests that did not end in convictions, or may include cases where charges were dropped or dismissed.

The data was published as the fight over DACA now rests in the hands of the country’s most powerful court.

Justices on the Supreme Court heard arguments on Tuesday over whether the Trump administration can legally terminate the program, which began through a 2012 executive order by then-president Barack Obama. Trump has long argued that Obama never had the legal authority to unilaterally create DACA, but so far the lower courts have blocked the White House from nixing the program.

While the president wants to end Obama’s executive order, he has publicly voiced his support for implementing the program through Congress. Trump recently tweeted about those enrolled in DACA, claiming that some are “hardened criminals.”

“Many of the people in DACA, no longer very young, are far from ‘angels.’ Some are very tough, hardened criminals. President Obama said he had no legal right to sign order, but would anyway. If Supreme Court remedies with overturn, a deal will be made with Dems for them to stay!” he wrote on Tuesday.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact

Support Conservative Daily News with a small donation via Paypal or credit card that will go towards supporting the news and commentary you've come to appreciate.

Related Articles


  1. Arguably, the Obama Administration was not one dedicated to Law & Order, respecting Law Enforcement Personnel, or the value of being Law-abiding. Why, then, should any of us be surprised by the facts in this story? One big concern is that our Chief Justice try to remember that the Supreme Court is not the law clerk for, of an adjunct to, Congress; The Supreme Court’s Constitutional obligation is to rule in a manner that FORCES both Congress and the Administration to do their job CORRECTLY, not to correct either. When Justices attempt to legislate, they undermine the Constitutional protections originally given to we, the People, by bypassing the People’s will if not reflected by Congressional or Presidential action by substituting themselves for us. That is not right. I, for one, don’t want them doing that…particularly as I have no recourse against their actions. Executive Orders can be overturned or reversed by President, both those that make them and by Presidents that follow.

  2. Jason, I’m not sure what your sources are, but glad you have them. They bolster the information I have. I am more concerned about those Americans that say ‘yea’ or ‘nay’ without any knowledge of what’s below the headlines than those that are legally enrolled in what was an illegal program. People like yourself are doing a service that is needed.

    Trump wasn’t the first President to find DACCA illegal. Then-president Obama himself stated that he had NO authority to interfere with existing law….but just couldn’t resist , again, throwing his power in America’s face. I am confident that the Supreme Court will do as Tomas stated…”rule on the legal Constitutional standings and not attempt to legislate.”

    The very sovereignty of our Nation is threatened by a continuation to ignore our Congress approved laws.
    That includes the free flow of insurgents claiming asylum without the “required” checks.

    JASON, Were these arrests before or after entry.??

  3. Barack Obama was not who I thought he was. He seemed sort of lazy. But lately his name has been popping up in all sorts of controversial news stories. He was a very busy man involving our country and the world and not for the good of our country and now I’m hoping he gets a good looking at under the microscope by people who won’t worry about what that man says anymore. He’s lied and should now admit to what he’s been up to, forced to if necessary, he’s not a nice guy and he hasn’t been up to anything nice.

Back to top button