Obama and Defense Spending
Here is a quote from Matthew Spalding, Ph.D., in a great article at The Foundry:
“Military strategy should drive the budget, not the other way around. The mission of the United States military is determined by America’s vital interests and an assessment of the threats to those interests. We must spend what is necessary to fully fund our military. Of course there is waste and inefficiency in the defense budget. But the core and undisputed responsibility of the U.S. government to provide for the nation’s security must not be up for negotiation.” [emphasis mine]
Spalding illustrates just how far down our military has fallen in the name of the budget. He also says:
“… while government spending is soaring, defense spending relative to the size of the economy is near historical lows. The Obama Administration is promising to hollow the military even more in the years ahead.”
Spalding paints a rather sobering picture of the current condition of our military, but with sequestration cuts of almost $500 billion just around the corner the worst is yet to come! The Army alone says that troop readiness and equipment repair will be affected by the cuts, as well as many family support programs. Sequestration is set to start on March 1, 2013, unless Congress enacts a preventative deal, which sources say is unlikely.
Here’s more news about the military. America’s enemies are increasing defense spending (as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product), while America does just the opposite. Current Defense Secretary Leon Panetta says, “Instead of being a first-rate power in the world, we’d turn into a second-rate power. That would be the result of sequester.” Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman General Martin Dempsey said that about a third of the cuts would have to come from forces. He also said that two-thirds of the cuts will be taken from spending on modernization, compensation, and readiness.
Compromise readiness. I guess that means that when Americans are being attacked, as they were in Benghazi, the solution is to “stand down.” But, what the heck? Obama could not care less. He, according to Leon Panetta, never communicated with Obama or anyone at the White House. Is this just a forecast of what is to come?
And let’s not forget this bit of information about former senator Chuck Hagel from PJ Media:
“Senate sources [say] that one of the reasons that President Barack Obama’s nominee for Secretary of Defense, Chuck Hagel, has not turned over requested documents on his sources of foreign funding is that one of the names listed is a group purportedly called ‘Friends of Hamas.'”
When it rains, it pours! Just when you think Fearless Leader Barack Hussein Obama and the Democrats can’t get any lower, they do.
But that’s just my opinion.
Please visit RWNO, my personal web site.
Soon after these hearings, a retired officer, now TV analyst said, in effect, “Not to worry,we’re ‘years’ ahead of any other countries in capability”, Brings to mind the “Rabbit & Turtle” story…& sound like we are the rabbit!! These gigantic cuts weaken beyond a doubt the greatest fighting force on the planet. What’s worse it demoralizes an entire Nation, that has already had its economy under siege.
Hagel was not wanted by his own state…why should we even think about him?…
IF we continue at this rate for another year, we might as well put out a welcome mat & put on a sign on our backside that says “KICK ME”
Thank you, Jan, for your very insiteful comment. Your comment about Hagel is right on the money.
It gets worse: look at this article by Doug Ross: https://directorblue.blogspot.com/2013/02/priorities-pampers-versus-aircraft.html
ARrrg!!!! & I shared it…just when you think you’ve heard it all!!!!