NATO Takes Over in Libyan Civil War. Excuse me?
NATO< stands for North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and for those who flunked History and Geography both, Libya is
A: Not in the Atlantic Ocean and, B: Libya did not attack the United States. The original NATO charter was set up as an organization that constitutes a group of member states that agree to collectively defend their countries against an external attack. Who did Libya attack recently? So how would the NATO charter become so convoluted as to allow other nations to proceed with an act of war against Libya ?
The United States of America is governed by the laws put forth within our Constitution and bill of rights, not by the U.N., NATO, or the E.U. We are not, and will not be governed by any New World Order or One World Governmental system bent on relegating America to a second-rate country, no matter what the collective failed governments from the rest of the world think. We will fight and defend The United States of America from having her wealth and prosperity pillagedby a bunch of wanna-be Marxist/Socialist King-makers, period. The American military action in the Libyan Civil war is illegal according to both the U.S. Constitution and the NATO charter.
Just five days ago, NATO refused to reach consensus on the enforcement of the U.N. authorized no-fly zone, due to Turkey rejecting the idea of waging war against Libya, and France’s reservations on transferring the command of its ongoing operations to NATO. In the meantime, the propagandists in charge of this war action have now renamed the term WAR, to be calleda Kinetic Military action. Boy, that is eerily similar to Socialist Democrats becoming Liberals, and then changing their name again to Progressives to try to hide their Socialistic/Communist agenda. ( All the while hiding behind the mantra of the old Democratic Party of the U.S. ) Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!
If the Obama wants to try to use the example of NATO being active in the Iraq and Afghanistan WARS as a defence for this ploy that has gotten the U.S.into another war, there is one glaring difference between that and the Libyan Civil war of today: America was attacked on her own soil on Sept. 11th, 2001. That dictates the right for America and NATO to stage the counter-offensive against the people behind those attacks, no matter where they chose to try to hide. This war action is a huge step towards a One World Government, as they are now combining Nato, the E.U, and the U.N. into one entity, and using the United States military to lead an attack on another country that has not attacked anyone.
Now that the dirty work is done and the U.S.can be blamed on the world stage once again for any civilian casualties, here comes the rest of the world agreeing to take part in patroling the no-fly zone. Must be nice to sit on your ass and let the Americans blow up all the anti-aircraft stations, and then when it is virtually danger-free, to agree to supply fighter jets.( See the Arabs ) The only effective military action that was taken here came in the form of the initial barrage of cruise missiles launched by U.S. warships, at a cost to the taxpayer of $567,000 a piece! Those strikes took out effectively 97% of all of Libya’s anti-aircraft stations. The rest of the story in the media about French jets hitting one truck, and other tall tales about the so-called *international coalition* is a bunch of propaganda to try to cover up the fact that Barack Hussein Obama has waged an illegal war on Libya without the approval of the U.S. Congress!
NATO is NOT the U.N peacekeeping force! This is not the business of the United States of America! Impeach Obama for entering into an illegal war and not going to Congress first, as the Constitution mandates!
Not an illegal war. Three words genius: WAR POWERS RESOLUTION. Want proof? https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/usc_sup_01_50_10_33.html
As a matter of fact Impeachment is the house trial that , when enough evidence is presented about a violation of the Constitution and Obama’s sworn Oath to defend it, it can lead to criminal charges.Impeachment also can mean kicked out of office disgracefully and open the door to furture charges. I,m not a law student, just a relentless researcher.
Impeachment is a formal process in which an official is accused of unlawful activity and the outcome of which, depending on the country, can lead to the removal of that official from office or ***other punishment.*** . Although the House vote is to lay charges to start the process. In the United States, impeachment can occur both at the federal and state level. The Constitution defines impeachment at the federal level and limits impeachment to “The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States” who may only be impeached and removed for “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors”.
An impeachable offense is whatever a majority (which is now Republican held) of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history. What part of Obama engaging in the Libya civil war do you not understand here? What part of Libya did not attack any NATO country, therefor it is illegal for NATO to wage a war on Libya do you not understand?
And to the other genius who commented on this story, you can impeach a president but no gov’t official can be charged with anything until and IF they are expunged from office. Impeachment is like shaking your finger at a child and saying, “No no! Bad!” Whoopdie freaking doo.
ONE WORD Slick, Constitution, which mandates that Congress will be consulted and all aspects of any military action will be explained, such as the end goal. Your supposed proof carries no weight, try reading it.
WWHOOPS< ley's see who is the Genuis, the one who wrote this article or the one using liberal ideology to try to twist the facts around: One of thjem actually knows how to read and found the following:
From AMBERS link:S1542:
The President in every possible instance shall consult with Congress before introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and after every such introduction shall consult regularly with the Congress until United States Armed Forces are no longer engaged in hostilities or have been removed from such situations.
Try again .
Aggression against Libya is off limits, unlike Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and other counries (all of Latin America) which are thoroughly within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization purview. Comrade B
Aggression against Libya is off limits, unlike Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and other countries (all of Latin America) which are thoroughly within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization purview. Comrade B P.S. typo error on “countries”
You are correct Comrade B- Bush went to Congress before both Iraq and Afghan which was AFTER the USA was attacked. As mentioned above, just when did Libya attack any country ? Answer that one and folks just might think you have a valid point here, otherwise it is known as trollling.
The progressive leftist, A.K.A, Socialist Marxists, can not see the writing on the wall. They are blinded by their firm belief in their Dear Leaders genus and magnetic personality to find any fault in his actions. It matters not, that Obama treats the Constitution with disregard. For these people do not hold these things in there hearts as the principles that forged this Nation. To them these are mere writings of old white men disgruntled with the English ruling class. It is nothing more then a Document that can be ignored if it suits the purpose of the leader at that moment. There are no absolutes, in this mindset. Logic is lost on emotions and feelings. All decisions can be made on a whim, history has no value in evaluating an outcome. If things turn out bad, one can always blame the unforeseen circumstances, or others that may have advised in the process. That is why we are in real danger of destruction from within.