The federal mask mandate on planes, trains and public transportation never was about “the science.” It was about politics.

No wonder then that U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle of the Middle District of Florida tossed the mandate in a 59-page ruling Monday.

At this moment, it is not clear if the Department of Justice will seek an emergency stay. In a way, it doesn’t matter. The toothpaste is out of the tube. Once you’ve told mask-resistant Americans they don’t have to fog up their glasses when they fly, it’s over.

If the mandate had been about science, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would have followed the Administrative Procedure Act and conducted notice and comment procedures to examine the real-world consequences of the Feb. 3, 2021, rule.

Experts would have welcomed the input of stakeholders who would have had a chance to voice concerns and suggestions. Tweaks could have been made. Instead, it was an edict.

“The flexing of administrative power,” attorney Glenn Roper of the Pacific Legal Foundation called it. Last year, Pacific Legal won a challenge against a CDC-ordered nationwide ban on evictions — another power grab because of COVID-19.

There was a time when COVID-19 was new and unknown. The public understood why bureaucrats might overreact — better safe than sorry.

Two years later, it’s hard to show faith in a bureaucracy that hasn’t even bothered to distinguish between mostly-for-show masks and more effective face coverings, such as N95s. Compliance apparently was the goal.

A chart by Ian Miller of the Brownstone Institute compares caseloads in states with and without mask mandates. Essentially, the chart shows no significant difference between states with or without mandates.

The Brownstone Institute is a think tank formed in response to “the global crisis created by policy responses to the Covid-19 pandemic of 2020.” The most egregious example: extended school closures that harmed far more children than they helped.

When reasonable voices pushed for targeted protections for the vulnerable while allowing the country to “resume life as normal” — I’m quoting from the Oct. 4, 2020, Great Barrington Declaration — they were dismissed as anti-science goofballs.

The goofballs were right, and the experts were too slow to figure it out.


Copyright 2022 Creators.com

Debra J. Saunders

Debra J. Saunders is a fellow at the Discovery Institute's Chapman Center for Citizen Leadership. Contact her at dsaunders@discovery.org.

Share
Published by
Debra J. Saunders

Recent Posts

Israel Begins Evacuation Operations In Rafah, Gears Up For Push Into Last Hamas Stronghold

Israel began civilian evacuation operations on Monday in Rafah ahead of a planned ground assault…

2 hours ago

New Study Highlights Another Potential Roadblock For Biden’s Offshore Wind Push

A new study has identified a potentially massive problem for offshore wind developments that could…

2 hours ago

Restore The Shield That Once Protected Home Sellers From Eye-Watering Taxes

Inflation isn’t the only thing that has soared in recent years. Home prices, as measured…

2 hours ago

Campus Craziness Will Get Worse With A Second Biden Term

There’s an antisemitic and anti-American insurrection taking place on college campuses around the country, and…

2 hours ago

Biden’s DOJ Threatens To Sue Another State For Enforcing Immigration Law

The Department of Justice is threatening a lawsuit over Iowa’s new illegal immigration law, the…

2 hours ago

President Joe Biden’s Schedule for Monday, May 6, 2024

Schedule Summary: President Joe Biden will present a trophy, have lunch with the King of Jordan, and…

3 hours ago