Customs, Border and Immigration News

9th Circuit Sides With Trump On Environmental Waivers For Border Wall

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled for the Trump administration Monday in a case challenging its use of waivers to bypass environmental regulations in constructing parts of the border wall.

The state of California and several environmental groups sued President Donald Trump and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in September 2017 to stop construction of a border wall prototype and ongoing repairs to 14 miles of an existing barrier in San Diego.

“Under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), the Secretary of the DHS has long had the authority ‘to install additional physical barriers and roads … in the vicinity of the United States border,’” the Ninth Circuit’s opinion states, quoting the IIRIRA.

The IIRIRA grants the secretary of the DHS “the authority to waive all legal requirements” as is “‘necessary to ensure expeditious construction’ of those barriers and roads,” according to the Ninth Circuit.

The Ninth Circuit’s three-judge panel ruled 2-1 in favor of the federal government. The dissenting judge, Consuelo Callahan, wrote that she supported the Trump administration’s argument, but thought the court lacked jurisdiction to review California’s appeal.

In 2017, the DHS waved provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act and the Coastal Zone Management Act, expediting approval to begin construction of the border wall prototype and repairs.

The ruling is Trump’s second legal victory in the case after U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel ruled against California in February 2018. Curiel found that “Congress delegated to its executive counterpart, the responsibility to construct border barriers as needed in areas of high illegal entry to detect and deter illegal entries.”

Trump accused Curiel of being biased against him in an earlier case involving Trump University. Curiel ruled against then-presidential candidate Trump on several points throughout the 2016.

“I think it has to do with perhaps the fact that I’m very, very strong on the border,” Trump told Fox News in February 2016. “Now, he is Hispanic, I believe. He is a very hostile judge to me.”

Trump eventually settled the case for $25 million.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org

Tim Pearce

Share
Published by
Tim Pearce

Recent Posts

President Joe Biden’s Schedule for Wednesday, May 1, 2024

Schedule Summary: President Joe Biden will ... well actually we don't know. Unfortunately, we aren't receiving the…

3 hours ago

Kansas Legislature Passes Bill Banning Chinese Land Purchases Near Military Sites After DCNF Investigation

The Kansas legislature passed a bill Tuesday that will prevent companies from China or other…

5 hours ago

Army, Marines Barreling Toward One Of The Deadliest And Costliest Years For Aviation Accidents

Incidents of the costliest and most deadly aviation accidents among Army and Marine Corps surged…

5 hours ago

Biden Admin Justifies Tax Hike Based On Racial Criteria

The Biden administration’s analysis of its revenue proposals for fiscal year 2025 argues targeted tax…

5 hours ago

Most Americans Support Using The Military To Conduct Mass Deportations Of Illegal Immigrants

Poll after poll is indicating that Americans are increasingly adopting hardline positions on border enforcement,…

5 hours ago

Ukraine Retreats From Frontline Positions As Kyiv Waits For Key US Aid

Ukraine’s top commander said on Sunday that the military had to retreat from positions on…

5 hours ago