Democrats Keep Chasing the Dragon on Trump Obstruction of Justice Charges

Never mind that a huge wing of the bogus Trump-Russia conspiracy house of cards came crashing down on Thursday when former FBI Director James Comey failed to deliver.

Democrats and their media lickspittles got an early lump of coal in their Christmas stockings when Comey’s ballyhooed sermon on the mount in the Senate didn’t result in the smoking gun that would lead to the impeachment of President Donald Trump.

Overall, it was a crappy day for the Democrats when their star witness acted like a typical bitchy disgruntled employee, calling his ex-boss a liar and griping about how the big bad Trump made him miss a dinner date with his wife.

Despite the spin, the Democrats’ witch hunt against Trump is running on fumes today. The hearings sucked the life out of the crowds in Beltway bars that had opened early for the occasion and by the time that the tall man left via underground tunnel, a good deal of life was drained from the Dems themselves.

The only things that came out of showboat Comey’s audition for a gig on Dancing With the Stars was that he copped that Trump wasn’t under investigation by the FBI, that he himself had been one of those who was leaking damaging documentation to the media and that the real obstruction of justice came from Loretta Lynch.

Comey said that he was “queasy” over the way that Lynch downplayed the investigation into Hillary’s emails.

Oh Lordy, it was a big nothing-burger for the Democrats.

But when you have nothing else to run on in 2018 other than whipping up the rabble with wild-assed conspiracy theories and when you have already wasted nearly nine months, your only choice is to keep selling the scam to the suckers.

That is what the contemptible neo-McCarthyite Democrat Adam “shifty” Schiff did on Friday afternoon when he demanded that the Trump administration release all tapes of conversations with the fallen angel Comey. This coming on the heels of the president’s offer of being willing to testify under oath on the Comey affair.

Even if they don’t exist.

According to a report from Reuters times perfectly for Friday evening’s evening news:

BREAKING: Leaders of House Russia probe said asked White House counsel if Comey tapes exist, and if so, they be provided by June 23 pic.twitter.com/siZEL9nbDV

— Reuters Politics (@ReutersPolitics) June 9, 2017

Shortly thereafter, CNN announced that the Senate is also demanding the tapes now that the plot to oust Trump has been dealt a severe blow.

House and Senate investigators call for Comey's memos and any records the White House kept of his talks with Trump https://t.co/t0MavIcIzB pic.twitter.com/SrxKhgesMy

— CNN (@CNN) June 9, 2017

Just like in Joseph Stalin’s totalitarian Soviet Union, the investigations never end – until the subject is either dead or in the gulags.

It’s another diversionary tactic by partisan hacks to obstruct any investigation into the allegations that a former government contractor turned whistleblower has requested that the committee look into the 47 hard drives and over 600 million pages of documentation that not only Trump and his associates, but other influential figures had been spied on by Barack Obama’s government.

While you won’t see it on Reuters, CNN, The New York Times or the Washington Post, a lawsuit against Comey and the FBI was filed earlier this week by watchdog FreedomWatch over what could be the scandal of all scandals and a monstrous cover-up at Comey’s FBI.

JUST IN: Did the FBI have evidence of a breach larger than Snowden? A lawsuit says yes. https://t.co/KqSeeinVt9 pic.twitter.com/phNK18ZX5Z

— The National Desk (@TND) June 7, 2017

Circa is reporting “Did the FBI have evidence of a breach larger than Snowden? A lawsuit says yes.”:

A former U.S. intelligence contractor tells Circa he walked away with more than 600 million classified documents on 47 hard drives from the National Security Agency and the CIA, a haul potentially larger than Edward Snowden’s now infamous breach.

And now he is suing former FBI Director James Comey and other government figures, alleging the bureau has covered up evidence he provided them showing widespread spying on Americans that violated civil liberties.

The suit, filed late Monday night by Dennis Montgomery, was assigned to the same federal judge who has already ruled that some of the NSA’s collection of data on Americans violates the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment, setting up an intriguing legal proceeding in the nation’s capital this summer.

Montgomery says the evidence he gave to the FBI chronicle the warrantless collection of phone, financial and personal data and the unmasking of identities in spy data about millions of Americans.

“This domestic surveillance was all being done on computers supplied by the FBI,” Montgomery told Circa in an interview. “So these supercomputers, which are FBI computers, the CIA is using them to do domestic surveillance.”

Documents obtained by Circa outside of the lawsuit show that the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington in 2015 approved a grant of limited immunity for Montgomery so he could explain how he managed to walk out of his contract and the buildings he worked in with the classified material.

Montgomery alleges that more than 20 million American identities were illegally unmasked – credit reports, emails, phone conversations and Internet traffic, were some of the items the NSA and CIA collected.

He said he returned the hard drives to the FBI, a fact confirmed in government documents reviewed by Circa.

The lawsuit comes after Larry Klayman of FreedomWatch sent a letter to the House Intelligence Committee in March on Montgomery’s behalf informing them of the circumstances involving the material that had been turned over to the FBI under Comey’s command and was being intentionally covered up.

Adam Schiff was on the distribution list of that letter and has done everything in his power to suppress the very serious issued by the now disappeared Devin Nunes who brought up issues that the Obama regime may have been involved in the abuse of the nation’s anti-terrorist surveillance systems for political purposes.

The one who really needs to testify under oath is Congressman Adam Schiff because he has engaged in a campaign of obfuscation, obstruction and quite likely outright lies.