This is yet one more instance of self-aggrandizing, big-government bureaucracy all wound together to hopefully get another pair of party-line idiots re-elected. It’s populist in nature but elitist in execution.
(A) the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of the issuer, except the chief executive officer (or any equivalent position) of the issuer;
(B) the annual total compensation of the chief executive officer (or any equivalent position) of the issuer; and
(C) the ratio of the amount described in subparagraph (A) to the amount described in subparagraph (B).
Basically, the average pay of all workers in a company, the wage of the CEO/President and a ratio comparing the two.
The intent of this bill is to show income inequality, which is only so great because of liberal initiatives. Unfortunately, it will cause more inequality, but their stats will look better.
Understand the mindset of the American business leader. If this regulation is truly enforced, the only course of action for them to take is to make sure this ratio does not end up higher than their competitors. To do that, they will simply lay-off every single one of their lowest wage earners. They will then outsource that work (the easiest to outsource by far) to Mexico (take a gander at what GM is doing with your bail-out money), China, or India.
This also means those companies won’t have to deal with oppressive health care mandates, ridiculous corporate taxes or whatever new populist garbage comes out of Washington. You have nothing to worry about, heck, 1 in 6 Americans rely on the government for income as it is .. this will just add a few million more.
Before 2011, earmarks were a frequent source of corruption and furthering of personal agendas by…
The Biden administration is creating regulations at an historic pace and it's making everything so…
The U.S. economy is showing signs of stagflation as growth slumps down and prices continue…
Another week and another first for Donald J. Trump. No doubt, this is one he…
I was never a fan of Howard Stern or any “shock-jock,” for that matter, but…