Yesterday, Nancy Pelosi revealed the almost 2,000 page monstrosity of a health care bill from the House of Representatives. I am not sure if our Congressmen will read it, but I knew I had to.
I spent nearly 8 hours speed-reading and trying to notate the critical sections of this incredibly-liberal health care reform bill. I know it’s not final, but I felt that my readers needed to know what this thing was. The high-points are that there are:
The core issue with this bill is that it claims to be budget-neutral. While I cannot prove that it is or is not, what I will do is explain why that’s not that great. While the bill may be deficit neutral, the 31 new bureaucratic agencies and program that it creates are not cost-neutral. This financial side of this plan is based on a principle equal to if you or I said, sure, we can buy that new house on the beach, we just need to bring in more money to pay for it. We would have to get another job, get a raise, or forget the house. The government is simply adding 5+ new taxes on us to pay for it. Deficit neutral is not the same thing as cost-neutral.
I could tack on the fact that it gives the White House the power to create “waiting lists” if when costs go higher than they expect. If Medicare were on the path that the original budget estimates set, it would be costing 1/35th of what it costs today. The government can’t and hasn’t ever estimated anything even remotely close to its actual costs and it always misses on the low-side. Why would this be different?
There are serious individual-liberty issues here. HSAs (health savings accounts) will no-longer be allowed to be used for medicine unless a Doctor writes a prescription. Owner’s of FSAs (Flexible Savings Accounts) will now be capped at a $2500/yr contribution. Why? These tools keep premiums down because FSA/HSA users are responsible citizens saving for their own health care needs. So again why? Because the government needs us to rely on them for more-and-more.
The grandfather clause will phase-out most existing health care plans as it does not allow insurers to enroll any new members into existing plans once the bill is enacted. This will kill every-single existing private insurance product over time. Insurers rely on a constantly-refreshing pool of insured persons to replenish those that leave. If people are allowed to leave (and they should be), but no one is allowed to join those plans, they will starve and die. You will not be allowed to keep your plan if you like it. Or rather, you can keep it, but your insurer won’t be servicing it once this fiasco goes live.
Abortions are covered, Medicare will get cut (Medicare Advantage will probably cease to exist), and Medicare fraud will be easier to perpetrate due to relaxed asset/income proof requirements.
The few positive benefits to the plan are the closing of the Medicare “doughnut hole” and the push to train more physicians and nurses. The rest of this thing is a disaster of epic proportions. “Fire and brimstone, cats and dogs living together…”, but I digress.
This will not lower costs for health care. When it doesn’t, they will continue to blame doctors, nurses, radiology technicians or perhaps hospital security guards. They will find anyone but themselves to blame… and they caused this mess in the first place.
note: side-by-side comparison of health bills at: health care reform bill comparison
Before 2011, earmarks were a frequent source of corruption and furthering of personal agendas by…
The Biden administration is creating regulations at an historic pace and it's making everything so…
The U.S. economy is showing signs of stagflation as growth slumps down and prices continue…
Another week and another first for Donald J. Trump. No doubt, this is one he…
I was never a fan of Howard Stern or any “shock-jock,” for that matter, but…