San Francisco Bans Police From Using Facial Recognition AI To Help Identify Suspects
San Francisco banned a piece of technology that police used in 2018 to identify a man who shot and killed several people at a Maryland newspaper, The New York Times reported Tuesday night.
The city’s Board of Supervisors voted 8-1 Tuesday to make San Francisco the first major American city to block a tool police rely on to identify criminal suspects. Civil liberty groups worry the technology’s potential could push the U.S. in the direction of an overly oppressive surveillance state.
“I think part of San Francisco being the real and perceived headquarters for all things tech also comes with a responsibility for its local legislators,” Aaron Peskin, the city supervisor who sponsored the bill, told TheNYT. “We have an outsize responsibility to regulate the excesses of technology precisely because they are headquartered here.”
Critics argue San Francisco is effectively tossing the good out with the bad. “It is ridiculous to deny the value of this technology in securing airports and border installations,” Jonathan Turley, a constitutional law expert at George Washington University, told reporters. “It is hard to deny that there is a public safety value to this technology.”
The technology “provides government with unprecedented power to track people going about their daily lives. That’s incompatible with a healthy democracy,” Matt Cagle, a lawyer with the A.C.L.U. of Northern California, told reporters, noting that such tools are a danger in the hands of the government.
The technology is used in several cities across the country, but is not currently being deployed in San Francisco, despite local concerns. Police believe the decision hinders their job nonetheless. A similar piece of technology was used to identify a person who shot and killed several people in 2018 at the Capital Gazette newsroom in Annapolis, MD.
“Although we understand that it’s not a 100 percent accurate technology yet, it’s still evolving,” Tony Montoya, the president of San Francisco Police Officers Association, told reporters. “I think it has been successful in at least providing leads to criminal investigators.”
Follow Chris White on Facebook and Twitter
Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2019 Daily Caller News Foundation
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org
“The technology “provides government with unprecedented power to track people going about their daily lives. That’s incompatible with a healthy democracy,” Matt Cagle, a lawyer with the A.C.L.U. of Northern California, told reporters, noting that such tools are a danger in the hands of the government.”
How far will the duplicitous A.C.L.U. go? After a shooting they always cry crocodile tears that government needs to do more to protect its citizens, yet when the opportunity is presented progressives shout “foul” and abandon their communities to free ranging criminals.