In The NewsMilitary and Defense

Stratcom Commander: U.S. Should Look to 1950s to Regain Competitive Edge

The current conflict in Ukraine is not the worst that the U.S. should be prepared for. Around the corner, said the commander of U.S. Strategic Command, the U.S. must be prepared for much more.

“This Ukraine crisis that we’re in right now, this is just the warmup,” Navy Adm. Charles A. Richard, commander of Stratcom, said. “The big one is coming. And it isn’t going to be very long before we’re going to get tested in ways that we haven’t been tested a long time.”

A helicopter hovers above a submarine at sea.

During a speech at the Naval Submarine League’s 2022 Annual Symposium & Industry Update Richard said the U.S. must get itself prepared.

“We have to do some rapid, fundamental change in the way we approach the defense of this nation,” he said. “I will tell you, the current situation is vividly illuminating what nuclear coercion looks like and how you, or how you don’t stand up to that.” 

Competitors like China, Richard said, are outcompeting the U.S., and in a dramatic fashion. The U.S. must step up its deterrence game, he said, or it’s going to be bowled over. 

“As I assess our level of deterrence against China, the ship is slowly sinking,” he said. “It is sinking slowly, but it is sinking, as fundamentally they are putting capability in the field faster than we are. As those curves keep going, it isn’t going to matter how good our [operating plan] is or how good our commanders are, or how good our horses are — we’re not going to have enough of them. And that is a very near-term problem.”

One area where the U.S. still dominates is with its underseas capabilities — the U.S. submarine fleet, Richard said. 

“Undersea capabilities is still the one … maybe the only true asymmetric advantage we still have against our opponents,” Richard said. “But unless we pick up the pace, in terms of getting our maintenance problems fixed, getting new construction going … if we can’t figure that out … we are not going to put ourselves in a good position to maintain strategic deterrence and national defense.” 

Regaining the advantage in other areas might mean looking backwards, as much as 60 or more years, Richard said, to a time when the U.S. military was able to do things faster than what it does today.

“We used to know how to move fast, and we have lost the art of that,” he said.

A large military aircraft flies.

One example he provided was that of the AGM-28 Hound Dog cruise missile, which entered service in 1960. 

“The Air Force went from a request, almost written on a napkin … when they figured out in the late 1950s that the Soviet integrated air defense systems were getting to the point that the B-52 just wasn’t going to make it in, and we needed a thing called up ‘cruise missile.’ And so, they envisioned what a standoff weapon looks like.” 

The U.S. military was able to deliver the Hound Dog cruise missile in just 33 months. 

“We had two squadrons of B-52s equipped with this 800-nautical-mile Mach two-plus, one megaton nuclear warhead with accuracy that was really good for its day, hanging off the wings of B-52s in less than three years,” he said. “This weapon was so cool you could actually turn the engines on, on its cruise missiles on your wings, to give you additional thrust on takeoff.” 

Richard said there are other examples of how the U.S. military was able to rapidly develop and field capability to meet its needs, and that the U.S. must get back to that. 

“We have got to get back into the business of not talking about how we are going to mitigate our assumed eventual failure to get Columbia in on time, and B-21, and LRSO, and flip it to the way we used to ask questions in this nation, which is what’s it going to take? Is it money? Is it people? Do you need authorities? What risk? That’s how we got to the Moon by 1969. We need to bring some of that back. Otherwise, China is simply going to outcompete us, and Russia isn’t going anywhere anytime soon.”

source: Department of Defense

Support Conservative Daily News with a small donation via Paypal or credit card that will go towards supporting the news and commentary you've come to appreciate.

Rich Mitchell

Rich Mitchell is the editor-in-chief of Conservative Daily News and the president of Bald Eagle Media, LLC. His posts may contain opinions that are his own and are not necessarily shared by Bald Eagle Media, CDN, staff or .. much of anyone else. Find him on twitter, facebook and

Related Articles

One Comment

  1. The real danger has always been China, not Russia. As if 30 NATO member nations wouldn’t be enough to stop any westward expansion by Putin, so we are now sending endless billions (74 billion so far) to a corrupt Ukraine government for another regime change war that we didn’t want, didn’t vote on, can’t win, and, oh yeah, for a war that we partly provoked by pushing Ukraine to join NATO. How did that work out in Iraq or in Afghanistan where we spent 2 trillion over 20 years only to see a disastrous withdrawal where we gave the Taliban 7 billion dollars of our weapons and top of line equipment.

    So to prepare for the future our military has destroyed the last meritocracy by going “woke” even though they can’t even meet 70% of their recruiting goals. Historically, our naturally diverse all volunteer army has still been made up (57%) primarily of patriotic young white men. Why on earth would they continue to join to be told that they are “racist” and “oppressors”? The staffing crises will become catastrophic. So to solve the problem, the same people that are responsible for the disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal, are hiring transgenders and painting “rainbow bullets” on Marine helmets in recruiting ads.

    The Chinese are rolling on the ground laughing; preparing to take Taiwan and buying politicians and businesses and property galore in America. God help us……

Back to top button