OpinionTrending Commentary

Changes in federal law shortly before COVID-19 ‘pandemic’ allowed secretive exercises and use of false data

Life Site News has reported extensively on changes to federal law months before the so-called “pandemic” began that adds to the evidence that this was planned all along.

Robert L. Kinney III, who reported on the changes, writes that it could be a coincidence but “it may serve as another possible tip-off that government officials may have been preparing for a major ‘hoax’ — or a national exercise, operational exercise, or some similar activity of law enforcement agencies of the United States —†which would require the false representation of information and/or data.”

Included was the Terrorist and Foreign Fighter Travel Exercise Act of 2019 which went into effect on Oct. 9 of 2019. That allowed the use of national “exercises” that could remain classified without the public ever knowing.

That law allows “law enforcement” agencies to take part in such exercises for “emerging threats.” The government has long classified coronavirus pandemics as an “emerging threat.”

“So, the October 2019 change suggests the possibility, or even the high probability, that the U.S. government was preparing for a national security exercise for such an ‘emerging threat,’ Kinney wrote. “Soon after the law change, the COVID-19 pandemic, a pandemic of an ‘emerging threat,’ reportedly began. The timing of the federal law followed by the reported beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic could merely be a coincidence, but the reasonable person could also say coincidence is unlikely.”

Then there was the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018 enacted in January of 2019 that appears to allow for “the use of data” that is falsified “for any purpose” which includes “law enforcement” purposes.

There was also the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness and Advancing Innovation Act of 2019 which was signed into law in June 0f 2019. It defines the authority given to government in the National Health Security Strategy.

That law enhances the government’s authority “to prepare for and respond to public health emergencies” allowing for “the periodic evaluation of Federal, State, local, and tribal preparedness and response capabilities through drills and exercises, including drills and exercises to ensure medical surge capacity for events without notice …. Cary out drills and operational exercises … to identify, inform, and address gaps in and policies related to all-hazards medical and public health preparedness and response.”

Kinney also links these recent changes to law to a 2004 law, Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, which he writes “permits ‘any lawfully authorized investigative, protective, or intelligence activity of a law enforcement agency of the United States,’ which, the law apparently implies, may include law enforcement agencies in the U.S. engaging in ‘conduct with intent to convey false or misleading information under circumstances where such information may reasonably be believed and where such information indicates that an activity has taken, is taking, or will take place.’

By the way, in each of these laws it was with wide bipartisan support. The 2004 law, signed by then President George W. Bush, was approved 89-2 by the Senate and 336-75 by the House. The 2018 law was approved 356-17 by the House and unanimous consent by the Senate. The terrorist act of 2019 was also unanimous consent by the Senate and 394-7 in the House. The pandemic act of 2019 was unanimous consent by the Senate and voice vote by the House.

Then, Kinney cites a 2016 executive order under the Obama-Biden administration “linking public health with law enforcement” which the Trump-Pence administration reaffirmed in the 2019 United States Government Health Security Strategy.

Then there was a change in definitions by the government in December of 2019 allowing “biological products” to be called vaccines. And, the government signed a contract that same month with Moderna stating “mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates [are] developed and jointly owned” with the government. Again, all of this before the so-called “pandemic” began.

Couple these legal changes with the case Dr. David Martin made showing evidence in the patent record showing that Fauci and friends have been planning an event like we are currently in for decades. Gary Barnett has shown the months of pandemic simulations in 2019. There’s Operation Crimson Contagion as well as Operation Lockstep and Event 201.

In a recent interview, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. exposed these exercises which were designed for “orchestrated planned use of pandemics to clamp down totalitarian control.”

Kennedy notes the “deep involvement of the intelligence agencies” including the CIA which is “not a health agency. It doesn’t do public health. It does coup d’états.”

In each of these exercises or simulations, the goal was never how to help the sick or prevent illness from the healthy. The plans never discussed how Constitutional freedoms are upheld while dealing with a pandemic.

“None of that was discussed,” Kennedy said. “It was all, how do you use the pandemic as a pretense to clamp down totalitarian controls and obliterate and deconstruct democracy. And the last simulation, which is called seminar four, was all about how do you get the social media companies to censor any discussion of a lab-generated coronavirus epidemic …. It’s how do you get all of the countries, all of the liberal democracies of the world to pivot and turn into dictatorships overnight.”

Is this all coincidence?

Content syndicated from TheLibertyLoft.com with permission.

Support Conservative Daily News with a small donation via Paypal or credit card that will go towards supporting the news and commentary you've come to appreciate.

Related Articles

Back to top button