Drone Spying Bill Passed by Florida Senate

The Florida Senate passed (SB-44) on a 39 to 0 vote, a bill granting exceptions “for drone use by law enforcement agencies, fire departments, state agencies, and political subdivisions.” This bill allows these agencies to use drones for the following:

  • “Gain an aerial perspective of a crowd of 50 or more persons;”
  • “Assist with traffic management, except that the agency may not issue a traffic infraction based on images or video captured by a drone; and”
  • “Facilitate evidence collection at a crime scene or traffic crash scene.”

Neither the Bill Text nor the Bill Analysis Report specify how it will be determined whether a crowd in fact contains 50 or more persons and not less than 50. This point is critical as a crowd that appears to contain 50 or more persons could in fact contain less than 50. The act of determining the number of persons in a crowd may violate the exemption in the law if in fact the crowd contains less than 50 persons.

Notwithstanding, certain guidelines are required by the agency undertaking the use of drones for the purpose of gaining “an aerial perspective of a crowd of 50 or more people.” These guidelines “must address the storage, retention, and release of images or video captured by the drone.” Additionally, “the guidelines must also address the personal safety and constitutional protections of the persons being observed.” The top agency official authorizing the use of drones for this purpose must provide “written authorization for such use and must maintain a copy on file at the agency.”

The Bill Analysis Report notes that drones are also referenced as “Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) and Unmanned Aerial System (UAS)” and are defined in Florida Statute 934.50 as an aerial vehicle that:

  • “Does not carry a human operator;”
  • “Uses aerodynamic forces to provide vehicle lift;”
  • “Can fly autonomously or be piloted remotely;”
  • “Can be expendable or recoverable; and”
  • “Can carry a lethal or nonlethal payload.”

The Bill Analysis Report notes a concern regarding the violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution regarding “unreasonable searches and seizures,” noting, “This is relevant because remote surveillance could constitute a search, which, if not supported by a search warrant or other authorization, would violate the Fourth Amendment.”

Edwin Vazquez

Christian, family oriented American Patriot. Math/Stats (BS), Biomedical Engineering (MS), and PhD student - U.S. History. Retired Chief Biomedical Engineer and United States Armed Forces and Gulf War veteran. Retired Entrepreneur.

Share
Published by
Edwin Vazquez

Recent Posts

Red State Slaps Wall Street Titan With Cease And Desist Order Over ‘Fraudulent’ Claims About Green Investments

Mississippi Secretary of State Michael Watson sent a cease and desist letter to investment manager…

3 hours ago

Red State Lawmakers Pass Bill Banning Chinese Land Purchases Near Military Sites After DCNF Investigation

The Kansas House of Representatives passed a bill Wednesday preventing foreign adversaries from buying up…

4 hours ago

Ron DeSantis Signs Bill That Takes Sledgehammer To Squatters’ Rights

Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a bill Wednesday to crack down on squatters taking…

5 hours ago

Disney Drops Lawsuits Against DeSantis-Backed Tourism District

Disney has dropped its lawsuits against a special district backed by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis…

6 hours ago

President Joe Biden’s Schedule for Thursday, March 28, 2024

Schedule Summary: President Joe Biden will receive the daily briefing and participate in a campaign fundraiser on…

6 hours ago

What’s Wrong With America’s ‘Elites’?

It is becoming increasingly clear that some of America's most serious problems can be traced…

7 hours ago