House, Senate Police Reform Bills Differ On Chokeholds, Warrants, Qualified Immunity
House Democrats and Senate Republicans have each rolled out potential police reform bills amid nationwide protests over the death of George Floyd, but despite their common goal of improving policing in the United States, they differ on police tactics and officer immunity.
While the two competing bills both increase funding for body cameras and elevate lynching to a federal crime, the House bill relies on the federal government to take the lead in police reform while the Senate bill provides incentives for state and local governments to do so. They specifically differ with regard to chokeholds, no-knock warrants, misconduct databases, and qualified immunity, The Hill reported.
California Rep. Karen Bass, the chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, sponsored the House bill, while South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, the lone black Republican senator, introduced the Senate bill.
Both the House and Senate bills target chokeholds, but the House bill includes legislation seen as much more strict towards the controversial police tactic.
The House bill would make chokeholds and any maneuver that blocks the intake of oxygen or the movement of blood to the brain blatantly illegal. Such actions were seen in the 2014 death of Eric Garner, who was killed after a NYPD officer held him in a chokehold, and the recent death of Floyd, who was killed after a Minneapolis police officer held his knee over Floyd’s neck for nearly nine minutes, video of the incident shows.
Now is not the time to study chokeholds, it’s time to ban them.
Now is not the time to study no-knock warrants, it’s time to ban them.
The cries in the streets are not for symbolism, they are for substantive action.
We must pass the #JusticeInPolicing Act.
— Congressmember Bass (@RepKarenBass) June 17, 2020
The Senate bill does not explicitly ban chokeholds, but disincentivizes police departments from allowing them by withholding federal grants from departments that continue to use them. The bill instead encourages police to restrain citizens in ways that do not restrict their breathing.
The bill also allows the use of chokeholds when “deadly force is authorized.”
On no-knock warrants, the House bill explicitly bans their use. The tactic was frequently used in drug-related cases but was widely criticized in March after 26-year-old Breonna Taylor was killed after Louisville police officers entered her apartment unannounced. Taylor was shot eight times by officers, who had a no-knock warrant pertaining to a drug-related case that did not involve Taylor.
The Senate bill does not ban no-knock warrants, but instead requires that departments keep track of when they are used and report their data to the federal government on a yearly basis. The reports would be released to the public, and departments that fail to comply would see a decrease in their federal funding similar to the bill’s provisions regarding chokeholds.
With regard to previous police misconduct, the House bill calls for a federal database that would record individual officers’ misconduct in an effort to prevent them from being rehired in a different precinct.
The Senate bill states that both state and local jurisdictions would have to report all officer-involved shootings and use-of-force incidents to the FBI each year. The FBI would then release those records to the public, and like the provisions regarding chokeholds and no-knock warrants, jurisdictions that fail to comply would see cuts to their federal funding.
Qualified immunity, which shields officers from being sued over potential misconduct and civl rights violations, has proved to be the most contentious issue between the two competing bills.
The House Bill would allow police officers to be sued by citizens who felt that their civil rights had been violated, and would make it easier for victims of police brutality to seek civil damages against officers and police departments. As of now, qualified immunity protects officers from such lawsuits.
End qualified immunity.
— Justin Amash (@justinamash) June 15, 2020
The Senate bill have designated any changes to qualified immunity as a non-starter, though Scott said that he was open to a “decertification” process for abusive officers. Instead, the bill focuses on providing additional funding and resources to improve officers’ de-escalation skills.
Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) says that ending qualified immunity for police officers is “off the table” for Republicans: “Any poison pill in legislation means we get nothing done.” https://t.co/HGbke5x04i
— Axios (@axios) June 14, 2020
“From the Republican perspective and the president sent the signal that qualified immunity is off the table. They see that as a poison pill on our side,” Scott said Sunday on “Face the Nation.”
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org
