Home >> Customs, Border and Immigration News >> ICE Slaps Another ‘Sanctuary’ State With Subpoenas In Bid To Force Cooperation

ICE Slaps Another ‘Sanctuary’ State With Subpoenas In Bid To Force Cooperation

http://dailycaller.com/

  • Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Thursday issued subpoenas with Connecticut for three illegal aliens who were arrested and later released, despite ICE detainers placed on them. 
  • All three of the illegal aliens were previously convicted criminals. ICE placed detainer requests on them, but because of the state’s “sanctuary” laws, they were released back into the public and remain at large.
  • At first a novel action, ICE is now consistently issuing subpoenas against sanctuary cities and states for information on criminal illegal aliens. 

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) issued three subpoenas with the state of Connecticut on Thursday, demanding information on criminal illegal aliens whom local officials refused to hand over and instead released back into the community.

ICE on Thursday subpoenaed the State of Connecticut Court Support Services Division for information on three foreign nationals — of all them convicted criminals living in the U.S. illegally — who were arrested, but subsequently released because of state laws that prohibit cooperation with the agency. At first a novel action, subpoenas are becoming a more common action by ICE as it escalates its fight with “sanctuary” jurisdictions.

“It’s unfortunate that elected officials in Connecticut seem unable to grasp the public safety threat posed by the criminal illegal aliens these officials are attempting to shield,” Todd Lyons, the acting field office director of ICE’s Boston office, said in a statement released Thursday.

(Article Continues Below Advertisement)

“These are the same criminals who’ve already been arrested for crimes by state and/or local law enforcement, often perpetrated against the very immigrant communities these officials claim to be protecting. Despite these short-sighted, reckless ‘sanctuary-for-criminal-aliens’ policies, ICE will continue to use all available legal tools to safeguard the public.”

While ICE did not disclose the identity of the individuals, the agency did describe their criminal background and how they benefited from Connecticut’s “sanctuary” policies.

A 31-year-old Honduran national, living illegally in the U.S. was convicted of second degree manslaughter following a hit-and-run incident in 2016 in the state. The individual was released in January 2020 by the State of Connecticut Department of Corrections, despite an ICE detainer lodged against him and a final order of removal by an immigration judge.

A 20-year-old Guatemalan national living in the country illegally was arrested in the state and convicted of third degree burglary and second-degree robbery charges in October 2019. Despite ICE lodging a detainer against him, the Connecticut Department of Corrections released him in January 2020.

(Article Continues Below Advertisement)
Sponsored Content

The final individual, a 21-year-old Dominican national living unlawfully in the U.S., was convicted of two counts of possession of narcotics with intent to sell. Like the other aforementioned people, the Dominican was released by the State of Connecticut Department of Corrections despite an ICE detainer for him.

All three of these individuals remain at large, and the agency is actively working to locate and apprehend them. ICE said these illegal aliens pose a threat to the public, and directly accused Connecticut’s “deliberate policy of proving sanctuary fo criminal illegal aliens” for the situation.

It remains to be seen if Connecticut will honor the subpoenas. When contacted by the Daily Caller News Foundation, a spokeswoman for the state’s court support services, Rhonda Hebert, said ICE’s requests have been forwarded to their “Legal Services unit for review.” When asked about the state’s position on cooperation with federal immigration authorities, Hebert pointed to the state’s Trust Act — a law that forbids officials from honoring an immigration detainer unless it comes with a judicial warrant.

Leaders of “sanctuary” localities and states have increasingly demanded a judicial warrant for detainers, but ICE and immigration experts have repeatedly said that it is not needed and that judicial warrants, in fact, don’t “exist” in the case for detainers. ICE issues administrative warrants for detainers, and the agency argues that the Immigration and Nationality Act gives them the authority to execute these administrative warrants.

The subpoenas mark an intensification of the fight between federal immigration authorities and the jurisdictions that are refusing to cooperate with them.

ICE subpoenaed Denver authorities in January for information on wanted illegal aliens, the first instance of the agency issuing subpoenas to a law enforcement entity. Since that time, ICE has also slapped New York City, another notorious “sanctuary” city, with subpoenas. The action is becoming a common practice for the agency in the wake of more jurisdictions refusing to honor their detainer requests.

Much like their position on detainers, ICE says these subpoenas are completely lawful actions.

“ICE has not historically needed to use its lawful authority to issue these subpoenas to obtain information from other law enforcement agencies as most law enforcement agencies throughout the country willingly provide ICE with information regarding aliens arrested for crimes in the interest of public safety,” the agency said Thursday.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected]

Wake up Right! Subscribe to our Morning Briefing and get the news delivered to your inbox before breakfast!

Sponsored Content
0

About Jason Hopkins

One comment

  1. While I wholly appreciate the job ICE is attempting to perform, they do not have the support of the DOJ or FBI, so their actions are meaningless.

    Only when these state officials (governors, attorney generals, legislators) are formally charged and prosecuted (by the DOJ) for violating Federal law, will I buy into all the talk and bluster. Till something tangible happens, that’s all it is – –

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sign up for our Newsletter

* indicates required field




Email Format


Subscribe!