FISA Judge Orders FBI To Identify All Cases Involving Lawyer Who Altered Carter Page Email
- The top judge on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court ordered the FBI to review cases involving a bureau attorney who altered an email regarding Carter Page.
- Judge Rosemary Collyer ordered the review in a secret filing on Dec. 5. The FISC released it on Friday.
- Collyer slammed the FBI for submitting “false” and “misleading” information in order to obtain surveillance warrants against Page.
The judge presiding over the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) ordered the FBI in a secret court filing earlier this month to identify all cases handled by a former FBI lawyer who altered an email during the investigation of former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
Judge Rosemary Collyer ordered the review on Dec. 5, several days before the release of a Justice Department inspector general’s (IG) report that found that the FBI made “significant inaccuracies” in applications to surveil Page.
The report said that a now-former FBI lawyer who has been identified as Kevin Clinesmith altered an email from the bureau’s liaison to the CIA in June 2017 to say that Page was “not a source” for the agency.
Shortly after altering the email, the FBI and Justice Department submitted a final application to renew surveillance against Page.
Clinesmith was one of the FBI’s top lawyers on Crossfire Hurricane before it was handed over to the special counsel’s office. He took part in a February 2017 interview with George Papadopoulos, another Trump campaign adviser.
Clinesmith, who recently resigned from the FBI, has also been identified as the FBI employee who sent anti-Trump text messages discussed in a separate IG report released last year. According to the report, a lawyer identified as Clinesmith wrote on Nov. 21, 2016, to a colleague, “Viva le [sic] Resistance!,” during a discussion about opposing Trump.
The Justice Department notified the FISC of Clinesmith’s actions in a letter on Nov. 25. Federal guidelines require that the government inform the FISC if it discovers that surveillance warrant filings “contained a misstatement or omission of material fact.”
In her order, Collyer said that Justice Department now has to “identify all other matters currently or previously before this Court that involved the participation of the FBI OGC attorney.” She set Friday as the deadline to hand over the information.
Collyer also ordered the FBI to disclose whether Clinesmith has been referred to any bar associates for investigation or disciplinary action. The Justice Department is reportedly conducted a criminal investigation into Clinesmith’s actions.
Collyer released another order on Tuesday blasting the FBI for submitting “false” and “misleading” applications for the surveillance warrants. That order said that the Justice Department reported other omissions in the Carter Page applications to the FISC in July 2018.
Collyer’s order does not address the activities of other FBI employees who withheld information from the court, including “Case Agent 1,” an FBI counterintelligence agent who is criticized heavily in the IG report.
“Case Agent 1 was primarily responsible for some of the most significant errors and omissions in the FISA applications,” the IG report says.
The agent is not accused of altering documents, but the report lays out six areas where he withheld information that was exculpatory for Page or derogatory for Christopher Steele, the former British spy whose dossier the FBI used in the Page applications.
The agent played a key role in several aspects of the investigation. He was the FBI handler for Stefan Halper, an informant who the bureau used to make contact with Page and George Papadopoulos, another Trump campaign aide.
The IG report said that Case Agent 1 failed to tell the Justice Department and FISC about exculpatory remarks that Page and Papadopoulos told Halper.
The agent also took part in a January 2017 interview with the main source for Christopher Steele’s dossier. The source disputed key parts of the dossier during that interview, and said that Steele had passed along rumor and speculation as fact. The agents failed to disclose the derogatory information about Steele to the FISC.
The agent, who initiated the FISA application against Page, also failed to tell Justice Department attorneys in August 2016 that the Trump adviser was an “operational contact” for the CIA. The agent falsely stated that Page’s relationship with the CIA ended far earlier than it actually did.
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact email@example.com
Damage control! Fires on all decks!
I wonder if Klinesmith’s attorneys will use the “Orange Man Bad” defense?
FISA court judges are either huge rubes , lazy ,unconcerned, or worse….. they were willing participants in this obvious
child-like setup. Regardless….. they should be fired …all who touched these warrants.
If the FBI submitted “false” or “misleading” statements in their applications what leads her to believe they will obey her orders? They knew what they were doing was wrong and even subversive, yet here we are.