OpinionTrending Commentary

Radical Rachel Maddow Moves to Save Trump-Russia Conspiracy Theories

With the fake news media still reeling after the CNN’s self-immolation over getting caught pushing a lie that an advisor of President Donald Trump was connected to a Russian investment fund, you can probably forgive many of them for looking to work new angles.

MSNBC’s star conspiracy monger Rachel Maddow has come up with a real doozy, a twist in the great Trump hunt that is diabolical and an inspiration that brings to mind disgraced former CBS anchorman Dan Rather.

On Thursday, the day prior to President Trumps meeting with Vladimir Putin, the ferret-faced lesbian used the first part of her show to claim that someone was trying to pass off fake documents to MSNBC on the Trump-Russia connection.

Via The Hill “Maddow warns other media of fake NSA documents”:

MSNBC host Rachel Maddow warned other media outlets on Thursday that she believes she was provided forged National Security Agency documents alleging collusion between a Trump campaign official and Russia’s efforts to influence last year’s presidential election.

“I feel like I need to send this up like a flare for other news organizations in particular,” Maddow said on her program Thursday night.

“Somebody, for some reason, appears to be shopping a fairly convincing fake NSA document that purports to directly implicate somebody from the Trump campaign in working with the Russians in their attack in the election,” she said.

“This is news, because: Why is someone shopping a forged document of this kind to news organizations covering the Trump-Russia affair?” Maddow asked.

Maddow explained that she and her producers compared the document they received with a leaked NSA document published last month by The Intercept. That document quickly resulted in the arrest of a 26-year-old federal contractor, Reality Winner.

Maddow said she thinks the document she received was created by copying elements of the document published by The Intercept.

Maddow’s claims drew the attention of Pulitzer Prize winner Glenn Greenwald over at The Intercept who expressed skepticism.

https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/883384446816223234

For which he was promptly called out as an agent of Putin:

https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/883373719405686788

Even James Comey‘s buddy Benjamin Wittes jumped into the fray, a possible sign that the former FBI Director may have something to do with the leaks behind Maddow’s story.

What Ms. Maddow is doing is really slick, she is immunizing MSNBC and the rest of the professional liars for the next time one of their stories gets blown up as total bullshit. They can always blame it on the “Russians” and their “agent”s providing forged or phony documents.

Raving Rachel didn’t come up with this herself. It was already tried by the Democrats and their deeply embedded Intelligence Community allies last year.

Furthermore, former FBI Director James Comey made the ridiculous assertion that he had what he claimed was a fake Russian document that drove his strange conduct when he cleared Hillary Clinton of any wrongdoing with her email matter.

What it appears to boil down to – at least in this humble author’s personal opinion – is that the CNN debacle badly harmed the perpetual conspiracy machine and the anonymous sources that provide the fuel for its engine.

Going forward, if a story fails to hold up under scrutiny, it will all be blamed on forged documents.

Down the rabbit hole we go!

Support Conservative Daily News with a small donation via Paypal or credit card that will go towards supporting the news and commentary you've come to appreciate.

Donn Marten

Donn Marten is a fearless truth teller who calls it like he sees it despite the prevailing establishment narrative. The opinions expressed belong solely to this author and not do not necessarily reflect those of CDN itself.

Related Articles

One Comment

  1. We don’t have to follow the rabbit……But, we DO need to plug the hole…..Creatures like Maddow aren’t slick….they’re sick! ….And dangerous!

    Even some ‘reliable’ sources should be checked for ‘truth’ and anonymous sources ignored. After vetting, we need to share with others the real story.

    What does it mean to you to be an American?

Back to top button