Tag Archives: VP Debate

VP Joe Biden Caught Embellishing His Role, Again

Here’s another story that should be on the “front lines” in the “Main Stream News”.  Unfortunately, many Americans will never learn of this story, which has been buried by ABC.  Jake Tapper, one of the few “real” journalists left attempting to dig into stories that have teeth, filed this story a few hours ago.  Apparently, VP Joe Biden has been caught embellishing his role in the 1983 Social Security reforms.  According to Biden, he was one of 8 key players who hunkered down in a room, coming to a bipartisan agreement which lead to the reform in 1983.  During the VP debate, Biden stated:

“Look, I was there when we did that with Social Security in 1983.  I was one of eight people sitting in the room that included Tip O’Neill negotiating with President Reagan.  We all got together and everybody said, as long as everybody’s in the deal, everybody’s in the deal, and everybody is making some sacrifice, we can find a way.”

Then, on Meet the Press on April 29,2007, then Senator Biden stated he was:

 “one of five people — I was the junior guy — in the meeting with Bob Dole and George Mitchell when we put Social Security on the right path for 60 years.”

Problematic, is the historical record.  Jovial Joe, simply was not one of the “key players” , nor was he is any “room” for any meeting about this reform.   In fact, in Biden’s own memoir “Promises to Keep”, makes no reference to Biden being a part of any such Social Security reform.  Something that so blatantly demonstrates the Vice Presidents misleading quotes in front of 60 million Americans during the VP Debate,  should be at least put ahead of what the “Main Stream Media” is leading with, “women in binders“.    Read the full article here on VP Joe Biden’s “misstatements”.

Did We Watch The Same VP Debate?

Rob Kall’s article, “Ryan: A Weak, Minor League Teacup” made me laugh. Kall tries to pass off Biden’s smiles and grins as, “… part of his plan to marginalize Ryan, to show … contempt for Ryan … Biden backed up his smiling contempt with strong words.”

That having been said, some research into what both candidates said is certainly in order.

  • Unbiased Martha Raddatz – She was, after the debate, criticized for interrupting [Paul Ryan] 31 times – that’s in addition to the 82 timesBiden interrupted Ryan. So, it seems that both Raddatz and Biden tried to “marginalize Ryan,” to “show … contempt for Ryan….””Biden backed up his smiling contempt with strong words” – unfortunately, his “strong words” weren’t founded on facts, something I don’t say without cause:
  • Biden’s “facts”require White House clarification; 26 times Biden stressed the importance of facts:
    • “White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, [on October 12, 2012,] tried to explain why Biden’s remarks were being misinterpreted.” There is a word for what Carney is doing: dissembling!
  • Foreign Policy:
    • “Biden falsely claims he did not vote to invade Afghanistan or Iraq.”
    • “Biden contradicts State, blames intelligence community for Libya misinformation.”
    • “Biden claims the administration didn’t know the Benghazi consulate requested greater security, again contradicting State.”
  • Tax “Malarkey”:
    • Biden: “97 percent of the small businesses in America pay less – make less than $250,000. Let me tell you who some of those other small businesses are: hedge funds that make $600 million, $800 million a year. That’s – that’s what they count as small businesses, because they’re pass-through.”
    • Biden: “We went ahead and made sure that we cut taxes for the middle class.”
  • Entitlements and Taxes. According to Biden:
    • “The capital gains tax rate is a loophole.” False.
    • “About 120,000 high-income families would get an additional $500 billion tax cut over 10 years.” False
    • “Romney’s tax plan would cut taxes by $5 trillion.” False
    • “Romney’s tax plan would cut deductions for the middle class.” FalseOn the other hand, we find Ryan’s statements to be true. It’s difficult to marginalize the truth!
    • “Raising taxes on small businesses would cost 710,000 jobs.” True
    • “The tax rate on small businesses would rise to nearly 45 percent under President Obama’s proposal.” True

I also got a laugh from Igor Volsky’s article, “At The Vice Presidential Debate: Ryan Told 24 Myths In 40 Minutes.” Volsky manages to list 24 myths, some of them are a “stretch” at best:

  • Myth # 1: Ryan said, “It took the president two weeks to acknowledge that [the Libya attack] was a terrorist attack.” Volsky says, “Obama used the word ‘terrorism’ to describe the killing of Americans the very next day at the Rose Garden.” To that statement, I have two questionsd. First, just where in his statement does Obama refer to the Lybia attack? Second, if Obama was referring to the Lybia attack, why the elablorate cover-up attempt by trying to blame a film? Even Biden didn’t buy what Volsky is espousing.
  • Myth # 3: Ryan said, “Medicare and Social Security are going bankrupt. These are indisputable facts.” Volsky replies: “[T]he possibility of Medicare going bankrupt is … greatly exaggerated.” I agree, “bankrupt” is the wrong word, so let’s use “insolvency.” According to a Congressional Research Service report, Medicare’s “Hospital Insurance Trust Fund” (Part A) is projected to be insolvent in 2017 (Table 1, page 5). Talk about a myth! The Social Security Trust Fund, comprised entirely of “Special Bonds,” is truly a myth. And, the Social Secuity Trust Fund is projected to become insolventin 2016.
  • Myth # 8: Ryan said, “Obamacare takes $716 billion from Medicare to spend on Obamacare.” Volsky replies: “Ryan is claiming that Obamacare siphons off $716 billion from Medicare, to the detriment of Medicare beneficiaries.” Please view this article. ‘Nuff said.

As Kall likes to say: “Bottom Line:” According to Dr. Charles Krauthammer, Washington Post columnist, ““If you read the transcript, I think it’s dead even. If you heard it on radio, Biden won. If you watched on television, he lost. In the transcript, if you just look at the raw arguments I think it was even because each side had points to make and made them. I think on balance, not one side was stronger than another.” He continued, “If you put them all together and you end up with television where you saw the demeanor that the Vice President had in regard to Ryan, I think that undid the advantage in rhetoric that he had in carrying the debate. It was so disrespectful.” So, according to Krauthammer, Biden was the loser if you watched the debate on TV.

Who “won?” I guess that is like beauty – it’s in the eye of the beholder.

But that’s just my opinion.

Please visit RWNO, my personal web site.