<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conservative Daily News &#187; Lord Moncton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/tag/lord-moncton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com</link>
	<description>The best conservative political news, analysis and opinion articles written by a collection of citizen journalists. Covering a range of important topics in blogs, op-ed, and news posts, these upstanding patriots are bringing back American exceptionalism with every entry..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:44:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>EPA Mandates Cap and Trade 3.0/ Congress Remains Irrelevant</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/03/epa-mandates-cap-and-trade-3-0-congress-remains-irrelevant/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=epa-mandates-cap-and-trade-3-0-congress-remains-irrelevant</link>
		<comments>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/03/epa-mandates-cap-and-trade-3-0-congress-remains-irrelevant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>R. Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative daily news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord Moncton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war on energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedailynews.com/?p=46686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Extreme Political Activists, (also known as the EPA, or Environmental Protection Agency) of the Obama administration recently announced new carbon emissions limits for all future coal-fired power plants in the U.S.  that will require all new coal-fired power plants to cut their carbon emissions by approximately 50%.  Just how does EPA head environmental activist Lisa Jackson propose that [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Extreme Political Activists, (also known as the EPA, or Environmental Protection Agency) of the Obama administration recently announced<a title="EPA war on coal" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/27/us-usa-carbon-idUSBRE82Q0W120120327" target="_blank"> new carbon emissions limits </a>for all future coal-fired power plants in the U.S.  that will require all new coal-fired power plants to cut their carbon emissions by approximately 50%.  Just how does EPA head environmental activist Lisa Jackson propose that these power plants acquire such a drastic reduction in carbon emissions?   By using<a title="CCS " href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_capture_and_storage" target="_blank"> CCS technology </a>that requires the capturing of carbon dioxide, and <em>storing it underground</em>, which is a technology that in her own words, will not even be commercially available for 10 years. &#8220;Every model that we&#8217;ve seen shows that technology as it develops will become commercially available certainly within the next 10 years&#8221;, stated Jackson.  Apparently, back in 2008 while campaigning for President, when Barack Hussein Obama told a reporter that under his plan &#8220;energy prices would necessarily skyrocket&#8221; he certainly meant it.</p>
<p><a title="Moncton on CCS" href="http://lordmoncktonfoundation.com/blog/?y=2012&amp;m=2" target="_blank">Lord Moncton</a> summed up the <em>CCS technology</em> Obama&#8217;s EPA is using as it&#8217;s main weapon in their<a title="EPA war on energy" href="http://news.investors.com/article/605833/201203271916/epa-war-on-energy-continues-draconian-rules.htm" target="_blank"> war on affordable energy </a>today as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p>There are clear remedies that could be applied to conventional pollutants. The particulate issue can be rectified by covering stockpiles of coal, dampening and more efficient transportation. The toxic trace elements issue could be resolved by the introduction of <a href="http://www.worldcoal.org/coal-the-environment/coal-use-the-environment/improving-efficiencies/"><span style="color: #aa0000;">ultrasuper-critical coal technology</span></a>. This technology is not only greatly more efficient than <a href="http://joannenova.com.au/2011/08/lower-co2-emissions-by-wait-for-it-building-new-coal-plants/"><span style="color: #aa0000;">all other forms of energy production</span></a> but because it operates at such high temperatures it eliminates most of the real pollutants such as the oxides and mercury.</p>
<div>Coal companies are making a strategic error here. They should acknowledge and rectify the well-known coal-related pollutants, and argue the lack of merit of AGW theory, instead of hiding behind the chimera of Clean Coal or carbon capture technology [CCS]. The problems of CCS are obviously insurmountable: the energy required to capture the CO2 emissions when the coal is burnt requires about as much energy as the coal produces. Secondly, the final sludge containing the captured CO2 requires a storage space about <a href="http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8408"><span style="color: #aa0000;">30 times the size of the quarry from which the coal was mined.</span></a> To date CCS has cost the Australian taxpayers and the coal industry about <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/05/20/ccs-is-doomed-yet-weve-pumped-millions-in-to-it/"><span style="color: #aa0000;">$400 million</span></a>. The coal industry could have solved the particulate problem and made a start on introducing ultrasuper-critical technology.</div>
</blockquote>
<div><a href="http://conservativedailynews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Energy-tyrants-inc.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-46692" title="Energy tyrants inc" src="http://conservativedailynews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Energy-tyrants-inc-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a> The White House claims that the new rules will impact only new plants. But in fact, in the past three years, the Obama administration has hit the utility industry with new regulations on mercury emissions and<a title="EPA cross state pollution illegal mandate" href="http://conservativedailynews.com/2011/11/progressive-senators-gang-up-on-rand-paul-to-allow-epa-to-apply-cap-and-trade-by-fiat/" target="_blank"> cross-border pollution </a>as well. This latest episode is just one of the many elements of the Obama administration&#8217;s war on affordable energy that will snowball into extremely expensive energy prices for the entire nation in the next decade. The<a title="EPA = extreme political activists" href="http://conservativedailynews.com/2011/04/epa-extreme-political-activism/" target="_blank"> <strong>E</strong>xtreme <strong>P</strong>olitical <strong>A</strong>ctivists </a>of the Obama administration must be reigned in immediately by the currently irrelevant [supposed] lawmakers of Congress. That starts with defeating Barack Obama in the November elections, and electing new members of Congress that will take a stand against the EPA&#8217;s unconstitutional mandating of Cap and Trade laws that were voted down by Congress in 2009.</div>
<div></div>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=EPA+Mandates+Cap+and+Trade+3.0%2F+Congress+Remains+Irrelevant+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FoSTjVA" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-big4.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/03/epa-mandates-cap-and-trade-3-0-congress-remains-irrelevant/&amp;t=EPA+Mandates+Cap+and+Trade+3.0%2F+Congress+Remains+Irrelevant" title="Post to Facebook"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/facebook/tt-facebook-big4.png" alt="Post to Facebook" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/03/epa-mandates-cap-and-trade-3-0-congress-remains-irrelevant/&amp;title=EPA+Mandates+Cap+and+Trade+3.0%2F+Congress+Remains+Irrelevant" title="Post to Reddit"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/reddit/tt-reddit-big4.png" alt="Post to Reddit" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/03/epa-mandates-cap-and-trade-3-0-congress-remains-irrelevant/" title="Post to Technorati"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/technorati/tt-technorati-big4.png" alt="Post to Technorati" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/03/epa-mandates-cap-and-trade-3-0-congress-remains-irrelevant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
