<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conservative Daily News &#187; az</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/tag/az/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com</link>
	<description>The best conservative political news, analysis and opinion articles written by a collection of citizen journalists. Covering a range of important topics in blogs, op-ed, and news posts, these upstanding patriots are bringing back American exceptionalism with every entry..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 12:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SCOTUS on AZ SB1070: Mixed Ruling &#8211; 1 of 4 Provisions Upheld</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/06/az-sb1070-mixed-ruling/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=az-sb1070-mixed-ruling</link>
		<comments>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/06/az-sb1070-mixed-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Teresa Wendt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[az]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB1070]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativedailynews.com/?p=58442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BREAKING: It appears the only part of the Arizona SB1070 law that has been upheld is that police can check the papers. In ruling the court has said that a state does not have the right to undermine the federal government. Depending on your personal opinion this was a partial win for Arizona or a [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/06/az-sb1070-mixed-ruling/sb1070/" rel="attachment wp-att-58446"><img class="size-medium wp-image-58446 alignright" title="sb1070" src="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/sb1070-300x199.png" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a>BREAKING: It appears the only part of the Arizona SB1070 law that has been upheld is that police can check the papers. In ruling the court has said that a state does not have the right to undermine the federal government. Depending on your personal opinion this was a partial win for Arizona or a net win for Obama.  <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-182b5e1.pdf">Supreme Court AZ vs United States</a></p>
<p>Update:</p>
<p>Section 3- Unconstitutional. Results: A person in the US does not have to carry identification papers. Federal law requires a legal alien to carry a &#8216;green card&#8217;.</p>
<p>Section 5- Unconstitutional. Results: Cannot be a violation for the state to say it is illegal for any person to look for a job.</p>
<p>Section 6- Unconstitutional. Results: Cannot routinely stop a person to check immigration status.</p>
<p>Section 2-Sent back to 9th Circuit: If a person has been stopped with reasonable suspicion of a crime it is okay to ask for identity/proof of residency.</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=SCOTUS+on+AZ+SB1070%3A+Mixed+Ruling+%E2%80%93+1+of+4+Provisions+Upheld+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FI3VTYD" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-big4.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/06/az-sb1070-mixed-ruling/&amp;t=SCOTUS+on+AZ+SB1070%3A+Mixed+Ruling+%E2%80%93+1+of+4+Provisions+Upheld" title="Post to Facebook"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/facebook/tt-facebook-big4.png" alt="Post to Facebook" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/06/az-sb1070-mixed-ruling/&amp;title=SCOTUS+on+AZ+SB1070%3A+Mixed+Ruling+%E2%80%93+1+of+4+Provisions+Upheld" title="Post to Reddit"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/reddit/tt-reddit-big4.png" alt="Post to Reddit" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/06/az-sb1070-mixed-ruling/" title="Post to Technorati"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/technorati/tt-technorati-big4.png" alt="Post to Technorati" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/06/az-sb1070-mixed-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
