Author Archives: Lisa Richards

About Lisa Richards

Lisa Richards is a life-long Conservative Republican with a capital "C," fighting leftist progressivism like a hyped-up hormonal verbal paper-shredder on over-drive. A writer of politics and history, Richards believes in upholding an defending the Constitution and American Exceptionalism without apologies. Lisa Richards Holds a Bachelors of Science in Political Science from Sacred Heart University. She resides in her native state of Connecticut with her family and an assortment of rescued animals

Why Miss California’s Seemingly Ignorant “Euthanasia, That’s a Vaccine Right?” Is Technically Correct

 miss cal

 

 

Many Americans who watch the Miss America Pageant no doubt wonder if intelligence is still a qualification for young women entering beauty pageants. It appears as long as beauty queens are left-winged and give the desired politically correct answers leftist judges demand, beauty overcomes inglorious stupidity.

I’m speaking of the the latest Miss America Pageant and the beautiful Miss California, who wowed judges with her anti-gun political correctness, but made the “Idiots Hall of Fame” headline’s with her answer to euthanasia: “That’s a vaccine, right?”

My first thought was: “If Euthanasia is a vaccine, strangulation is the best Asthma medication!”

At first I thought Miss California’s brain was perhaps crushed by years of over-weight pageants crowns, until I realized Miss California’s seemingly ignorant answer is 100% correct.

No, I’m not giving stupidity the thumbs up; I’m looking within Miss California’s answer. The young woman has no idea she stated an historical fact: Vaccines do kill diseases, but euthanasia is not about eliminating AIDS or the Flu, it’s about extermination, and you can’t find a better vaccine to kill off mankind than euthanasia.

Obviously Miss California was not joking when she responded. She truly has no idea what euthanasia or eugenics projects are, and for that, the young woman needs to read books containing words and study what she is reading. But despite proving herself ill-educated, Miss California’s brainless comment is historically true.

For instance: Leftist feminist’s ideology demands abortion as the best way to keep a woman’s life free of the hindrance of that nasty pre-existing condition called motherhood. Since pregnancy is viewed by FemiNazis as a disease worse than Cancer and AIDS, as well as the destruction of women’s sex lives, the answer to eliminating the pre-existing condition of motherhood is abortion—euthanasia.

In view of the fact abortion takes the life of unborn children, it technically is euthanasia.

Abortion is the vaccine of all vaccines against unwanted pregnancies for pre-existing conditioned women.

Of course no one in the pageant will ever utter such words. To do so might demoralize women expected to have such high morals, they make Catholic nuns look like street walkers.

History, however, proves Miss California’s uneducated answer true: Euthanasia has vaccinated millions of unwanted human beings from existence.

In author Edwin Black’s book War Against The Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race he discusses how early 19th century, British statistician Francis Galton believed forced sterilization on women considered inferior would prevent a so-called degenerate race, while superior women produced children.

American Charles Davenport, who helped launch radical feminism’s push for abortion with eugenics, believed abortion and sterilization was the answer to creating a perfect society by:

plot[ing] a bold campaign of ‘purging the blood of the American people of the handicapping and deteriorating influences of these anti-social classes,’ meaning the socially unfit, such as epileptics, the feebleminded, the deformed, the deaf, mute and blind.

 

eugenics

 

Davenport’s horrific methods sterilized 50,000 Americans.

Sadly, Miss California would be on the list of “feebleminded, but would be allowed to live, because her looks could produce superior-looking, tall blonde children. And isn’t that of utmost importance!

President Theodore Roosevelt agreed with Davenport’s sterilization and euthanizing of unborn children:

Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce.

 

The Carnegie Institute and Rockefeller Foundation funded the euthanasia projects in America. By 1904, those seen as unfit to breed children were sterilized or forced into abortions. They were: Native Americans, epileptics, alcoholics, Jews, Mexicans, Blacks, small-time crooks, the mentally ill, the unemployed and homeless. In fact David Rockefeller stated this of China’s Mao

The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.

 

Look at China today: The One Child Only Policy. Girl children must be aborted or killed after birth to create a male-dominated society.

Rockefeller was so intent on sterilization and abortion for a perfect race; he funded Hitler’s eugenics scientists in order to create the master race.

Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes upheld Virginia’s decision to sterilize a woman named Carrie Buck, because:

Three generations of imbeciles are enough” in this country.

 

Justice Holmes may have been on to something: Three generations of Kennedys did actually breed  “alcoholics,” “imbecile” sleep drivers, and “degenerate” womanizers!

President Woodrow Wilson approved of sterilization and abortion against anyone considered unfit, and

created a board of examiners of feeble-minded, epileptics and other defectives. Under it, the state could determine, ‘when procreation is inadvisable like for criminals, prisoners, poor kids and the ill-defined, other defectives.’

 

Wilson didn’t realize it, but he classified the whole of Washington leadership in both parties!

Margaret Sanger, who saidThe most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it,” set up the Negro Project to sterilize black mothers and “exterminate” unborn black children.

margaret sanger

 

Hitler was so taken with America’s euthanasia plan; he used abortion and sterilization to euthanize the unborn children of Jewish women and mentally disabled women. This was Hitler’s way of vaccinating unfit women’s bodies in order to produce a pure Aryan race.

 

eugenics holocaust

400,000 Germans were sterilized against their will, while 800,000 abortions were performed yearly. Germany literally began losing its population due to euthanasia. The result was the Lebensborn Born Project: impregnate as many German women by SS soldiers to create the master race. Many of those children were killed because they didn’t look Nordic.

Miss California has no idea just how point on her ill-educated answer is. It’s too bad the young woman doesn’t have a clue as to what euthanasia is and what it has done to the world, as well as her own country, or she could have answered by saying: “Euthanasia? You can’t find a better vaccine against humanity and breeding what progressives consider unfit-to-live people than sterilization and abortion.”

If Bill Clinton is “Father of the Year,” Roman Polanski Should Receive “Baby-Sitter of the Century” Award

Bill ClintonIt’s official: Accused rapist, serial philanderer, and law-breaking impeached President Bill Clinton is “Father of the Year.”

Now all America needs to do is give Roman Polanski America’s “Baby-Sitting” award of the century!

Polanski

For reasons that can only be deemed a-love-of-all-things-immoral-and-licentious, Americans have come to idolize rapists, molesters, murderers, and thugs of every sort.

If you raise your children to be decent, law-abiding people, discipline them with love, teach them that God is real and God loves them, tell them they must achieve what they dream through hard work, don’t expect Americans to hold you in high regard. Morals and values are for old-fashioned idiots.

Case in point: The Father’s Day/Mother’s Day Council Inc. declares:

The Father’s Day/Mother’s Day Council, Inc. is a not-for-profit, non-commercial, all volunteer association. Our mission is to promote the celebration, observation, and preservation of the holidays Mother’s Day and Father’s Day by focusing on the value of good sound parenting.

I’ve no doubt Bill Clinton loves his daughter, but doesn’t sound parenting and being a good father include fidelity?  Apparently not.

 

Bill and Monica

Bill hugs Monica

America no longer values traditional values that create functional, well-rounded citizens. Adultery and fathering children by as many women as possible—while living under the same roof with all those women a man sleeps with—is now considered the utmost in upstanding morals.

The left is gushing over their favorite serial molester—after rapist Roman Polanski of course—Bill Clinton, who is receiving the  “Father of the Year” award.  Huffington Post noted that “National Father’s Day Committee chairman Dan Orwig commended the politician and philanthropist.”

USA Today said Orwig gave Clinton the award for his:

profound generosity, leadership and tireless dedication to both his public office and many philanthropic organizations, President Clinton exemplifies the attributes that we celebrate through the Father of the Year award.

Cheating on your wife, being accused of rape, losing your law license after lying under oath, and being impeached is what The Father’s Day Mother’s Day Council considers exemplary characteristics for fathers? No wonder reality TV is promoting single fatherhood and motherhood (16 and Pregnant), as well as fathering as many children as (All My Babies Mama’s) possible, by as many women a man can have sex with, as normal.

Forget traditional fathers and happily married devoted husbands like father of five and grandfather of 15, presidential candidate Governor Mitt Romney: That man is over-populating the country! And heaven forbid we award the happily married Catholic Senator Rick Santorum! That father of seven children is a creationist, who supports the War on Terror, is against abortion and gay marriage, demands religious freedom for Christians, and home schools his seven children!

Men like Romney and Santorum are ruining America’s new-found ideology of  “do whatever makes you happy.” We need to look to the scumbags and morons of Hollywood if we want our children to have role models they can look up to.

For instance: Drug-addicted, alcoholic, wife beater Charlie Sheen, who was fired from his TV show “Two and a Half Men,” only to become a national hero by displaying his outlandish and debauched life-style in TV interviews. That led to Americans following Sheen by the tens of thousands on Twitter. It also gave Sheen TV commercials where Sheen makes fun of himself, and now, a new and highly rated TV show “Anger Management,” devoting constant innuendos to Sheen’s real life. Charlie Sheen is an icon to today’s young America.

Next: Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, who committed adultery together when Pitt was married to actress Jennifer Aniston. Pitt dumped Aniston for mistress Jolie, whom he refuses to marry, but continues to get pregnant, until gay marriage is legal in all 50 states. Pitt and Jolie’s lives are idolized by Americans.

Next we have reality TV’s superstar foul-mouth: The un-wed “Jersey Shore” mother Snooki, who is famous for doing nothing but drinking, partying, brawling, cussing on TV, and excessive tanning and shopping sprees spent on New Jersey taxpayer’s dime. None of this matters to America’s younger generation, who aspire to be more like Snooki (as well as her drunken, party-boy male co-stars), than well-educated leaders like Governor Sarah Palin and Congresswoman Michele Bachmann and Rep. Lt. Col. Allen West and Senator Marco Rubio.

America’s youth look up to the likes of rappers, whose songs glorify rape and cop killing, as well as mass murderer Charles Manson, who, over the years, has become an icon to music celebrities and their fans.

So, is it any wonder the man accused of rape, who had sex in the oval office, lied about the affair under oath, was impeached and lost his law license as a result, ignored Osama bin Laden, disqualifying bin Laden as a threat when Clinton had the chance to take the terrorist into custody years before 9/11, is awarded “Father of the Year?”

If rap singers, who shoot people, are glorified, but not condemned by the government gunning for guns, and drug addicts and alcoholics are praised as kool, and adulterers are looked upon as people to aspire to, why on earth aren’t we handing Roman Polanski an award for “Baby-Sitter of the Century?”

The UK’s Daily Mail Blames Guns for United States Low Life Expectancy, Not 54 Million and Counting Abortions

Ban Guns1 pound baby

 

 

Leave it to the socialist/collectivist/statist, low-life expectancy, gun-banned UK to blame the United State’s low life expectancy on American gun-ownership and not the fact America has aborted over 54 million children, who, if allowed to live, would be populating this nation’s future.

Never blame abortion for population decline; you might wage war on selfish women’s sexual life-styles, which includes sex, getting pregnant, and aborting that infringement on women’s non-existent constitutional privacy rights.

Infringe the Second Amendment; its guns are decreasing the population!

According to England’s Daily Mail:

The lax gun rules are a major contributor to the low life expectancy rate that Americans have compared to their global counterparts. A new report reveals that of the 17 wealthiest countries, American males have the lowest life expectancy of 75.6 years and their female counterparts are the second lowest in the rankings coming in at 80.7 years.

 

Those mortality numbers are not caused by guns, thousands die each year in America from Influenza.

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) says 71,382 Americans died from the flu in 2007. That year, 23,199 Americans died from alcohol related deaths, and by 2011, the CDC says the leading causes of death in America continue to be “heart disease, cancer, and stroke.”

The CDC further says:

[I]n 2006, Last up to date numbers [for gun deaths], 30,896 total, of which, 642 accidental, 16,883 were Suicide, 12,791 were Homicide, 220 were Undetermined and 360 by Legal intervention. Remember that in the same year, 43,664 [people] were killed in Motor vehicle accidents, 37,286 died from poisoning, 20,823 died from unintention falls. In 2005 CDC reported 652,091 people died from heart disease, 559,312 from cancer and 143,579 from stroke.

 

The University of Utah points out that  “In the U.S. for 2010, there were 31,513 deaths from firearms.” The causes of these guns deaths were the combination of “Suicide 19,308; Homicide 11,015; Accident 600.”

Guns did not make the CDC’s 15 leading causes of death in America for 2011.

Never mind facts, leftists are determined to blame America’s population decline on guns, not leading causes such as disease, or heaven forbid, something far more significant annihilating human life daily: Abortion.

The truth is leftists don’t give a flying fart in space when it comes to unborn children. The left only cares about children born and old enough to enter classrooms where they can be indoctrinated into believing government control of every aspect of citizen’s lives improves health.  Guns, however, are evil, but not pedophilia against children’s little bodies, which is just another sexual orientated life-style choice.

Gun deaths compared to mothers who willingly allow doctors to vacuum their unborn children from the womb and toss babies in trash cans is low.

According to the National Right to Life, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and Guttmacher Institute (GI):

Using GI figures through 2008, estimating 1,212,400 abortions for 2009 through 2011, and factoring in the possible 3% undercount GI estimates for its own figures, the total number of abortions performed in the U.S. since 1973 equals 54,559,615.

 

Abortion in black communities is far higher than gun deaths in American black communities.

 

black baby in gun crosshairs

 

According to GI:

[B]lack women are more than 5 times as likely as white women to have an abortion.  On average, 1,876 black babies are aborted every day in the United States.

 

 Black Genocide.org says:

This incidence of abortion has resulted in a tremendous loss of life. It has been estimated that since 1973 Black women have had about 16 million abortions.

 

The number is calculated at 36 million black American women, whom BG says:

[R]epresents an enormous loss,” [because had] America’s Black community [not aborted 16 million children, there] would now number 52 million persons. It would be 36 percent larger than it is. Abortion has swept through the Black community like a scythe, cutting down every fourth member.

 

Alan Guttmacher says:

black women are more than four times more likely than non-Hispanic white women to have an abortion, and Hispanic women are 2.7 times as likely.

 

“In the US, every day during 2007, about 266 Americans were shot. Every day, a third of them (82 daily) died.” That overall number is extremely low compared to abortion.

Notice the left refuses to declare abortion what it truly is: Race murder.

For the left, murder is only murder when guns are involved. Gun deaths are treated as the most threatening thing to life in America. Abortion simply keeps the planet’s population (which the left is only concerned about when guns are involved) low.

The United States does not have 1,876  gun murders daily in America’s black communities;  murder-by-abortion doctors is helping decrease America’s population, most specifically black Americans.

Your “Babies Mama’s” don’t need guns to decrease population; Margaret Sanger’s vile plan to decrease America’s black population is succeeding.

The Daily Mail skimmed facts while blaming guns for U.S. population decline: “The United States has about six violent deaths per 100,000 residents and none of the 16 other countries included in the review came anywhere close to that ratio.” But:

The researchers said there is little evidence that violent acts occur more frequently in the United States than elsewhere. It’s the lethality of those attacks that stands out…‘One behavior that probably explains the excess lethality of violence and unintentional injuries in the United States is the widespread possession of firearms and the common practice of storing them (often unlocked) at home. The statistics are dramatic,’ the report said.

 

Daily Mail admits:

The U.S. also suffers higher rates of drug-related deaths, infant mortality and AIDS…The nation’s health disadvantages have economic consequences as they lead to higher costs for consumers and taxpayers as well as a workforce that remains less healthy than that of other high-income countries.

 

Notice the quick mention of disease that shifted to blaming America’s economy  for disease deaths.  That’s the subtle statist insinuation that if America had free, socialized [tax-funded] medicine, we would not have people dying from diseases. Just like Europeans, who die from diseases, because socialism forbids full healthcare until your Cancer reaches stage 4, or you have a fatal gun-shot to the head.

The Mail won’t admit guns are not the problem, guns are not decreasing population, and aside from disease and seasonal viruses; abortion is the epidemic decreasing the United State’s population rate by the thousands each day.

No, abortion was never mentioned in the Mail, nor will abortion be mentioned by Stalin-sympathizing, Gulag thug leftists who believe children are not worth crying over unless they are born, and then shot to death, by psychotic murderers.

The truth is, when guns are used to do what abortion doctors do by the thousands each day—kill, then  leftists consider killing children murder.

Piers Morgan Spews Leftist Anti-Gun Propaganda to Gain Independence From America

morgan uncle sam

 

CNN’s socialist import Piers Morgan is threatening “Deport me? If America won’t change its crazy gun laws… I may deport myself” from the United States and go back to anti-gun Great Britain where  the crime rate is the highest in the European Union.

By-the-way, how is Piers leaving America a threat. It’s a gift!

Morgan believes if America’s guns are banned and America has gun-free zones, murders-by-gun will cease.

Can Morgan explain mass-gun murders in gun-free zones? This useless leftist cannot, so his reply to those asking this question is: “You are…unbelievably stupid!” 

Morgan’s leftist stupidity spun into overload after the Newtown, Connecticut massacre. The gun-free zoned school reminds Morgan of a British school shooting that changed his mind regarding gun ownership laws: “The Sandy Hook massacre brought back such horribly vivid memories for me of Dunblane, the worst mass shooting in Britain in my lifetime.”

Dunblane’s massacre didn’t prevent Morgan from enjoying a high-powered sporting shoot-up:

I have fired guns only once in my life, on a stag party…a few years ago when part of the itinerary included a trip to an indoor shooting range. For three hours, our group were let loose on everything from Magnum 45 handguns and Glock pistols, to high-powered  ‘sniper’ rifles and pump-action shotguns. It was controlled, legal, safe and undeniably exciting. But it also showed me, quite demonstrably, that guns are killing machines.

 

“Let loose on everything for three hours?” Sounds like a lot of pent-up aggression Piers!

Notice Morgan admits those “exciting,” “high powered rifles” were safe in his hands. That’s because guns only become killing machines against people when purposely used by evil people to commit cold blooded murder. Or, in the worst case scenario for every law-abiding citizen—shooting someone in self defense.

Morgan knows full-well people determine whether or not guns become killing machines, but he is purposely exercising the First Amendment as a weapon against the Second Amendment for left-wing anti-gun propaganda.

Morgan says:  “If you [Americans] don’t change your gun laws to at least try to stop this relentless tidal wave of murderous carnage, then you don’t have to worry about deporting me.”

Please! I’m turning blue waiting!

Morgan threatened America in a letter printed in Britain’s Daily Mail: 

It’s no exaggeration to say that America’s unique fondness for guns pretty much got cemented by hatred of us Brits and the War of Independence. But the main reason the more fervent gun-rights activists give is a fear of their own US federal government using its army to impinge on their freedom. The problem is that America’s historical love of guns means the country is now awash with them – and with gun death.

 

America’s “fondness” for guns was born out of abject abuse by British Troops: They stormed our towns and homes because the king    “…erected a multitude of new offices and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance,” while seizing our property and people and “…protecting them [British troops], by a mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these States… [and]…depriving us in many cases of the benefits of trial by jury [and] transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses.”

Americans were arrested at will, tried without jury, and executed without evidence.

Americans lacked basic human rights. We were controlled by a tyrant king, prohibited from protecting ourselves from British troops, governors, and the crown that owned everything. The King “…plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.”

We were forced to manufacture British goods without compensation. We were forbidden the use of those goods we manufactured for the king and country, because the King was “abolishing the free system of English laws!

Americans enacted the Second Amendment to prevent government abuse against citizen’s fundamental human rights, not “let loose on everything” and shoot up the streets as Morgan suggests when claiming America is “awash with gun death.”

Morgan is gunning against firearms while blaming the Constitution: “unfortunately ambiguous wording of the 2nd Amendment is twisted to mean that anyone in America can have any firearm they want.”

The wording is clear. Anyone who can read can understand the Second Amendment:  Clause One for a “well regulated militia,” Clause Two gives each citizen the “right to bear arms.”

Furthermore, Americans enacted the Second Amendment to legally own guns through written law, not anarchy! We never sought anarchy, not even war! Our Founders wrote letters for years, begging the king to allow us the basic rights of man. Something Piers Morgan takes full advantage of by living in the U.S.

Moreover, Americans are proud military supporters. Americans willingly join and fight against foreign invaders and those harming our allies. That is why the United States has an all-volunteer military.

Never mind facts, guns kill and Piers claims banning guns eliminates crime:

The ‘more guns, less crime’ argument is utter nonsense. Britain, after Dunblane, introduced some of the toughest gun laws in Europe, and we average just 35 gun murders a year.

 

Hoover Institute Senior Fellow Richard A. Epstein argues against gun bans preventing crime:

It is always hard to design licensing systems to stop dangerous behaviors like driving automobiles, controlling the sale of hard drugs, or using guns… The basic point here is that in any gun-free environment (such as that of Virginia Tech), the assailant knows that he will not meet with any immediate armed resistance, and this puts innocent people at risk.

 

Morgan disagrees:

The gun-lobby logic dictates that the only way to defend against gun criminals is for everyone else to have a gun, too. Teachers, nurses, clergymen, shop assistants, cinema usherettes – everyone must be armed. To me, this is a warped, twisted logic that bears no statistical analysis and makes no sense. Do you fight drug addiction with more cocaine? Alcoholism with more Jack Daniel’s? Of course not…This gun debate is an ongoing war of verbal attrition in America – and I’m just the latest target, the advantage to the gun lobbyists being that I’m British, a breed of human being who burned down the White House in 1814 and had to be forcefully deported en masse, as no American will ever be allowed to forget – Special Relationship notwithstanding.

 

Using the British Troop-Card won’t work Piers. The U.K. and U.S. have been allies since WWI.

As to gun lobbyists: They do not dictate our lives and demand we all own guns. Gun ownership is free choice.

If Morgan wants to leave America, leave, but stop fictionalizing gun statistics if you insist on living off of, and under, our Bill of Rights. And do Americans a favor:  Stop insinuating that we hate the British because of two wars that happened two centuries-ago.

We Americans like Brits, notwithstanding Piers Morgan, whom we should use to get even with Libya—give them Piers Morgan!

How Many Times Does America Have to Go Over the Fiscal Cliff Before the Concussion Kills Us?

uncle sam drives over the fiscall cliff

 

America has gone over the fiscal cliff so often; the concussions have definitely created economic brain damage and lunacy.

First: “Fiscal Cliff” is nothing more than an economic political term for economic idiocy leaders engage in more often than they do with Dominican hookers and interns.

Second: America goes over the fiscal cliff every time the Federal Reserve lowers interest rates to give the federal government an excuse to over lend, spend, and borrow what can never be repaid.

If you are panicking right now, you forgot America has been cliff-diving  for over 200 years and generations of economic brain damage hasn’t taught America one, single thing about printing paper currency and borrowing: Loans cannot be repaid with paper or excessive taxes.

If we paid attention to history, the Federal Reserve wouldn’t stand at attention every time it hears the ca-ching of cash registers ringing the national hymn of Weimar.

Most leaders are more interested in gambling for power than America’s preservation, which is why Obama and Democrats are hyping the fiscal cliff: Make Americans believe the wealthy caused the $16 trillion debt and they must be over-taxed! Only taxation can stop America from collapsing and going over the cliff!

The “Fiscal Cliff” is purposely used as a weapon to destroy the economy and push America to the brink of bankruptcy in order to destroy individual American wealth.

Obama and Democrats are using the “Fiscal Cliff” weapon well. They’ve scared the daylights out of Americans who prefer suffering blind eye concussions rather than understanding that history is repeating itself on a level like never before because of our leaders, not the people.

Example: The American Revolution cost a fortune, and when we ran out of money, the Continental Congress created a new currency: Paper notes known as “Continentals.”

 

hamilton note

As always, the government over prints paper and people assume the notes are equal to gold coins and paper will back up their means.

“Continental” currency worked as well then as now: The Central Bank over-printed to keep up with“Continental” demands.  But paper is not a redeemable, tangible asset.  As the war accelerated, Congress reneged on its promise to issue more notes, inflation skyrocketed, and Americans were left in desperate need.

Alexander Hamilton, whose ideas were more in line with British government, created another central bank with one currency. The colonies had few banks: Britain controlled banking and prevented rival banks from developing. America needed a way to smooth the progress of government financing to investors and lending to businesses to develop a prosperous American economy. The idea was great, but failed: Hamilton’s Second Bank sent all United States gold [currency backing] to foreign countries during the 1790s.

In Hamilton’s Writings, his December 13, 1790  “Report on a National Bank” to the House of Representatives he stated: “The bank did not have the ability to circulate great sums of money beyond actual gold and silver coins held within the bank’s vaults,” so another rout was taken that pushed America over a fiscal cliff:

The stamping of paper is an operation so much easier than the laying of taxes, that a government in the practice of paper emissions, would rarely fail in any such emergency to indulge itself too far, in the employment of that resource, to avoid as much as possible one less auspicious to present popularity.

 hamilton dollar

Hamilton’s Bank continued printing nonredeemable notes as inflation escalated. By 1812 America dove over the fiscal cliff.

I’ll never understand why we outlawed dueling!

According to the Bureau of Public Debt:

The War of 1812 was financed mainly through the use of borrowed funds. Total public debt increased from $45.2 million on January 1, 1812, to $119.2 million as of September 30, 1815.

America’s banking system was so mismanaged; we dove again: The Panic of 1819.

In his book Andrew Jackson and the Bank War, historian Robert V. Remini wrote that by 1822 America’s economy collapsed: American banks fell and the people lost everything. Anger was so wide-spread, Americans elected President Andrew Jackson, who tore down the Second Bank,  placed money back into individual state’s hands, pushed for gold and silver to remain in America, and sold federal land to pay off the national debt.

 

destroying second bank

Jackson’s policies never prevented future government borrowing and lending idiocy or the creation of Federal Reserve.

Cheap paper seems to cause convenient amnesia.

By 1846, the United States war with Mexico over annexation of Texas and California cost $64 million, so “Congress authorized the issuing of additional debt to meet these obligations. It is this concept that would later become the basis for the Savings Bond program. By the end of 1849, public debt totaled $63.1 million.”

The War Between the States:

A final official estimate in 1879 totaled $6,190,000,000. The Confederacy spent perhaps $2,099,808,707. By 1906 another $3.3 billion already had been spent by the U.S. government on Northerners’ pensions and other veterans’ benefits for former Federal soldiers. Southern states and private philanthropy provided benefits to the Confederate veterans. The amount spent on benefits eventually well exceeded the war’s original cost.

By the end of the fiscal year of 1899, America paid much of its debt, leaving the country with $1.9 billion in gross debt.

But America elected Woodrow Wilson, who enacted the Federal Reserve, IRS, and borrowed $11.577 billion ($206.186 billion in 2002 dollars), we are still repaying today, to finance WWI, while borrowing further from Americans. This doesn’t include the enactment of the Debt Commission for borrowing funds.

Wilson admitted:

I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world – no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.

Notice the “unhappy” president never repealed his ruination.*

Next, the “dominant” FDR “civilized” us with government programs and ended the gold standard in 1933,  declaring private ownership of gold illegal, except gold jewelry. I assume marriage had something to do with that decision.

exec order to confiscate gold

Though foreign governments could sell gold to America, President Nixon destroyed the gold standard completely, leaving America on a fiat standard not backed by commodities.

But hey, we have communist China backing worthless paper while manufacturing worthless American products!

Forget the damn cliff, we threw a rope over the highest limb on the tallest tree long-ago and hanged ourselves with our own economic stupidity!

* [Editor’s note: This story may be apocryphal.]

Harry Reid, Why Are You Furious with John Boehner’s “Plan B;” It’s A Democrat Plan in Republican Disguise!

 Beohner if we must destropy nation

 

Harry Reid is up in arms over John Boehner’s “Plan B,”  insisting the plan will hurl America over the fiscal cliff and force the nation to default its loans.

Memo to Harry Reid: America is $16 trillion in debt. I think it’s safe to assume you leaders defaulted America when we passed the $1 trillion mark.

Furthermore, if you’re going to feign indignant outrage, don’t do it over John Boehner’s liberal Democrat actions. Boehner’s no different than you Harry: You’re both sticking it to the people!

 

Reid gives the finger

 

As to Speaker Boehner, he’s is nothing more than a liberal Democrat in GOP clothing. He has no intentions of demanding deep tax-and-spend cuts or he never would have agreed to the 2011 debt ceiling hike.  If Boehner truly wanted to cut spending, he would have called the Democrat’s bluff:  Demand they cut billions from  government-funded programs like Planned Parenthood. Nancy Pelosi’s facelift would hit the floor, but, calling for deep cuts in areas taxpayers do not want to fund is the kind of demands conservatives want, not tax-hikes on the wealthy, as Boehner’s “Plan B” demands.

Despite “Plan B” being nothing more than anti-wealth  socialist collectivism, Reid says:

Speaker Boehner’s ‘plan B’ is the farthest thing from a balanced approach. It will not protect middle class families because it cannot pass both Houses of Congress. The Senate bill is the only ‘plan B’ that can be signed into law and prevent taxes from rising by $2,200 on the average middle-class family. Now is the time to show leadership, not kick the can down the road. Speaker Boehner should focus his energy on forging a large-scale deficit reduction agreement. It would be a shame if Republicans abandoned productive negotiations due to pressure from the Tea Party, as they have time and again.

 

Give me a break! John Boehner lays down and rolls over for Obama and spending hikes like a Paris Hilton sex video!

I’m surprised Harry Reid isn’t praising “Plan B;” it’s progressive Democrat legislation: More tax-and-spend hikes on millionaire earners that will trickle down to the middle class, creating more job and business losses and more government dependency.

Reid is angry. He  says “John Boehner seems to care more about keeping his speakership than keeping the nation on firm financial footing.” If I didn’t know better I would say Harry was talking about himself and every other leader serving unconstitutional life terms.

Its obvious Harry Reid doesn’t spend much time around Speaker Boehner or Reid would realize they are two of a kind:  They care more about their careers than serving the country and fixing America’s economy.

Reid and Boehner

Still, Reid is in a huff over Boehner’s tax-hiking fiscal cliff standoff.  As if any legislative standoff will stop the bill-shoving Obama from hiking taxes on   American earners in 2013.

Reid blames Boehner, insisting he is pushing America over the fiscal cliff with a plan that terminates Bush-era tax-cuts to those earning $250,000 and under. Reid says this debacle could be avoided if only Boehner would concede to Senate legislation.  Political translation: Concede to Harry Reid. America’s dilemma: All Boehner ever does is concede.

America has a debt crisis both parities contributed to.  None of these spendaholic leaders ever admits that America goes over the fiscal cliff every time the Federal Reserve cuts interests rates too low, over prints worthless paper, and the federal government over spends, lends and borrows what it cannot repay.

That didn’t stop Reid from calling Boehner a “dictator” who won’t go against the GOP, because Boehner caterers to his fellow Republican leaders:

The American people I don’t think understand the House of Representatives is operating without the House of Representatives. It’s being operated by a dictatorship of the speaker, not allowing the vast majority of the House of Representatives to get what they want…If the 250 [cut-off for income tax votes] were brought up, it would pass overwhelmingly.

 

Furthermore, Reid insists “what goes on [in the GOP] shouldn’t be decided by the majority, it should be decided by the whole House of Representatives.”

Reid never made that statement when Nancy Pelosi was Speaker of the House. Nor will Reid admit his statements reflect the way President Obama pushes bills into law without a “majority” Congressional consent.

As to dictators, most leaders in Washington are dictators, the reason many Americans dislike the modern-day government. Both parties have become power-grabbing life-termed aristocrats who care more about party loyalty than working to preserve, uphold, and defend the Constitution.  That’s why the Tea Party started.

Reid himself  admitted to the Senate that conservatives are sick and tired of Boehner:

He has so many people over there [in the GOP] that won’t follow what he wants, That’s obvious from the debacle that took place that week [with Tea Party leaders saying no to “Plan B”]. And it was a debacle. It was so bad, he was in such difficult shape there, he wouldn’t even allow a vote to take place with his Republicans because he knew he would lose.

 

Boehner cartoon

 

Conservative House members are furious with Boehner because he silenced their votes, removed their committee seats, trashed the Tea Party, and acts like Harry Reid:  He legislates as Democrat and compromises to Obama.

Boehner has not presented one, single plan that significantly cuts spending, decreases the deficit, and reduces taxes for every American.

According to The Economist:  

“Plan B” is a bill that hikes taxes only for income over $1 m[illion] per year, with no other spending measures or tax compromises…Mr. Boehner’s Plan B is an attempt to defray blame for the fiscal cliff onto Democrats, but if the country actually goes over the cliff, Plan B is unlikely to shield Republicans. Pressure from business groups and from taxpayers to reach a compromise deal before the economy suffers serious damage will become immense.

 

Hiking taxes on millionaires will crush middle class businesses that earn $1-$5 million before taxes. “Plan B” is another compromise for government programs to continue spending billions through taxes and  increasing debt as America defaults.

Both Reid and Obama should be jumping for joy; John Boehner has been a gift to the DNC: He’s just like Harry Reid, a liberal Democrat.

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Left: Conservatives Will Discuss Gun Control When the Left Agrees to Discuss Abortion Control

ban rifles1 pound baby

 

 

How many anti-gun leftists screaming for gun control would have supported the abortions of the 20 Newtown, Connecticut children had their parents chose abortion when those children were in the womb? Millions of leftists, including many screaming for gun bans.  Yet, when children are murdered by-way-of guns, leftists whore out every media camera, grabbing front and center attention to demonstrate tearful horror over the loss of innocent lives. Innocent lives leftists consider a hindrance to women when the innocents are in the womb.

So to leftists demanding more gun control discussions with legislators and citizens, let’s have that gun control discussion when you leftists are willing to talk about abortion control.

The left’s favorite protest next to capitalism and abortion on demand is gun control. Considering how fervently anti-death penalty and anti-Second Amendment the left is, it’s quite an oxymoron on their part to support killing children in the womb while mourning children who have been murdered by a monstrous gunman.

Let’s not forget the majority of these gun-ban pushers, horrified by a lunatic’s mass murder of children, would protest for that gunman’s life had he not killed himself and faced the death penalty.

death penalty makes us all killers

 

 

Of course this is a hopeless argument against useless idiots.  If given the choice to save pregnant women or puppies standing before firing squads, the left would throw themselves on top of the doomed puppies. To hell with our nation’s future and our Constitution’s preservation, unborn children and guns hinder our lives!

Conservatives across the spectrum can try to hold abortion control discussions, but we know the left will have none of it: Abortion is necessary to a woman’s sexual liberty, abortion is not murder, guns are, because guns kill! Abortion simply makes life-style problems go away.

Despite gun violence arguments and the Brady Campaign’s  claim that citizen gun mortality is higher than all U.S. wars combined, America has more abortion deaths per year than gun deaths.  But comparing civilian gun deaths to over 300 years of wars involving Americans is a political ploy to outlaw all guns.  Everyone knows wars incurs death; that’s why war is called war. Correlating armed civilians with war insinuates armed citizens are at war with other citizens. That is false. But don’t ever call abortion a war on children; you might offend women crusading for their freedom from that combat known as motherhood!

 

abortion not legal debate

 

If the left wants to discuss their hatred of guns, the right is justified in discussing its abhorrence toward taking the lives of unborn, as well as presenting those statistics.

According to National Right To Life, the CDC reports:

After dropping 25% from a high of over 1.6 million [abortions] in 1990, the number of abortions performed annually in the U.S. has leveled off at about 1.2 million a year.

 

Still, the abortion rate is high.

 The CDC reports: 

In 2009 [alone], 784,507 legal induced abortions were reported to CDC from 48 reporting areas. The abortion rate for 2009 was 15.1 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years and the abortion ratio was 227 abortions per 1,000 live births.

 

The overall total of abortions in America to date:

Using GI figures through 2008, estimating 1,212,400 abortions for 2009 through 2011, and factoring in the possible 3% undercount GI estimates for its own figures, the total number of abortions performed in the U.S. since 1973 equals 54,559,615.

 

Abortion rates may have dropped, but the numbers are still astronomical compared to gun deaths.

But leftist will never admit abortion is a war on unborn children.

 

gun to unborn baby

 

Gun deaths in 2009—intentional and accidental combined—totaled:“31,347, Deaths per 100,000 population: 10.2” CDC tracking has shown that firearm-related deaths—homicide, suicide or accidental—have declined each year.

The University of Pennsylvania Wharton College facilitates the anti-gun beliefs by claiming:

The US remains far behind most other affluent countries in terms of life expectancy…[and] the elimination of all firearm deaths in the US would increase the male life expectancy more than the total eradication of all colon and prostate cancers.

 

Sorry academics, but had 54,559,615 Americans not been aborted, America would have a higher life expectancy today.

This is not making light of gun deaths. All death is tragic. But leftists view high abortion rates as a woman’s entitlement (unborn children lack rights until born and a gunman puts a gun to their heads) to control her own body and gun ownership the ultimate threat to society. That perspective is two-faced. How is killing unborn children, our nation’s future, just, but guns are deadly? Wouldn’t it be correct to say abortion is deadly because that is the procedure’s intention, and guns are only deadly when used to commit harm or fired accidentally?

Leftists disagree. Preventing abortion is a “War on Women.” Abortion is necessary for population control and freeing women from sexual impediments. Gun control and bans, however, are necessary for government to control citizen’s lives, conduct, religious, social, and political views.

If you cannot defend yourself from tyranny, then you are forced to become its servant.

Still, if Americans are to have gun control debates, leftists must allow conservative views on abortion. If leftists are hell-bent on abolishing the Second Amendment, conservatives have every right to discuss petitioning the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v Wade and placing abortion back in individual state hands.

If states have rights to impose stringent laws on guns, individual states should be given back their rights to decide whether or not citizens want abortion legal.

The mere suggestion of that discussion would go over like the Atomic Bomb on Japan.

Never mind the fact radically leftist California, New York and Massachusetts would never outlaw abortion and women seeking sexual freedom could turn their vacuumed sovereignty into a vacation package. Forget it, abortion is not allowed on the control discussion table.

No matter how hard commonsense argues with the left, guns will always be deemed violent weapons and abortion will always be considered a necessary means to end the domination of women’s bodies by unwanted children, those same women show compassion for, if children are murdered by an insane gunman.

There are two sides to life and death issues.  If one side is allowed to have a debate on gun deaths, the other side deserves the right to bring up abortion deaths. After all, it is only “fair” to “share” our individual ideas.

Ban All Guns, But Whatever You Do, Don’t Violate the Violent Criminal’s Right to Commit Evil

stop the gun violence

As a resident of the state of Connecticut, I can state quite categorically that Connecticut has some of the strictest gun control laws in the United States. Despite those laws, the left insists that if  Connecticut imposed stricter bans, Newtown resident Adam Lanza would never have murdered 20 children and seven adults in a mass shooting.

The left continues making that claim, but so far this ideology toward  banning guns has never prevented gun violence or stopped monsters from obtaining guns. Anyone determined to commit violent crimes will purchase guns illegally if guns are banned.

Try telling that to leftists, they believe guns are the problem, the left wants guns put away, not the criminally insane, who seem to have more rights than innocent people who have a right to bear arms.

CNN’s Piers Morgan, who hails from gun free/high crime Britain, is an example of anti-gun leftist ignorance that views guns as the perpetrator, not violent people. Morgan insists gun-free zones prevent gun violence and  argued this flawed view with More Guns, Less Crime author John R. Lott who explained that “gun-free” zones attract those seeking gun violence:

Look at the [Aurora] movie theater one, for example. There were seven movie theaters showing the movie “Batman” movie within a 20 minute drive of where the killer lived. Only one of those banned guns. He [the killer] didn’t go to the movie theater closest to his home. He didn’t go to the movie theater with the largest screen. He went to the one movie theater that banned guns. Now if you look at bans generally…In the U.K. and Jamaica, Ireland, island nations that have banned guns, you can’t find a place where murder rates have actually gone down. They have gone up usually by large amounts.

 

bloody gun

 

 

Morgan’s reply to gun bans not preventing gun crimes is it’s “a load of nonsense,” and “Nobody needs one of these [guns] in their home, end of story.”

The left chooses to view mentally unbalanced people as harmless and guns as mentally unbalanced.

Leftist logic has never, in its progressive history, contributed laws preventing demented monsters from committing cold-blooded murder with guns or other weapons.  Instead, the left, who decided mentally insane should rehabilitate among society, claim: “[I]if all else failed, such horrors could always be attributed to improper implementation of Progressive programs, reflecting ‘not faulty conceptualization but inadequate funding.’”

Inadequate funding is not the problem.  Every violent mass gun spree has been committed by mentally deranged people who methodically plotted violence with intent to murder as many human lives as possible.

The left ignores facts in order to hone in on guns as perpetrators of gun violence.  If the mentally derange rehabilitate by committing violence against human beings, don’t blame their violent actions, blame guns!

 

guns kill people

 

That brings us to Adam Lanza. What if Lanza’s mother never owned a gun? Can anti-gun lobbyists guarantee Lanza would never have found a way to illegally purchase guns?  Can the left promise that people intent on mass murder will never use bombs to blow up schools or other public places? No one can make those promises. Evil does not alert law enforcement prior to the act, giving details to the plans. Violent people plot murder in secret and gun laws do not stop them from carrying out their intentions.

What about Connecticut gun laws?  Connecticut requires that gun owners  have permits to carry pistols in public, otherwise, “No state permit is required for the possession of rifles, shotguns or handguns. A person must be twenty-one years of age to possess a handgun.”  Furthermore, Connecticut enforces strict background checks on everyone registering to purchase guns. Adam Lanza was 20 years-old, he could not register or purchase handguns, so he stole his mother’s guns after murdering her.

Also, Connecticut’s strict gun laws demand:

It is unlawful to possess a handgun by a person who has been convicted of a felony; convicted as a delinquent of a serious juvenile offense which includes illegal possession of a controlled substance, negligent homicide, third degree assault, first degree reckless endangerment, second degree unlawful restraint, rioting, or second degree stalking; discharged from custody within the preceding 20 years after acquittal by reason of mental disease or defect; confined by court order for mental illness within the preceding 12 months; subject to a restraining or protective order involving physical force; or an illegal alien. It is unlawful to possess any other firearm by a person who has been convicted of a felony.

So far it doesn’t appear that Lanza had a criminal record. But that doesn’t change the fact that every criminal has a first time.

As far as “assault weapons” go, Connecticut  gun laws state

No person shall possess any “assault weapon” unless that person possessed that firearm before October 1, 1993 and received a certificate of possession from the Connecticut State Police prior to July 1994

When registering in this state, Connecticut law demands “The applicant must successfully complete a handgun safety course approved by the commissioner.”

Connecticut forbids gun owners from storing “any loaded firearm on any premises under his control if” an underage teen or child can gain access to the weapon.” The state requires gun owners to keep guns “secured…in a locked container.”

If Nancy Lanza securely stored her guns, firearm laws did not stop her son from acting out in violence.

Moreover, it’s illegal in Connecticut to carry firearms on public, private elementary or secondary school property.  Strict gun laws did not prevent Lanza from entering the school and shooting 27 people.

But it’s not the criminals’ fault. Laws are ignored by violent criminals, whose guns should have told them: “You cannot use me to murder other people, it’s wrong, and I will be forced to take all the blame!”

Facts remains: Evil people will always plot and carry out malevolent deeds. Banning guns, titling guns “assault weapons”, blaming guns for violence and not people,  hasn’t prevented murderous lunatics from obtaining guns. Banning guns in America will never prevent illegal gun possession, it will only lead to crimes against the innocent without rights to bare arms.

Satan’s Off the Hook: Guns are Responsible for Mankind’s Violent Actions

Satan can rest assured, the fall of mankind is not his fault: “The gun made us do it!”  By the way radical leftists react to guns, one would assume that is what the original Biblical translation in Genesis of mankind’s fall states.

Since the 1960’s radical leftists have been assaulting guns with the concocted phrase “assault weapons,” in order to  scare everyone into believing that owning guns automatically leads to violent crimes.

NBC’s Bob Costas used leftist propaganda in an on air tirade to attack guns, which seem to have excessively high levesl of anger. And those bullets! They have a deep desire to poke holes in people!

Human beings are incapable of assaulting others unless they possess mentally disabled guns. After all, “guns kill, not people!”

Please, one  does not need a gun to assault; a baseball bat to the knees will do the job quite well. So I’ve heard.

Bob Costas and the anti-gun crowd refuse to face facts: Had Jovan Belcher not owned a gun, he could have strangled his girlfriend to death, but the left must blame guns so leftists can assault the Second Amendment and individual liberties.

If guns truly are “assault weapons,” and it’s guns that actually kill, then lunatics should never be blamed when they go on a murderous rampage, shooting up a movie theater, right? After all, the gun did it.

 

Facts are facts: In the United States, non-gun related deaths and injuries occur at higher rates than gun injuries and deaths: “Choking and suffocation is the third leading cause of home and community death in the United States.”

Look at the causes of death by accident or murder in America:

Falls: 5,961 deaths
Fires/Burns: 4,833 deaths
Poisonings: 3,402 deaths
Drownings: 1,092 deaths
Suffocations: 823 deaths        
Other: 1,937 deaths
All Causes: 18,408 deaths

 

 

 

“In Japan, around 150 people die from hot water scalding every year.”

Let’s not forget the infamous Connecticut Wood Chipper Murder Case: The husband murdered his wife, without a gun, and dismembered the body so he could put the body parts through a wood chipper to hide the crime.

So Jovan Belcher did not need a gun to kill his girlfriend; he could have poisoned her or pushed her down the stairs, and then stuffed her body into a wood chipper.

Violent people commit violent crimes with their bare hands when they don’t have weapons.

Death-by-sports injuries has high statistics.  According to Sports Illustrated, a high rate of deaths occur in baseball from head injuries caused by fast balls:

 

[N]ine minor leaguers and 111 amateur baseball players as young as eight years old have died as a result of beanings since 1887. More than 90 other players were killed either by pitches that hit other parts of their bodies, usually the chest, or by balls thrown by other fielders.

 

 

Golf has a 78% rate of injuries caused by golf clubs and balls.  That’s not including Tiger Woods’ head and face injuries caused by his club-wielding wife, who assaulted Woods, and his Cadillac Escalade, with his golf club. We can’t blame Mrs. Woods, after all, that golf club carried a lot of pent up anger against its owner.

 

Perhaps we should ban golf. That would force President Obama to go to work. On second thought, let’s keep golf legal!

What about knife related crimes? Gun-banned Great Britain has a high rate of gang related “knife crimes,”  proving gun bans never stop criminals from finding ways to commit violent crimes.

Even lamps can be used as weapons. Remember the infamous Clinton Oval Office Brass Lamp Wars? Hillary Clinton never used a gun to get even with Bill Clinton for his affair with Monica Lewinsky; Hillary assaulted Bill with a lamp-to-the head.

I say we ban Hillary Clinton!

Look how nature assaults human beings.  Snow storms create hazardous roads, causing car accidents, trees fall on cars and houses, killing people, high winds, floods and tsunamis wash away entire towns and islands.

According to the Daily Mirror : “COCONUTS apparently kill around 150 people every year.” Talk about anger. Tropical trees are hurling fruit at tourists!

Should we destroy the tropics?  It’s obvious from the above list that Global Warming is not the problem; Mother Nature is moody.

Next:  Great Britain’s Metro reports:

Falls from trees account for 1,200 cases, while 170 are admitted after falling from cliffs. In total, falls accounted for almost 460,000 hospital admissions from March last year to February this year, up by 18,700 on the previous 12 months.

 

Should we cut down every tree in existence to save us from being hurled from trees that don’t want us climbing them? It’s obvious trees are a threat. As to the problem with cliffs being perpetrators of accidents, we should ban cliffs, that prohibition alone might save America!

 

Furthermore, Metro says:

About 20,000 people each year are admitted to accident and emergency wards in England after falling out of bed, compared with 6,400 who drop from ladders…

 

If our beds are so hell bent on throwing us off them, we should make beds illegal and sleep on floors.

But people fall on slippery floors, hitting their heads, breaking legs or injuring backs? Should we outlaw bare floors in favor of carpeted floors only? Oh wait, carpeting produces dust and mold. Carpets are trying to assault our lungs!

Cars can become assault weapons to drive over philandering husbands. Remember Clara Harris, the dentist who ran over her husband?  Technically, she didn’t kill her husband, the Mercedes did: “Harris insisted the death…[in July 2003] was an accident and that she only wanted to damage the black Lincoln Navigator belonging to her husband’s receptionist turned lover, Gail Bridges.”

It’s not Harris’s fault that her Mercedes drove over her husband instead of smashing the Navigator. Harris was behind the wheel of a possessed car.

Anything can be used as a weapon. Women use handbags to the head, car keys and long finger nails to the eyes, high heels to the feet, as well as head, and knees to the groin to fight off muggers. Should America ban the female gender?  FemiNazis would no doubt support that veto if the ban includes making women grow penises and becoming the men radical feminists are determined to be.

Maybe we should ban frying pans, pipes, crow bars, rope used to lynch, two-by-fours and  hands.  Common sense says one does not need a gun to attack; the list of assault weapons is infinite. But in the mind of leftists,  guns are the only assault weapons. Unless used by terrorists to attack Israel and the West, then it’s a justified demonstration of resistance by freedom fighters.

If guns are banned, guns won’t go away. Criminals will purchase guns the way they always have–illegally. And  innocent citizens will use whatever they must to prevent violent attacks against themselves and loved ones.

Gun bans are just another way to control people, remove individual liberties and the right to protect one’s self and family.

Conservatives Need to Kick GOP, Democrats Over Cliff – Replace with Tea Partiers

It’s time conservatives think about pushing the GOP machine over the cliff they are helping Democrats hurl America over and replace them with Tea Party conservative leaders. The moderate RINOs are nothing more than Democrats in cheap Republican clothing.

Seriously people, is John Boehner a Republican, is he a conservative, or a fence-straddling Democrat who sticks his cigarette in the wind to see which way the wind blows the smoke so he can decide which deal will keep him in power?

When conservative House members refuse to vote in lockstep with Reps Boehner, Cantor and McCarthy, they are politically  purged from Congressional meetings.

Reps Tim Huelskamp of Kansas and Michigan’s Justin Amash refused to vote with House Speaker John Boehner on key votes during the past two years. The punishment: losing their seats on the House Budget Committee chaired by Rep. Paul Ryan along with Reps. Walter Jones of North Carolina and David Schweikert of Arizona are losing their seats on the House Financial Services Committee.

Huelskamp said:

I think it’s the worst form of petty, vindictive politics that a member is removed from a committee when he votes his conscience and he votes his district… [but these People go behind closed doors. They [the GOP Establishment] don’t talk to your constituents. They don’t care about your constituents. All they care about is raw political power.

As America is headed over a cliff, Speaker Boehner and his Republican Democrats (moderates) are pushing conservative party leadership under a bus. TEA party conservatives need to take over the GOP.

The Republican Party’s authentic conservative base is the tea party who want America restored, not the likes of John Boehner who seems only concerned about keeping his job.

Moderates must go! Their preference to compromise America’s economic stability by making deals with Obama that increase America’s debt. Republicans in the House of Representatives caved to the $2.4 trillion debt ceiling hike and now they are willing to raise taxes by $800 billion.

Next: The GOP refuses to hammer home tax hikes and government spending truths: Tax increases, disguised as getting even with the rich, will hike taxes on the Middle Class.

 Thomas Sowell explains this:

The actual tax increase plans being proposed by Obama do not start with people who have an income of a million dollars a year. They start with people with incomes of $250,000 and up. That is more than most people make, but it is far short of a million dollars, and miles away from a billion dollars. How many of the people who stand to get hit with Obama’s higher tax rate plan are in fact either millionaires or billionaires? According to the Internal Revenue Service, there are more than 2,700,000 people who earn $250,000 a year or more — and fewer than one-tenth of them earn a million dollars or more. So more than nine-tenths of the people who would be hit with the higher taxes supposedly aimed at “millionaires and billionaires” are neither.

Hey, what’s another $800 billion? We’ll just borrow the money from China so taxpayers can experience that joyous funding of Arab Spring and enemy nations who hate our guts and want us all dead.

The GOP machine has become a bunch of liberal Democrats whose only care is reelection. If that’s false, they would have pulled out all the stops and fought Democrats excessive spending over the last four years, not to mention 20 years of over-the-top Clinton housing loans to the poor.

Is the GOP serious about restoration? They certainly didn’t nominate a conservative presidential candidate.

Furthermore, GOP leadership has sat back and allowed Obama to demonize  Republicans as greedy, rich fat cats, while Obama and Democrats falsely argue that raising taxes increases revenue. Unfortunately, Obama’s Trotsky ploy is winning the argument with his downtrodden 99% invention just as well as it won the election.

After Reagan left office, the establishment crumbled.  The GOP hurled conservatism over a cliff in favor of becoming Democrats in cheap GOP suits. In fact,  GOP leadership has become so liberally Democrat, it looks like the Democrat Party’s behind.

Tea partiers must take over GOP leadership. Conservatives must take up the restorative mantle and change America back to America. W need to push the GOP machine over a cliff, because authentic Conservatives will be be bullied by Democrats.

Conservatives must elect authentic fiscal Conservatives to the House in the 2014 mid-term elections. If we don’t, Nancy Pelosi will ride back in on her broom and her Flying Monkeys will have full control.

John Boehner, even your compromises can’t afford the bucket of water to melt that power.

America that needs leadership fighting unconstitutional administrative government, but today’s GOP lacks the Democrat’s dog-fighting spirit that knows how to go for the jugular and rip votes out of the necks of Republican candidates. Republicans leaders have become dogs who rolls over and submit to robbers invading the House, and Republicans allow those thieves to steal everything without a fight.

Worse:  Both parties are beginning to look like one of loyalists with conservative voters as the the new generation of colonists trying to save liberty from tyranny.

 

 

 

The truth is we conservative need to become the new generation of colonists fighting to save the Republic.

“Mr. Nice Guy” politicians refuse to stand up to Barack Obama and shove his Marxist “spread the wealth,” “fair share” policies back in his face, exposing his destructive plans to the nation. But the GOP hasn’t acted manly since Reagan and William F. Buckley. Republican leaders allow Obama and his administration to double-deal the race card demagoguery against Republicans, wealthy Americans, property and business owners, and basically anyone who has something Obama’s “poor” do not have and are told they are entitled to have by equal fair sharing.

Where is the leadership willing to stand up and rip open the lie behind those polices? Tea party conservatives.

But we can’t forget these leaders are being thrown under the bus because they  stand up against Obama and fight GOP corruption:  Governor Sarah Palin jailed Alaskan GOP leaders for corruption, Michele Bachmann exposed Hillary Clinton top aid Huma Abedin for connections to the Muslim Brotherhood and was trounced by the GOP for protecting national security. Let’s not forget tea party candidate Allen West, whom the GOP never bothered to stand up for as Democrats extinguished West’s district.

Do we need more proof the Tea Party needs to take over before America becomes a nation run by one monarchical party assuming divine rights until the Constitution is obsolete?

Moderates are handing America over to Democrat Trotsyites hell-bent on removing traditional conservative founding values, morals, independence, liberty, constitutional rights, while hurling America over the economic fiscal cliff we cannot climb up and out of.

The GOP has fantastic Tea Party leaders capable of moving this country in the right direction, but Speaker Boehner and his cronies trample them. They’ve turned on conservatives while enabling Democrat leftists to push America into socialist-control.

Moderateness must stop if America is to endure; that can only happen if conservatives shove RINOs over the cliff and elect authentic fiscal conservatives to the House in 2014.

If we don’t fight liberal Republicans and leftists, Obama will enact the “Dreams of My Father” and we can kiss our American lives goodbye.