Author Archives: Rebecca Diserio

About Rebecca Diserio

About Rebeca Diserio–After the tragic death of her first husband, LA County Deputy Sheriff Stephen Blair (Gang Unit, Compton, CA), in the line of duty, she became a Conservative Writer, Activist, and Speaker. She worked on Star Parker’s campaign, co-managing a district office. Currently, she is the CEO & Executive Producer of FIDELIS RADIO NETWORK, and host of the REBECCA DISERO show. She resides with her 3 sons, 3 dogs and 3 cats.

Petraeus Bombshell: Private Emails Led FBI To Mistress, Conflicting Details Emerge

The Benghazi story line never fails to shock.  The latest on the Petraeus Affair is worth noting, not for gossip purposes, but for the possible connection to the upcoming Benghazi hearing.  FBI sources say they began an investigation last spring, when they mistook an email Petraeus had sent to his girlfriend  as referring to corruption.   At that point they uncovered the affair, and continued to investigate the emails.  And here is where the story gets “murky”.  There are two conflicting reports in regards to the ending of the relationship.  One report, Ed Morrsisey at HotAir cites a series of tweets by Martha Raddatz:

Official tells me sevrl people who knew Petraeus got anonymous harassing emails. So investigation started. Emails then traced to Broadwell.

— Martha Raddatz (@MarthaRaddatz) November 10, 2012

(1/2) @martharaddatz reports thatfriends of Petraeus received weird emails, & i’ve learned the CIA& D/CIA ASKED the FBI to investigate.

— Marc Ambinder (@marcambinder) November 10, 2012
(2/2). The FBI did. They discovered that Broadwell was likely the source. They disclosed this to Petraeus 2 weeks ago.

Ok, so from this information it looks like it was Petraeus himself, who asked the FBI to investigate.  That Paula Broadwell, the mistress, went “Fatal Attraction” email version on Petraeus. From another source, Ronald Kessler   we read a total different version:

At some point after Petraeus was sworn in as CIA director on Sept. 6, 2011, the woman broke up with him. However, Petraeus continued to pursue her, sending her thousands of emails over the last several months, raising even more questions about his judgment.(emphasis mine)

This article also cites “FBI sources” for the information above.  Which is it?  And why is it important?  This affair happened prior to Petraeus becoming the CIA Director.  We can surmise that the CIA was well aware of the ended affair.  So why did he have to resign now?  Why did Petraeus have to “tell the world” the reason he was leaving?  Its logical to conclude that even if they told him to resign, or, if Petraeus had a moment of “guilt” and felt he needed to resign, what is the purpose of outing the whole affair?  Why not just say “I am leaving for personal reasons” and spare your family the embarrassment?  And lastly, why is this coming now, 3 days after the Election, and a week before the Benghazi hearings?

What if Petraeus had information as CIA Director that would point at the White House for the Benghazi debacle?  Petraeus went on record and stated

 No One In the CIA Ordered Operatives To Stand Down

No one in the CIA.  Does Petraeus know who ordered the “stand down” order?  Could it be that the White House knowing of Petraeus’ affair told the Director “he might want to play ball with their narrative on Benghazi, or that affair you had might just make it into the news?”  This is just speculation on this writer’s part, but much of this Petraeus resignation doesn’t pass the smell test.  Could have Petraeus then, decided to “just out the affair himself”?  The conflicting reports about the affair, seemingly both from “FBI sources” to the timing and circumstances surrounding the resignation are producing many more questions than answers.

UPDATE!  In an article by Aaron Klein this other bombshell

Perhaps overlooked is the CIA’s role in purportedly using the Benghazi mission to coordinate U.S. aid to Syrian opposition groups and information those same insurgents include jihadists openly acting under the al-Qaida umbrella.

Patraeus resigned at a time when the U.S. intelligence community is facing criticism over both its response to the assault in Benghazi and whether it had early warnings of al-Qaida plans to attack the U.S. mission in that country.

These issues, of the US “gun running” from Benghazi, and aiding jihadits is information that Petraeus needs to testify on.  Recall that the Benghazi “mission” was called the “Benghazi Consulate”, fact is, there is no Consulate in Benghazi.  Obama and Hillary Clinton were careful in the last weeks to refer to the Benghazi “mission”, as they dropped the term “Consulate”.  That is important, there was a “mission” in Benghazi, and that mission was arming the Syrian rebels, who have ties to al-Qaida.  Petraeus must testify if we are to know the truth.

–thanks to Diana Nowell of “Hidden British News” who contributed to this post.

 

 

UPDATED! Sex, Lies & Videotape; Petraeus’ Benghazi Problem

Something isn’t adding up.  While America was voting on November 6th, a certain theme was emerging regarding General Petraeus.  Seems with all the Benghazi drip, drip revelations one fact got swept under the rug, forgotten as the scandal mounted.  Remember back to the beginning, and the YouTube “excuse” that many questioned from day one.  That “excuse” remains problematic, and with the hearings set for November 15th, the origin of that excuse will again be in the spotlight.  From a November 6th article by Diana West, she recalls the September 14th House and Intelligence Committee briefing:

That most important question is, Why, three days after this terrorist attack that killed four Americans in Benghazi, did Petraeus go before the House Intelligence Committee and brief lawmakers that a Youtube video was to blame for a “spontaneous” protest — wholly fictitious — that “went on,” as ranking Democrat Dutch Ruppersberger told ABC on September 14 following the Petraeus briefing, “for two to three hours”?

Ruppersberger:

“In the Benghazi area, in the beginning we feel that it was spontaneous – the protest- because it went on for two or three hours, which is very relevant because if it was something that was planned, then they could have come and attacked right away,” Ruppersberger, D-Md., said following the hour-long briefing by Petraeus. “At this point it looks as if there was a spontaneous situation that occurred and that as a result of that, the extreme groups that were probably connected to al Qaeda took advantage of that situation and then the attack started.”

That West wrote that article November 6th, makes the Petraeus “resignation” on November 9th highly suspect.  Pundits are out in force questioning the “affair” with high ranking retired Military stating “its not a must for him to resign over an affair”.   That the FBI was conducting “some investigation” in which they learned of the Petraeus affair is interesting, as the FBI is the agency investing Benghazi too.   What even causes one to pause is what West uncovers about Petraeus and the funerals for the 2 CIA operatives:

Mr. Petraeus didn’t attend funerals held later for the two CIA contractors, irking some administration officials and CIA veterans.

With that said, most of what we know of Petraeus prior to Benghazi is that he is a true American hero.  We hope this scandal doesn’t end like a bad suspense novel for Petraeus.  All the American people have ever wanted out of the Benghazi attack is to know the truth.  We have heard rumors that Petraeus will probably “lawyer” up and as of now its reported he will not testify at the hearing on Benghazi.  In his place will be  Michael Morell, the “now” acting CIA Director.

What is also incredibly “odd” is that this affair with Paula Broadwell, an embedded reporter in Afghanistan, happened prior to Petraues becoming Director of the CIA.  That is significant as Paul Mirengoff points out:

If so, then it seems that the affair started before Petraeus became the director of the CIA. The background check on Petraeus when he was being considered for the CIA job must have been incredibly thorough. And, since an affair with an embedded reporter would probably have been difficult to keep fully secret, even an ordinary investigation might well have uncovered word of it.

Thus, it may be that the White House knew of the General’s affair before he became the DCIA.

Updated: Here is a FOX News account on the possible impetus of the FBI “investigating” a CIA Director:

The FBI investigation that led to the discovery of CIA Director David Petraeus’ extramarital affair and his resignation Friday started when the agency began monitoring Petraeus’ email, Fox News has learned.

The agency was alerted that biographer Paula Broadwell, with whom Petraeus had the affair, may have had access to his personal email account.

The investigation began when someone reported suspicious emails allegedly from Broadwell to the FBI. The agency then determined that she allegedly had emailed a number of government employees. The FBI was at one point trying to determine whether any of the employees were being stalked, sources told Fox News. …

Source said the FBI investigation ended when the agency determined no criminal acts had been committed.

 

Then there is the whole “timing issue” of the resignation:

Proof The Main Stream Media Controls Our Country Creating Ignorant Voters

Well, as I stated in my last post, the Main Stream Media must be exposed.  They are the fifth column for the the Democratic Party and Leftist Ideals.  Just how bad is it?  Bad.  Media is a powerful tool, and its impact can be summed up in an analogy about spreading gossip from the movie “Doubt”, a conversation between a woman “confessing” the sin of gossiping to her Priest:

 ‘Did you gut the pillow with a knife?’ he says. ‘Yes, Father.’ ‘And what were the results?’ ‘Feathers,’ she said. ‘Feathers?’ he repeated. ‘Feathers; everywhere, Father.’ ‘Now I want you to go back and gather up every last feather that flew out onto the wind,’ ‘Well,’ she said, ‘it can’t be done. I don’t know where they went. The wind took them all over.’ ‘And that,’ said Father O’ Rourke, ‘is gossip!’ 

And that “gossip” can be translated to represent the lies and misleading stories the Main Stream Media perpetrates on the US population.  Those “feathers” the media sends out are spread far and wide, their reach is massive, and the video below will shock you on the intensity these stories take hold.    Most who will read this are “plugged in” to grassroots media knowing that the Main Stream Media is dead as a “truthful information” source.  The challenge is growing our reach,  change the “talking points” to a search for truth.  If our struggle is to shed sunlight on the truth, no matter who is right and who is wrong, if we remain ethical and call a spade a spade no matter of their “political party,” then even with the worst odds I have faith we can succeed.  I don’t know “how” yet, I only know the struggle is just.  Here is the video, which is of 2008 Obama voters:

“We Can Flip The Vote 51-49% & They Would Never See It” Says Computer Programmer Under Oath

Following the 2004 Presidential Election, hearings commenced regarding the possible “rigging” of the computer software programs.  Clinton Curtis, a Computer Programmer, testified under oath that he was asked to “rig” the system, and to flip the vote for Congressman Tom Feeney.  Clinton goes on the say that he wrote a program that would “do just that, it would flip the vote to 51%-49%”.  When pressed if there would be a way to detect this “rigging”, Clinton responded “No, they would never see it”.  Yes, this is from 2004, but the question is “how safe are we from this type of thing happening again?”  I have read many articles about how shell shocked veteran political analysts are over the 2012 Presidential election.  How Obama crushed a known “political rule” about undecided voters, which should always edge to the challenger.  And then the numbers that just don’t add up.  At one political blog here is what is stated

Independents were shown favorable to Romney over Obama in poll after poll – in some cases by a significant margin.  CBS is attempting to state that those Independents were in fact just Republicans.  Really?  Then if you add the Republican numbers with the Independent numbers that would make the electorate approximately  60% Republican-leaning, right?  So if that is in fact the reality that CBS is attempting to state here – how does Mitt Romney or any Republican lose any national race?  Again, the numbers simply don’t add up – but somehow, someway, they did add up for Barack Obama on Election Day.

 

GOP Establishment Vs. The Conservative Base; Your Social Issues Gotta Go

Let me get this straight.  Let’s not pretend Conservatives, especially Social Conservatives, the message is loud and clear, for the GOP to survive you’re not wanted.  Oh yea, they will use us.  But the bottom line is, they see us as bible thumpers, gun toting, mullet wearing preppers who are uneducated, backwards, cousin marrying idiots.   Straight out of “Deliverance”.

The GOP old boys have the money to back this all up.  They brought us John McCain, and I believe they coached Mitt Romney into taking the road of playing “nice guy” after the first debate.  The Romney Campaign was run by many of the same McCain Campaign people, and its evident by the same tactics.  Stay away from all Tea Party types….Sarah Palin was not invited to the RNC.   Go all squishy on all things like abortion, or same sex marriage.  I think we have seen this same movie before, and we get the same results.

This same group is either totally incompetent, in figuring out how to beat an incumbent who has no record, or some are whispering, the Old Boys network can just look ahead to 2016.  Yes, folks, as crazy as it might be, let’s think this through.  We know the GOP Old Boys don’t want any part of any true blue conservative candidate.  They are “moderate” Republicans, and think the GOP needs to rid itself of all the Tea Party supporters, all the “value voters”.  Only then, do they see a way for the GOP to take on the Democrats.  In other words, become Dem-Lite.  These are powerful people, like Karl Rove, and the Bush family, who backed Romney on day one.   They “run” much of who gets the “nod” to run for President, behind the scenes.  And there are those saying, and this is just speculation, that they weren’t too upset if Romeny didn’t prevail.  No, that would open the door for Jeb Bush for 2016.  If Romney had won, well that’s OK too, but if not, its sure is easier to have a “clean field” with no Republican incumbent in the way.  This source, who wishes to stay anonymous, is a Washington insider.  They tell me to look for a new book from Jeb Bush–you know the kind of book one writes right before they start down that road to President.

What I find incredible, is just how the GOP Old Boys thought they could win this election without the Conservative base and without making some real inroads into the Hispanic vote.  Yet, that was exactly the strategy.  We know that 3 million GOP voters who identified as “Tea Party” or Conservative stayed home.  Who knows how that would have changed the Electoral College, but its fact that if they would have voted Romney, Romney would have won the popular vote by 180,000.  Today on Rush limbaugh one of those voters called in–he stated he didn’t vote due to the GOP Old Boys’ bringing us another moderate Republican as Candidate.  I have stated, this would be the last time this writer would back the GOP unless they give the Conservative base–yes the value voters a seat at the table.

So, where do we go from here? Since World War II,  history tells me the only GOP President to resoundingly win big is Ronald Reagan.  He was a William Buckley, Jr. Conservative, and he crossed over to those who became to be known as “Reagan Democrats”  and Independents alike.   We are being told that’s dead—Conservatives of that ilk just aren’t relevant.  We need to “modernize” and face the fact the demographics have changed.  I laugh at this nonsense.  I agree, the Hispanic vote is growing, and I know a little bit about that demographic.  And I know this—Hispanics values fit with Conservative values.  Those Hispanics who have been in this Country for a few generations, vote Democratic like football fans root for their home team.  Its their “home Party”.   They don’t realize what Conservatism is, that it aligns with individual freedom, and strong moral values.  Now, I am in reality, I realize not all Hispanics will be moved by this, but I know a large number feel the GOP is a white boys club.  The true message of Conservatism is what got us out of the Jimmy Carter era “depression” of 17% interest rates, and made a whole lot of Iranian hostage takers pretty nervous.  Since Reagan, we haven’t had a true Conservative in the White House.

Let us begin again.  Let the Conservative base put egos aside.  Let’s not be vindictive, we have the right message, we have the truth.  We have the remnants of what Buckley started.  First order of business, in my humble opinion—we must stop preaching to the choir somehow.  And to do that, we need to expose the Main Stream Media.  We need to expose their double dealing ways, their omission of important facts on Benghazi, how they work arm and arm with just one Political party in this Country.  I know you know this.  We must somehow reach those who are brainwashed and will be hurting as America is transformed into Obama’s utopia.   A utopia that will seem more like a very long dark night.  Sadly, it may be only then, that those who voted for Obama in blind ignorance, who were swayed by the Springsteen Hollywood crowd, who thought he seemed Presidential during Hurricane Sandy, who bought every lie the Main Stream Media “reported’ as fact, only during this dark night will they realize, they have been duped.  We need to not say “told you so”(although that would bring some satisfaction) —no, we need to take the high road.   To provide the truth of Conservatism and how there is real hope in that message.

Grassroots Conservative Radio~Election Night Coverage!

Join three Conservative Radio Shows as they bring you the “grassroots” coverage and commentary from across the Country.  Starting at 7pmET, we join Diane Student Diane is a conservative libertarian political activist who has been blogging since 2008 and hosting the award winning internet radio show The Freedom’s Wings Show since 2009. She is a proud member of the Tea Party Movement and has traveled around Florida and to Washington D.C. to attend rallies. She also happens to be one of those non-existant gay conservatives.

Diane’s wit and humor, blended with her “spot on” commentary, makes Freedomswings, one of the BEST “up and coming” Conservative Talk shows you will not want to miss!!

Next in the line-up is In Defense of Freedom from 9-11pmET hosted by Beth (aka Batgirl) and Ellie.  In Defense of Freedom is a “main-stay” in grassroots Conservative talk, acclaimed by pundits and plain American citizens alike.  They describe tonight’s show:

This is the most important election of our life as we conservatives fight to keep our country.  The U.S.A. was once the beacon of light and hope for all around the world who wanted to escape oppressive governments and have a life of freedom. Let’s hope that we can keep it that way, as Franklin said “you have a republic madam for as long as you can keep it”, come on America don’t let our founding fathers down!! 

Lastly, Fidelis Radio’s “Friday Night Live” hosts, are back for this special broadcast starting at 11pmET.  Rebecca Diserio and Stephen VanderGast will bring their hilarious take on Politics, reporting the up to date Election News as it continues to come in—hopefully this show will be our “Victory Lap”.  

They’re Back!! New Black Panther Party Returns To Philadelphia Polling Place

A deja vu moment is happening outside a Philadelphia polling spot.  Reporting from South 12 and Fairmount, Ward 14, Philadelphia, Americans arriving to vote are greeted with a beret wearing “New Black Panther” party member, who apparently thinks he is “door monitor” for the polling place.  This from 2008, when the same “New Black Panther” party with night stick, scared potential voters, and later, Eric Holder dropped the case of “voter intimidation”.  This is not 2008, and I feel something in the air, whether the “new Black panther” party shows up or not.  Do not be fearful, my fellow Americans.  But, please be vigilant as you go to vote.  Americans who believe in free elections are the real poll watchers, and that’s you and me. And lastly, why has the police not removed these people? Just saying….

Prediction: Romney Wins 321-217 Electoral Vote~Main Stream Media Skewed Polls

The Main Stream Media is out in force touting “polls” that have errors in 3 basic elements.

  • Most of these polls, are including all the minority and “younger” vote that launched Obama as the 44th President of the United States.  Pew polls and Gallup state that this part of the electorate is not as engaged, and in fact they will not impact the 2012 race as they did in 2008.
  • Motivation-Pew polls have indicated that Republican voters have the edge at +3.  The polls the MSM are basing their stats on all have the “old” 2008 model (Dem +4),  for motivation among likely voters.  This isn’t 2008, no matter how much they want it to be–thus their polls are off.  Example, Obama just had a Bruce Springsteen event and only drew 18,000.  In 2008 the same event with the “Boss”, 40,000 attended.  Romney sans Rock Star drew 40,000 in Virginia today.  The “motivation” is all Republican, period.
  • The “Undecided”vote.  This always “tips” against the incumbent. Yet, the MSM is using again the 2008 model tipping it +2 to +3 for Obama.  This needs to be changed to +2-3 for Romney.

The Main Stream is predicting a “tight” race, and most are calling it for Obama.  Are they doing this to “help” Obama, hoping to keep “spirits” up within the Democratic Electorate?  Hoping to “will” their Messiah to victory?   We can only speculate, but what is clear, from Benghazi, they will stop at nothing to cover for Obama.  Just today, stories are circulating about CBS with holding parts of the Obama interview which aired the Sunday that Susan Rice took to the airwaves, with the bogus “video” excuse.  CBS seems to have done some “selected” editing to help out the narrative on Benghazi.  So, is there any doubt, that the Main Stream would either intentionally or unintentionally skew the polls?  It makes all the difference as I have demonstrated above, how the polls are analyzed, using the 2008 models– just skew it a tad in favor of Obama.  Here is how I predict the Electoral College to go Tuesday.  This is my prediction, and yes, I am standing by it!

Tonight “Friday Night Live” Grassroots Conservative Radio Show Poking Fun At The Left

“Friday Night Live” with Steve and Rebecca airs Friday nights at 11pm ET

Join Rebecca Diserio and her Co-host Stephen VanderGast as they take on the Left, with wit and a lot of sarcasm.  They describe the show as “Friday Night Live”—what this isn’t–dull political talk.  What this is?  We have no idea.   If you slow down for accidents, then you’ll want to tune in.”  Tonight, they wrap up Election season “the Obama Regime is getting crazy, with only a few hours before the Election, “Desperado” seems to be playing as the background music throughout the Campaign Headquarters…” Tune in at 11pm ET for what promises to be one hilarious episode!  Click here at 11pm!

Geraldo Rivera Visibly Shaking After Exploding At Fox Co-Host Over Benghazi

Geraldo Rivera continues his allegations that anyone claiming the Obama Administration could have mounted a rescue at Benghazi “is just preposterous!”  Geraldo appearing on Fox and Friends Friday morning, seems to have adopted the Left’s talking points, screaming at Co-Host Eric Bolling

“You are a politician looking to make a political point!” he added after Bolling challenged him, later repeating the point: “You are misleading the American people because you want to make a political point.”

Poor Geraldo, what is known is that Geraldo has always “leaned forward” championing this Regime’s talking points.  At one point,  he even goes after Charles Woods, Ty Woods’ Dad.  Pointing his finger and pontificating that Mr. Woods is being led down this path of misinformation, and declaring  how unfair it was to blame Obama for going to Las Vegas instead of saving Ty Woods was a “disgrace” according to Geraldo.   No Geraldo, what is a disgrace is for a journalist, who through his career has done his share of exploiting stories, is allowing his personal “leanings” to blind him”?  Stonewalling the American people is the disgrace, as Gretchen Carlson points out.

After we killed Bin Laden, the Obama Administration had no problem leaking out ALL the information just days after that event.  So what gives here Geraldo?   As for Geraldo’s claim that “he has consulted with four star Generals, and other military personnel and nothing could have been done to rescue those in Libya” —I’d like to point Geraldo to BlackFive.net.   Geraldo using the “Raid on Entebbe”, (in which a plane was hijacked by terrorists, kidnapping the Israeli passengers, and holding them in Uganda) as a comparison is pure hogwash!  Were the passengers being actively killed, and the LIVE feed being watched by the Israeli PM?  OF course not, Geraldo!  Geraldo stating it took the Israelis “seven days” to mount a rescue, is correct.   However, one of the big glaring differences Geraldo, is that Benghazi was an attack, not a hijacking, Benghazi was a battle happening in real time, not a hostage taking!  Thanks for trying Geraldo, but we get how the Left uses its talking points to confuse.

Let’s not indulge in fairy tales Geraldo,  your anger proves you are very invested and upset over the facts that your guy, Barack Obama, left men to die, facts you aren’t able to personally face yet.

Smoking Gun: August Cable to Sec. Clinton “Ten Islamist Militias And Al Qaeda Training Camps” Surround Us

As the information slowly tirckles out on Benghazi, one item can no longer have any doubt–the White Houses’ narrative regarding the “video” is ludicrous.  And from that untruth, we see lies after lie compounding the cover-up narrative.  That old saying “what a tangled web one weaves, when we practice to deceive”, could be the byline to every story on Benghazi.  If you saw it in a movie, jeers and reviews of “bad story line” and “not believable” would be the norm.  What we cannot do, is deny this is in fact what we have lived through as reality.

From FOX October 31st, Catherine Herridge reports on cable received directly to the desk of Hillary Clinton on August 16, 2012.  This cable outlines an environment of which the “Regional Security Officer” for Mission Benghazi states he does not believe “the consulate could be protected.”  The cable marked “secret” summarizes the Aug. 15 emergency meeting convened by the U.S. Mission in Benghazi :

“RSO (Regional Security Officer) expressed concerns with the ability to defend Post in the event of a coordinated attack due to limited manpower, security measures, weapons capabilities, host nation support, and the overall size of the compound,” the cable said.

and this:

the Emergency Action Committee was also briefed “on the location of approximately ten Islamist militias and AQ training camps within Benghazi … these groups ran the spectrum from Islamist militias, such as the QRF Brigade and Ansar al-Sharia, to ‘Takfirist thugs.’” Each U.S. mission has a so-called Emergency Action Committee that is responsible for security measures and emergency planning.

In light of the uncertain security environment, US Mission Benghazi will submit specific requests to US Embassy Tripoli for additional physical security upgrades and staffing needs by separate cover.”

Now, how can Obama, and anyone “in the loop” send Susan Rice out to those Sunday shows,  the Sunday after the attack, and look the American people in the eye, and profess the “we didn’t see it coming, it is due to spontaneous protests, anger over the video” motive.  How could Hillary Clinton looked at Ty Wood’s dad, and vowed to bring to justice those responsible for the video?  Obama in the Rose Garden on September 13th?  This is all a huge cover-up.  This cannot be incompetence, no that cannot be.  We are 5 days away from this Election.  Americans deserve to know what it is Obama is covering up.  Is it the “gun running”?  There is evidence that “Mission Benghazi” was tasked with smuggling guns into Syria, through Turkey, arming the rebels, which are Al Qaeda backed.  No American who truly cares about this Country can say this is some story about “politicizing” an event to win an Election.  This goes to the very heart of the Obama Administration, and were four Americans sacrificed by Obama to avoid the uncovering of something so terribly bad, the lies weaved became so tangled, only an outcry from the American population at large will remedy it.  In a “related” matter– Glenn Beck threatens “media outlets” who apparently have “benghazi emails” they will not release.

MSNBC Says Romney Broke Charity Guidelines; Obama Talks “Lean Forward” In Covert Speech Speak

What can I say?  Has it come to this?  Is the Obama campaign so desperate that it is making coordinated attacks using MSNBC  “slogans”?  As we get closer to the Election it just keeps getting stranger and stranger.

MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell, a real life “radical” of journalistic bias, had a discussion over the Romney Campaign recently using a scheduled stop in Ohio, and transforming it into a “donation drive” of sorts for the victims of  Hurricane Sandy.  The day after the Hurricane did its worse damage, Romney staff  rightly cancelled the event as a regular Campaign stop, and asked the attendees and the community at large to stop by the event bringing canned goods, bottled water, clothes, all the items one would need after such a tragic event as Hurricane Sandy.

Well, what in the world was Romney and his staff thinking?  Don’t they know the Red Cross has guidelines and those items aren’t what they are looking for?  Gee, I don’t think Romney was thinking about the Red Cross, he was using his own bus to drive in the goods directly into the areas most affected and distribute the items.     Aren’t there laws in place prohibiting this kind of misguided giving?   According to Andrea Mitchell, and then later Martin Bashir, it sure seems so!  Romney is not worthy to be President, seems to be the thinking—he broke with the Red Cross guidelines, how dare he!   No way can he be “Commander and Chief” says the Left,  this “donation violation” situation sure proves it!

 

Then, Martin Bashir, feels this is discussion worthy.  He even implies Obama is taking a “jab” at Romney as Obama spoke at the Red Cross later in the day.

President Obama speaking at the Red Cross, used what this writer believes to be “code words“.  Yes, besides Obama himself stressing the Red Cross’ guidelines, stating “these folks know what they are doing, they have guidelines, so give them a call…” he then goes on to “work in” MSNBC’s slogan “Lean Forward”.     So get out your decoder rings, folks.  I agree, this is strange, and if I didn’t hear it myself,  I would have dismissed it.  What caught most as downright odd, he uses this “lean forward” not once, but twice, in the same “speech” which is only a few minutes long. (Listen to the context, it sounds utterly nonsensical, are we losing it altogether?)

 If this is all they got, coordinating slogan speak, and accusing your opponent of donations “violations”  –I am hearing the fat lady sing, loud and clear.  And no, you don’t need a “decoder ring” to get what I am talking about.   Hear me “ranting” on this whole situation from my Radio Show here.    Five days and counting….

Bombshell: “My Sources Tell Me Obama Was In The Room Watching Benghazi Attack” says Lt. Col Anthony Schaffer

In the closest factual response to “Did Obama watch the Benghazi attack, and was he the bottom line in denying help to our forces on the ground?” Lt Anthony Schaffer reported a resounding “Yes” to this question on FOX’s “Justice with Judge Jeanine”. Lt. Anthony Schaffer reports that “his sources on the ground’ report not only was Obama watching the developments in Benghazi, but Obama is the one who would have told Panetta to “stand down” and also—and here is the key, Obama would have also been the one to deny Tyrone Woods’ pleas for help as he courageously made his stand in service to the United States of America.

We know Woods had “laser locked” the position of the mortars that eventually claimed his life sometime on September 11-12 2012. Its time we hear directly from the President, the American people deserve to know exactly why it is that Obama made the political decision to leave our men alone to fend for themselves—no doubt this was Tyrone Woods last thoughts—“why didn’t they come to help me?”  See video of interview here:

%CODE%

To add insult to injury, watch Tyrone Woods’ Dad Charles Woods, as he relates his story about his ordeal.  He asks Obama directly “to change his life, and admit his fault”.  Mr. Woods holds the White House directly responsible for “the murder of his son”.  The Main Stream Media is all but ignoring this story, as they attempt to shield the Obama Administration in its final days prior to the Election.

Obama Refuses To Answer Direct Questions On “Requests For Help” In Benghazi

Obama seemed a little indignant, to something his staff shields him from—a News reporter asking the hard questions.  In a Denver 9News Report, Obama was asked direct questions about the “stand down” orders and why requests for help were denied during the ongoing attacks in Benghazi.  Obama, talking “around” the direct questions responded:

“Well, we are finding out exactly what happened. I can tell you, as I’ve said over the last couple of months since this happened, the minute I found out what was happening, I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to. Number two, we’re going to investigate exactly what happened so that it doesn’t happen again. Number three, find out who did this so we can bring them to justice. And I guarantee you that everyone in the state department, our military, the CIA, you name it, had number one priority making sure that people were safe. These were our folks and we’re going to find out exactly what happened, but what we’re also going to do it make sure that we are identifying those who carried out these terrible attacks.”

Obama was asked twice, “were they denied requests for help during the attack?” Each time he gave his now standard “talking points script” on all things Benghazi, “I’m making sure we are securing all our personnel, we are investigating, we will find out who did this and bring them to justice.”  No doubt Team Obama is betting on the clock running out to Election day, hoping against hope that the breaking news which has been coming out of the Benghazi massacre will slow down, and that no more damning details will come to light.

Its worth noting, in keeping his “story” straight, that Obama said on”The Michael Smerconish Show” Friday :

“I was not personally aware of any request, adding that there is an “infrastructure” in place to “manage requests.”

FOX news has reported that in a recently released cable from Ambassador Stevens on the day of the attack stated a “growing problems with security” in Benghazi.”  And the CIA, is throwing the blame game ball out of their court.  ABC’s Jake Tapper, who has been following this story from day one, tweeted

CIA spox: “No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate. ” –@jaketapper Oct. 26, 2012

We know from the Congressional hearings of October 9th, that a low level Officer at the State Department, Susan Lamb, testified that she received requests for added security prior to the attacks, and that they were denied.  Remember, that Hillary Clinton has stated she personally was requesting this added security—but it was denied—so this points directly to the White House.  All roads in this tangled web seem to lead to one place—whether its the requests for added security prior to the attacks, or, if its the requests for help during the attack, all roads point directly to the White House.   Will we learn the whole truth on Benghazi prior to Election day?  If Obama and his regime get their way, I’d say No.

Stay tuned, we will continue to bring you up to date information on this story.

UPDATE! Benghazi CIA Operators Told To Stand Down; Fallen Navy Seal Dad “The President & Hillary Did Not Tell Me The Truth”

CIA Operators, Glenn Dougherty and Tyrone Woods, heard the cries from the CIA safe house nearby.  All accounts have these men fighting until their deaths.  But what we know now is that not only did they send 3 separate requests for help, they were told to “Stand Down”.  Fox News reports that

Former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods was part of a small team who was at the CIA annex about a mile from the U.S. Consulate where Ambassador Chris Stevens and his team came under attack. When he and others heard the shots fired, they informed their higher-ups at the annex to tell them what they were hearing and requested permission to go to the consulate and help out. They were told to “stand down,” according to sources familiar with the exchange. Soon after, they were again told to “stand down.”

They ignored those orders.  They went to the rescue of Ambassador Stevens and the other Americans on scene.  They took fire, rescued as many as they could, but could not find Ambassador Stevens, so they returned to the CIA “annex” located a few miles away.  At that point they started to receive mortar fire, and they called again for help.  And that request was denied, too. They were denied a total of 3 times.

 FOX  is the only Main Steam Media reporting on Benghazi, you can find the whole report here.  This part of this story is still breaking, we will continue to update as needed. Update below.

There are some stories that hit a chord, when you sit down to write, there is a fear you won’t convey the proper words, sometimes there are no words.  Being that the Main Stream Media is ignoring “all things Benghazi” its up to us, regular Americans, to do “their” job and spread the truth.  To spread the truth so these heroes will not have died in vain.  With that said, this  story will enrage you, and it should.

Charles Woods is the father of Tyrone Woods, the ex-Navy Seal who answered the call from the Benghazi “CIA Safe House” which was attacked on September 11th, 2012.  Tyrone didn’t make it out alive, but not before he fought valiantly for  several hours, taking out dozens of terrorists.  When Tyrone’s body was brought back via Andrew’s Air Force base, his father Charles was on hand to receive his slain son’s flag draped coffin.  After Obama and Hillary spoke, Charles was greeted separately by Obama and Hillary.  As Obama greeted Charles, Charles stated:

“…his face was pointed toward me, but he could not look me in the eye, he looked somewhere over my shoulder, and his handshake was like a dead fish.  I am a retired Judge, and it was my job to know when someone is telling the truth, his voice was not forceful–not like ‘I am really sorry about this Mr. Woods’, no he was not sorry or remorseful.  I could tell he wasn’t being truthful.  I didn’t speak out before, but after I learned they knew, I want to know who it was that gave the order to not protect…to not send in troops? ” (emphasis mine)

Mr. Woods goes on to relate his encounter then with Hillary Clinton.  Hillary, gave him a “hug”, and he thanked her for taking the time to come and speak with him.  Mr. Woods goes on to state:

“…..first off she said she was “sorry”, her countenance was not good, she then tells me ‘we will make sure the person who made that film is arrested and prosecuted’ and I could tell, she was not telling me the truth, I mean she is smarter than me, I’m sure, and she knew she was not telling me the truth…”

Charles Woods also was incensed by VP Joe Biden.  Blundering Joe is one thing, but what he said to Mr. Woods is so crass  and in this case, so offensive:

….then Joe Biden in a real ‘boisterous” voice says ‘yea, I’ve gotten a call like that in the middle of the night, hey let me ask you something, did your son always have balls the size of cue balls?’

Yea, Joe, I’m sure watching that live feed, watching men who go in and take fire, realizing at some point they were it, no back-up would be coming, God forgive you, Obama and Hillary.  God help us.  Obama, you- Joe and Panetta were meeting at 5pm during this attack, and CIA sources report it would be the POTUS who would have to say “stand down”.  And all you have to offer this slain hero’s Dad has to do with the anatomy of his private parts?

Let me say why this story is so very important right now.  Charles Woods says he is a man of faith, and that one thing he knows for sure—is that his son did not die in vain.  As it stands, this story—Tyrone Woods’ story and all 4 dead Americans, their deaths may well be swept under the rug by the Main Stream Media, the Benghazi cover-up forgotten in a few weeks.  So, for these Americans deaths to be not in vain, we must make this the turning point—it would be the turning point in this Election if it had the same press as a Cindy Sheehan.

This Country may well perish for lack of knowledge–information.  I know one thing, most Americans are good honorable people.  Many are just not “plugged in” to these events, and they then have no idea that we have a President who lies, who dishonors, who is so arrogant, who is condescending.   He thinks he can “lecture” and use “mock anger” as he did in that second debate over Benghazi.   I don’t think I will ever forget his superb acting when he reeled around at Romney saying “I take it as an offense for anyone to suggest that I don’t take this seriously, it is I who has to stand over those graves, meet those families, and to suggest I or anyone in my Administration would politicize such a thing…well is despicable”.

No, they Obama, Biden, and Hillary just stood over those coffins and lied, and they felt no remorse.  These people do not  represent me,  they do not represent who America is—this really has nothing whatsoever to do with Politics.  This has to do with honor, and decency, who who we are as Americans.  I know many of you wanted to believe that Obama was going to be the next Abe Lincoln, a man who would bring us all together.  You wanted to believe he would be fair, that he was for the poor, he was for the disenfranchised. I am sorry, I wanted that too—but its time to face the truth.  He is none of those things.

Are we so numb to Charles Wood’s pain?   We can’t bring his son back, a son who died for our Freedom.  But we can honor him, by promising to do what we can, to restore America’s honor.  And that has to start with the defeat of Obama and his regime.

Hear Charles Woods interview on FOX here.