Get the word out!

Watch interview with Clint Tarver:

For full story go to “Ironic Surrealism”

Check out this video about how beloved Clint is to the Community:

As reported by NBC news:

United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice has pulled her name out of consideration for nomination as the next secretary of state.

“If nominated, I am now convinced that the confirmation process would be lengthy, disruptive and costly – to you and to our most pressing national and international priorities,” Rice wrote in a letter to President Obama obtained by NBC News. ”That trade-off is simply not worth it to our country…Therefore, I respectfully request that you no longer consider my candidacy at this time.”

Rice has come under sustained criticism from Republicans both for her handling of questions about the attack on a U.S. diplomatic outpost in Benghazi.

President Obama responded in a statement of his own, saying that he is “grateful” that Rice will continue to serve as ambassador to the United Nations and as a “key member” of his national security team.

This is no shock. As arrogant as Obama is, and his tendency to act like a Dictator, I admit it is a tad shocking that he didn’t attempt to ram her confirmation through–but then there is Benghazi. Did the cabal surrounding Obama make it clear that the Rice confirmation hearings would stir the pot called Benghazi? Seems stories on Benghazi are fading, and that is just how the Regime wants it. Reflecting on the Rice Sunday show debacle, its Hillary Clinton who seems to have been the savvy Politician. Clinton has traveled out of the Country and been silent mostly on the Benghazi issue—she sure KNEW not to be available for those Sunday shows.

Well, gang, it looks like John Kerry, that stellar liberal with the “Swift Boat” controversy will be the likely Secretary of State.

O’Reilly made his case by first detailing who has been booking Fluke with various media outlets — a mysterious man named “Mike.” Strangely enough, O’Reilly can’t track Mike down, and now, Fluke is being represented by someone from the progressive PR firm SKDKnickerbocker, where Anita Dunn — the former Obama communications director — is a managing director.

So, here is this “activist”who is launched to be a paid “actor” in the fake “War on Women”.  As you all remember, Fluke, a law student at Georgetown University, gave a mediocre “performance” testifying before the Democratic Steering Committee, headed by Nancy Pelosi and Elijah Cummings.  She played the part of a “storyteller” about how women at Georgetown (a Catholic University by the way) could not obtain adequate birth control.  Sounds like a “plot” rife with unreasonable scripting—if it wasn’t “real life” no one would believe it!  Yet, that is how it went down.  Fluke, sometimes on the verge of tears, sometimes with mock “outrage” in her voice, gave an implausible speech, not worthy of even a “B” movie.  Sandy talked about how a friend had ovarian cysts, who couldn’t afford over 100 dollars a month out of pocket expense for Birth Control pills.   Sandy stating she was denied coverage, oh yea and she was gay, so Sandy thought herself the smart vixen, saying “I don’t think pregnancy was her reason for needing the BC pills”.  (Question- you can get it at the Walmart for 30 bucks a month, Sandy.  Was that not an option?) She continued to preach to her handlers, Pelosi and Cummings, in a ridiculous hearing, paid for by you and me.  All this to “launch” this fake “War on Women”, which sadly, did have quite an effect on single female voters.

We all recall their “game plan” then unfold.  This would be a major “talking point” for the Obama re-election Campaign.  Even though Sandy decided on Georgetown (I doubt anyone from the Vatican put a gun to Ms. Fluke’s head to attend Catholic Georgetown)  she must have known the Church isn’t a fan of Birth Control, yet that’s where Sandy decided to place her cap for her education.  Only to “kill two birds with one stone” attacking the Church and attacking insurances.  Brilliant.

She went on to infamy, highlighted by our President making a phone call to Sandy.  Yes, these memories are little nuggets of  gold which helped re-elect Barak Obama.  Obama, placed a much publicized phone call to Sandy, making sure “she was OK” after Rush Limbaugh referred to her as a whore in an on air diatribe.  Perfectly reasonable, for the President to make sure a 30 year old paid shill was “OK” after such a National incident as the Limbaugh diatribe.  Call Brian Terry’s family?  You know, Brian Terry, the Border Patrol agent who was gunned down by our weapons in the Fast & Furious debacle.  NO sir.  Why would he call them?  Sandy being called a whore, now there is a tragedy, worthy of a phone call.

Is Sandy a whore?  You betcha.  A whore for the Left, a paid shill.  A self promoted activist, who was in the right place at the right time. Just like a “working girl” on any urban corner, waiting for the right “John” to drive by.

“The neighbors all described the militants setting up checkpoints around the compound at about 8 p.m.” The checkpoints were described as being manned by bearded jihadis in pickup trucks mounted with heavy machine guns and bearing the logo of the Al-Qaeda terror franchise, Ansar al-Shariah.

That means that the Turkish Consul General would have had to pass out through the blockade as he departed the American compound and left the area. There is no record that he phoned a warning to his American colleague, the one he’d just had dinner with, Ambassador Stevens. Given the description of the blockade around the American compound and of the jihadis and their trucks that were manning it, it seems unlikely that the he somehow just failed to notice. “[N]o one could get out or in,” according to one neighbor interviewed by the AP.

“No one could get out or in?” Really?  Seems nobody but the Turkish Consul, Ali Sait Akin.

What about the guards around the “mission Benghazi?” (I am calling it “mission Benghazi, because this was not a “Consulate” —and notice you won’t hear Obama or Clinton or anyone in the Regime call it one.  Why?  Because this was a “mission” and the whole thing is —what was the MISSION?)  The “mission” was guarded by this Feb. 17th Brigade:

“February 17 Martyrs Brigade,” the jihadi militia subcontracted by the British firm Blue Mountain, which was the prime contractor for the U.S. Benghazi compound security contract. (emphasis mine)

These “guards” must have been aware, in the very least 5-10 minutes prior (if not all along) for they were guarding the perimeter.  Yet, not until they burst through the gates, did any of our American personnel know.  Which gives credence to Sean Smith, last report.  And get this, this news comes from:

United Arab Emirate (UAE)’s Alaan TV, in which an intrepid young reporter shows viewers how she found pages of documents strewn about the U.S.’s Benghazi Tactical Operations Center (TOC) in the wake of the 11 September 2012 attack.

This “report” is from November 1st! Of course our FBI has been through the whole place--I guess they just “missed” these papers...both are dated September 11th, and they are from Sean Smith, from Lopez’s article (shocking video of News report):

One report was addressed to Mohamed Obedi, head of the Libyan Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ office in Benghazi and the other to the “Benghazi Police Chief.” According to the Alaan report, the letters complained about an incident which had occurred outside the Benghazi compound where Sean Smith and the Ambassador would be killed later that night.

Describing the incident as “troubling,” the report states that at 6:30 that morning, one of the Libyan guards(likely a member of the “February 17 Martyrs Brigade” that had been hired to protect the facility) reported that he’d seen someone he identified as a member of the local police force in the upper level of a building across from the American compound photographing the interior of the compound.

Here’s the deal.  WE the United States of America, were moving weapons from that CIA Annex to arm the Syrian Rebels.  Those Rebels are linked to Al-Qaida and other jihadis.  We know this.  The route to which we transferred these weapons is through Turkey.  Hence, we have this Turkish Consul at dinner with Stevens—this was “mission Benghazi”.   As Clare Lopez notes:

There is no doubt but that the U.S. Department of State (DoS) would have received an official cable traffic from Sean Smith (probably signed off on by Ambassador Stevens) about the Libyan police surveillance activity as well as the Libyan failure to provide the security previously requested. Such traffic would have been marked with a high level of urgency

And the cover-up and lack of responding to our people there is due to this gun running, just as Brian Terry our hero from “Fast and Furious” will never receive justice, neither will our 4 American “heroes” who must have wondered “where are they, where is our back-up?” right before they died.  Don’t count on Petraeus.  I highly suspect he will toe the line of the Regime. I hope not, we could use a real LIVE American hero about now, General.

The defense official confirmed the investigation was due to allegations of inappropriate emails between Allen and Jill Kelley, a close friend of the Petraeus family who reportedly led the FBI to investigate communications between Petraeus and his biographer Paula Broadwell.

The FBI then discovered Petraeus and Broadwell had engaged in an extramarital affair, which led Petraeus to resign as director of the CIA on Nov. 9.
The defense official says the investigation into Allen involves 20,000 to 30,000 emails that were dated between 2010 and 2012, and that the department is in the very early stages of their investigation.
He would not say whether they involved sexual matters or whether they are thought to include unauthorized disclosures of classified information or any criminal activity. He said he did not know whether Petraeus is mentioned in the emails. (emphasis mine)

Meanwhile, Fox News also confirmed Monday night that the FBI is searching Broadwell’s North Carolina home, though they did not say what they were doing there or what prompted the search.  Searching her home tells me they are looking for something “incriminating”?  There seems to be quite a bit more to this whole “email” scandal then meets the eye.

In another as the “emailing of Jill Kelley turns” moment, the initial FBI agent who was assigned to investigate the “threatening emails” Ms. Kelley was complaining of, sent Kelley “shirtless” photos of himself.  Why are all theses seemingly accomplished men losing “it” over Kelley?  The agent was later taken off the case because

“supervisors soon became concerned that the initial agent might have grown obsessed with the matter, and prohibited him from any role in the investigation.”

Something very odd here. I want to recommend a 12 step “email anonymous” program, hi my name is John, or Jill, and I am powerless over emailing….  This woman Jill Kelley sure seems to be one “popular” woman, people in high places like to email her—alot.  I think we will learn there is more to Jill Kelley than just being a “victim”, receiving 20-30 thousand emails reek of obsessive behavior that is pretty mutual.   This story is like a bad “B” movie, and the popcorn is stale, soda is flat.  Terrible plot, so not believable.    And no refunds, no exceptions.  Just like the Obama Administration, even the scandals are shoddy.

Let’s keep our eyes on Benghazi, and not get caught up in this “Jersey Shore” type scintillating headlines being thrown at us.

UPDATE!! OK, here ya go….reports are surfacing that the Kelley’s are broke, house in foreclosure—and Ms. Kelley has hired the same “crisis management” team as Monica Lewinsky hired during the Bill Clinton sex scandal.  Hmmm, I smell possible book deal, wow, just in time to pay off the house!   Remember those so called “threatening emails” were not so “threatening”, in fact its reported the FBI was sort of “not impressed” with their content, and originally told Ms. Kelley—

The messages were instead what the source terms “kind of cat-fight stuff.”

“More like, ‘Who do you think you are? … You parade around the base … You need to take it down a notch,’” according to the source, who was until recently at the highest levels of the intelligence community and prefers not to be identified by name.

Yet Ms. Kelley pushed the FBI—interesting, very interesting.

On October 26, 2012, Paula Broadwell appeared at the University of Denver for a presentation in which she claims

Now I don’t know if a lot of you heard this, but the CIA annex had actually had taken a couple of Libya militia members prisoner. And they think that the attack on the consulate was an effort to try to get these prisoners back. So that’s still being vetted.

Reports came out Sunday from Arutz Sheva, an Israeli news outlet, first published a partial transcript of Broadwell’s speech.  By late Sunday night news agencies were reporting and tweeting

CIA adamant that Broadwell claims about agency holding prisoners at Benghazi are not true.

— Greg Miller (@gregpmiller) November 12, 2012

This is just the latest in the Petraeus shocker that came Friday November 9th, 2012, when he resigned citing and extra martial affair.  Speculation surrounds this Broadwell disclosure of the CIA Annex/ Prisoner allegation, which seems to be false, could have led the CIA to push for resignation.  Questions are swirling of the “way” in which Broadwell came upon said information.  What is clear, there is far more to this story, something is just not adding up.  According to CNN, Petraeus was in Libya in the last 2 weeks, conducting his own investigation. Now, Petraeus is not slated to testify, although Congressman have alluded to the possibility if said investigation on November 15th “requires” it.  Diane Feinstein talks about the upcoming hearings, and her disappointment the FBI did not update the House Intelligence Committee regarding Petraeus.

Ms. Broadwell revealed information about the Benghazi attack at the University of Denver talk.  During the question and answer period, at about 35:44 min, you will hear Ms. Broadwell state:

 “Now I don’t know if a lot of you heard this, but the CIA annex had actually had taken a couple of Libya militia members prisoner. And they think that the attack on the consulate was an effort to try to get these prisoners back. So that’s still being vetted.”

This information has not been available to the Main Stream Press.  It sure raises questions as to what else Ms. Broadwell knows, and if it  was this type of “disclosures” on her part that caused the FBI to pull the plug on Petraues, who resigned Friday November 9th, 2012.

–”Poppy” of Hidden British News contributed to the article.

Official tells me sevrl people who knew Petraeus got anonymous harassing emails. So investigation started. Emails then traced to Broadwell.

— Martha Raddatz (@MarthaRaddatz) November 10, 2012

(1/2) @martharaddatz reports thatfriends of Petraeus received weird emails, & i’ve learned the CIA& D/CIA ASKED the FBI to investigate.

— Marc Ambinder (@marcambinder) November 10, 2012
(2/2). The FBI did. They discovered that Broadwell was likely the source. They disclosed this to Petraeus 2 weeks ago.

Ok, so from this information it looks like it was Petraeus himself, who asked the FBI to investigate.  That Paula Broadwell, the mistress, went “Fatal Attraction” email version on Petraeus. From another source, Ronald Kessler   we read a total different version:

At some point after Petraeus was sworn in as CIA director on Sept. 6, 2011, the woman broke up with him. However, Petraeus continued to pursue her, sending her thousands of emails over the last several months, raising even more questions about his judgment.(emphasis mine)

This article also cites “FBI sources” for the information above.  Which is it?  And why is it important?  This affair happened prior to Petraeus becoming the CIA Director.  We can surmise that the CIA was well aware of the ended affair.  So why did he have to resign now?  Why did Petraeus have to “tell the world” the reason he was leaving?  Its logical to conclude that even if they told him to resign, or, if Petraeus had a moment of “guilt” and felt he needed to resign, what is the purpose of outing the whole affair?  Why not just say “I am leaving for personal reasons” and spare your family the embarrassment?  And lastly, why is this coming now, 3 days after the Election, and a week before the Benghazi hearings?

What if Petraeus had information as CIA Director that would point at the White House for the Benghazi debacle?  Petraeus went on record and stated

 No One In the CIA Ordered Operatives To Stand Down

No one in the CIA.  Does Petraeus know who ordered the “stand down” order?  Could it be that the White House knowing of Petraeus’ affair told the Director “he might want to play ball with their narrative on Benghazi, or that affair you had might just make it into the news?”  This is just speculation on this writer’s part, but much of this Petraeus resignation doesn’t pass the smell test.  Could have Petraeus then, decided to “just out the affair himself”?  The conflicting reports about the affair, seemingly both from “FBI sources” to the timing and circumstances surrounding the resignation are producing many more questions than answers.

UPDATE!  In an article by Aaron Klein this other bombshell

Perhaps overlooked is the CIA’s role in purportedly using the Benghazi mission to coordinate U.S. aid to Syrian opposition groups and information those same insurgents include jihadists openly acting under the al-Qaida umbrella.

Patraeus resigned at a time when the U.S. intelligence community is facing criticism over both its response to the assault in Benghazi and whether it had early warnings of al-Qaida plans to attack the U.S. mission in that country.

These issues, of the US “gun running” from Benghazi, and aiding jihadits is information that Petraeus needs to testify on.  Recall that the Benghazi “mission” was called the “Benghazi Consulate”, fact is, there is no Consulate in Benghazi.  Obama and Hillary Clinton were careful in the last weeks to refer to the Benghazi “mission”, as they dropped the term “Consulate”.  That is important, there was a “mission” in Benghazi, and that mission was arming the Syrian rebels, who have ties to al-Qaida.  Petraeus must testify if we are to know the truth.

–thanks to Diana Nowell of “Hidden British News” who contributed to this post.

That most important question is, Why, three days after this terrorist attack that killed four Americans in Benghazi, did Petraeus go before the House Intelligence Committee and brief lawmakers that a Youtube video was to blame for a “spontaneous” protest — wholly fictitious — that “went on,” as ranking Democrat Dutch Ruppersberger told ABC on September 14 following the Petraeus briefing, “for two to three hours”?

Ruppersberger:

“In the Benghazi area, in the beginning we feel that it was spontaneous – the protest- because it went on for two or three hours, which is very relevant because if it was something that was planned, then they could have come and attacked right away,” Ruppersberger, D-Md., said following the hour-long briefing by Petraeus. “At this point it looks as if there was a spontaneous situation that occurred and that as a result of that, the extreme groups that were probably connected to al Qaeda took advantage of that situation and then the attack started.”

That West wrote that article November 6th, makes the Petraeus “resignation” on November 9th highly suspect.  Pundits are out in force questioning the “affair” with high ranking retired Military stating “its not a must for him to resign over an affair”.   That the FBI was conducting “some investigation” in which they learned of the Petraeus affair is interesting, as the FBI is the agency investing Benghazi too.   What even causes one to pause is what West uncovers about Petraeus and the funerals for the 2 CIA operatives:

Mr. Petraeus didn’t attend funerals held later for the two CIA contractors, irking some administration officials and CIA veterans.

With that said, most of what we know of Petraeus prior to Benghazi is that he is a true American hero.  We hope this scandal doesn’t end like a bad suspense novel for Petraeus.  All the American people have ever wanted out of the Benghazi attack is to know the truth.  We have heard rumors that Petraeus will probably “lawyer” up and as of now its reported he will not testify at the hearing on Benghazi.  In his place will be  Michael Morell, the “now” acting CIA Director.

What is also incredibly “odd” is that this affair with Paula Broadwell, an embedded reporter in Afghanistan, happened prior to Petraues becoming Director of the CIA.  That is significant as Paul Mirengoff points out:

If so, then it seems that the affair started before Petraeus became the director of the CIA. The background check on Petraeus when he was being considered for the CIA job must have been incredibly thorough. And, since an affair with an embedded reporter would probably have been difficult to keep fully secret, even an ordinary investigation might well have uncovered word of it.

Thus, it may be that the White House knew of the General’s affair before he became the DCIA.

Updated: Here is a FOX News account on the possible impetus of the FBI “investigating” a CIA Director:

The FBI investigation that led to the discovery of CIA Director David Petraeus’ extramarital affair and his resignation Friday started when the agency began monitoring Petraeus’ email, Fox News has learned.

The agency was alerted that biographer Paula Broadwell, with whom Petraeus had the affair, may have had access to his personal email account.

The investigation began when someone reported suspicious emails allegedly from Broadwell to the FBI. The agency then determined that she allegedly had emailed a number of government employees. The FBI was at one point trying to determine whether any of the employees were being stalked, sources told Fox News. …

Source said the FBI investigation ended when the agency determined no criminal acts had been committed.

Then there is the whole “timing issue” of the resignation:

 ‘Did you gut the pillow with a knife?’ he says. ‘Yes, Father.’ ‘And what were the results?’ ‘Feathers,’ she said. ‘Feathers?’ he repeated. ‘Feathers; everywhere, Father.’ ‘Now I want you to go back and gather up every last feather that flew out onto the wind,’ ‘Well,’ she said, ‘it can’t be done. I don’t know where they went. The wind took them all over.’ ‘And that,’ said Father O’ Rourke, ‘is gossip!’ 

And that “gossip” can be translated to represent the lies and misleading stories the Main Stream Media perpetrates on the US population.  Those “feathers” the media sends out are spread far and wide, their reach is massive, and the video below will shock you on the intensity these stories take hold.    Most who will read this are “plugged in” to grassroots media knowing that the Main Stream Media is dead as a “truthful information” source.  The challenge is growing our reach,  change the “talking points” to a search for truth.  If our struggle is to shed sunlight on the truth, no matter who is right and who is wrong, if we remain ethical and call a spade a spade no matter of their “political party,” then even with the worst odds I have faith we can succeed.  I don’t know “how” yet, I only know the struggle is just.  Here is the video, which is of 2008 Obama voters:

Independents were shown favorable to Romney over Obama in poll after poll – in some cases by a significant margin.  CBS is attempting to state that those Independents were in fact just Republicans.  Really?  Then if you add the Republican numbers with the Independent numbers that would make the electorate approximately  60% Republican-leaning, right?  So if that is in fact the reality that CBS is attempting to state here – how does Mitt Romney or any Republican lose any national race?  Again, the numbers simply don’t add up – but somehow, someway, they did add up for Barack Obama on Election Day.

The GOP old boys have the money to back this all up.  They brought us John McCain, and I believe they coached Mitt Romney into taking the road of playing “nice guy” after the first debate.  The Romney Campaign was run by many of the same McCain Campaign people, and its evident by the same tactics.  Stay away from all Tea Party types….Sarah Palin was not invited to the RNC.   Go all squishy on all things like abortion, or same sex marriage.  I think we have seen this same movie before, and we get the same results.

This same group is either totally incompetent, in figuring out how to beat an incumbent who has no record, or some are whispering, the Old Boys network can just look ahead to 2016.  Yes, folks, as crazy as it might be, let’s think this through.  We know the GOP Old Boys don’t want any part of any true blue conservative candidate.  They are “moderate” Republicans, and think the GOP needs to rid itself of all the Tea Party supporters, all the “value voters”.  Only then, do they see a way for the GOP to take on the Democrats.  In other words, become Dem-Lite.  These are powerful people, like Karl Rove, and the Bush family, who backed Romney on day one.   They “run” much of who gets the “nod” to run for President, behind the scenes.  And there are those saying, and this is just speculation, that they weren’t too upset if Romeny didn’t prevail.  No, that would open the door for Jeb Bush for 2016.  If Romney had won, well that’s OK too, but if not, its sure is easier to have a “clean field” with no Republican incumbent in the way.  This source, who wishes to stay anonymous, is a Washington insider.  They tell me to look for a new book from Jeb Bush–you know the kind of book one writes right before they start down that road to President.

What I find incredible, is just how the GOP Old Boys thought they could win this election without the Conservative base and without making some real inroads into the Hispanic vote.  Yet, that was exactly the strategy.  We know that 3 million GOP voters who identified as “Tea Party” or Conservative stayed home.  Who knows how that would have changed the Electoral College, but its fact that if they would have voted Romney, Romney would have won the popular vote by 180,000.  Today on Rush limbaugh one of those voters called in–he stated he didn’t vote due to the GOP Old Boys’ bringing us another moderate Republican as Candidate.  I have stated, this would be the last time this writer would back the GOP unless they give the Conservative base–yes the value voters a seat at the table.

So, where do we go from here? Since World War II,  history tells me the only GOP President to resoundingly win big is Ronald Reagan.  He was a William Buckley, Jr. Conservative, and he crossed over to those who became to be known as “Reagan Democrats”  and Independents alike.   We are being told that’s dead—Conservatives of that ilk just aren’t relevant.  We need to “modernize” and face the fact the demographics have changed.  I laugh at this nonsense.  I agree, the Hispanic vote is growing, and I know a little bit about that demographic.  And I know this—Hispanics values fit with Conservative values.  Those Hispanics who have been in this Country for a few generations, vote Democratic like football fans root for their home team.  Its their “home Party”.   They don’t realize what Conservatism is, that it aligns with individual freedom, and strong moral values.  Now, I am in reality, I realize not all Hispanics will be moved by this, but I know a large number feel the GOP is a white boys club.  The true message of Conservatism is what got us out of the Jimmy Carter era “depression” of 17% interest rates, and made a whole lot of Iranian hostage takers pretty nervous.  Since Reagan, we haven’t had a true Conservative in the White House.

Let us begin again.  Let the Conservative base put egos aside.  Let’s not be vindictive, we have the right message, we have the truth.  We have the remnants of what Buckley started.  First order of business, in my humble opinion—we must stop preaching to the choir somehow.  And to do that, we need to expose the Main Stream Media.  We need to expose their double dealing ways, their omission of important facts on Benghazi, how they work arm and arm with just one Political party in this Country.  I know you know this.  We must somehow reach those who are brainwashed and will be hurting as America is transformed into Obama’s utopia.   A utopia that will seem more like a very long dark night.  Sadly, it may be only then, that those who voted for Obama in blind ignorance, who were swayed by the Springsteen Hollywood crowd, who thought he seemed Presidential during Hurricane Sandy, who bought every lie the Main Stream Media “reported’ as fact, only during this dark night will they realize, they have been duped.  We need to not say “told you so”(although that would bring some satisfaction) —no, we need to take the high road.   To provide the truth of Conservatism and how there is real hope in that message.