The dictionary has the definition of Treason as:
1. The offense of acting to overthrow one’s government or to harm or kill its sovereign.
2. A violation of allegiance to one’s sovereign or to one’s state.
3. The betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery.
Each elected official in Washington from the president to senators to representatives, all take an oath to uphold the Constitution, their allegiance is to the Constitution, not their party and definitely not to only one man. I have read many stories lately, of how many of the Democrats who backed Obama, knew from the beginning that he was incompetent, yet they shouted that he was the best thing for this country since sliced bread. Is this treason? It seems to me it falls under the definition 2. A violation of allegiance to one’s sovereign or to one’s state. 3. The betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery. After all, their allegiance is supposed to be to the Constitution and the country.
Even the Royals of the Democratic Party, the Clintons know what Obama truly is. In a new book titled “Blood Fued,” Hillary was quoted as saying that Obama was, ‘incompetent and feckless’ then went on to say, “the thing with Obama is that he can’t be bothered and there is no hand on the tiller half the time,” ‘That’s the story of the Obama presidency, no hand on the f***ing tiller,’ and also “Obama has turned into a joke,” and ‘You can’t trust the motherf***er. While Bill said, “I hate that man Obama more than any man I’ve ever met, more than any man who ever lived,”‘ Yet they also shouted that he was the best thing for this country since sliced bread. Is this treason?
Yet, in the 2012 election, Bill and Hillary shouted from the rooftop, that Obama was the only one who can save America. Instead of backing the best man for America, they went with a man who has no clue about running a hot dog stand, let alone a country. Why did they do that, who benefits from their deceit? Bill and Hillary, naturally. Putting their self interests before the country’s is the opposite of what Bill and Hillary are supposed to be doing, is this treason, intentionally putting the country in harm’s way sounds like treason to me. Bill and Hillary are set for life, so what do they care who runs the country, everything that they do benefits them in one way or another.
Let me say that I am a firm believer in loyalty; I believe that loyalty is one of the most noble qualities a person can have. However, there comes a point when you have to draw the line, a president like Obama, who seems like he is intentionally trying to run this country into the ground, should be exposed, not protected. Still, the Democrats who know in their hearts that Obama is a disastrous president still praise him and his policies. Is this treason?
Politicians on both sides of the aisle are guilty, putting self-preservation before country seems to be a pre-requisite of becoming a politician, it just seems to me that the Democrats go overboard. I am not a Constitutional scholar or lawyer, all I know is what I read in the dictionary. I’m not accusing anyone of treason, but the definition I believe speaks for itself.
Hey Alan Colmes ‘I Read Your Book’ A Republicans Rebuttal. Available here.
This is one man’s opinion.