Political Populism, Not Economics, Behind Minimum Wage Proposal

By | March 8, 2014

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Political Populism, Not Economics, Behind Minimum Wage Proposal”.

Category: Politics

About Richard Larsen

AP award winning columnist Richard Larsen is President of Larsen Financial, a brokerage and financial planning firm in Pocatello, Idaho, and is a graduate of Idaho State University with a BA in Political Science and History and former member of the Idaho State Journal Editorial Board. He can be reached at [email protected]

Conservative Daily News allows a great deal of latitude in the topics contributors choose and their approaches to the content. We believe that citizens have a voice - one that should be heard above the mass media. Readers will likely not agree with every contributor or every post, but find reasons to think about the topic and respond with comments. We value differing opinions as well as those that agree. Opinions of contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of CDN, Anomalous Media or staff. Click here if you'd like to write for CDN.
Put This Story in your Circles and Share with your Friends

6 thoughts on “Political Populism, Not Economics, Behind Minimum Wage Proposal

  1. Jan Brown

    Rick, enjoyed the way you combine the fiscal facts & common sense. I, like you, have never seen a business man that opened his doors NOT to prosper. Nor one that doesn’t have a dollar plus ‘sweat investment.’ To the very few that don’t ‘get it’ business owners WORK.
    Taking this a step further while admitting we all need & use ‘stepping stones’ to have a business, I find that business owners don’t feel ‘entitled’ to success & depend not on government, but themselves for success. Whereas the majority of minimum wage earners do depend on government, & indeed, feel ‘entitled’. Curious how this ‘entitlement gene’ is passed from generation to generation readily….
    Keep your powder dry & pen inked!

      1. Jan Brown

        I just try to rise to the occasion.


        1. Richard Larsen Post author

          Jan, that’s an $18 trillion question that we, as an electorate, need to define. As it is now, Democrats are “socialist-lite,” and Republicans are “Democrat-lite.” If Republicans could return to their classical-liberal roots, as Cruz, Lee, et al are attempting, the Republican label could again mean something. As it stands now, they’re more facilitators of the erosion and eventual demise of our republic than anything else.

  2. Derrell Poole

    There is one very outstanding characteristic (to some degree about politicians in general but) very specifically to liberals, progressives and communists (as if there was any real difference); they always have to use deceit in order to perpetuate their policies and goals! If what THEY want is so much better for us than what WE want why do they always have to trick us?!

    1. Richard Larsen Post author

      Darrell, you’re exactly right. They cannot be honest about their objectives, means, and agenda. It’s mandatory for their success to employ subterfuge, misrepresentation, and dishonesty. Well said, my friend!

Comments are closed.