Conservative Daily News - The best news, analysis and opinion articles written by a collection of citizen journalists. Covering a range of important topics in blogs, op-ed, and news posts, these upstanding patriots are bringing back American exceptionalism with every entry..

White Guilt: Not For This White Guy

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “White Guilt: Not For This White Guy”.

Conservative Daily News allows a great deal of latitude in the topics contributors choose and their approaches to the content. This is due to our approach that citizens have a voice, not only the mass media. Readers will likely not agree with every contributor or every post, but find reasons to think about the topic and respond with comments. We value differing opinions as well as those that agree. Opinions of contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of CDN, Anomalous Media or staff. Click here if you'd like to write for CDN.
Put This Story in your Circles and Share with your Friends

Tags:

Comments (16)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Jan Brown says:

    I see Jon has been ‘smokin’ in the boy’s room’ again

  2. Jon says:

    “White guilt makes as much sense as paying reparations to black people because of slavery, if there are any slaves still alive then pay them, just because a black person had an ancestor who was a slave, doesn’t mean they deserve any money, that makes as much sense as white guilt.”

    I suppose this means you are in favor of a 100% estate tax.

    • Chris Vaca says:

      I am in favor of death to the death tax. Estate tax makes as much sense as white guilt.

      • Jon says:

        Well, you shot that down pretty quickly, but do you see the connection? Generations of slaves generated immense wealth for a lot of people and saw none of it, and were unable to pass on the fruits of that labor to the next generation. If you dismiss the idea of reparations as nonsense, you are essentially saying that the transfer of wealth from one generation to the next is not something that should be defended. Or am I wrong? And if so, how?

        • Chris Vaca says:

          I see no connection, where you come up with this stuff is beyond me. Slaves owned nothing so how could they pass any thing down, they made money for the land owners who passed their wealth down. The times were what they were, get over it.

          • Jon says:

            You see no connection??? Really? Sir, that is the point. For generations these people were not paid for their work, and so there is entire class of people who should have been accumulating some sort of wealth but were not because of their status as slaves. This is not a huge leap to make. Money going to descendants of slaves as repayment for the work of their ancestors is comparable to wealth going from one generation to the next. If you say you are against all reparations you are saying that the ancestors of slaves are not entitled to any wealth that came as a result of their labor. Fine. But you are essentially saying that wealth is not something that should go from generation to generation. Now am I understanding your comment “they made money for the land owners who passed their wealth down” correctly if I interpret that to mean that those landowners’ families should be on the hook for reparations?

        • Chris Vaca says:

          Sorry, you make no sense. If I were to think like you I could say that slaves were paid for their labor, were they not given a place to live, clothes to wear and food to eat? That is what they received for their labor. So you can’t say they received nothing.

          • Jerry Peters says:

            Excellent Chris that is a good point I guess you put Jon in his place.

          • Jon says:

            How does this not make sense? While you can make the (deeply flawed and ethically troubling) argument that slaves were paid for their labor with free room and board, it would not even slightly address the horrors of slavery that have been well documented (physical torture, sexual abuse,etc.). This would seem to call for some sort of reparation or payment. To shrug it off and say, “well, things were different then” seems to shrug off responsibility, and the shrugging off of responsibility is not what I consider a Conservative value. Now, I understand that Rush Limbaugh says something ridiculous and provocative, and, well, he’s a drug addicted felon who for some reason has the Conservative movement in this country eating out of the palm of his hand. But Chris, you seem pretty smart. I don’t get why this is such a leap. Slavery was one of the fairly obvious sins of this country, and your response to this seems to be to brush it off. No one is saying that you, Chris Vaca, were a slave owner, or even that you personally benefited from slavery. But to reject outright the notion that The United States of America–and white land owners in specific–benefited from slavery, well, that is just false. Furthermore, it would be wrong to say that racism and the effects of racism that was widespread, systematic, and institutionalized for the hundred years that followed the abolition of slavery are not still seen today. I don’t think you are racist Chris. I would not lay that at your feet. But I do not think you appreciate the largeness of the issue you are commenting on, and you are being particularly glib about something that effects large numbers of people. Please understand, there are real solid racial problems in this country–Stop and Frisk comes to mind–and your objection to white guilt seems, well, trivial.

        • Chris Vaca says:

          Jon, save that crap for all those bleeding heart Liberals. Slavery ended 150 years ago, get over it. Are you going to cry about it for another 150 years? Room & board is compensation, you started it when you said they were not compensated. 96% of the crimes in New York are committed by people of color, why would they focus on an Irish neighborhood? Stop & frisk makes sense.You are the type of guy who is gonna start complaining that too many blacks are being killed,and say why aren’t the police doing anything if they stop using stop & frisk. Read my article on profiling
          http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2013/07/profiling-its-just-common-sense/

          reperations are moronic, just like white guilt.

          • Jon says:

            Real quick, just a bit of a pivot…were you at all bothered by the IRS scandal involving a heightened awareness of Conservative/Tea Party groups? Is it possible that naming a group after the most famous tax revolt in U.S. history is tantamount to reasonable suspicion for a search in much the same way having the same skin color is reasonable suspicion?

        • Chris Vaca says:

          If 96% of crime is being done by blacks in black neighborhoods it maks sense to profile blacks. But you will never see the logic in that.

  3. Brandon says:

    I couldn’t agree with you more. This whole white guilt crap is getting quite irritating and I am ecstatic about the fact that more Americans are starting to wake up.