Logical Fallacies and AGW Alarmism

By | July 12, 2013

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Logical Fallacies and AGW Alarmism”.

Category: Politics

About Richard Larsen

AP award winning columnist Richard Larsen is President of Larsen Financial, a brokerage and financial planning firm in Pocatello, Idaho, and is a graduate of Idaho State University with a BA in Political Science and History and former member of the Idaho State Journal Editorial Board. He can be reached at [email protected]

Conservative Daily News allows a great deal of latitude in the topics contributors choose and their approaches to the content. We believe that citizens have a voice - one that should be heard above the mass media. Readers will likely not agree with every contributor or every post, but find reasons to think about the topic and respond with comments. We value differing opinions as well as those that agree. Opinions of contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of CDN, Anomalous Media or staff. Click here if you'd like to write for CDN.
Put This Story in your Circles and Share with your Friends

2 thoughts on “Logical Fallacies and AGW Alarmism

  1. jan brown

    One day that bandwagon of sound byte parrots will fall apart and they’ll have to fly on their own…if they can…Perhaps all the flapping wings will help clear the air, assuming of course, their emissions aren’t too great….

    I often find that when attacks become personal, it is quite often the lack of conviction in ‘their’ own opinion. Add in a title for no reason indicates a feeling steeped in insecurity… (I’ve do believe I’ve seen similar post on this site) It can be a way of saying……”I have absolutely nothing to offer, but I want attention too.”

    Tsk Tsk…just add them to your prayer list & keep up the good work!!

  2. Derrell Poole

    Mr. Larson, I enjoy your depth and insight!

    And I’m getting awful sick of “experts” whos’ primary motivations are their ego. When an expert ignores my arguments in a debate I interpret it as demeaning to me personally – not worthy of “their” focus – while at the same time a perceived opportunity to elevate themselves at my expense.

    Wasn’t it “the Pride of Man” that the Bible described as the first sin? First man thought to be like God – then he disobeyed!

Comments are closed.