Home >> Politics >> What Part Of “Shall Not Be Infringed” Does Obama Not Understand?

What Part Of “Shall Not Be Infringed” Does Obama Not Understand?

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “What Part Of “Shall Not Be Infringed” Does Obama Not Understand?”.

READ:  The United Nations, The Star Wars Bar Scene, And The Jew-Hating Obama

Looking for more great news and commentary from a conservative perpective? Visit our homepage!

About Warren Beatty (not the liberal actor)


  1. I would guess any and all parts that are discussed in the constitution. Lord knows Obama has trampled over that national document many times in the past. This is just another feather in his hat, and another defeat for democracy.

    • The #1 flaw. People calling the USA a democracy when is a constitutional republic. Let me illustrate the difference.

      Two wolves and a sheep deciding whats for dinner.

      Constitutional Republic:
      Two wolves and a well armed sheep deciding whats for dinner.

      Democracy is just rule by the mob. Uninformed people deciding on whatever the media sells them as the truth.

      The vote of a fool has exactly the same weight as the vote of the wise. As there are more fools than wise, the result of a democracy is always foolishness.

  2. How about his oath of office, he either does not understand or intentionally dishonors this “I do solemnly swear(or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” I’m betting that he has no intention of honoring his oath or the Constitution. A man without honor is nothing but flesh and bones with no substance.

  3. What part of “well regulated” don’t you understand?

    • What part of “…shall not be infringed,” don’t you understand? Self-Defense: This Right is “fundamental” and is a “major component” of the 2d Amendment–SCOTUS said so, see, McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010). BHO, Jr., nor VP Joe have ANY duty, or authority, to “change, revise, suspend, or eliminate,” ANY of the Bill of Rights. Want to do so? Call a Convention and go through the process. I don’t think that would be successful.