Conservative Daily News allows a great deal of latitude in the topics contributors choose and their approaches to the content. We believe that citizens have a voice - one that should be heard above the mass media. Readers will likely not agree with every contributor or every post, but find reasons to think about the topic and respond with comments. We value differing opinions as well as those that agree. Opinions of contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of CDN, Anomalous Media or staff. Click here if you'd like to write for CDN.
Put This Story in your Circles and Share with your Friends

5 thoughts on “What Part Of “Shall Not Be Infringed” Does Obama Not Understand?

  1. Cal

    I would guess any and all parts that are discussed in the constitution. Lord knows Obama has trampled over that national document many times in the past. This is just another feather in his hat, and another defeat for democracy.

    1. rxantos

      The #1 flaw. People calling the USA a democracy when is a constitutional republic. Let me illustrate the difference.

      Democracy:
      Two wolves and a sheep deciding whats for dinner.

      Constitutional Republic:
      Two wolves and a well armed sheep deciding whats for dinner.

      Democracy is just rule by the mob. Uninformed people deciding on whatever the media sells them as the truth.

      The vote of a fool has exactly the same weight as the vote of the wise. As there are more fools than wise, the result of a democracy is always foolishness.

  2. L.E. Liesner

    How about his oath of office, he either does not understand or intentionally dishonors this “I do solemnly swear(or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” I’m betting that he has no intention of honoring his oath or the Constitution. A man without honor is nothing but flesh and bones with no substance.

  3. Mack

    What part of “well regulated” don’t you understand?

    1. Chuck

      What part of “…shall not be infringed,” don’t you understand? Self-Defense: This Right is “fundamental” and is a “major component” of the 2d Amendment–SCOTUS said so, see, McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010). BHO, Jr., nor VP Joe have ANY duty, or authority, to “change, revise, suspend, or eliminate,” ANY of the Bill of Rights. Want to do so? Call a Convention and go through the process. I don’t think that would be successful.

Comments are closed.