Comments on: Professor calls for abolition of Constitution

By: David A. McElroy

David A. McElroy — Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:15:04 +0000

Prof. Seidman gives no credence to timeless principles of truth, justice, or liberty. He has no appreciation for the dignity of the individual. He worships the collectivist mindset as “progressives” do in their communist bent, with no respect for an immutable structure defining a righteous and representative republic. Seidman’s liberal sort will never respect that. Liberal academics crave the exercise of raw tyrannical power because they serve and advise the autocratic elite wielding state forces to control every aspect of life on the planet according to their exalted ungodly sciences of domination to build an inhumane technocratic New World Order.

By: Derrell Poole

Derrell Poole — Thu, 03 Jan 2013 01:18:43 +0000

Furthermore mr seeeedman, as you sit pompous and all modern and progressive on you throne of Constitutional expertise, I wonder if it occurs to you while under the provisions of the very document you so disregard, that you have NO guarantee that anything to replace It would be so much better! You Utopia-philes are all the SAME! You imagine how much better it would be if ONly you could mold (read – forced, bamboozled, cajoled, humiliated and otherwise herded) the masses into the sweet, brotherly loving, we-are-all-equal little automatons you dream of. If only we could get all of these stupid freedom mongers out of the way! The world would be green and clean and free of trouble.

Did it ever occur to you that what you most likely will get is a new much darker document that will ultimately give the government not only the authority to liquidate you for anything you say but even think against its declaration of mandate? You enjoy the liberty of flippantly disparaging the Constitution with no more worry that to piss off a lot of Constitutional Americans like me who cannot do what SHOULD be done to you. But in the New order you may find that liberty is mortally GONE! You may consider the Constitution out of date but it certainly SEEMs to be working for you currently. Isn’t it? I mean, I understand you like certain parts, like the part about freedom of speech – oh how shallow can a hypocrite be?! What your sadly and sickeningly over estimated little mind doesn’t understand is the Constitution is like a sheet of glass – if you break part of it you break all of it!

I am amazed at how utterly stupid intelligent people can be. Go ahead, Louie. Roll the dice. Hold a Constitutional Convention. SEEE what you get!

Derrell

By: Lisa Richards

Lisa Richards — Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:35:35 +0000

Thank you for writing this Christopher. Eloquently stated: Our Founders did not see future, but knew enough to write a Constitution that could survive, as you say, by we people electing moral leaders. So it is not the Constitution that is wrong, as this leftist professor tries to assume, it is we the voters. We elect those we want, and we have the choice to remove if those policies they enact are repugnant to the Constitution. If we don’t, it’s our fault.

By: Derrell Poole

Derrell Poole — Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:51:39 +0000

My heart breaks over the blood that has been spilled in order to defend this TRAITOR’s right to voice his opinion. Tears well up when I think about all the poison he has installed in young minds. There is an easy solution to your objection to our Timeless Constitution, Louie!

LEAVE!

(…and you call yourself an America? – I would trade you for 100 illegal aliens who want to stand for our Sacred Document!!!!)

Derrell

By: Jan Brown

Jan Brown — Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:51:20 +0000

Ann, you are right, a multitude of sacrifices have been made to protect our beloved nation & they must not have been in vain. Our univrsities & even elementary schools ALL have ‘teachers’saying the same things. We have been much too comfortable in our assumed exceptionlizm & rights that we became lax & unaware. After all, this is the United States of America! Had we ‘known’ & been paying attention for the last couple of generations, this professor would not have been in his position to speak from. There seems to still be an air of disbelief that a Country like ours is vunerable, so perhaps the paper did us a favor with this slap in the face. Our schools are filled with progressives, statist, lefties etc. They teach what they know, which doesnt seem to be much in the way of history. In Tuscon, children are being taught that Mexico is the rightful owner of that area..Across the Country, American flags are relagated to lesser status or removed…So as dispicable as this is…it’s not new or isolated. So now what? United, we can surround & overcome. We still ‘have’ Our Constitution & even tattered it can serve us well. Changing or eliminating an amendment call for the “convening of a Constitutional Convention” We MUST NOT allow that, once it open the doors any (all) can be changed or eliminated!!! Even if your representation in D.C. is the one you voted for, write & ask their position on issue that concern you. If you don’t get answers that you like or don’t get one at all, keep on asking & demanding. You tell them what you expect! Encourage those around you to do the same. Again I point out that the grassroot efforts through the Tea Parties, 9-12′s & other coalitions carry a lot of weight as we’ve seen. Using outside voices, let freedom ring!!

By: ANN CAIN

ANN CAIN — Wed, 02 Jan 2013 07:15:12 +0000

Shame on the NY Times for giving this subversive Professor an elevated forum to spew his traitorous belief that the Foundation upon which our country was built and defended by the blood of American soldiers, should be thrown away because, as he claims “it’s archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions”. He would have us throw it in the trash so others can move on with their subverted desires to create a country that would horrify our Founding Fathers. It’s very important to note that our Founding Fathers knew very well that this form or government would serve our country well for centuries, provided the country was filled citizens and elected representatives of high moral character with the best of intentions toward those they served. Jefferson, without such high moral character and values, this system of government would not survive. Apparently, they knew the treasonous, greedy and self serving hearts of such treasonous men would not respect or uphold our Foundation of the Constitution with it’s checks and balances. Jefferson has certainly been proven right and must be as sad as I am this historic night.