<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thought the VP debate moderator was bad? Crowley intends to go farther</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/10/thought-the-vp-debate-moderator-was-bad-crowley-intends-to-go-farther/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/10/thought-the-vp-debate-moderator-was-bad-crowley-intends-to-go-farther/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=thought-the-vp-debate-moderator-was-bad-crowley-intends-to-go-farther</link>
	<description>The best conservative political news, analysis and opinion articles written by a collection of citizen journalists. Covering a range of important topics in blogs, op-ed, and news posts, these upstanding patriots are bringing back American exceptionalism with every entry..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:04:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: janbrown</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/10/thought-the-vp-debate-moderator-was-bad-crowley-intends-to-go-farther/comment-page-1/#comment-183537</link>
		<dc:creator>janbrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 23:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativedailynews.com/?p=70289#comment-183537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Debate&quot; certainly takes on a different meaning these days, yet nearly as different as &#039;moderator&#039;
From indications I heard today, Ms Crowley is carrying the mantel for &#039;women&#039;s femminist groups. She apparently thinks that womem have been ignored for these events &amp; this round the 2 women are being relegated to the &#039;less important&#039; dabates because men don&#039;t think &#039;they&#039;(women) are smart enough. And it&#039;s pandering &amp; part of the war on women. This is NOT MY opinion...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Debate&#8221; certainly takes on a different meaning these days, yet nearly as different as &#8216;moderator&#8217;<br />
From indications I heard today, Ms Crowley is carrying the mantel for &#8216;women&#8217;s femminist groups. She apparently thinks that womem have been ignored for these events &#038; this round the 2 women are being relegated to the &#8216;less important&#8217; dabates because men don&#8217;t think &#8216;they&#8217;(women) are smart enough. And it&#8217;s pandering &#038; part of the war on women. This is NOT MY opinion&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SovereignMary</title>
		<link>http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/10/thought-the-vp-debate-moderator-was-bad-crowley-intends-to-go-farther/comment-page-1/#comment-183427</link>
		<dc:creator>SovereignMary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservativedailynews.com/?p=70289#comment-183427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is disgusting. But, what else is new? These egotistical moderators don&#039;t care about the questions or the answers we the people wish to hear. They only wish to push their agenda&#039;s. Especially if those agenda&#039;s usurp this nation&#039;s ONLY Supreme Rule of Law!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is disgusting. But, what else is new? These egotistical moderators don&#8217;t care about the questions or the answers we the people wish to hear. They only wish to push their agenda&#8217;s. Especially if those agenda&#8217;s usurp this nation&#8217;s ONLY Supreme Rule of Law!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
